Here’s how I’d approach this: think of prompt engineering as building a well-structured pipeline that guides the AI through your product development flow — from PRD to implementation. Right now, you’re imagining:
PRD → Architecture → JTBD → Backend/Frontend Todos
This is a good starting point, but for software teams, there are a few extra layers we should consider to ensure the process produces useful, actionable, and technically consistent outputs.
Instead of a single giant prompt, break it into stages where each stage’s output becomes the next stage’s input.
Here’s a refined workflow:
-
PRD Understanding
- Input: Raw PRD from product team.
- Output: A clear, structured summary with explicit requirements, constraints, edge cases, success metrics, and assumptions.
-
Requirements Breakdown & Architecture Suggestion
- Input: Structured PRD summary.
- Output: Suggested system architecture, key services, data flow, and tech stack decisions.
- Optional: Generate diagrams automatically.
-
Job-To-Be-Done (JTBD) Creation
- Input: Requirements + architecture.
- Output: JTBD per major feature or user interaction, so developers understand the "why".
-
Task Generation & Allocation
-
Input: JTBD.
-
Output: Actionable tasks split between:
- Backend
- Frontend
- DevOps/Infrastructure (if applicable)
- QA/Testing
-
-
PR Review Checklist & Risk Analysis (optional but very useful)
- Input: Tasks + architecture.
- Output: Pre-commit checklist, potential risks, scalability considerations.
Instead of trying to do everything in one step, craft specific prompts for each stage.
Goal: Extract clean, structured requirements from the PRD.
Prompt example:
"You are a senior technical product manager. I will give you a raw PRD. Extract the following:
- Core objective (what problem it solves)
- Success metrics (how we measure success)
- Functional requirements
- Non-functional requirements (performance, security, compliance, etc.)
- Assumptions or open questions
- Edge cases or failure scenarios Return in structured JSON format."*
This guarantees a machine-readable output for later stages.
Goal: Propose architecture aligned with requirements and constraints.
Prompt example:
"Given the following structured requirements, propose an optimal system architecture. Include:
- High-level system diagram
- Key services/modules and their responsibilities
- Recommended tech stack with justifications
- Data flow outline
- Integration points with third-party services"
Goal: Frame development work in a user-centric way.
Prompt example:
"Based on these requirements and architecture, generate a set of Jobs-To-Be-Done (JTBD) statements that describe what the user is trying to accomplish and why. Format each JTBD as:
When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [desired outcome].
"*
Goal: Produce concrete, developer-ready tasks.
Prompt example:
"Using the JTBD list, create a backlog of actionable development tasks. Categorize into:
- Backend
- Frontend
- Infrastructure/DevOps
- QA/Testing Each task must include: description, dependencies, estimated complexity (S/M/L), and priority."
-
Version Control Hooks
- Integrate this workflow into GitHub/GitLab pipelines.
- For example, when a PRD is merged into a
/product
folder, automatically run Stage 1–4 and output to a/planning
folder.
-
Integrate with Jira or Linear
- Convert generated tasks directly into Jira tickets.
-
Feedback Loop
- After sprint review, feed real-world outcomes back to the model to improve future breakdowns.
-
Consistency Guardrails
- Use a style guide and glossary to enforce consistent naming across outputs.
- Example: ensure "User" is always referred to the same way across PRD, code, and docs.
Imagine your PRD says:
"We need a new feature where users can upload images, apply filters, and share them with friends. The feature must be mobile-first and support up to 10,000 concurrent users."
Stage 1 Output (Structured):
{
"objective": "Allow users to upload, edit, and share images",
"success_metrics": ["90% user adoption in first month", "System handles 10k concurrent users"],
"functional_requirements": [
"Image upload",
"Filter application",
"Sharing via links"
],
"non_functional_requirements": ["Mobile-first UI", "Scalable architecture"],
"assumptions": ["Users are already logged in"],
"edge_cases": ["Upload fails due to network issues"]
}
Stage 2 Output (Architecture):
- Microservice for image processing (Node.js, AWS Lambda)
- CDN for image distribution
- Frontend in Next.js
- Data stored in PostgreSQL + S3
Stage 3 Output (JTBD):
- "When I take a photo, I want to enhance it with filters, so I can share a beautiful image with friends."
- "When my network is unstable, I want my upload to resume automatically, so I don't lose progress."
Stage 4 Output (Tasks):
- Backend: "Implement image upload API with resumable uploads" (L, high priority)
- Frontend: "Build filter selection UI" (M, medium priority)
- Infra: "Configure S3 and CDN for image storage and distribution" (M, high priority)
- Predictable: Each stage has clear input and output formats.
- Scalable: You can automate or run stages independently.
- Team-friendly: Outputs map directly to engineering team workflows (e.g., tickets).
- AI-augmented, not AI-dependent: Engineers still make final decisions but get a huge productivity boost.
Would you like me to design Stage 1 and Stage 2 prompts in full detail so you can start experimenting right away?