Created
November 13, 2025 11:06
-
-
Save hugobowne/236c17db4ba1d380ed3443b91601c2a0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Short research synthesis on "what comes after LLMs" — summary of themes across 5 sources (OpenAI, Google results, TechTarget, O'Reilly, Forbes).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| # What Comes After LLMs — Research Notes | |
| Short Description of Research Question | |
| What are the leading ideas, research directions, and likely near-term and longer-term evolutions in AI that could follow, complement, or supplant large language models (LLMs)? | |
| ## Summary of Findings | |
| Across the sources reviewed, there is broad agreement that LLMs will remain important but are likely to be complemented (not immediately replaced) by a range of approaches that address LLM weaknesses (hallucination, lack of continuous learning, heavy compute, limited reasoning, limited embodiment). Key themes: | |
| - Hybrid/neuro-symbolic and reasoning systems: combining neural models with symbolic/logic layers to improve reasoning, verifiability, and reduce hallucinations. | |
| - Real-time/continuous learning approaches: liquid learning networks, integrated neurosymbolic architectures, or models designed to update online so knowledge stays current. | |
| - Smaller, specialized language models (SLMs): domain-tuned, compute-efficient models that hallucinate less and are cheaper for narrow tasks. | |
| - Agentic / multi-agent systems and tool-using agents: systems of agents or single agent architectures that orchestrate tools, external retrieval, and actions — often called agentic AI, AutoGPT/MetaGPT-like approaches. | |
| - Spatial, embodied, and multimodal foundation models: models that understand 3D space, sensor input, and are embodied in robots or virtual agents — enabling new forms of control and reasoning. | |
| - Neuromorphic and hardware advances: neuromorphic computing for brain-like efficiency and novel memory/compute tradeoffs; quantum computing as a longer-term accelerator for specific tasks. | |
| - Human-centered, institutional, and governance shifts: focus on social intelligence, human-AI collaboration, safety, infrastructure, and regulation as part of what "comes next". | |
| - Ecosystem-level convergence: many authors expect the next era to be a blend of approaches (e.g., LLMs + reasoning + agents + specialized models) rather than a single replacement. | |
| Near-term outlook: incremental stacks and integrations (retrieval augmentation, reasoning modules, agents, smaller domain models) will proliferate. Longer-term: potential paradigm shifts (neuromorphic, quantum, fully embodied AGI) but with high uncertainty and substantial research/hardware gaps. | |
| ## Sources | |
| - [OpenAI News — OpenAI News page](https://openai.com/news/) - general state of the field and recent model releases (shows ongoing LLM development and productization). | |
| - [Google Search results: what comes after LLMs](https://www.google.com/search?q=what+comes+after+LLMs) - aggregated search results pointing to community discussions (Reddit, HN, Quora), news, and commentary summarizing common community views about next directions. | |
| - [TechTarget — "What comes after LLMs? The next wave in generative AI"](https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/opinion/What-comes-after-LLMs-The-next-wave-in-generative-AI) - outlines LLM limitations and suggests alternatives: logical reasoning systems, real-time learning models, liquid learning networks, and small language models. | |
| - [O'Reilly Radar — "What Comes After the LLM: Human-Centered AI, Spatial Intelligence..."](https://www.oreilly.com/radar/what-comes-after-the-llm-human-centered-ai-spatial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-practice/) - emphasizes human-centered AI, spatial intelligence (3D and embodied models), institutions and ecosystems shaping future work. | |
| - [Forbes — "The Six AI Pathways..."](https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/2025/10/20/the-six-ai-pathways-that-will-overcome-todays-dead-end-llms-and-finally-get-us-to-agi/) - summarizes a CCC report and six candidate paradigms: neuro-symbolic, neuromorphic, embodied, multi-agent, human-centered, and quantum AI. | |
| (Visited 5 sources total.) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment