imaman

const fs = require('fs')
const path = require('path')
const os = require('os')


const d = path.join(os.homedir(), PICK_YOUR_CLAUDE_CODE_DIRECTORY)
const objects = fs.readdirSync(d).map(at => path.join(d, at)).filter(at => at.endsWith('.jsonl')).flatMap(at => {
  return fs.readFileSync(at, 'utf-8').split('\n').flatMap((line, i) => {
    if (!line.trim()) {
      return []

imaman

BLUE="\[\033[01;34m\]"
~/code/sample-monorepo$ WHITE="\[\033[01;00m\]"
~/code/sample-monorepo$ PS1="${debian_chroot:+($debian_chroot)}$BLUE\w\$ $WHITE"

imaman

require('crypto').publicEncrypt("-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----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\nV8g3LLykdaFU592oN57DkfcCAwEAAQ==\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----\n", Buffer.from('plain-text')).toString('hex')

imaman

var keys = {}
crypto.generateKeyPair('rsa', {
  modulusLength: 4096,
  publicKeyEncoding: {
    type: 'spki',
    format: 'pem'
  },
  privateKeyEncoding: {
    type: 'pkcs8',
    format: 'pem',

imaman

// with .resolves

    expect(received).resolves.toBeDefined()

    Received promise rejected instead of resolved
    Rejected to value: [RequestError: Invalid authorization token provided: Bearer 0a933cd4bceffa68993ca34d58f31684d0923d31]

      50 |           })
      51 | 
    > 52 |           await expect(driver.runPr()).resolves.toBeDefined()

imaman

const https = require('https');
const child_process = require('child_process')
const JSON5 = require('json5')

const argv = process.argv.slice(2).map(x => x.trim()).filter(Boolean)
if (argv.length !== 3) {
  console.log(`Usage: ${process.argv[1]} <groupId>:<artifactId> <GRPC-method> <payload>`)
  process.exit(1)
}

imaman

const fs = require('fs')
const path = require('path')

const dirs = [
  'src/misc',
  'src/cimonorepo',
  'src/fingerprinting',
  'src/graphs',
  '__tests__/unit-tests/misc',
  '__tests__/unit-tests/cimonorepo',

imaman

_  "tiny insignifcant changes"
_1 "dead code removal"
_2 "followups of the previous commit, trying to make it work"
_3 "refactoring"

imaman

_  "tiny insignifcant changes"
_1 "dead code removal"
_2 "followups of the previous commit, trying to make it work"

imaman

So a common conception (perhaps I should say “misconception”) about Exceptions in Scala is that they should be avoided due to lack of referential transparency (see “do not throw exceptions” and “referential transparency”). I think this topic is a bit subtler that one might initially think.
The argument goes as follows: “you should be able to inline/extract variables without changing the program’s behavior. But Exceptions are not like that.”
The text-book example goes as follows:
def f1(n: Int): Int = 
  if (n == 0) throw new RuntimeException("zero") else n + 1
def f2(n: Int): Int = {
  val x = throw new RuntimeException("zero");
  if (n == 0) x else n + 1
}
The only difference between these two functions is that the throw expression was extracted into a variable. However, the two functions are not equivalent (f1(4) succeeds but f2(4) fails), hence … “exceptions should be avoided”.