Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@innerop

innerop/stock-purchase-agreement-analyzed.json

Last active June 5, 2024 07:34
Show Gist options
  • Save innerop/f489aac6b2e29027b294a10d52e43d89 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save innerop/f489aac6b2e29027b294a10d52e43d89 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Raw
stock-purchase-agreement-analyzed.json
{
"section_header": "Section V.04. Public Announcements",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Unless otherwise required by applicable Law, noparty to this Agreement shall make any public announcements in respect of this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby without the prior written consent of the other party (which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), and the parties shall
cooperate as to the timing and contents of any such announcement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "17 C.F.R. § 243.100",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This regulation, also known as Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure), mandates that publicly traded companies must disclose material information to all investors at the same time. This aligns with the clause's requirement for consent and cooperation in public announcements to ensure fair and simultaneous disclosure.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/243.100",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to Regulation FD (17 C.F.R. § 243.100) within the clause.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with U.S. federal law, specifically Regulation FD, it is advisable to explicitly mention this regulation in the clause. This will clarify that any public announcements must also adhere to the requirements of fair and simultaneous disclosure as mandated by Regulation FD."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision addressing potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions.",
"explanation": "While the clause currently addresses compliance with applicable Law, it would be prudent to include a specific statement that acknowledges the possibility of conflicting state laws or local jurisdiction requirements. This will ensure that the parties are aware of and prepared to navigate any additional legal obligations that may arise."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VII.04. Severability",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "If any term or provision of this Agreement is invalid,illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not
affect any other term or provision of this Agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 184 (1981)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 184 addresses the enforceability of contracts when a term is unenforceable, which aligns with the severability clause by allowing the remainder of the contract to remain effective.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.ali.org/publications/show/contracts/",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1599",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1599",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 1599 states that if a contract has several distinct objects, and one at least is lawful, the contract is void as to the unlawful part and valid as to the rest. This aligns with the severability clause by allowing the valid parts of the contract to remain enforceable."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-1401",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GOB/5-1401",
"relevance": "New York General Obligations Law § 5-1401 allows parties to a contract to agree that the law of New York will govern their rights and duties, even if the contract has connections to other jurisdictions. This supports the severability clause by ensuring that the enforceable parts of the contract remain governed by New York law."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the applicable jurisdiction's law regarding severability.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, it is advisable to explicitly state that the severability clause will be interpreted in accordance with the relevant jurisdiction's law. For example, referencing California Civil Code § 1599 or New York General Obligations Law § 5-1401 can provide clarity and legal grounding."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of the severability clause to address partial invalidity.",
"explanation": "To align with the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 184, the clause should specify that if a term or provision is partially invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, only the invalid part will be severed, and the rest of the provision will remain in effect. This ensures that the clause is not overly broad and complies with the principle of maintaining the enforceable parts of the contract."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for reformation or modification of invalid terms.",
"explanation": "Including a provision that allows for the reformation or modification of invalid terms to make them enforceable can help ensure that the contract remains functional and enforceable. This aligns with the principle of maintaining the intent of the parties as much as possible, as supported by the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 184."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VII.06. Successors and Assigns",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "This Agreement shall be binding uponand shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted
assigns. Neither party may assign its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written
consent of the other party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. No
assignment shall relieve the assigning party of any of its obligations hereunder.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 317 (1981)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 317 addresses the assignment of rights and the conditions under which such assignments are valid, including the necessity of consent and the effect on the assignor's obligations.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.ali.org/publications/show/contracts/",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the term 'unreasonably withheld or delayed' in the consent conditions.",
"explanation": "The phrase 'unreasonably withheld or delayed' can be subjective and may lead to disputes. To ensure compliance with the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 317 and to avoid potential legal conflicts, it is advisable to define what constitutes 'unreasonable' in the context of withholding or delaying consent. This can provide clearer guidelines and reduce ambiguity."
},
{
"change": "Include a clause addressing potential conflicts with state laws.",
"explanation": "While the clause aligns with the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 317, state laws may have additional requirements or restrictions regarding assignment of rights and obligations. Including a clause that acknowledges the need to comply with applicable state laws can help prevent conflicts and ensure the agreement is enforceable in various jurisdictions."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.04. No Subsidiaries",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "The Company does not own, or have any interest in anyshares or have an ownership interest in any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited
liability company, unincorporated organization, trust, association, or other entity.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires companies to disclose their ownership interests in other entities, ensuring transparency and preventing conflicts of interest.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 1502",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=1502",
"relevance": "This section requires corporations to file an annual statement disclosing their ownership interests in other entities, aligning with the federal requirement for transparency."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 408",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/BSC/408",
"relevance": "This section mandates that corporations disclose their ownership interests in other entities in their biennial statements, ensuring compliance with both state and federal transparency requirements."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Add a disclosure requirement",
"explanation": "To comply with 15 U.S.C. § 78m of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the clause should include a requirement for the Company to disclose any ownership interests in other entities. This ensures transparency and prevents conflicts of interest, aligning with federal law."
},
{
"change": "Include state-specific disclosure requirements",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws, the clause should also reference compliance with state-specific disclosure requirements, such as Cal. Corp. Code § 1502 and N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 408. This ensures that the Company meets both federal and state transparency obligations."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section IV.04. Brokers",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Except for BROKER, FINDER, OR INVESTMENTBANKER NAME, no broker, finder, or investment banker is entitled to any brokerage, finder's
or other fee or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of Buyer.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78o",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the registration and regulation of brokers and dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. It is relevant because it outlines the legal requirements and restrictions for brokers, which align with the clause's stipulation that no broker, finder, or investment banker is entitled to fees or commissions unless properly arranged.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78o&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'broker, finder, or investment banker' to ensure it aligns with the definitions provided under 15 U.S.C. § 78o.",
"explanation": "The clause should explicitly define these terms to avoid any ambiguity and ensure compliance with federal regulations. This will help in clearly identifying the parties who are subject to the restrictions and requirements under the law."
},
{
"change": "Include a statement confirming that any broker, finder, or investment banker involved in the transactions must be registered and in good standing as required by 15 U.S.C. § 78o.",
"explanation": "This addition will ensure that all parties involved are compliant with federal registration and regulation requirements, thereby aligning the clause with the legal standards set forth in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision that explicitly states the consequences of non-compliance with the registration and regulation requirements under 15 U.S.C. § 78o.",
"explanation": "Including this provision will provide clarity on the repercussions of failing to meet federal legal requirements, which can serve as a deterrent and ensure adherence to the law."
},
{
"change": "Review and ensure that the clause does not conflict with any state laws or local jurisdiction requirements regarding brokerage, finder's fees, and commissions.",
"explanation": "State laws and local jurisdictions may have additional or differing requirements. Ensuring there is no conflict will help in maintaining the enforceability of the clause across different legal landscapes."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VI.01. Survival",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Subject to the limitations and other provisions of thisAgreement, the representations and warranties contained herein shall survive the Closing and
shall remain in full force and effect until the date that is NUMBER months/years from the
Closing Date. None of the covenants or other agreements contained in this Agreement shall
survive the Closing Date other than those which by their terms contemplate performance after
the Closing Date, and each such surviving covenant and agreement shall survive the Closing for
the period contemplated by its terms. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any claims asserted in good
faith with reasonable specificity (to the extent known at such time) and in writing by notice from
the non-breaching party to the breaching party prior to the expiration date of the applicable
survival period shall not thereafter be barred by the expiration of such survival period and such
claims shall survive until finally resolved.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78u-4",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 provides guidelines for the survival of claims and the specificity required in pleadings, which aligns with the clause's requirements for claims to be asserted in good faith with reasonable specificity.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78u-4&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the specificity requirement for claims",
"explanation": "The clause requires claims to be asserted with 'reasonable specificity.' To align with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4, it would be prudent to define what constitutes 'reasonable specificity' in the context of this agreement. This will ensure that the clause meets the legal standards for specificity in pleadings, reducing ambiguity and potential disputes."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to the applicable federal law",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance and provide clear guidance, the clause should reference the PSLRA under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4. This will make it explicit that the standards set forth in the federal law are being adhered to, which can help in the enforcement and interpretation of the clause."
},
{
"change": "Review for potential conflicts with state laws",
"explanation": "While the clause aligns with federal law, it is important to review it for potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions. Different states may have varying requirements for the survival of representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements. Ensuring that the clause is compliant with both federal and state laws will prevent legal complications."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VII.07. Amendment and Modification; Waiver",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "This Agreement mayonly be amended, modified or supplemented by an agreement in writing signed by each party
hereto. No waiver by any party of any of the provisions hereof shall be effective unless explicitly
set forth in writing and signed by the party so waiving. No failure to exercise or delay in
exercising, any right or remedy arising from this Agreement shall operate or be construed as a
waiver thereof. No single or partial exercise of any right or remedy hereunder shall preclude any
other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or remedy.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 89 (1981)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 89 provides guidance on the modification of executory contracts, which aligns with the clause's requirements for amendments to be in writing and signed by each party.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.ali.org/publications/show/contracts/",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1698",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1698.",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 1698 outlines the requirements for modifying a contract, which must be in writing and signed by the parties, aligning with the clause's stipulations."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 15-301",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GOB/15-301",
"relevance": "New York General Obligations Law § 15-301 requires that any modification to a written agreement must also be in writing and signed by the parties, consistent with the clause's requirements."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a clause specifying that any amendments or waivers must comply with applicable state laws.",
"reason": "To ensure that the agreement is enforceable under state laws such as California Civil Code § 1698 and New York General Obligations Law § 15-301, which require modifications to be in writing and signed by the parties."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision that explicitly states that the amendment and waiver clause does not override any mandatory state or federal laws.",
"reason": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions that may have specific requirements for contract modifications and waivers."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section V.06. Transfer Taxes",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "All transfer, documentary, sales, use, stamp, registration,value added and other such Taxes and fees (including any penalties and interest) incurred in
connection with this Agreement (including any real property transfer Tax and any other similar
Tax) shall be borne and paid by Buyer when due. Buyer shall, at its own expense, timely file any
Tax Return or other document with respect to such Taxes or fees (and Seller shall cooperate with
respect thereto as necessary).",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 164",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Internal Revenue Code deals with the deductibility of certain taxes, which is relevant to the Buyer's obligations to pay and file taxes as stipulated in the clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section164&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 11911",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=RTC&sectionNum=11911",
"relevance": "This section of the California Revenue and Taxation Code imposes a documentary transfer tax on the transfer of real property, which is relevant to the Buyer's obligation to pay transfer taxes."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Tax Law § 1402",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/TAX/1402",
"relevance": "This section of the New York Tax Law imposes a real estate transfer tax, which is relevant to the Buyer's obligation to pay transfer taxes."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Taxes and fees' to explicitly include state-specific taxes such as the California documentary transfer tax and the New York real estate transfer tax.",
"reason": "To ensure compliance with state laws like Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 11911 and N.Y. Tax Law § 1402, which impose specific transfer taxes that the Buyer must pay."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision that addresses the potential for conflicting state and local tax obligations.",
"reason": "To mitigate the risk of non-compliance with varying state and local tax laws, which may impose additional or different tax obligations on the Buyer."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VI.06. Tax Treatment of Indemnification Payments",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "All indemnificationpayments made under this Agreement shall be treated by the parties as an adjustment to the
Purchase Price for Tax purposes, unless otherwise required by Law.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 1060",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 1060 deals with the allocation of purchase price in the acquisition of a business, which is relevant to the treatment of indemnification payments as adjustments to the Purchase Price for tax purposes.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section1060&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 17942",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=RTC&sectionNum=17942",
"relevance": "This state law addresses the tax treatment of business transactions and may impact how indemnification payments are treated for state tax purposes in California."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Tax Law § 208",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/TAX/208",
"relevance": "This state law outlines the tax treatment of corporate transactions in New York, which could affect the treatment of indemnification payments as adjustments to the Purchase Price for state tax purposes."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Add a clarification clause to address potential conflicts with state laws.",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws such as Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 17942 and N.Y. Tax Law § 208, it is advisable to include a clause that explicitly states how indemnification payments will be treated for state tax purposes. This will help ensure compliance with both federal and state tax regulations."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to 26 U.S.C. § 1060 for clarity.",
"explanation": "To ensure that the parties are aware of the federal law governing the allocation of purchase price in business acquisitions, it would be beneficial to explicitly reference 26 U.S.C. § 1060 in the clause. This will provide clear guidance on the tax treatment of indemnification payments."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.08. Absence of Certain Changes, Events and Conditions",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Except asexpressly contemplated by this Agreement or as set forth on Section 3.08 of the Disclosure
Schedules, from the Balance Sheet Date until the date of this Agreement, the Company has
operated in the ordinary course of business in all material respects and there has not been: (a) an
MAE; or (b) any event, occurrence, fact, condition or change that is materially adverse to the
ability of Seller to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m (2021)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the reporting requirements for companies, ensuring transparency and accountability in their operations, which aligns with the clause's emphasis on the company operating in the ordinary course of business and disclosing material events.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 220",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc07/index.html",
"relevance": "This Delaware law provides shareholders with the right to inspect the books and records of a corporation, which supports the clause's emphasis on transparency and accountability in company operations."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 1501",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=1501",
"relevance": "This California law requires corporations to prepare and distribute annual financial statements to shareholders, aligning with the clause's focus on regular business operations and material disclosures."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m (2021) in the clause.",
"explanation": "To ensure that the clause aligns with federal reporting requirements, it is advisable to explicitly state that the company will comply with 15 U.S.C. § 78m (2021). This will reinforce the commitment to transparency and accountability in operations, as required by federal law."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for compliance with Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 220.",
"explanation": "Given that Delaware law provides shareholders with the right to inspect the books and records of a corporation, it is important to include a clause that ensures compliance with this state law. This will help avoid potential conflicts and ensure that the company's operations are transparent and accountable to shareholders."
},
{
"change": "Incorporate a clause for adherence to Cal. Corp. Code § 1501.",
"explanation": "To align with California's requirement for corporations to prepare and distribute annual financial statements to shareholders, the clause should include a provision that mandates compliance with Cal. Corp. Code § 1501. This will ensure that the company meets state-specific disclosure requirements and maintains transparency in its financial operations."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section IV.02. No Conflicts; Consents",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "The execution, delivery and performance byBuyer of this Agreement, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, do not
and will not: (a) violate or conflict with any provision of the certificate of incorporation or
by-laws of Buyer; (b) violate or conflict with any provision of any Law or Governmental Order
applicable to Buyer; (c) except as set forth in Section 4.02 of the Disclosure Schedules, require
the consent, notice or other action by any Person under, violate or conflict with, or result in the
acceleration of any agreement to which Buyer is a party; or (d) except as set forth in Section
4.02 of the Disclosure Schedules, require any consent, permit, Governmental Order, filing or
notice from, with or to any Governmental Authority; except, in the cases of clauses (b) and (c),
where the violation, conflict, acceleration or failure to obtain consent or give notice would not
have a material adverse effect on the buyer's ability to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby and, in the case of clause (d), where such consent, permit, Governmental
Order, filing or notice which, in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect on the
buyer's ability to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78n (Securities Exchange Act of 1934)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is relevant as it governs the conduct of companies in securities transactions, ensuring that the execution, delivery, and performance of agreements do not violate federal securities laws.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "8 Del. C. § 141",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc04/index.html",
"relevance": "Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) is relevant as many companies are incorporated in Delaware, and it governs corporate governance, including the execution, delivery, and performance of agreements by corporations."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 300",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=300.",
"relevance": "California Corporations Code is relevant as it governs the conduct of corporations in California, including the execution, delivery, and performance of agreements."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Law or Governmental Order' to explicitly include federal securities laws, such as those under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.",
"reason": "To ensure compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78n, which governs the conduct of companies in securities transactions, it is important to explicitly state that the execution, delivery, and performance of the agreement must not violate federal securities laws."
},
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) and California Corporations Code where applicable.",
"reason": "Given that many companies are incorporated in Delaware and operate in California, it is crucial to ensure that the clause explicitly acknowledges and complies with state-specific corporate governance laws, such as 8 Del. C. § 141 and Cal. Corp. Code § 300."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision that addresses potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions.",
"reason": "To mitigate any legal risks, it is advisable to include a clause that ensures the agreement's terms do not conflict with state laws or local jurisdictions, particularly those that may have specific requirements or restrictions on corporate actions."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.19. Brokers",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Except for BROKER, FINDER, OR INVESTMENTBANKER NAME, no broker, finder or investment banker is entitled to any brokerage, finder's
or other fee or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of Seller.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78o",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the registration and regulation of brokers and dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. It is relevant because it outlines the legal requirements and restrictions for brokers, which aligns with the clause's stipulation that no broker, finder, or investment banker is entitled to fees or commissions in connection with the transactions.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78o&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25210",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=25210.&lawCode=CORP",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code requires brokers and dealers to be licensed in the state. It is relevant because it supports the clause's stipulation that no unlicensed broker, finder, or investment banker is entitled to fees or commissions."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 359-e",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/359-E",
"relevance": "This section of the New York General Business Law requires brokers and dealers to register with the state. It is relevant because it aligns with the clause's requirement that no unregistered broker, finder, or investment banker is entitled to fees or commissions."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the Licensing Requirement",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, the clause should explicitly state that any broker, finder, or investment banker involved in the transactions must be properly licensed and registered as required by applicable federal and state laws. This would align the clause with 15 U.S.C. § 78o, Cal. Corp. Code § 25210, and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 359-e."
},
{
"change": "Include a Compliance Statement",
"explanation": "Add a statement that confirms the Seller has verified that no unlicensed or unregistered broker, finder, or investment banker is involved in the transactions. This would help ensure that the Seller is in compliance with the relevant legal requirements and avoid potential legal conflicts."
},
{
"change": "Specify Jurisdictional Compliance",
"explanation": "Include a clause that specifies compliance with the laws of the jurisdictions where the transactions are taking place. This would address potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions and ensure that the clause is enforceable in all relevant locations."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VI.05. Indemnification Procedures",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Whenever any claim shall arise forindemnification hereunder, the Indemnified Party shall promptly provide written notice of such
claim to the Indemnifying Party. Such notice by the Indemnified Party shall: (a) describe the
claim in reasonable detail; (b) include copies of all material written evidence thereof; and (c)
indicate the estimated amount, if reasonably practicable, of the Loss that has been or may be
sustained by the Indemnified Party. In connection with any claim giving rise to indemnity
hereunder resulting from or arising out of any Action by a Person who is not a party to this
Agreement, the Indemnifying Party, at its sole cost and expense and upon written notice to the
Indemnified Party, may assume the defense of any such Action with counsel reasonably
satisfactory to the Indemnified Party. The Indemnified Party shall be entitled to participate in the
defense of any such Action, with its counsel and at its own cost and expense, subject to the
Indemnifying Party's right to control the defense thereof. If the Indemnifying Party does not
assume the defense of any such Action, the Indemnified Party may, but shall not be obligated to,
defend against such Action in such manner as it may deem appropriate, including settling such
Action, after giving notice of it to the Indemnifying Party, on such terms as the Indemnified
Party may deem appropriate and no action taken by the Indemnified Party in accordance with
such defense and settlement shall relieve the Indemnifying Party of its indemnification
obligations herein provided with respect to any damages resulting therefrom. Seller and Buyer
shall cooperate with each other in all reasonable respects in connection with the defense of any
claim, including: (i) making available (subject to the provisions of Section 5.03) records relating
to such claim; and (ii) furnishing, without expense (other than reimbursement of actual
out-of-pocket expenses) to the defending party, management employees of the non-defending
party as may be reasonably necessary for the preparation of the defense of such claim. The
Indemnifying Party shall not settle any Action without the Indemnified Party's prior written
consent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed).",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78u-4",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 outlines procedures for the notification and defense of securities class action lawsuits, which align with the indemnification procedures described in the clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78u-4&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 317",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=317",
"relevance": "California's Corporations Code § 317 provides detailed procedures for indemnification of corporate agents, which align with the indemnification procedures described in the clause."
},
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 145",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc04/index.html#145",
"relevance": "Delaware General Corporation Law § 145 outlines the indemnification rights and procedures for corporate directors, officers, employees, and agents, which are relevant to the indemnification procedures described in the clause."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4.",
"reason": "To ensure that the indemnification procedures align with federal requirements for securities class action lawsuits, it is advisable to explicitly state that the procedures will comply with the PSLRA."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the relationship between the indemnification procedures and state laws, particularly California's Corporations Code § 317 and Delaware General Corporation Law § 145.",
"reason": "Given the potential for conflict with state laws, it is important to specify that the indemnification procedures will be subject to and interpreted in accordance with applicable state laws. This will help avoid legal disputes and ensure compliance with both federal and state regulations."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision that explicitly states the indemnification procedures will not override any mandatory state law requirements.",
"reason": "To prevent any potential legal conflicts, it is crucial to include a clause that acknowledges the supremacy of mandatory state law requirements over the indemnification procedures outlined in the agreement."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section I.02. Purchase Price",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "The aggregate purchase price for the Shares shall be$NUMBER (the \"Purchase Price\"). Buyer shall pay the Purchase Price to Seller at the Closing
in cash by wire transfer of immediately available funds in accordance with the wire transfer
instructions set forth in Section 1.02 of the Disclosure Schedules. The term \"Disclosure
Schedules\" means the disclosure schedules, attached hereto and made a part hereof, delivered by
Seller and Buyer concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m (Securities Exchange Act of 1934)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is relevant as it governs the trading of securities, including the purchase and sale of shares, and ensures transparency and fairness in such transactions.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 251",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc09/index.html",
"relevance": "Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) is relevant as it governs mergers and acquisitions involving Delaware corporations, which may include the purchase and sale of shares."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25401",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25401",
"relevance": "California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 is relevant as it regulates the offer and sale of securities in California, ensuring that such transactions are conducted fairly and transparently."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a representation and warranty clause from the Seller regarding compliance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m, the Seller should represent and warrant that all disclosures related to the Shares are accurate and complete, and that the transaction complies with all applicable securities laws."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause requiring the Buyer to comply with Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) if the Seller is a Delaware corporation.",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 251, the agreement should explicitly state that the Buyer must comply with DGCL provisions related to the purchase and sale of shares to avoid any legal conflicts."
},
{
"change": "Include a clause ensuring compliance with California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 if the transaction involves California-based entities or securities.",
"explanation": "To align with Cal. Corp. Code § 25401, the agreement should include a clause that mandates compliance with California's securities regulations to ensure the transaction is conducted fairly and transparently."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VII.02. Notices",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "All notices, claims, demands and other communicationshereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given: (a) when delivered by
hand (with written confirmation of receipt); (b) when received by the addressee if sent by a
nationally recognized overnight courier (receipt requested); (c) on the date sent by facsimile or
email of a PDF document (with confirmation of transmission) if sent during normal business
hours of the recipient, and on the next business day if sent after normal business hours of the
recipient; or (d) on the third/NUMBER day after the date mailed, by certified or registered
mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, if sent to the respective parties at the following
addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be specified in a notice given in
accordance with this Section 7.02): If to Seller: SELLER ADDRESS
Facsimile: FAX NUMBER
Email: EMAIL ADDRESS
Attention: TITLE OF OFFICER TO RECEIVE NOTICES
with a copy (which shall not SELLER LAW FIRM ADDRESS
constitute notice) to: Facsimile: FAX NUMBER
Email: EMAIL ADDRESS
Attention: ATTORNEY NAME
If to Buyer: BUYER ADDRESS
Facsimile: FAX NUMBER
Email: EMAIL ADDRESS
Attention: TITLE OF OFFICER TO RECEIVE NOTICES
with a copy (which shall not BUYER LAW FIRM ADDRESS
constitute notice) to:
Facsimile: FAX NUMBER
Email: EMAIL ADDRESS
Attention: ATTORNEY NAME",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 7001",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN Act) is highly relevant as it validates the use of electronic records and signatures in interstate and foreign commerce, which aligns with the clause's provisions for email and facsimile communications.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.1 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&division=3.&title=2.5.&part=2.&chapter=1.&article=1.",
"relevance": "California's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) aligns with the E-SIGN Act and supports the validity of electronic records and signatures, which is relevant to the clause's provisions for email and facsimile communications."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. State Tech. Law § 301 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/STT/A3",
"relevance": "New York's Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA) provides a legal framework for the use of electronic signatures and records, supporting the clause's provisions for email and facsimile communications."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the E-SIGN Act (15 U.S.C. § 7001) and relevant state laws (California's UETA and New York's ESRA) within the clause.",
"reason": "To ensure compliance with federal and state laws validating electronic records and signatures, explicitly referencing these laws can provide clarity and legal grounding for the use of email and facsimile communications."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for obtaining explicit consent from the parties to use electronic records and signatures.",
"reason": "The E-SIGN Act requires that parties consent to the use of electronic records and signatures. Including a clause that specifies obtaining such consent will ensure compliance with this requirement."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'normal business hours' for the recipient.",
"reason": "To avoid ambiguity and potential disputes, it is advisable to define 'normal business hours' within the clause, as this affects when email and facsimile communications are considered effective."
},
{
"change": "Include a fallback method for notice delivery in case electronic methods fail.",
"reason": "To ensure that notices are reliably received, it is prudent to include a fallback method (such as certified mail) in case electronic delivery methods (email or facsimile) fail or are not acknowledged."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section IV.05. Legal Proceedings",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Except as set forth in Section 4.05 of the DisclosureSchedules, there are no Actions pending or, to Buyer's knowledge, threatened against or by
Buyer that challenge or seek to prevent, enjoin or otherwise delay the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the reporting requirements for securities transactions, which is relevant to the clause as it deals with the disclosure of pending or threatened actions that could affect the transactions contemplated by the agreement.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25110",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25110",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code pertains to the qualification of securities, which is relevant to the clause as it deals with the disclosure of actions that could affect the transactions contemplated by the agreement."
},
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 251",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc09/index.html",
"relevance": "This section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertains to mergers and consolidations, which is relevant to the clause as it deals with the disclosure of actions that could affect the transactions contemplated by the agreement."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with federal securities reporting requirements, it is advisable to explicitly state that the Buyer is in compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m. This will help to align the clause with federal law and provide clarity on the Buyer's obligations regarding the disclosure of pending or threatened actions."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Actions' to include state-specific securities regulations",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws such as Cal. Corp. Code § 25110 and Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 251, it is important to clarify that 'Actions' also encompass any proceedings or investigations under applicable state securities laws. This will ensure that the clause is comprehensive and accounts for potential conflicts with state regulations."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for ongoing disclosure obligations",
"explanation": "To address the dynamic nature of legal actions, it is recommended to include a provision that obligates the Buyer to update the Disclosure Schedules if any new actions arise that could affect the transactions. This will ensure continuous compliance with both federal and state laws."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VII.09. Counterparts",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "This Agreement may be executed in counterparts,each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to be one
and the same agreement. A signed copy of this Agreement delivered by email or other means of
electronic transmission shall be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original
signed copy of this Agreement.
SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the date first written above by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.
SELLER NAME
By_____________________
NAME
TITLE
BUYER NAME
By_____________________
NAME
TITLE",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 7001",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN Act) under 15 U.S.C. § 7001 provides that electronic signatures and records have the same legal effect as their paper counterparts, which aligns with the clause's provision that a signed copy delivered by email or other electronic means has the same legal effect as an original signed copy.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.7",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1633.7",
"relevance": "California's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) under Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.7 provides that electronic signatures and records are legally equivalent to their paper counterparts, supporting the clause's provision regarding the legal effect of electronically transmitted signed copies."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. State Tech. Law § 304",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/STT/304",
"relevance": "New York's Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA) under N.Y. State Tech. Law § 304 establishes that electronic signatures and records have the same legal validity and effect as handwritten signatures and paper documents, aligning with the clause's stipulation on electronic transmission."
},
{
"state": "Texas",
"citation": "Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 322.007",
"url": "https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/BC/htm/BC.322.htm",
"relevance": "Texas's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) under Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 322.007 confirms that electronic signatures and records are legally equivalent to their paper counterparts, which is consistent with the clause's provision on the legal effect of electronically transmitted signed copies."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'electronic transmission' to ensure it encompasses all forms of electronic communication recognized by relevant laws.",
"reason": "While the clause broadly mentions 'email or other means of electronic transmission,' it would be prudent to explicitly define what constitutes 'electronic transmission' to avoid any ambiguity and ensure compliance with the E-SIGN Act and state laws such as California's UETA, New York's ESRA, and Texas's UETA. This can prevent potential disputes over what forms of electronic communication are acceptable."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to the applicable federal and state laws governing electronic signatures and records.",
"reason": "Adding a reference to the E-SIGN Act (15 U.S.C. § 7001) and relevant state laws (e.g., Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.7, N.Y. State Tech. Law § 304, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 322.007) can provide clarity and reinforce the legal basis for the clause. This can help ensure that all parties are aware of the legal framework supporting the use of electronic signatures and records."
},
{
"change": "Specify the jurisdiction governing the agreement.",
"reason": "Including a clause that specifies the governing jurisdiction can help address any potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions. This is particularly important given the variations in electronic signature laws across different states. Specifying the jurisdiction can provide clarity and reduce the risk of legal disputes."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.06. Financial Statements",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Copies of the Company's audited financialstatements consisting of the balance sheet of the Company as at FISCAL YEAR END DATE in
each of the years YEAR 1, YEAR 2 and YEAR 3 and the related statements of income and
retained earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flow for the years then ended (the \"Financial
Statements\") are included in the Disclosure Schedules/have been delivered to Buyer/have been
made available to Buyer in Seller's virtual data room maintained by DATA ROOM PROVIDER
NAME on behalf of Seller for purposes of this Agreement. The Financial Statements have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in effect in the United
States from time to time (\"GAAP\"), applied on a consistent basis throughout the period
involved. The Financial Statements fairly present in all material respects the financial condition
of the Company as of the respective dates they were prepared and the results of the operations of
the Company for the periods indicated. For purposes of this Agreement, the balance sheet of the
Company as of MOST RECENT FISCAL YEAR END DATE is referred to herein as the
\"Balance Sheet\" and the date thereof as the \"Balance Sheet Date.\"",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for periodic and other reports by companies, including the necessity for accurate and comprehensive financial statements, which aligns with the clause's emphasis on GAAP and fair presentation.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Ensure that the clause explicitly states compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m.",
"reason": "To align with federal law requirements for periodic and other reports by companies, including the necessity for accurate and comprehensive financial statements."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision for updating the financial statements if there are any material changes after the Balance Sheet Date but before the delivery to the Buyer.",
"reason": "To ensure that the financial statements remain accurate and comprehensive as required by 15 U.S.C. § 78m."
},
{
"change": "Verify that the clause does not conflict with any state laws or local jurisdictions regarding financial reporting and disclosure requirements.",
"reason": "State laws or local jurisdictions may have additional or differing requirements that need to be addressed to ensure full compliance."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section II.01. Closing",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "The closing of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
(the \"Closing\") shall take place simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement on the date
hereof (the \"Closing Date\") at the offices of LAW FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, or remotely by
exchange of documents and signatures (or their electronic counterparts). The consummation of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be deemed to occur at 12:01 a.m. TIME
ZONE time on the Closing Date.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 7001",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN Act) is highly relevant to the clause as it validates the use of electronic signatures and records in interstate and foreign commerce, which aligns with the clause's provision for remote closing by exchange of documents and electronic counterparts.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter96&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.7",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1633.7",
"relevance": "California's Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) is relevant as it provides legal recognition of electronic signatures and records, similar to the E-SIGN Act, thereby supporting the clause's provision for remote closing by exchange of documents and electronic counterparts."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. State Tech. Law § 304",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/STT/304",
"relevance": "New York's Electronic Signatures and Records Act (ESRA) is relevant as it ensures the validity of electronic signatures and records, aligning with the clause's provision for remote closing by exchange of documents and electronic counterparts."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Specify the time zone explicitly.",
"explanation": "The clause mentions '12:01 a.m. TIME ZONE time' but does not specify which time zone. This could lead to confusion and potential legal disputes. Explicitly stating the time zone (e.g., '12:01 a.m. Eastern Standard Time') ensures clarity and compliance with the timing of the transaction."
},
{
"change": "Ensure compliance with state-specific electronic signature laws.",
"explanation": "While the clause aligns with the federal E-SIGN Act, it is important to ensure that it also complies with state-specific laws such as California's UETA (Cal. Civ. Code § 1633.7) and New York's ESRA (N.Y. State Tech. Law § 304). This can be done by including a statement that the electronic signatures and records will be recognized in accordance with both federal and applicable state laws. This ensures that the clause is legally enforceable in jurisdictions with specific electronic transaction laws."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VII.03. Interpretation; Headings",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "This Agreement shall be construedwithout regard to any presumption or rule requiring construction or interpretation against the
party drafting an instrument or causing any instrument to be drafted. The headings in this
Agreement are for reference only and shall not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 206 (1981)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts addresses the principle of contra proferentem, which is the legal doctrine that ambiguities in a contract should be construed against the party that drafted it. The clause in question explicitly rejects this principle, making the Restatement highly relevant.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.ali.org/publications/show/contracts/",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1654",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1654.",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 1654 codifies the principle of contra proferentem, stating that any ambiguity in a contract should be interpreted against the party who caused the uncertainty to exist. This is directly relevant as the clause in question seeks to negate this principle."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-702",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GOB/5-702",
"relevance": "New York General Obligations Law § 5-702 requires that any ambiguity in a contract be construed against the drafter. This is relevant because the clause in question explicitly rejects this rule."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a disclaimer or carve-out for jurisdictions where the principle of contra proferentem is codified and cannot be waived.",
"explanation": "The clause explicitly rejects the principle of contra proferentem, which is codified in certain state laws such as California Civil Code § 1654 and New York General Obligations Law § 5-702. To ensure compliance with these state laws, it is advisable to include a disclaimer or carve-out stating that the clause will not apply in jurisdictions where such a principle is legally mandated and cannot be waived."
},
{
"change": "Add a severability clause to ensure the rest of the agreement remains enforceable if the anti-contra proferentem clause is found to be unenforceable in certain jurisdictions.",
"explanation": "Given the potential conflict with state laws that mandate the principle of contra proferentem, adding a severability clause will help ensure that the rest of the agreement remains enforceable even if this specific clause is invalidated in certain jurisdictions."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.05. No Conflicts or Consents",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "The execution, delivery and performance bySeller of this Agreement, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, do not
and will not: (a) violate or conflict with any provision of the certificate of incorporation or
by-laws of Seller or the Company; (b) violate or conflict with any provision of any Law or
Governmental Order applicable to Seller or the Company; (c) except as set forth in Section 3.05
of the Disclosure Schedules, require the consent, notice or other action by any Person under,
violate or conflict with, or result in the acceleration of any Material Contract; or (d) except as
set forth in Section 3.05 of the Disclosure Schedules, require any consent, permit, Governmental
Order, filing or notice from, with or to any Governmental Authority; except, in the cases of
clauses (b) and (c), where the violation, conflict, acceleration or failure to obtain consent or give
notice would not have a Material Adverse Effect and, in the case of clause (d), where such
consent, permit, Governmental Order, filing or notice which, in the aggregate, would not have a
Material Adverse Effect. For purposes of this Agreement: (i) \"Law\" means any statute, law,
ordinance, regulation, rule, code, order, constitution, treaty, common law or other requirement or
rule of law of any Governmental Authority; (ii) \"Governmental Order\" means any order, writ,
judgment, injunction, decree, stipulation, determination or award entered by or with any
Governmental Authority; (iii) \"Governmental Authority\" means any federal, state, local or
foreign government or political subdivision thereof, or any agency or instrumentality of such
government or political subdivision, or any arbitrator, court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction;(iv) \"Person\" means an individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability
company, Governmental Authority, unincorporated organization, trust, association or other
entity; and (v) \"Material Adverse Effect\" means any event, occurrence, fact, condition or
change that is materially adverse to the business, results of operations, financial condition or
assets of the Company, taken as a whole.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for periodic and other reports by companies, which aligns with the clause's stipulations on compliance with laws and governmental orders.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25110",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25110",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code requires the qualification of securities before they can be offered or sold, which is relevant to the clause's stipulations on compliance with laws and governmental orders."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/352",
"relevance": "This section of the New York General Business Law pertains to the regulation of securities and the requirement for registration, aligning with the clause's focus on compliance with laws and governmental orders."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with federal securities laws, such as 15 U.S.C. § 78m, within the clause.",
"explanation": "To ensure the clause explicitly aligns with federal requirements for periodic and other reports by companies, it is advisable to mention compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m. This will reinforce the clause's stipulations on adherence to applicable laws and governmental orders."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision addressing compliance with state securities laws, such as Cal. Corp. Code § 25110 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352.",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws requiring the qualification and registration of securities, it is important to include a clause that mandates compliance with these state-specific regulations. This will help avoid potential conflicts with state laws and ensure comprehensive legal compliance."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Material Adverse Effect' to explicitly include non-compliance with federal and state securities laws.",
"explanation": "To avoid ambiguity, it is recommended to explicitly state that any non-compliance with federal and state securities laws constitutes a 'Material Adverse Effect.' This will provide clear guidance on the implications of legal non-compliance and ensure that all parties understand the significance of adhering to these laws."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section V.05. Further Assurances",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Following the Closing, each of the parties heretoshall, and shall cause their respective Affiliates to, execute and deliver such additional
documents and instruments and take such further actions as may be reasonably required to carry
out the provisions hereof and give effect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for periodic and other reports by companies, which aligns with the clause's requirement for parties to execute and deliver additional documents and take further actions to carry out the provisions of the agreement.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 1501",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=1501",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code requires corporations to prepare and distribute annual reports, which aligns with the clause's requirement for parties to execute and deliver additional documents and take further actions to carry out the provisions of the agreement."
},
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 220",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc07/index.html",
"relevance": "This section of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides shareholders the right to inspect books and records, which aligns with the clause's requirement for parties to execute and deliver additional documents and take further actions to carry out the provisions of the agreement."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"explanation": "To ensure that the clause aligns with federal requirements for periodic and other reports by companies, it would be prudent to explicitly state that the parties and their respective Affiliates must comply with 15 U.S.C. § 78m when executing and delivering additional documents and taking further actions. This will provide clarity and ensure legal compliance."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for compliance with state-specific laws",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of Cal. Corp. Code § 1501 and Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 220, it is advisable to include a clause that mandates compliance with applicable state laws. This will help avoid potential conflicts with state laws and ensure that the parties are aware of their obligations under both federal and state jurisdictions."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VII.05. Entire Agreement",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "This Agreement constitutes the sole and entireagreement of the parties to this Agreement with respect to the subject matter contained herein,
and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous representations, warranties, understandings and
agreements, both written and oral, with respect to such subject matter. In the event of any
inconsistency between the statements in the body of this Agreement, any exhibits, and the
Disclosure Schedules (other than an exception expressly set forth as such in the Disclosure
Schedules), the statements in the body of this Agreement will control.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 213 (1981)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 213 addresses the Parol Evidence Rule, which is highly relevant to the 'Entire Agreement' clause as it supports the principle that the written contract is the final and complete expression of the parties' agreement, superseding prior agreements and representations.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.ali.org/publications/show/contracts/",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1625",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1625.&lawCode=CIV",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 1625 states that the written terms of a contract supersede any prior or contemporaneous oral agreements, aligning with the principles of the 'Entire Agreement' clause."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 15-301",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GOB/15-301",
"relevance": "New York General Obligations Law § 15-301 enforces the rule that a written agreement is the final and complete expression of the parties' agreement, which is consistent with the 'Entire Agreement' clause."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of the 'Entire Agreement' clause to explicitly state that it includes all exhibits and schedules attached to the agreement.",
"reason": "While the clause already mentions that the body of the Agreement will control in case of inconsistencies, explicitly stating that all exhibits and schedules are part of the 'Entire Agreement' can help avoid any ambiguity and ensure full compliance with the Parol Evidence Rule as outlined in Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 213."
},
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to state laws that may impact the enforceability of the 'Entire Agreement' clause.",
"reason": "Given the relevance of state laws such as California Civil Code § 1625 and New York General Obligations Law § 15-301, it would be prudent to acknowledge these laws within the clause to preempt any potential conflicts and reinforce the clause's enforceability in those jurisdictions."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision that explicitly states the agreement's governing law and jurisdiction.",
"reason": "Specifying the governing law and jurisdiction can help resolve any potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions, ensuring that the 'Entire Agreement' clause is interpreted consistently with the applicable legal framework."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.12. Insurance",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Section 3.12 of the Disclosure Schedules sets forth a list, asof the date hereof, of all material insurance policies maintained by the Company or with respect
to which the Company is a named insured or otherwise the beneficiary of coverage (collectively,
the \"Insurance Policies\"). Such Insurance Policies are in full force and effect on the date of this
Agreement and all premiums due on such Insurance Policies have been paid, except as would not
have a Material Adverse Effect.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) governs the administration of insurance policies related to employee benefits, ensuring that such policies are maintained and premiums are paid, which aligns with the clause's requirements for insurance policies to be in full force and effect and premiums to be paid.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter18&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Ins. Code § 10110.6",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=INS&sectionNum=10110.6",
"relevance": "This section of the California Insurance Code mandates that insurance policies must be maintained and premiums paid to ensure coverage, which aligns with the clause's requirements."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Ins. Law § 3201",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ISC/3201",
"relevance": "New York Insurance Law requires that insurance policies be in full force and effect and that premiums are paid, which is consistent with the clause's stipulations."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with ERISA (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.)",
"explanation": "To ensure that the clause aligns with federal law governing the administration of insurance policies related to employee benefits, it is recommended to explicitly state that the insurance policies comply with ERISA requirements. This will provide clarity and ensure legal compliance."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause to address potential conflicts with state laws, specifically California Insurance Code § 10110.6 and New York Insurance Law § 3201",
"explanation": "Given that state laws may have specific requirements regarding the maintenance and payment of premiums for insurance policies, it is advisable to include a provision that acknowledges and ensures compliance with relevant state laws. This will help avoid any legal conflicts and ensure that the insurance policies are in full force and effect as required by both federal and state regulations."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section I.01. Purchase and Sale",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, atthe Closing, Seller shall sell to Buyer, and Buyer shall purchase from Seller, the Shares, free and
clear of any lien, pledge, mortgage, deed of trust, security interest, charge, claim, easement,
encroachment or other similar encumbrance (each, an \"Encumbrance\").",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 governs the trading of securities such as shares and ensures that transactions are conducted in a fair and transparent manner, which aligns with the clause's requirement for the sale of shares to be free of encumbrances.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25000 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&division=1.&title=4.&part=&chapter=1.&article=1.",
"relevance": "The California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 regulates the offer and sale of securities in California, ensuring that such transactions are conducted fairly and without encumbrances, similar to the federal law."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/A23-A",
"relevance": "The New York Martin Act provides the Attorney General with broad powers to investigate and prosecute securities fraud, ensuring that securities transactions, including the sale of shares, are free from fraudulent encumbrances."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a representation and warranty clause from the Seller that the Shares are free and clear of any encumbrances.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, it is crucial to explicitly state that the Seller represents and warrants that the Shares are free and clear of any encumbrances. This aligns with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and state laws such as the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 and the New York Martin Act, which mandate that securities transactions be conducted fairly and without encumbrances."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause requiring compliance with applicable state securities laws.",
"explanation": "Given the potential conflict with state laws, it is advisable to include a clause that explicitly requires compliance with applicable state securities laws, such as California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 and New York's Martin Act. This ensures that the transaction adheres to both federal and state regulations, thereby mitigating the risk of legal issues arising from non-compliance."
},
{
"change": "Specify the governing law and jurisdiction for dispute resolution.",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws and local jurisdictions, it is important to specify the governing law and jurisdiction for dispute resolution. This provides clarity on which legal framework will apply in case of any disputes, ensuring that both parties are aware of the legal context in which the agreement will be interpreted and enforced."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.07. Undisclosed Liabilities",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "The Company has no liabilities, obligations orcommitments of a type required to be reflected on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with
GAAP, except (i) those which are adequately reflected or reserved against in the Balance Sheet
as of the Balance Sheet Date; and (ii) those which have been incurred in the ordinary course of
business since the Balance Sheet Date and which are not material in amount.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for financial reporting and accounting standards for publicly traded companies, which aligns with the requirement for liabilities to be reflected on a balance sheet prepared in accordance with GAAP.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'material in amount'",
"reason": "The clause mentions that liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business since the Balance Sheet Date should not be material in amount. However, 'material in amount' is a subjective term and could lead to different interpretations. To ensure compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m, which requires accurate and clear financial reporting, it is advisable to define what constitutes 'material in amount' within the context of the company's financials."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to compliance with state laws",
"reason": "While the clause aligns with federal law (15 U.S.C. § 78m), it does not address potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions. Including a statement that the company will also comply with relevant state laws can help mitigate any legal risks arising from state-specific financial reporting requirements."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section V.03. Confidentiality",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Buyer acknowledges and agrees that the ConfidentialityAgreement, dated as of DATE, between Buyer and Seller (the \"Confidentiality Agreement\")
remains in full force and effect and, in addition, covenants and agrees to keep confidential, in
accordance with the provisions of the Confidentiality Agreement, information provided to Buyer
pursuant to this Agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "18 U.S.C. § 1836(b)(1)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) provides a federal cause of action for the misappropriation of trade secrets, which aligns with the clause's emphasis on maintaining the confidentiality of information.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section1836&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 3426.1",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=3426.1",
"relevance": "California's Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA) provides similar protections for trade secrets at the state level, reinforcing the confidentiality obligations outlined in the clause."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 360",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/360",
"relevance": "New York's trade secret laws provide additional legal frameworks for protecting confidential information, which supports the clause's intent to maintain confidentiality."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Specify the exact date of the Confidentiality Agreement.",
"reason": "The clause currently uses a placeholder 'DATE'. Specifying the exact date is necessary for legal clarity and enforceability."
},
{
"change": "Include a definition of 'information' to clarify what constitutes confidential information.",
"reason": "To ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, it is important to clearly define what information is considered confidential. This helps avoid ambiguity and potential legal disputes."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause addressing the duration of the confidentiality obligation.",
"reason": "Specifying the duration for which the Buyer must keep the information confidential is crucial for legal enforceability and aligns with best practices in confidentiality agreements."
},
{
"change": "Include a clause that addresses the permissible use of confidential information.",
"reason": "Clarifying how the Buyer can use the confidential information ensures that the use is limited to the purposes outlined in the Agreement, which is important for compliance with trade secret laws."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause that addresses the return or destruction of confidential information upon termination of the Agreement.",
"reason": "Including a provision for the return or destruction of confidential information upon termination of the Agreement ensures that the information is not retained or misused, which is important for compliance with both federal and state trade secret laws."
},
{
"change": "Include a clause that addresses the consequences of a breach of the confidentiality obligation.",
"reason": "Specifying the consequences of a breach, such as injunctive relief or damages, provides a clear legal remedy and aligns with the enforcement mechanisms provided under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and state laws like California's Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA)."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section IV.06. Independent Investigation",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Buyer has conducted its own independentinvestigation, review and analysis of the Company, and acknowledges that it has been provided
adequate access to the personnel, properties, assets, premises, books and records and other
documents and data of Seller and the Company for such purpose. Buyer acknowledges and
agrees that: (a) in making its decision to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby, Buyer has relied solely upon its own investigation and the
express representations and warranties of Seller set forth in ARTICLE III of this Agreement
(including related portions of the Disclosure Schedules); and (b) none of Seller, the Company or
any other Person has made any representation or warranty as to Seller, the Company or this
Agreement, except as expressly set forth in Article III of this Agreement (including the related
portions of the Disclosure Schedules).",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 pertains to fraud and misrepresentation in securities transactions, which is relevant to the clause as it emphasizes the Buyer's reliance on its own investigation and the Seller's express representations and warranties.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78j&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25401",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25401",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code addresses the prohibition of false or misleading statements in the sale of securities, which aligns with the clause's emphasis on accurate representations and warranties."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/352-C",
"relevance": "This section of the New York General Business Law pertains to fraud in the offering of securities, which is relevant to the clause's focus on the Buyer's reliance on its own investigation and the Seller's express representations and warranties."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific disclaimer regarding the Buyer's reliance on any oral statements or representations not included in the Agreement.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and similar state laws such as Cal. Corp. Code § 25401 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c, it is crucial to explicitly state that the Buyer has not relied on any oral statements or representations not expressly included in the Agreement. This helps to mitigate the risk of claims related to fraud or misrepresentation."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause requiring the Seller to disclose any material changes or updates to the information provided up to the closing date.",
"explanation": "To align with the principles of full disclosure and to prevent any potential claims of misrepresentation or omission, it is advisable to include a requirement for the Seller to update the Buyer on any material changes. This ensures that the Buyer has the most current and accurate information when making their decision."
},
{
"change": "Incorporate a mutual indemnification clause for any breaches of representations and warranties.",
"explanation": "Including a mutual indemnification clause can provide a remedy for either party in case of a breach of the representations and warranties. This is particularly important to address potential conflicts with state laws that emphasize accurate representations, such as Cal. Corp. Code § 25401 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section IV.01. Organization and Authority of Buyer",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Buyer is a corporation dulyorganized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws of the state of STATE. Buyer
has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this Agreement, to carry out its
obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution
and delivery by Buyer of this Agreement, the performance by Buyer of its obligations hereunder,
and the consummation by Buyer of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly
authorized by all requisite corporate action on the part of Buyer. This Agreement constitutes a
legal, valid and binding obligation of Buyer enforceable against Buyer in accordance with its
terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization,
moratorium or similar Laws affecting creditors' rights generally and by general principles of
equity (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a proceeding at law or in equity).",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for corporations to file periodic reports with the SEC, ensuring that they are duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing, which aligns with the buyer's status and corporate power and authority as described in the clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 101",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc01/index.html",
"relevance": "This section of the Delaware General Corporation Law outlines the requirements for the formation and good standing of corporations in Delaware, which is relevant to the buyer's status as a duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing corporation."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 200",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=200",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code details the requirements for the formation and maintenance of corporations in California, ensuring they are duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing, which aligns with the buyer's status in the clause."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the enforceability conditions",
"explanation": "The clause mentions enforceability conditions such as 'bankruptcy,' 'insolvency,' 'reorganization,' 'moratorium,' and 'similar laws affecting creditors' rights,' as well as 'general principles of equity.' It would be prudent to specify that these conditions are subject to both federal and state laws. This ensures that the clause is comprehensive and acknowledges the potential impact of state-specific regulations, such as those in Delaware and California, which have their own corporate governance laws."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to compliance with SEC reporting requirements",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of 15 U.S.C. § 78m, which pertains to the requirements for corporations to file periodic reports with the SEC, it would be beneficial to explicitly state that the Buyer is in compliance with all applicable SEC reporting requirements. This aligns with the buyer's status and corporate power and authority as described in the clause and ensures transparency and adherence to federal law."
},
{
"change": "Specify the state of incorporation",
"explanation": "The clause currently states 'STATE' as the place of incorporation. It is essential to specify the actual state of incorporation to ensure clarity and compliance with the relevant state laws. For instance, if the Buyer is incorporated in Delaware or California, the clause should explicitly mention this to align with the respective state laws (Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 101 for Delaware and Cal. Corp. Code § 200 for California)."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.01. Organization and Authority of Seller",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Seller is a corporation dulyorganized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws (as defined in Section 3.05) of
the state of STATE. Seller has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this
Agreement, to carry out its obligations hereunder and to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery by Seller of this Agreement, the performance
by Seller of its obligations hereunder, and the consummation by Seller of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all requisite corporate action on the part of
Seller. This Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of Seller enforceable
against Seller in accordance with its terms, except as such enforceability may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar Laws affecting creditors' rights
generally and by general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a
proceeding at law or in equity).",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "11 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The United States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.) is highly relevant to the clause as it outlines the legal framework for bankruptcy, which is one of the limitations mentioned in the enforceability of the Seller's obligations.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title11&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 1000 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&division=1.&title=1.&part=&chapter=10.&article=",
"relevance": "California's Corporations Code outlines the requirements for corporate powers, authority, and the legal standing of corporations, which are relevant to the Seller's representations and warranties."
},
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 101 et seq.",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/index.html",
"relevance": "Delaware General Corporation Law provides the legal framework for the formation, operation, and dissolution of corporations in Delaware, which is pertinent to the Seller's status and powers."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the jurisdiction of the Seller",
"explanation": "The clause currently states 'state of STATE' as the jurisdiction. This should be replaced with the specific state where the Seller is incorporated to ensure compliance with state-specific corporate laws. For example, if the Seller is incorporated in Delaware, it should state 'state of Delaware'."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to the United States Bankruptcy Code",
"explanation": "Given that the enforceability of the Seller's obligations is subject to limitations such as bankruptcy, it would be prudent to explicitly reference the United States Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.) to provide clarity on the legal framework governing bankruptcy proceedings."
},
{
"change": "Ensure compliance with state-specific corporate laws",
"explanation": "The clause should be reviewed to ensure it aligns with the corporate laws of the state where the Seller is incorporated. For instance, if the Seller is incorporated in California, the clause should comply with Cal. Corp. Code § 1000 et seq. Similarly, if the Seller is incorporated in Delaware, it should comply with Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 101 et seq. This ensures that the Seller's representations and warranties are legally valid and enforceable under the relevant state laws."
},
{
"change": "Address potential conflicts with state laws",
"explanation": "The clause should be reviewed for any potential conflicts with state laws where the Seller operates. For example, if the Seller operates in multiple states, the clause should ensure that the representations and warranties do not conflict with the corporate laws of those states. This may involve adding language to clarify that the Seller's obligations are subject to compliance with applicable state laws."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.02. Organization, Authority and Qualification of the Company",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "TheCompany is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the Laws
of the state of STATE and has all necessary corporate power and authority to own, operate or
lease the properties and assets now owned, operated or leased by it and to carry on its business as
it is currently conducted. The Company is duly licensed or qualified to do business and is in
good standing in each jurisdiction in which the properties owned or leased by it or the operation
of its business as currently conducted makes such licensing or qualification necessary, except
where the failure to be so licensed, qualified or in good standing would not have a material
adverse effect. All corporate actions taken by the Company in connection with this Agreement
have been duly authorized.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for companies to file periodic reports with the SEC, ensuring that they are duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing, which aligns with the clause's requirements for corporate status and operations.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 102",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc01/index.html",
"relevance": "This section of the Delaware General Corporation Law outlines the requirements for the formation and organization of corporations, ensuring they are duly organized and in good standing, which aligns with the clause's requirements."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 200",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=200.",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code specifies the requirements for the formation and existence of corporations, ensuring they are duly organized and in good standing, which aligns with the clause's requirements."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 402",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/BSC/402",
"relevance": "This section of the New York Business Corporation Law outlines the requirements for the formation and organization of corporations, ensuring they are duly organized and in good standing, which aligns with the clause's requirements."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Specify the exact state in the clause instead of using 'state of STATE'.",
"reason": "To ensure compliance with state-specific laws and avoid ambiguity, the exact state should be mentioned. This will help in aligning the clause with the relevant state laws such as Delaware, California, or New York, which have specific requirements for the formation and organization of corporations."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'material adverse effect' in the context of licensing and qualification.",
"reason": "The term 'material adverse effect' can be subjective and may vary by jurisdiction. Clarifying this term will help ensure that the clause is interpreted consistently and in compliance with both federal and state laws."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to compliance with federal reporting requirements under 15 U.S.C. § 78m.",
"reason": "To ensure that the clause aligns with federal requirements for periodic reporting to the SEC, it would be beneficial to explicitly state that the company complies with these federal reporting requirements. This will reinforce the company's commitment to maintaining its status as duly organized, validly existing, and in good standing."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section IV.03. Investment Purpose",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Buyer is acquiring the Shares solely for its ownaccount for investment purposes and not with a view to, or for offer or sale in connection with,
any distribution thereof or any other security related thereto within the meaning of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the \"Securities Act\"). Buyer acknowledges that Seller has not
registered the offer and sale of the Shares under the Securities Act or any state securities laws,
and that the Shares may not be pledged, transferred, sold, offered for sale, hypothecated or
otherwise disposed of except pursuant to the registration provisions of the Securities Act or
pursuant to an applicable exemption therefrom and subject to state securities laws and
regulations, as applicable. Buyer is able to bear the economic risk of holding the Shares for an
indefinite period (including total loss of its investment), and has sufficient knowledge and
experience in financial and business matters so as to be capable of evaluating the merits and risk
of its investment.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Securities Act of 1933 governs the registration and distribution of securities, ensuring that investors receive significant information regarding securities being offered for public sale and prohibiting deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2A&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "California Corporations Code § 25110",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25110",
"relevance": "This law requires the qualification of the sale of securities in California, aligning with the clause's acknowledgment of state securities laws."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "New York General Business Law § 359-e",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/359-E",
"relevance": "This law mandates the registration of securities brokers and dealers in New York, which is relevant to the clause's emphasis on compliance with state securities laws."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the specific exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933 that the Buyer might rely on for future transfers.",
"explanation": "While the clause mentions that the Shares may not be transferred except pursuant to the registration provisions of the Securities Act or an applicable exemption, it would be beneficial to specify which exemptions (e.g., Rule 144, Regulation D) might be applicable. This provides clearer guidance and ensures compliance with federal law."
},
{
"change": "Include a statement that the Buyer will comply with relevant state securities laws when transferring the Shares.",
"explanation": "The clause acknowledges state securities laws but does not explicitly state that the Buyer will comply with them when transferring the Shares. Adding this statement ensures that the Buyer is aware of and agrees to adhere to state-specific regulations, such as California Corporations Code § 25110 and New York General Business Law § 359-e."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision requiring the Buyer to provide evidence of compliance with securities laws upon request by the Seller.",
"explanation": "Including a requirement for the Buyer to provide evidence of compliance with both federal and state securities laws upon the Seller's request can help ensure ongoing adherence to legal requirements and protect the Seller from potential legal issues."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VI.07. Exclusive Remedies",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "The parties acknowledge and agree that from andafter the Closing their sole and exclusive remedy with respect to any and all claims (other than
claims arising from intentional fraud on the part of a party hereto in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement) for any breach of any representation, warranty,
covenant, agreement or obligation set forth herein or otherwise relating to the subject matter of
this Agreement shall be pursuant to the indemnification provisions set forth in this ARTICLE VI.
In furtherance of the foregoing, each party hereby waives, from and after the Closing, to the
fullest extent permitted under Law, any and all rights, claims and causes of action for any breach
of any representation, warranty, covenant, agreement or obligation set forth herein or otherwise
relating to the subject matter of this Agreement it may have against the other parties hereto and
their Affiliates arising under or based upon any Law, except pursuant to the indemnification
provisions set forth in this Article VI. Nothing in this Section 6.07 shall limit any Person's right
to seek and obtain any equitable relief to which such Person shall be entitled or to seek any
remedy on account of any intentional fraud by any party hereto.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"url_of_negatively_aligned_contract_law": "null",
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78u-4",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 is relevant as it addresses the limitation of liability and the exclusive remedy provisions in securities fraud cases, which aligns with the clause's focus on indemnification and remedies for intentional fraud.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78u-4&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "null",
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "null",
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "null",
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1668",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1668.&lawCode=CIV",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 1668 states that contracts which exempt anyone from responsibility for their own fraud are against the policy of the law. This is relevant as it aligns with the clause's exception for intentional fraud."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-401",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GOB/5-401",
"relevance": "New York General Obligations Law § 5-401 prohibits agreements that exempt anyone from liability for their own fraud. This is relevant to the clause's provision that does not limit remedies for intentional fraud."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the exception for intentional fraud",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, it is recommended to explicitly state that the indemnification provisions do not apply to claims arising from intentional fraud. This aligns with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4, California Civil Code § 1668, and New York General Obligations Law § 5-401, which all emphasize that liability for intentional fraud cannot be waived or limited."
},
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to state laws",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws, it is advisable to include a clause that acknowledges the applicability of state laws such as California Civil Code § 1668 and New York General Obligations Law § 5-401. This can be done by adding a statement that the agreement will be interpreted in a manner consistent with these state laws, ensuring that the clause does not inadvertently violate local jurisdictional requirements."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section I.03. Withholding Taxes",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Buyer shall be entitled to deduct and withhold fromamounts otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement such amounts as are required to be
deducted and withheld under applicable law. Buyer shall provide Seller with written notice of its
intent to withhold at least ten (10) days prior to the Closing with a written explanation
substantiating the requirement to deduct or withhold, and the parties shall use commercially
reasonable efforts to cooperate to mitigate or eliminate any such withholding to the maximum
extent permitted by law. Assuming Seller delivers the certificate described in Section 2.02(c),
Buyer acknowledges and agrees that no withholding is required as of the date hereof. To the
extent that amounts are so withheld and paid over to the appropriate tax authority by the Buyer,
such withheld amounts shall be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to
the person in respect of which such deduction and withholding was made.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 1441",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) deals with the withholding of tax on nonresident aliens, which is relevant to the clause as it outlines the Buyer's entitlement to withhold amounts as required by applicable law.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section1441&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'applicable law' to explicitly include 26 U.S.C. § 1441.",
"explanation": "While the clause generally refers to 'applicable law,' it would be beneficial to explicitly mention 26 U.S.C. § 1441 to ensure clarity and compliance with federal tax withholding requirements on nonresident aliens. This will help avoid any ambiguity regarding the specific legal obligations the Buyer must adhere to."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision for compliance with state and local tax withholding laws.",
"explanation": "The clause currently focuses on federal law but does not address potential state or local tax withholding requirements. Including a provision that mandates compliance with relevant state and local tax laws will ensure comprehensive adherence to all applicable legal obligations, thereby mitigating the risk of legal conflicts."
},
{
"change": "Specify the process for handling disputes regarding the requirement to withhold.",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts, it would be prudent to include a clear process for resolving disputes between the Buyer and Seller regarding the necessity and amount of withholding. This could involve arbitration or mediation clauses to ensure a smooth resolution process."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VII.01. Expenses",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Except as otherwise expressly provided herein
(including Section 5.06 hereof), all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such
costs and expenses; provided, however, Buyer/Seller shall pay all amounts payable to",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78cc (Securities Exchange Act of 1934)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This law is relevant as it governs the costs and expenses related to securities transactions, which may be similar to the transactions contemplated in the Agreement.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'costs and expenses' to ensure compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78cc.",
"explanation": "The clause should explicitly define what constitutes 'costs and expenses' to avoid any ambiguity and ensure it aligns with the requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This will help in preventing any potential legal disputes regarding the interpretation of these terms."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to compliance with federal securities laws.",
"explanation": "Adding a statement that all costs and expenses must be in compliance with applicable federal securities laws, including 15 U.S.C. § 78cc, will ensure that the parties are aware of their obligations under these laws and reduce the risk of non-compliance."
},
{
"change": "Review for potential conflicts with state laws.",
"explanation": "While the clause appears to be in general compliance with federal law, it is important to review it against relevant state laws to ensure there are no conflicts. Different states may have specific regulations regarding the allocation of costs and expenses in transactions, and these should be considered to avoid any legal issues."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "BROKER/FINDER/INVESTMENT BANKER NAME.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"url_of_aligned_contract_law": null,
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78o",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the regulation of brokers and dealers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which is relevant to the expenses related to brokers, finders, or investment bankers.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78o&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a compliance clause",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78o, the clause should explicitly state that all expenses related to brokers, finders, or investment bankers must comply with the regulations set forth under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This will help ensure that the parties involved are aware of and adhere to federal regulations governing broker-dealer activities."
},
{
"change": "Specify the nature of expenses",
"explanation": "The clause should detail the types of expenses that are permissible and those that are not, in accordance with federal law. This will provide clarity and prevent any potential violations of 15 U.S.C. § 78o, which regulates the conduct and expenses of brokers and dealers."
},
{
"change": "Add a state law compliance clause",
"explanation": "Given that state laws can vary and may impose additional requirements or restrictions on brokers, finders, or investment bankers, the clause should include a provision that requires compliance with all applicable state laws. This will help avoid conflicts with state regulations and ensure comprehensive legal compliance."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.09. Material Contracts.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) Section 3.09(a) of the Disclosure Schedules lists each of the following
contracts and other agreements of the Company (together with all Leases listed in Section
3.10(a) of the Disclosure Schedules, collectively, the \"Material Contracts\"):(i) each agreement of the Company involving aggregate consideration
in excess of $NUMBER or requiring performance by any party more than one
year from the date hereof, which, in each case, cannot be cancelled by the
Company without penalty or without more than 180/NUMBER days' notice;(ii) all agreements that relate to the sale of any of the Company's
assets, other than in the ordinary course of business, for consideration in excess of
$NUMBER;(iii) all agreements that relate to the acquisition of any business, a
material amount of stock or assets of any other Person or any real property
(whether by merger, sale of stock, sale of assets or otherwise), in each case
involving amounts in excess of $NUMBER; and
(iv) except for agreements relating to trade payables, all agreements
relating to indebtedness (including, without limitation, guarantees) of the
Company, in each case having an outstanding principal amount in excess of
$NUMBER.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for periodic and other reports by companies, which aligns with the disclosure and reporting obligations outlined in Section 3.09(a) regarding material contracts.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25110",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25110",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code requires the qualification of securities before they can be offered or sold, which is relevant to the disclosure of material contracts involving the sale of assets or stock."
},
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 271",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc09/index.html",
"relevance": "This section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertains to the sale, lease, or exchange of assets, which is relevant to the disclosure requirements for material contracts involving significant transactions."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Specify the exact monetary thresholds in the subsections (i) to (iv) to ensure clarity and compliance.",
"explanation": "The clause currently uses placeholders like '$NUMBER' which need to be replaced with specific amounts. This is crucial for compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m, which requires clear and precise disclosure of material contracts."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision for periodic review and update of the disclosure schedules.",
"explanation": "To align with the requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 78m, which mandates periodic reporting, the clause should explicitly state that the disclosure schedules will be reviewed and updated regularly to ensure ongoing compliance."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the term 'ordinary course of business' in subsection (ii).",
"explanation": "The term 'ordinary course of business' can be subjective. Providing a clear definition will help ensure that the clause is interpreted consistently and complies with both federal and state laws, such as Cal. Corp. Code § 25110 and Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 271."
},
{
"change": "Add a cross-reference to relevant state laws where applicable.",
"explanation": "Including references to state laws like Cal. Corp. Code § 25110 and Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 271 will help ensure that the clause is not only compliant with federal law but also with state-specific requirements regarding the sale of assets and securities."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) Except as set forth on Section 3.09(b) of the Disclosure Schedules, the
Company is not in breach of, or default under, any Material Contract, except for such
breaches or defaults that would not have a Material Adverse Effect.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2)(A)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirement for companies to maintain accurate books and records, which is relevant to ensuring that the company is not in breach of any Material Contract.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 1501",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=1501",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code requires corporations to maintain accurate and complete books and records, which aligns with the requirement to ensure the company is not in breach of any Material Contract."
},
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 224",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc07/index.html",
"relevance": "This section of the Delaware General Corporation Law requires corporations to keep proper books and records, which is relevant to the clause ensuring the company is not in breach of any Material Contract."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the requirement for maintaining accurate books and records as per 15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2)(A).",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with federal law, the clause should explicitly state that the company is required to maintain accurate books and records. This will align the clause with the federal requirement and provide clarity on the company's obligations."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision that addresses compliance with state laws, specifically referencing Cal. Corp. Code § 1501 and Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 224.",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws in California and Delaware regarding the maintenance of accurate books and records, the clause should include a statement that the company will also comply with these state-specific requirements. This will help avoid potential conflicts with state laws and ensure comprehensive compliance."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'Material Contract' to ensure it encompasses all contracts that could have a significant impact on the company's financial status or operations.",
"explanation": "To avoid ambiguity and ensure that all relevant contracts are covered, the clause should provide a clear definition of what constitutes a 'Material Contract.' This will help in assessing compliance and identifying any potential breaches or defaults accurately."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VI.03. Indemnification by Buyer",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Subject to the other terms and conditions ofthis ARTICLE VI, from and after the Closing, Buyer shall indemnify Seller against, and shall
hold Seller harmless from and against, any and all Losses incurred or sustained by, or imposed
upon, Seller based upon, arising out of or with respect to:(a) any inaccuracy in or breach of any of the representations or warranties of
Buyer contained in this Agreement; or",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78u-4",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 is relevant as it provides a framework for indemnification and liability in securities transactions, which can be analogous to the indemnification obligations outlined in the clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-108",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title6/c018/index.html",
"relevance": "Delaware law is highly relevant as it governs many corporate transactions and provides specific provisions for indemnification in LLC agreements, which can be analogous to the indemnification obligations outlined in the clause."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 317",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=317",
"relevance": "California law provides detailed provisions on indemnification of corporate directors, officers, and agents, which can be relevant to understanding the scope and limitations of indemnification obligations in the clause."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the Scope of Indemnification",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, it is recommended to explicitly define the scope of 'Losses' to avoid ambiguity. This can help in aligning with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4, which provides a framework for indemnification and liability in securities transactions. Clear definitions can prevent potential disputes over what constitutes 'Losses' and ensure that the indemnification obligations are not overly broad or vague."
},
{
"change": "Include Limitations on Indemnification",
"explanation": "To align with Delaware law (Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-108) and California law (Cal. Corp. Code § 317), it is advisable to include specific limitations on indemnification. For instance, the clause should specify that indemnification does not cover losses resulting from gross negligence, willful misconduct, or fraud by the Seller. This ensures that the indemnification obligations are reasonable and not overly burdensome, which is consistent with state laws governing corporate transactions."
},
{
"change": "Specify Procedures for Indemnification Claims",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with relevant laws and to provide clarity, it is recommended to outline the procedures for making indemnification claims. This includes specifying the timeframe within which claims must be made, the process for notifying the indemnifying party, and the method for resolving disputes. This procedural clarity can help in aligning with both federal and state laws, ensuring that the indemnification process is fair and transparent."
},
{
"change": "Address Potential Conflicts with State Laws",
"explanation": "Given the potential conflicts with state laws, it is recommended to include a choice of law provision that specifies which state's laws will govern the interpretation and enforcement of the indemnification clause. This can help in resolving any conflicts between different state laws, such as those of Delaware and California, and provide certainty to both parties regarding the applicable legal framework."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) any breach or non-fulfillment of any covenant, agreement or obligation to
be performed by Buyer pursuant to this Agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 235 (1981)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts outlines the effects of a breach of contract, which is directly relevant to the clause addressing the Buyer's breach or non-fulfillment of obligations.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.ali.org/publications/show/contracts/",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 3300",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=3300",
"relevance": "This statute outlines the measure of damages for breach of contract in California, which is relevant to understanding the consequences of the Buyer's breach or non-fulfillment of obligations under the Agreement."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. U.C.C. Law § 2-711",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/UCC/2-711",
"relevance": "This section of the New York Uniform Commercial Code provides remedies for the buyer in the event of a breach by the seller, which can be analogously relevant to understanding the Buyer's obligations and potential breaches."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the Consequences of Breach or Non-Fulfillment",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, it is advisable to explicitly outline the consequences of the Buyer's breach or non-fulfillment of obligations. This can help align the clause with the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 235 (1981) and state laws such as Cal. Civ. Code § 3300 and N.Y. U.C.C. Law § 2-711, which detail the effects and remedies for breach of contract."
},
{
"change": "Specify Remedies Available to the Non-Breaching Party",
"explanation": "Including specific remedies available to the non-breaching party (e.g., the seller) in the event of the Buyer's breach or non-fulfillment can provide clarity and ensure the clause is enforceable under relevant state laws. This aligns with the principles outlined in Cal. Civ. Code § 3300 and N.Y. U.C.C. Law § 2-711, which provide guidance on the measure of damages and remedies for breach of contract."
},
{
"change": "Include a Reference to Applicable State Laws",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws, it is recommended to include a reference to the applicable state laws governing the agreement. This can help ensure that the clause is interpreted and enforced in accordance with the relevant jurisdiction's legal framework, thereby reducing the risk of legal disputes."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VI.02. Indemnification by Seller",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Subject to the other terms and conditions ofthis ARTICLE VI, from and after the Closing, Seller shall indemnify Buyer against, and shall
hold Buyer harmless from and against, any and all losses, damages, liabilities, deficiencies,
Actions, judgments, interest, awards, penalties, fines, costs or expenses of whatever kind,
including reasonable attorneys' fees (collectively, \"Losses\"), incurred or sustained by, or imposed
upon, Buyer based upon, arising out of, with respect to or by reason of:(a) any inaccuracy in or breach of any of the representations or warranties of
Seller contained in this Agreement; or",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78u-4",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 provides guidelines for indemnification clauses in securities transactions, ensuring that indemnification for losses due to misrepresentations or breaches of warranties is clearly defined and enforceable.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 2772",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=2772",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 2772 defines indemnity and provides the legal framework for indemnification agreements within the state, ensuring that such clauses are enforceable under California law."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-322.1",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GOB/5-322.1",
"relevance": "New York General Obligations Law § 5-322.1 outlines the enforceability of indemnification clauses in contracts, particularly in construction contracts, ensuring that indemnification for negligence is clearly defined and limited."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of indemnification to explicitly exclude indemnification for the Seller's own negligence or willful misconduct.",
"reason": "To ensure compliance with New York General Obligations Law § 5-322.1, which limits the enforceability of indemnification clauses that cover negligence."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision that specifies the indemnification does not cover punitive damages unless explicitly stated.",
"reason": "To align with general principles of indemnification under both federal and state laws, which often exclude punitive damages unless expressly included."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause that the indemnification is subject to the limitations and requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4.",
"reason": "To ensure that the indemnification clause is compliant with federal securities law, particularly in transactions involving securities."
},
{
"change": "Specify that the indemnification obligations are subject to the applicable state laws where the transaction is taking place.",
"reason": "To ensure that the indemnification clause is enforceable under the relevant state laws, such as California Civil Code § 2772 and New York General Obligations Law § 5-322.1."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) any breach or non-fulfillment of any covenant, agreement or obligation to
be performed by Seller pursuant to this Agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 235 (1981)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 235 is highly relevant as it outlines the effects of a breach of contract, which directly pertains to the clause regarding the breach or non-fulfillment of covenants, agreements, or obligations by the Seller.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.ali.org/publications/show/contracts/",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 3300",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=3300.",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 3300 is relevant as it provides the measure of damages for breach of contract, which is pertinent to understanding the consequences of a breach or non-fulfillment of covenants, agreements, or obligations by the Seller."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. U.C.C. Law § 2-711",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/UCC/2-711",
"relevance": "New York U.C.C. Law § 2-711 is relevant as it outlines the buyer's remedies in the event of a breach by the seller, which is directly related to the clause concerning the breach or non-fulfillment of covenants, agreements, or obligations by the Seller."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the measure of damages for breach of contract as outlined in California Civil Code § 3300.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with California state law, it is advisable to explicitly state the measure of damages for breach of contract. This will provide clarity on the consequences of a breach or non-fulfillment of covenants, agreements, or obligations by the Seller, aligning the clause with California Civil Code § 3300."
},
{
"change": "Incorporate a reference to the buyer's remedies as per New York U.C.C. Law § 2-711.",
"explanation": "To align with New York state law, the clause should mention the buyer's remedies in the event of a breach by the seller. This will ensure that the clause is consistent with New York U.C.C. Law § 2-711, which outlines the buyer's rights and remedies in such situations."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.13. Legal Proceedings; Governmental Orders.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) Except as set forth in Section 3.13(a) of the Disclosure Schedules, there
are no claims, actions, suits, investigations or other legal proceedings (collectively,
\"Actions\") pending or, to Seller's knowledge, threatened against or by the Company
affecting any of its properties or assets (or by or against Seller or any Affiliate thereof
and relating to the Company), which if determined adversely to the Company (or to
Seller or any Affiliate thereof) would result in a Material Adverse Effect. For purposes of
this Agreement: (x) \"Affiliate\" of a Person means any other Person that directly or
indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with, such Person; and (y) the term \"control\" (including the terms
\"controlled by\" and \"under common control with\") means the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of
a Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m (Securities Exchange Act of 1934)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires companies to disclose material information, including legal proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition. This aligns with the clause's requirement to disclose pending or threatened actions that could materially affect the company.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25401",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25401",
"relevance": "California's Corporate Securities Law requires the disclosure of material facts in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of securities, which includes legal proceedings that could materially affect the company."
},
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 102(b)(7)",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc01/index.html",
"relevance": "Delaware General Corporation Law allows for the inclusion of provisions in a corporation's certificate of incorporation that limit the liability of directors for monetary damages for breaches of fiduciary duty, except in cases of certain misconduct, which may include failure to disclose material legal proceedings."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with federal law, the clause should explicitly reference the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m). This will clarify the requirement for the Company to disclose material information, including legal proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Material Adverse Effect'",
"explanation": "To align with both federal and state laws, the definition of 'Material Adverse Effect' should be clarified to include specific examples or thresholds that would trigger the disclosure requirement. This will help ensure that all relevant legal proceedings are disclosed in compliance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and state laws like California's Corporate Securities Law (Cal. Corp. Code § 25401)."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for compliance with state laws",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws, the clause should include a provision that explicitly states the Company’s obligation to comply with relevant state laws, such as California's Corporate Securities Law and Delaware General Corporation Law. This will ensure that the Company is aware of and adheres to state-specific disclosure requirements."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) Except as set forth in Section 3.13(b) of the Disclosure Schedules, there
are no outstanding Governmental Orders against, relating to, or affecting the Company or
any of its properties or assets which would have a Material Adverse Effect.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m (Securities Exchange Act of 1934)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires companies to disclose material information that could affect investors' decisions. The clause's focus on the absence of Governmental Orders that would have a Material Adverse Effect aligns with the Act's requirements for transparency and disclosure of significant legal and regulatory matters.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25401",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=25401&lawCode=CORP",
"relevance": "California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 requires the disclosure of material facts necessary to make statements not misleading. This aligns with the clause's requirement to disclose any Governmental Orders that could have a Material Adverse Effect."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/352-C",
"relevance": "New York's Martin Act mandates the disclosure of material information in the sale of securities. This law supports the clause's emphasis on transparency regarding Governmental Orders that could impact the company."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Governmental Orders' to ensure it encompasses all relevant orders, decrees, and injunctions from federal, state, and local authorities.",
"explanation": "To comply with 15 U.S.C. § 78m and similar state laws like Cal. Corp. Code § 25401 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c, it is crucial that the clause clearly defines 'Governmental Orders' to include all possible legal and regulatory actions that could materially affect the company. This ensures comprehensive disclosure and avoids potential legal ambiguities."
},
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with both federal and state securities laws.",
"explanation": "Explicitly stating compliance with federal laws such as the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and relevant state laws like California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 and New York's Martin Act will reinforce the clause's alignment with legal requirements. This addition will help ensure that the company meets all necessary disclosure obligations."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for periodic review and update of the Disclosure Schedules.",
"explanation": "To maintain ongoing compliance with evolving legal standards and regulatory requirements, it is advisable to include a clause that mandates regular review and updating of the Disclosure Schedules. This will help the company stay current with any new Governmental Orders or changes in the legal landscape that could have a Material Adverse Effect."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.03. Capitalization.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of NUMBER
shares of common stock, $NUMBER par value/no par value, of which NUMBER
shares are issued and outstanding and constitute the Shares. All of the Shares have been
duly authorized, are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable, and are owned of
record and beneficially by Seller, free and clear of all Encumbrances, other than those
Encumbrances set forth in Section 3.03(a) of the Disclosure Schedules.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 77e",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Securities Act of 1933 regulates the offer and sale of securities, ensuring that the shares are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid, and non-assessable.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section77e&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Ensure that the clause explicitly states compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, particularly 15 U.S.C. § 77e.",
"explanation": "To ensure full legal compliance, the clause should explicitly reference adherence to the Securities Act of 1933, which governs the offer and sale of securities. This will provide clarity and legal assurance that the shares are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid, and non-assessable."
},
{
"change": "Include a statement confirming that all necessary filings and registrations with the SEC have been completed.",
"explanation": "To comply with 15 U.S.C. § 77e, it is essential to confirm that all required filings and registrations with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have been completed. This ensures that the issuance and sale of shares are legally compliant."
},
{
"change": "Verify and include any state-specific securities laws that may apply.",
"explanation": "While the clause aligns with federal law, it is important to consider and include any relevant state securities laws that may impose additional requirements or restrictions. This will help avoid potential conflicts and ensure comprehensive legal compliance."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) Except as set out in Section 3.03(b) of the Disclosure Schedules, there
are no outstanding or authorized options, warrants, convertible securities, stock
appreciation, phantom stock, profit participation or other rights, agreements or
commitments relating to the shares of the Company or obligating Seller or the Company
to issue or sell any shares of, or any other interest in, the Company. There are no voting
trusts, stockholder agreements, proxies, or other agreements in effect with respect to the
voting or transfer of any of the Shares.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78n (Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 14)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This law is relevant as it governs the solicitation of proxies and the disclosure requirements for companies, which aligns with the clause's focus on voting trusts, stockholder agreements, and proxies.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "8 Del. C. § 211",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc07/index.html",
"relevance": "This state law is relevant as it governs the requirements for stockholder meetings and voting procedures in Delaware corporations, which is pertinent to the clause's focus on voting trusts and stockholder agreements."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 705",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=705",
"relevance": "This state law is relevant as it addresses the voting rights of shareholders and the use of proxies in California corporations, aligning with the clause's focus on voting-related agreements."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78n (Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 14)",
"explanation": "To ensure the clause aligns with federal law governing the solicitation of proxies and disclosure requirements, it is recommended to explicitly state that any actions related to voting trusts, stockholder agreements, and proxies must comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 14."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for compliance with state-specific laws such as 8 Del. C. § 211 and Cal. Corp. Code § 705",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws governing stockholder meetings, voting procedures, and the use of proxies, it is advisable to include a clause that mandates compliance with applicable state laws, particularly for corporations incorporated in Delaware and California. This will help avoid potential conflicts with state regulations."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.14. Compliance with Laws; Permits.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) Except as set forth in Section 3.14(a) of the Disclosure Schedules, the
Company is in compliance with all Laws applicable to it or its business, properties or
assets, except where the failure to be in compliance would not have a Material Adverse
Effect.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2)(A)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires companies to maintain accurate books and records and to have internal controls that ensure compliance with applicable laws, which aligns with the clause's requirement for the Company to comply with all applicable laws.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 1501",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=1501.",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code requires corporations to maintain accurate books and records and to provide annual reports to shareholders, which supports the clause's emphasis on compliance with applicable laws."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 624",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/BSC/624",
"relevance": "This section of the New York Business Corporation Law mandates that corporations keep accurate books and records and make them available for inspection, aligning with the clause's requirement for compliance with applicable laws."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the requirement for maintaining accurate books and records and internal controls.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the clause should explicitly state that the Company is required to maintain accurate books and records and implement internal controls. This will align the clause with federal law requirements."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'all Laws applicable' to include both federal and state laws.",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws such as Cal. Corp. Code § 1501 and N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 624, the clause should explicitly state that compliance includes both federal and state laws. This ensures that the Company is aware of and adheres to all relevant legal requirements."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for periodic review and updates of compliance measures.",
"explanation": "Including a requirement for periodic review and updates of compliance measures will help ensure ongoing adherence to applicable laws, including any changes in federal or state regulations. This proactive approach can prevent future legal issues and align with best practices for corporate governance."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) All permits, licenses, franchises, approvals, authorizations and consents
required to be obtained from Governmental Authorities (collectively, \"Permits\") for the
Company to conduct its business have been obtained and are valid and in full force and
effect, except where the failure to obtain such Permits would not have a Material Adverse
Effect.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "5 U.S.C. § 558",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the conditions under which federal agencies issue licenses and permits, ensuring that they are valid and in full force and effect, which aligns with the clause's requirement for the Company to have all necessary permits and licenses.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title5-section558&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Gov't Code § 65941",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=65941",
"relevance": "This section of the California Government Code outlines the requirements for obtaining permits and licenses from state and local agencies, ensuring they are valid and in full force and effect, similar to the federal requirement."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 130",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/130",
"relevance": "This section of the New York General Business Law specifies the requirements for business permits and licenses, ensuring they are valid and in full force and effect, aligning with the clause's requirements."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Governmental Authorities' to include both federal and state/local agencies.",
"explanation": "The clause currently refers to 'Governmental Authorities' without specifying whether this includes state and local agencies. Given the relevance of state laws such as Cal. Gov't Code § 65941 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 130, it is important to explicitly state that 'Governmental Authorities' encompasses federal, state, and local agencies to ensure comprehensive compliance."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision for ongoing compliance and renewal of permits.",
"explanation": "While the clause states that all necessary permits have been obtained and are valid, it does not address the need for ongoing compliance and timely renewal of these permits. Adding a provision that requires the Company to maintain and renew these permits as necessary would align with the requirements of 5 U.S.C. § 558 and relevant state laws, ensuring that permits remain in full force and effect."
},
{
"change": "Specify the consequences of failing to obtain or maintain necessary permits.",
"explanation": "The clause mentions that failure to obtain permits would not have a Material Adverse Effect, but it does not specify the consequences if such a failure does occur. Clarifying the potential legal and operational consequences would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the risks involved and ensure alignment with both federal and state regulations."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) None of the representations and warranties contained in this Section 3.14
shall be deemed to relate to environmental matters (which are governed by Section 3.15),
employee benefits matters (which are governed by Section 3.16), employment matters
(which are governed by Section 3.17) or tax matters (which are governed by Section
3.18).",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) governs employee benefits matters, which are specifically excluded from the representations and warranties in Section 3.14 and are instead governed by Section 3.16.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Lab. Code § 2800 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&sectionNum=2800",
"relevance": "California Labor Code governs employment matters, which are specifically excluded from the representations and warranties in Section 3.14 and are instead governed by Section 3.17."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Lab. Law § 200 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/200",
"relevance": "New York Labor Law governs employment matters, which are specifically excluded from the representations and warranties in Section 3.14 and are instead governed by Section 3.17."
},
{
"state": "Texas",
"citation": "Tex. Lab. Code § 21.001 et seq.",
"url": "https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LA/htm/LA.21.htm",
"relevance": "Texas Labor Code governs employment matters, which are specifically excluded from the representations and warranties in Section 3.14 and are instead governed by Section 3.17."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a reference to ERISA in Section 3.16.",
"explanation": "Since employee benefits matters are governed by Section 3.16 and ERISA (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.) is highly relevant to employee benefits, it would be prudent to explicitly reference ERISA in Section 3.16 to ensure compliance with federal law."
},
{
"change": "Ensure compliance with state labor laws in Section 3.17.",
"explanation": "Section 3.17 governs employment matters, which are subject to state-specific labor laws. To avoid potential conflicts, it is recommended to review and ensure that Section 3.17 complies with relevant state labor laws such as California Labor Code § 2800 et seq., New York Labor Law § 200 et seq., and Texas Labor Code § 21.001 et seq."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.18. Taxes.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) Except as set forth in Section 3.18(a) of the Disclosure Schedules:(i) The Company has filed (taking into account any valid extensions)
all material returns, declarations, reports, information returns and statements and
other documents required to be filed by the Company with respect to Taxes
(including amended returns and claims for refund) (collectively, \"Tax Returns\").
Such Tax Returns are true, complete and correct in all material respects. The
Company is not currently the beneficiary of any extension of time within which to
file any material Tax Return other than extensions of time to file Tax Returns
obtained in the ordinary course of business. All material Taxes due and owing by
the Company have been paid or accrued. For purposes of this Agreement, \"Taxes\"
means all federal, state, local, foreign and other income, gross receipts, sales, use,
production, ad valorem, transfer, franchise, registration, profits, license, lease,
service, service use, withholding, payroll, employment, unemployment, estimated,
excise, severance, environmental, stamp, occupation, premium, property (real or
personal), real property gains, windfall profits, customs, duties or other taxes,
fees, assessments or charges of any kind whatsoever, together with any interest,
additions or penalties with respect thereto and any interest in respect of such
additions or penalties.
(ii) No extensions or waivers of statutes of limitations have been given
or requested with respect to any material Taxes of the Company.
(iii) There are no ongoing Actions by any taxing authority against the
Company.
(iv) The Company is not a party to any Tax-sharing agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 6011",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 6011 outlines the general requirement for filing tax returns, statements, and other documents, which aligns with the clause's requirement for the Company to file all material tax returns and related documents.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section6011&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 18621",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=18621&lawCode=RTC",
"relevance": "This state law requires the filing of tax returns and other documents, similar to the federal requirement, ensuring compliance at the state level."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Tax Law § 651",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/TAX/651",
"relevance": "This state law mandates the filing of tax returns and related documents, aligning with the clause's requirements for state-level tax compliance."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with both federal and state tax laws.",
"explanation": "While the clause broadly covers the filing and payment of taxes, it would be beneficial to explicitly state that the Company must comply with both federal and state tax laws. This ensures clarity and reinforces the requirement to adhere to relevant state laws such as Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 18621 and N.Y. Tax Law § 651."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for ongoing compliance monitoring.",
"explanation": "To ensure continuous compliance with tax laws, it would be prudent to include a clause that mandates regular reviews or audits of the Company's tax filings and payments. This can help identify and rectify any discrepancies promptly, ensuring adherence to 26 U.S.C. § 6011 and relevant state laws."
},
{
"change": "Specify the handling of potential conflicts with state laws.",
"explanation": "Given the potential for conflicts between federal and state tax laws, the clause should include a provision that addresses how such conflicts will be managed. This can help prevent legal complications and ensure that the Company remains compliant with all applicable laws."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(v) All material Taxes which the Company is obligated to withhold
from amounts owing to any employee, creditor or third party have been paid or
accrued.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 3402",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Internal Revenue Code mandates that employers must withhold federal income taxes from employees' wages, which aligns with the clause's requirement for the Company to withhold and pay or accrue material taxes.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section3402&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 13020",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=RTC&sectionNum=13020",
"relevance": "This section of the California Revenue and Taxation Code requires employers to withhold state income taxes from employees' wages, which is relevant to the clause's requirement for the Company to withhold and pay or accrue material taxes."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Tax Law § 671",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/TAX/671",
"relevance": "This section of the New York Tax Law mandates that employers must withhold state income taxes from employees' wages, aligning with the clause's requirement for the Company to withhold and pay or accrue material taxes."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Specify the jurisdictions",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, the clause should explicitly mention that the Company is obligated to withhold and pay or accrue material taxes in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws. This will cover the requirements under 26 U.S.C. § 3402 for federal taxes, as well as state-specific laws such as Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 13020 and N.Y. Tax Law § 671."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'material Taxes'",
"explanation": "The term 'material Taxes' should be clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. This will ensure that the Company understands its obligations regarding which taxes need to be withheld and paid or accrued, thereby reducing the risk of non-compliance."
},
{
"change": "Include a compliance clause",
"explanation": "Add a clause that explicitly states the Company's commitment to comply with all applicable tax withholding and payment laws. This will reinforce the Company's obligation to adhere to both federal and state tax laws, thereby minimizing legal risks."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) Except for certain representations related to Taxes in Section 3.16, the
representations and warranties set forth in this Section 3.18 are the Seller's sole and
exclusive representations and warranties regarding Tax matters.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 7422",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 7422 pertains to the procedure for tax refunds and is relevant to the clause as it outlines the legal framework for tax-related representations and warranties, which are the subject of Section 3.18.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section7422&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 19382",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=RTC&sectionNum=19382",
"relevance": "This state law pertains to the procedure for tax refunds in California, aligning with the federal law and the clause's focus on tax-related representations and warranties."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Tax Law § 687",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/TAX/687",
"relevance": "This state law outlines the process for tax refunds in New York, which is relevant to the clause's emphasis on tax matters and representations."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of representations and warranties",
"explanation": "The clause should explicitly state that the representations and warranties regarding tax matters are in compliance with both federal and state laws. This ensures that the Seller's representations are not only limited to federal tax laws but also consider state-specific tax regulations, such as those in California (Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 19382) and New York (N.Y. Tax Law § 687)."
},
{
"change": "Include a disclaimer for state-specific tax obligations",
"explanation": "Given the potential conflict with state laws, the clause should include a disclaimer that the Seller's representations and warranties are subject to state-specific tax obligations. This would help mitigate any legal risks arising from discrepancies between federal and state tax laws."
},
{
"change": "Reference to 26 U.S.C. § 7422",
"explanation": "The clause should explicitly reference 26 U.S.C. § 7422 to align with the federal procedure for tax refunds. This ensures that the clause is legally robust and provides a clear framework for addressing tax-related representations and warranties."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section V.01. Employee Benefit Plans.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) During the period commencing at the Closing and ending on the date
which is 12/NUMBER months from the Closing (or if earlier, the date of the
employee's termination of employment with the Company), Buyer shall and shall cause
the Company to provide each Employee who remains employed immediately after the
Closing (\"Company Continuing Employee\") with: (i) base salary or hourly wages
which are no less than the base salary or hourly wages provided by the Company
immediately prior to the Closing; (ii) target bonus opportunities (excluding equity-based
compensation), if any, which are no less than the target bonus opportunities (excluding
equity-based compensation) provided by the Company immediately prior to the Closing;(iii) retirement and welfare benefits that are no less favorable in the aggregate than those
provided by the Company immediately prior to the Closing; and (iv) severance benefits
that are no less favorable than the practice, plan or policy in effect for such Company
Continuing Employee immediately prior to the Closing.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans. The clause's provisions regarding retirement and welfare benefits align with ERISA's requirements to ensure that employees receive benefits that are no less favorable than those provided prior to the Closing.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter18&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "California Labor Code § 2800-2810.5",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&division=3.&title=&part=1.&chapter=2.&article=2.",
"relevance": "California's labor laws provide additional protections for employees, including requirements for the payment of wages and benefits. These laws ensure that employees in California receive benefits that are consistent with the protections outlined in the clause."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "New York Labor Law § 190-199-A",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/A6",
"relevance": "New York labor laws include provisions for the payment of wages and benefits, which align with the clause's requirements to provide no less favorable benefits to employees post-closing."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'retirement and welfare benefits' to ensure compliance with ERISA standards.",
"explanation": "While the clause states that retirement and welfare benefits should be 'no less favorable in the aggregate' than those provided prior to the Closing, it is important to explicitly reference compliance with ERISA standards to avoid any ambiguity and ensure that the benefits meet the minimum requirements set forth by federal law."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision for compliance with state-specific labor laws, particularly for employees in California and New York.",
"explanation": "Given the additional protections provided by California Labor Code §§ 2800-2810.5 and New York Labor Law §§ 190-199-A, it is advisable to include a clause that explicitly states the Company's obligation to comply with relevant state labor laws. This will help prevent potential conflicts and ensure that employees in these states receive the benefits and protections mandated by local jurisdictions."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) With respect to any employee benefit plan maintained by Buyer
(collectively, \"Buyer Benefit Plans\") in which any Company Continuing Employees will
participate effective as of the Closing, Buyer shall, or shall cause the Company to,
recognize all service of the Company Continuing Employees with the Company, as if
such service were with Buyer, for vesting and eligibility purposes in any Buyer Benefit
Plan in which such Company Continuing Employees may be eligible to participate after
the Closing Date; provided, however, such service shall not be recognized to the extent
that (x) such recognition would result in a duplication of benefits or (y) such service was
not recognized under the corresponding Benefit Plan.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "29 U.S.C. § 1054",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) addresses minimum vesting standards, which are relevant to the clause's requirement for recognizing service for vesting and eligibility purposes.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title29-section1054&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Lab. Code § 227.3",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&sectionNum=227.3",
"relevance": "This California law requires that employees be paid for vested vacation time upon termination, which aligns with the clause's focus on recognizing service for vesting purposes."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Lab. Law § 195",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/195",
"relevance": "This New York law mandates that employers provide written notice of benefit plans, which is relevant to the clause's requirement for recognizing service for eligibility purposes."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of service recognition to ensure compliance with ERISA's minimum vesting standards.",
"explanation": "The clause should explicitly state that service recognition for vesting and eligibility purposes will comply with the minimum standards set forth in 29 U.S.C. § 1054. This will ensure that the clause aligns with federal law and avoids any ambiguity regarding the recognition of service for vesting purposes."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision to address state-specific requirements for vested benefits.",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws such as Cal. Lab. Code § 227.3 and N.Y. Lab. Law § 195, the clause should include a provision that acknowledges and complies with state-specific requirements for vested benefits and written notice of benefit plans. This will help avoid potential conflicts with state laws and ensure comprehensive compliance."
},
{
"change": "Add a disclaimer to prevent duplication of benefits in accordance with ERISA and state laws.",
"explanation": "While the clause already mentions avoiding duplication of benefits, it should explicitly state that this is in accordance with both ERISA and applicable state laws. This will provide clarity and ensure that the clause is fully compliant with all relevant legal standards."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) This Section 5.01 shall be binding upon and inure solely to the benefit of
each of the parties to this Agreement, and nothing in this Section 5.01, express or
implied, shall confer upon any other Person any rights or remedies of any nature
whatsoever under or by reason of this Section 5.01. Nothing contained herein, express or
implied, shall be construed to establish, amend or modify any benefit plan, program,
agreement or arrangement. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the terms set
forth in this Section 5.01 shall not create any right in any employee of the Company or
any other Person to any continued employment with the Company, Buyer or any of their
respective Affiliates or compensation or benefits of any nature or kind whatsoever.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) is relevant as it governs employee benefit plans, which are explicitly excluded from being established or modified by this clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter18&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to ERISA (29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.) within the clause to explicitly state that the clause is compliant with federal law governing employee benefit plans.",
"explanation": "This will ensure that the clause is clearly aligned with federal regulations and leaves no ambiguity regarding the exclusion of benefit plans from being established or modified by this agreement."
},
{
"change": "Add a disclaimer that the clause does not override any state laws that may provide additional protections or requirements related to employee rights, benefit plans, or employment terms.",
"explanation": "This will help prevent potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions that may have stricter regulations or additional requirements beyond federal law."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section II.03. Buyer's Deliveries",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "At the Closing, Buyer shall deliver the following toSeller:(a) The Purchase Price pursuant to Section 1.02.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78n (Securities Exchange Act of 1934)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is relevant as it governs the transfer of securities, which may be part of the Purchase Price in certain transactions. It ensures that the delivery of the Purchase Price is conducted in a fair and regulated manner.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25000 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&division=1.&title=4.&part=&chapter=1.&article=1.",
"relevance": "The California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 regulates the offer and sale of securities in California, ensuring that transactions involving the Purchase Price, if it includes securities, comply with state regulations."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/A23-A",
"relevance": "The New York Martin Act governs securities transactions in New York, providing a framework for the regulation of securities to protect investors and ensure fair practices in the delivery of the Purchase Price."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a clause specifying compliance with federal and state securities laws.",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and state laws such as the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 and the New York Martin Act, it is crucial to explicitly state that the transaction will comply with all applicable federal and state securities regulations. This ensures that the delivery of the Purchase Price, especially if it includes securities, adheres to legal requirements and protects both parties from potential legal issues."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for regulatory approval if required.",
"explanation": "To avoid conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions, it is advisable to include a provision that mandates obtaining any necessary regulatory approvals before the transaction is completed. This is particularly important in states like California and New York, where securities transactions are heavily regulated."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) A certificate of the Secretary (or other officer) of Buyer certifying: (i) that
attached thereto are true and complete copies of all resolutions of the board of directors
of Buyer authorizing the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, and that such resolutions are in
full force and effect; and (ii) the names, titles and signatures of the officers of Buyer
authorized to sign this Agreement.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for periodic and other reports by companies, which includes the necessity for accurate and complete documentation and certifications by officers, aligning with the clause's requirements for certification of resolutions and officer details.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the relevant U.S. federal law (15 U.S.C. § 78m) within the clause.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with federal requirements for accurate and complete documentation and certifications by officers, it is advisable to explicitly reference 15 U.S.C. § 78m in the clause. This will provide clear legal grounding and align the clause with federal reporting standards."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for periodic updates or reviews of the certifications.",
"explanation": "Given the federal law's emphasis on periodic and accurate reporting, it would be prudent to include a requirement for periodic updates or reviews of the certifications to ensure they remain current and accurate. This aligns with the ongoing compliance obligations under 15 U.S.C. § 78m."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the jurisdictional scope of the clause to address potential conflicts with state laws.",
"explanation": "To preempt any conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions, the clause should specify the jurisdictional scope and indicate that it is subject to compliance with both federal and applicable state laws. This will help avoid legal ambiguities and ensure comprehensive compliance."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) OTHER BUYER DELIVERABLES
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER
Seller represents and warrants to Buyer that the statements contained in this ARTICLE III
are true and correct as of the date hereof. For purposes of this Article III, \"Seller's knowledge,\"
\"knowledge of Seller,\" and any similar phrases shall mean the actual knowledge of NAMES
OR TITLES OF KNOWLEDGE PERSONS.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78u-4",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 is relevant as it sets forth requirements for representations and warranties in securities transactions, including the necessity for accurate and truthful disclosures, which aligns with the Seller's representations and warranties in the clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78u-4&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25401",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25401",
"relevance": "California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 under Cal. Corp. Code § 25401 requires that all representations and warranties in securities transactions be truthful and not misleading, which is directly relevant to the Seller's representations and warranties in the clause."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/352-C",
"relevance": "New York's Martin Act under N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c mandates full and truthful disclosure in securities transactions, aligning with the requirements for Seller's representations and warranties in the clause."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Specify the 'NAMES OR TITLES OF KNOWLEDGE PERSONS' explicitly within the clause.",
"explanation": "To comply with the requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4, it is essential to clearly identify the individuals whose knowledge is being referenced. This ensures that the representations and warranties are based on identifiable and accountable sources, thereby enhancing the accuracy and truthfulness of the disclosures."
},
{
"change": "Include a statement that the representations and warranties are made to the best of Seller's knowledge and belief, after due inquiry.",
"explanation": "Both California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 (Cal. Corp. Code § 25401) and New York's Martin Act (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c) require that representations and warranties in securities transactions be truthful and not misleading. Adding a clause that the representations and warranties are made to the best of Seller's knowledge and belief, after due inquiry, ensures compliance with these state laws by emphasizing the Seller's obligation to conduct a reasonable investigation before making such statements."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.17. Employment Matters.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) Except as set forth in Section 3.17(a) of the Disclosure Schedules, the
Company is not a party to, or bound by, any collective bargaining or other agreement
with a labor organization representing any of its employees. Except as set forth in
Section 3.17(a) of the Disclosure Schedules, since DATE, there has not been, nor, to
Seller's knowledge, has there been any threat of, any strike, slowdown, work stoppage,
picketing or other similar labor disruption or dispute affecting the Company.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151-169",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) governs the rights of employees to engage in collective bargaining and to take collective action such as strikes and picketing. The clause in question addresses the company's status regarding collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes, which are directly regulated by the NLRA.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter7&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "California Labor Code § 923",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&sectionNum=923",
"relevance": "California Labor Code § 923 supports the rights of employees to engage in collective bargaining and protects their freedom to associate, which aligns with the NLRA and the clause's focus on collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "New York Labor Law § 700",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/700",
"relevance": "New York Labor Law § 700 outlines the state's policy to encourage collective bargaining and protect employees' rights to organize, which is relevant to the clause's emphasis on the company's status regarding collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) within the clause.",
"explanation": "To ensure that the clause explicitly acknowledges and adheres to federal law, it is recommended to include a statement that the company's practices are in compliance with the NLRA. This will provide clarity and legal alignment with the federal regulations governing collective bargaining and labor disputes."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision addressing compliance with relevant state laws, such as California Labor Code § 923 and New York Labor Law § 700.",
"explanation": "Given the potential for conflict with state laws that support collective bargaining and protect employees' rights to organize, it is advisable to include a clause that ensures the company's practices are also in compliance with applicable state laws. This will help mitigate any legal risks associated with state-specific labor regulations."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) The Company is in compliance with all applicable Laws pertaining to
employment and employment practices to the extent they relate to employees of the
Company, except to the extent non-compliance would not result in a Material Adverse
Effect. Except as set forth in Section 3.17(b) of the Disclosure Schedules, or as would
not have a Material Adverse Effect, there are no Actions against the Company pending,
or to the Seller's knowledge, threatened to be brought or filed, by or with any
Governmental Authority or arbitral tribunal in connection with the employment or
termination of employment of any current or former employee of the Company,
including, without limitation, any Action relating to unfair labor practices, employment
discrimination, harassment, retaliation, leave, accommodation, minimum wages,
overtime compensation, equal pay or any other hiring, employment or employment
termination related matter arising under applicable Laws.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "29 U.S.C. § 206",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which governs minimum wage, overtime pay, and other employment standards. It is highly relevant to the clause as it ensures compliance with employment laws related to wages and hours.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter8&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Lab. Code § 1197",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&sectionNum=1197",
"relevance": "This section of the California Labor Code sets the minimum wage for employees in California, aligning with the federal FLSA requirements for minimum wage compliance."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Lab. Law § 652",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/652",
"relevance": "This section of the New York Labor Law establishes the minimum wage requirements for employees in New York, which is relevant to the clause's focus on compliance with employment laws."
},
{
"state": "Texas",
"citation": "Tex. Lab. Code § 62.051",
"url": "https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LA/htm/LA.62.htm",
"relevance": "This section of the Texas Labor Code outlines the state's minimum wage requirements, ensuring alignment with federal standards under the FLSA."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and relevant state laws.",
"explanation": "While the clause broadly states compliance with 'all applicable Laws,' explicitly mentioning the FLSA and relevant state laws (such as California Labor Code § 1197, New York Labor Law § 652, and Texas Labor Code § 62.051) would provide clarity and ensure that the clause is aligned with both federal and state requirements. This is particularly important given the specific focus on minimum wage and overtime compensation in the clause."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for periodic review and update of compliance practices.",
"explanation": "Employment laws, including those related to minimum wage and overtime, are subject to change. Including a provision that mandates periodic review and update of the Company's compliance practices would help ensure ongoing adherence to both federal and state laws, thereby mitigating the risk of non-compliance."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Material Adverse Effect' in relation to state-specific laws.",
"explanation": "The term 'Material Adverse Effect' is used to qualify the extent of non-compliance. However, what constitutes a 'Material Adverse Effect' may vary by jurisdiction. Clarifying this term in the context of state-specific laws (e.g., California, New York, Texas) would provide better guidance on compliance expectations and reduce ambiguity."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) The representations and warranties set forth in this Section 3.17 are the
Seller's sole and exclusive representations and warranties regarding employment matters.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) is relevant as it governs employment matters, particularly those related to age discrimination, which could be a subject of the Seller's representations and warranties.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter14&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Gov't Code § 12940",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=12940&lawCode=GOV",
"relevance": "California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) addresses employment discrimination, including age discrimination, which is relevant to the Seller's representations and warranties regarding employment matters."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Exec. Law § 296",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/EXC/296",
"relevance": "New York's Human Rights Law prohibits employment discrimination, including age discrimination, which is pertinent to the Seller's representations and warranties regarding employment matters."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with relevant federal and state employment laws.",
"explanation": "To ensure the clause complies with the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and state laws such as California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and New York's Human Rights Law, it is advisable to explicitly state that the Seller's representations and warranties are made in compliance with these laws. This can help mitigate potential legal conflicts and ensure clarity regarding the Seller's obligations."
},
{
"change": "Add a disclaimer for compliance with local jurisdiction laws.",
"explanation": "Given the potential for conflict with state laws or local jurisdictions, it is prudent to include a disclaimer that the Seller's representations and warranties are subject to compliance with applicable local, state, and federal employment laws. This can help address any discrepancies between the clause and specific state or local regulations."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.10. Real Property; Title to Assets.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) Section 3.10(a) of the Disclosure Schedules lists all real property in which
the Company has an ownership or leasehold (subleasehold) interest (together with all
buildings, structures and improvements located thereon, the \"Real Property\"), including:(i) the street address of each parcel of Real Property, and (ii) a list, as of the date of this
Agreement, of all leases for each parcel of leased Real Property involving total annual
payments of at least $NUMBER (collectively, \"Leases\"), including the identification of
the lessee and lessor thereunder.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.) is relevant as it governs the leasing and sale of real property, ensuring non-discriminatory practices which align with the disclosure requirements of real property interests.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title42/chapter45&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1940 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&division=3.&title=5.&part=4.&chapter=2.&article=1.",
"relevance": "California's landlord-tenant laws, codified in Cal. Civ. Code § 1940 et seq., are relevant as they provide specific regulations regarding the leasing of real property, including disclosure requirements and tenant rights, which align with the clause's focus on lease details."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Real Prop. Law § 220 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/RPP",
"relevance": "New York's Real Property Law, particularly N.Y. Real Prop. Law § 220 et seq., is relevant as it governs the leasing and management of real property, including disclosure obligations and tenant protections, which are pertinent to the clause's requirements."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a non-discrimination clause",
"explanation": "To comply with the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), it is essential to include a clause that explicitly states that the leasing and sale of real property will be conducted in a non-discriminatory manner. This ensures alignment with federal law, which mandates non-discriminatory practices in housing."
},
{
"change": "Specify tenant rights and disclosure requirements",
"explanation": "To align with California's landlord-tenant laws (Cal. Civ. Code § 1940 et seq.) and New York's Real Property Law (N.Y. Real Prop. Law § 220 et seq.), the clause should specify tenant rights and the disclosure requirements for leases. This includes providing detailed information about the lease terms, tenant protections, and any obligations of the lessor and lessee. This ensures compliance with state-specific regulations that govern the leasing of real property."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'total annual payments'",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws and ensure clarity, the clause should define what constitutes 'total annual payments' for leases. This will help in determining which leases need to be listed based on the specified threshold ($NUMBER) and ensure that all relevant leases are disclosed in accordance with the clause's requirements."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) The Company has good and valid (and, in the case of owned Real
Property, good and marketable fee simple) title to, or a valid leasehold interest in, all Real
Property and tangible personal property and other assets reflected in the Financial
Statements or acquired after the Balance Sheet Date (other than properties and assets sold
or otherwise disposed of in the ordinary course of business since the Balance Sheet Date).
All such properties and assets (including leasehold interests) are free and clear of
Encumbrances, except for the following (collectively, the \"Permitted Encumbrances\"):(i) those items set forth in Section 3.10(b) of the Disclosure
Schedules;(ii) liens for Taxes not yet due and payable or being contested in good
faith by appropriate procedures;(iii) mechanics', carriers', workmen's, repairmen's or other like liens
arising or incurred in the ordinary course of business;(iv) liens arising under original purchase price conditional sales
contracts and equipment leases with third parties entered into in the ordinary
course of business; and",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for companies to maintain accurate financial records and disclosures, which aligns with the clause's emphasis on the company's title to assets as reflected in the Financial Statements.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 2924",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=2924.&lawCode=CIV",
"relevance": "This section of the California Civil Code pertains to the procedures for the sale of real property under a power of sale contained in a deed of trust or mortgage, which is relevant to the clause's discussion of the company's title to real property and encumbrances."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Real Prop. Law § 291",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/RPP/291",
"relevance": "This section of the New York Real Property Law deals with the recording of conveyances of real property, which is relevant to the clause's emphasis on the company's title to real property and the need for clear records."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m.",
"explanation": "To ensure alignment with federal law, the clause should explicitly state that the company maintains accurate financial records and disclosures in accordance with 15 U.S.C. § 78m. This will reinforce the clause's emphasis on the company's title to assets as reflected in the Financial Statements."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the handling of encumbrances in accordance with state laws.",
"explanation": "Given the potential conflict with state laws such as Cal. Civ. Code § 2924 and N.Y. Real Prop. Law § 291, the clause should specify that any encumbrances or liens on real property will be handled in compliance with relevant state laws. This will ensure that the procedures for the sale of real property and the recording of conveyances are properly addressed."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for updating the Disclosure Schedules.",
"explanation": "To maintain accuracy and compliance, the clause should include a requirement for regularly updating the Disclosure Schedules to reflect any new encumbrances or changes in the status of existing ones. This will help ensure that all encumbrances are accurately documented and disclosed."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(v) other imperfections of title or Encumbrances, if any, that would not
have a Material Adverse Effect.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m (Securities Exchange Act of 1934)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires public companies to disclose material information that may affect investors' decisions. Imperfections of title or encumbrances that do not have a Material Adverse Effect may not need to be disclosed under this law.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "11 U.S.C. § 544 (Bankruptcy Code)",
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "The Bankruptcy Code allows a trustee to avoid certain transfers and encumbrances that could be considered imperfections of title, regardless of whether they have a Material Adverse Effect. This could negatively align with the clause as it does not consider the materiality of the effect.",
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title11/chapter5&edition=prelim",
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1214",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1214.&lawCode=CIV",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 1214 addresses the recording of conveyances and encumbrances, which could impact the recognition of imperfections of title. This law is relevant as it determines the priority of recorded interests, potentially affecting the materiality of such imperfections."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Real Prop. Law § 291",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/RPP/291",
"relevance": "New York Real Property Law § 291 pertains to the recording of conveyances and encumbrances. It is relevant because it establishes the priority of recorded interests, which could influence whether an imperfection of title is considered to have a Material Adverse Effect."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'Material Adverse Effect' within the clause.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m), it is crucial to clearly define what constitutes a 'Material Adverse Effect.' This will help determine whether imperfections of title or encumbrances need to be disclosed to investors. A clear definition will also help align the clause with the requirement to disclose material information that may affect investors' decisions."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision addressing the potential avoidance of transfers and encumbrances under the Bankruptcy Code.",
"explanation": "To address the negative alignment with the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 544), the clause should include a provision that acknowledges the trustee's power to avoid certain transfers and encumbrances, regardless of their materiality. This will ensure that the clause does not conflict with the trustee's authority under bankruptcy law."
},
{
"change": "Incorporate references to state recording statutes.",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws such as California Civil Code § 1214 and New York Real Property Law § 291, the clause should reference the importance of complying with state recording statutes. This will help ensure that imperfections of title and encumbrances are properly recorded and prioritized, potentially affecting their materiality and the overall impact on the agreement."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section II.02. Seller Closing Deliverables",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "At the Closing, Seller shall deliver to Buyerthe following:(a) Share certificates evidencing the Shares, free and clear of all
Encumbrances, duly endorsed in blank or accompanied by stock powers or other
instruments of transfer duly executed in blank.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78q-1",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 pertains to the transfer and registration of securities, which is directly relevant to the delivery of share certificates free of encumbrances.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78q-1&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "8 Del. C. § 201",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc07/index.html",
"relevance": "This section of the Delaware General Corporation Law pertains to the issuance and transfer of stock certificates, which is relevant to the delivery of share certificates in a corporate transaction."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 416",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=416.",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code addresses the issuance and transfer of share certificates, which is pertinent to the delivery of share certificates in a corporate transaction."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a provision for compliance with federal securities laws.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78q-1, the clause should explicitly state that the delivery of share certificates will be conducted in accordance with all applicable federal securities laws. This will help avoid any potential legal issues related to the transfer and registration of securities."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the handling of encumbrances.",
"explanation": "The clause should specify the process for verifying that the share certificates are free and clear of all encumbrances. This is important to ensure that the Buyer receives the shares without any legal or financial liabilities attached."
},
{
"change": "Address state-specific requirements.",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws such as 8 Del. C. § 201 and Cal. Corp. Code § 416, the clause should include a statement that the delivery of share certificates will also comply with applicable state laws. This will help ensure that the transaction is legally sound in the relevant jurisdictions."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) A certificate of the Secretary (or other officer) of Seller certifying: (i) that
attached thereto are true and complete copies of all resolutions of the board of directors
and the stockholders of Seller authorizing the execution, delivery and performance of
this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, and that
such resolutions are in full force and effect; (ii) the names, titles and signatures of the
officers of Seller authorized to sign this Agreement; and (iii) that attached thereto are true
and complete copies of the governing documents of the Company, including any
amendments or restatements thereof, and that such governing documents are in full force
and effect.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the requirements for periodic and other reports by companies, which includes the necessity for accurate and complete documentation and certifications by officers, aligning with the need for a certificate of the Secretary to confirm the validity and authorization of corporate actions.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "8 Del. C. § 141(f)",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc04/index.html",
"relevance": "This section of the Delaware General Corporation Law allows for board actions to be taken without a meeting if all members of the board consent in writing, which is relevant to the certification of board resolutions in the Certificate of the Secretary."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 313",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=313.",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code specifies the authority of certain officers to sign documents on behalf of the corporation, which is pertinent to the certification of officers' authorization in the Certificate of the Secretary."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a provision for written consent by the board of directors.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with Delaware General Corporation Law (8 Del. C. § 141(f)), which allows for board actions to be taken without a meeting if all members of the board consent in writing, the clause should explicitly state that board resolutions can be certified based on written consent."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the authority of officers to sign documents.",
"explanation": "To align with California Corporations Code § 313, which specifies the authority of certain officers to sign documents on behalf of the corporation, the clause should clearly identify the officers who are authorized to sign the Agreement and ensure their titles and signatures are accurately documented."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) A certificate pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.1445-2(b) that
Seller is not a foreign person within the meaning of Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 (as amended, the \"Code\").",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 1445",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code outlines the requirements for withholding tax on dispositions of U.S. real property interests by foreign persons, which directly relates to the need for a certificate confirming that the seller is not a foreign person.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section1445&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Rev. & Tax Code § 18662",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=RTC&sectionNum=18662",
"relevance": "California requires withholding on the sale of California real property by non-residents, similar to the federal requirement under 26 U.S.C. § 1445."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Tax Law § 663",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/TAX/663",
"relevance": "New York imposes withholding requirements on the sale of real property by non-residents, aligning with the federal requirements under 26 U.S.C. § 1445."
},
{
"state": "Florida",
"citation": "Fla. Stat. § 213.758",
"url": "http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0200-0299/0213/Sections/0213.758.html",
"relevance": "Florida has specific provisions for withholding on the sale of real property by non-residents, which is relevant to the federal requirements under 26 U.S.C. § 1445."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a reference to state-specific withholding requirements.",
"explanation": "While the clause complies with federal law under 26 U.S.C. § 1445, it does not address state-specific withholding requirements that may also apply. For instance, California, New York, and Florida have their own withholding requirements for the sale of real property by non-residents. Including a reference to these state laws can ensure comprehensive compliance and avoid potential legal conflicts."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'foreign person' as per state laws.",
"explanation": "The definition of 'foreign person' under federal law may differ from state definitions. To avoid ambiguity and ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, it is advisable to clarify that the term 'foreign person' should be interpreted in accordance with both federal and applicable state laws."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(d) OTHER SELLER DELIVERABLES",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m (2021)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the U.S. Code pertains to the reporting requirements for securities transactions, which may include deliverables that a seller must provide at closing in a transaction involving securities.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78m&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the reporting requirements under 15 U.S.C. § 78m (2021) within the 'OTHER SELLER DELIVERABLES' subsection.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with federal securities laws, it is crucial to explicitly state that the seller must provide all necessary documentation and disclosures required under 15 U.S.C. § 78m. This will help avoid any ambiguity and ensure that the seller is aware of their obligations under federal law."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause addressing potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions.",
"explanation": "While the federal law is highly relevant, there may be state-specific regulations or local jurisdiction requirements that could impact the seller's deliverables. Including a clause that acknowledges and addresses these potential conflicts will help ensure comprehensive compliance and mitigate legal risks."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.11. Intellectual Property.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) The term \"Intellectual Property\" means any and all of the following
arising pursuant to the Laws of any jurisdiction throughout the world: (i) trademarks,
service marks, trade names and similar indicia of source or origin, all registrations and
applications for registration thereof, and the goodwill connected with the use of and
symbolized by the foregoing; (ii) copyrights and all registrations and applications for
registration thereof; (iii) trade secrets and know-how; (iv) patents and patent applications;(v) internet domain name registrations; and (vi) other intellectual property and related
proprietary rights.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "17 U.S.C. § 101",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "17 U.S.C. § 101 provides definitions and scope for copyrights, which are a key component of the Intellectual Property clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title17/chapter1&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 3426.1",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=3426.1",
"relevance": "Defines trade secrets and provides legal framework for their protection, aligning with the trade secrets and know-how component of the Intellectual Property clause."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 360",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/360",
"relevance": "Addresses trademarks and service marks, aligning with the trademarks, service marks, and trade names component of the Intellectual Property clause."
},
{
"state": "Texas",
"citation": "Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 16.01",
"url": "https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/BC/htm/BC.16.htm",
"relevance": "Covers trademark registration and protection, aligning with the trademarks and registrations component of the Intellectual Property clause."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to 17 U.S.C. § 101 within the clause to ensure clarity and compliance with U.S. federal copyright law.",
"explanation": "17 U.S.C. § 101 provides definitions and scope for copyrights, which are a key component of the Intellectual Property clause. Explicitly referencing this statute can help avoid ambiguity and ensure that the clause is aligned with federal law."
},
{
"change": "Add a disclaimer or clarification regarding the applicability of state laws, particularly those from California, New York, and Texas.",
"explanation": "State laws such as Cal. Civ. Code § 3426.1, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 360, and Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 16.01 provide specific definitions and protections for trade secrets, trademarks, and service marks. Including a disclaimer or clarification can help prevent potential conflicts and ensure that the clause is interpreted consistently with relevant state laws."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) Section 3.11(b) of the Disclosure Schedules lists all issued patents, patent
applications, trademark registrations and pending applications for registration, copyright
registrations and pending applications for registration and internet domain name
registrations owned by the Company. Except as set forth in Section 3.11(b) of the
Disclosure Schedules, or as would not have a Material Adverse Effect, the Company
owns or has the right to use all Intellectual Property necessary for the conduct of the
Company's business as currently conducted (the \"Company Intellectual Property\").",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "35 U.S.C. § 101",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "35 U.S.C. § 101 pertains to the patentability of inventions, which is directly relevant to the clause as it lists issued patents and patent applications as part of the Company Intellectual Property.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title35/part2/chapter10&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 980",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=980.&lawCode=CIV",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 980 pertains to the ownership of intellectual property, which is relevant to the clause as it discusses the ownership and rights to use various forms of intellectual property by the Company."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 360",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/360",
"relevance": "New York General Business Law § 360 deals with trademark registration and protection, which is relevant to the clause as it includes trademark registrations and pending applications for registration."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify Ownership and Rights",
"explanation": "The clause should explicitly state that the Company owns or has the right to use the listed intellectual property in compliance with both federal and state laws. This ensures alignment with 35 U.S.C. § 101 regarding patentability and state laws like Cal. Civ. Code § 980 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 360, which govern intellectual property ownership and trademark registration."
},
{
"change": "Include State Law Compliance",
"explanation": "Add a provision that the Company’s ownership and rights to use the intellectual property comply with relevant state laws, such as California Civil Code § 980 and New York General Business Law § 360. This will help mitigate potential conflicts with state-specific intellectual property regulations."
},
{
"change": "Material Adverse Effect Definition",
"explanation": "Define 'Material Adverse Effect' within the clause or ensure it is defined elsewhere in the agreement. This will provide clarity on what constitutes a material adverse effect, which is crucial for understanding the exceptions listed in the clause."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) Except as would not have a Material Adverse Effect, to Seller's
knowledge: (i) the conduct of the Company's business as currently conducted does not
infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the Intellectual Property of any Person; and
(ii) no Person is infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating any Company
Intellectual Property. This Section 3.11(c) constitutes the sole representation and warranty
of Seller under this Agreement with respect to any actual or alleged infringement,
misappropriation or other violation of Intellectual Property.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The U.S. Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.) is highly relevant to the clause as it governs the protection of intellectual property, including the rights to prevent infringement, misappropriation, or other violations of copyrighted works.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title17&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 980 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&division=3.&title=1.&part=4.&chapter=2.&article=1.",
"relevance": "California's Civil Code § 980 et seq. provides state-level protection for intellectual property, including rights against infringement and misappropriation, which aligns with the representations and warranties in Section 3.11(c)."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 360 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/360",
"relevance": "New York's General Business Law § 360 et seq. addresses the protection of trademarks and service marks, which is relevant to the clause's focus on intellectual property rights and potential infringements."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the Scope of 'Material Adverse Effect'",
"explanation": "The clause currently includes an exception for situations that would not have a 'Material Adverse Effect.' To ensure compliance with both federal and state laws, it is recommended to define 'Material Adverse Effect' more precisely within the agreement. This will help avoid ambiguity and potential legal disputes regarding what constitutes a material adverse effect in the context of intellectual property violations."
},
{
"change": "Include Explicit Reference to State Laws",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws such as California's Civil Code § 980 et seq. and New York's General Business Law § 360 et seq., it is advisable to explicitly reference these state laws within the clause. This will ensure that the representations and warranties are aligned with both federal and state-level protections for intellectual property, thereby reducing the risk of non-compliance."
},
{
"change": "Add a Disclaimer for State-Specific IP Laws",
"explanation": "To address potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions, it is recommended to add a disclaimer stating that the representations and warranties are subject to compliance with applicable state-specific intellectual property laws. This will help mitigate the risk of legal challenges based on state-level IP protections that may differ from federal law."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.20. No Other Representations and Warranties",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Except for therepresentations and warranties contained in this ARTICLE III (including the related portions of
the Disclosure Schedules), none of Seller, the Company or any other Person has made or makes
any other express or implied representation or warranty, either written or oral, on behalf of Seller
or the Company, including any representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of
any information regarding the Company furnished or made available to Buyer (including the
confidential information memorandum prepared by FINANCIAL ADVISOR NAME dated",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 77k",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This law pertains to the liability for false or misleading statements in registration statements, which is relevant to the representations and warranties clause as it deals with the accuracy and completeness of information provided.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section77k&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)",
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "This law addresses fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, which could be negatively aligned with the disclaimer of any express or implied representations or warranties.",
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78j&num=0&edition=prelim",
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25401",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=25401&lawCode=CORP",
"relevance": "This law prohibits the offer or sale of securities by means of any written or oral communication that includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made not misleading, which is relevant to the representations and warranties clause."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/352-C",
"relevance": "This law addresses fraud, deception, concealment, suppression, false pretense, or fictitious or pretended purchase or sale in connection with the issuance, distribution, exchange, sale, negotiation, or purchase within or from the state of any securities or commodities, which is relevant to the disclaimer of any express or implied representations or warranties."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of the disclaimer to ensure compliance with federal and state laws.",
"explanation": "The clause currently disclaims any express or implied representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided. However, under 15 U.S.C. § 77k and 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), as well as state laws such as Cal. Corp. Code § 25401 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c, there are legal obligations to avoid false or misleading statements in securities transactions. To comply with these laws, the disclaimer should explicitly state that it does not waive any legal obligations or liabilities under federal or state securities laws."
},
{
"change": "Include a carve-out for fraud and intentional misrepresentation.",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and state laws addressing fraud (e.g., N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c), the clause should explicitly state that the disclaimer does not apply to instances of fraud or intentional misrepresentation. This ensures that the clause does not inadvertently conflict with laws designed to prevent fraudulent activities in securities transactions."
},
{
"change": "Specify that the disclaimer does not affect statutory rights.",
"explanation": "To align with 15 U.S.C. § 77k and relevant state laws, the clause should include language clarifying that the disclaimer does not affect any statutory rights or remedies available to the Buyer under federal or state securities laws. This ensures that the clause is not interpreted as limiting the Buyer's legal recourse in the event of a violation of these laws."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "DATE and any information, documents or material delivered to Buyer/made available to",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78m (Securities Exchange Act of 1934)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This law requires companies to disclose certain information to buyers and the public, ensuring transparency and accountability in transactions.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25401",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25401",
"relevance": "This state law mandates the disclosure of material information in the sale of securities, aligning with the federal requirement for transparency."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/352-C",
"relevance": "This law requires full disclosure of material facts in the sale of securities, ensuring that buyers receive all necessary information."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m) within the clause.",
"explanation": "Explicitly referencing this federal law will ensure that the clause aligns with the legal requirement for transparency and accountability in transactions, as mandated by the Act."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision that ensures compliance with state laws, specifically mentioning Cal. Corp. Code § 25401 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c.",
"explanation": "Including a reference to these state laws will help ensure that the clause is compliant with both federal and state requirements for the disclosure of material information in the sale of securities, thereby avoiding potential legal conflicts."
},
{
"change": "Specify the types of information, documents, and material that need to be delivered to the Buyer.",
"explanation": "Clarifying the types of information, documents, and material will ensure that all necessary disclosures are made, in line with both federal and state laws, thereby enhancing transparency and reducing the risk of legal disputes."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "Buyer in the Seller's virtual data room maintained by DATA ROOM PROVIDER NAME on
behalf of Seller for purposes of this Agreement or any management presentations made in
expectation of the transactions contemplated hereby) or as to the future revenue, profitability or
success of the Company, or any representation or warranty arising from statute or otherwise in
law.
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER
Buyer represents and warrants to Seller that the statements contained in this",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 77q (Securities Act of 1933)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Securities Act of 1933 is relevant as it governs the disclosure of information in securities transactions, ensuring that all material information is provided to investors. This clause, which limits representations and warranties, must still comply with the disclosure requirements under this Act.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2A&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78j (Securities Exchange Act of 1934)",
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 addresses fraudulent activities in securities transactions. This clause, by limiting representations and warranties, could potentially conflict with the anti-fraud provisions of this Act, which require full and fair disclosure to prevent misleading statements.",
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title15/chapter2B&edition=prelim",
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25401",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25401",
"relevance": "This state law prohibits the sale of securities by means of any written or oral communication that includes an untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made not misleading. This aligns with the federal laws ensuring full and fair disclosure."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/352-C",
"relevance": "This state law addresses fraudulent practices in the sale of securities, similar to the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934. It ensures that all material information is disclosed and prevents misleading statements, which is relevant to the clause limiting representations and warranties."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a carve-out for compliance with federal and state securities laws.",
"explanation": "The clause should explicitly state that it does not limit any representations or warranties required by federal or state securities laws, such as the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This ensures that the clause does not conflict with mandatory disclosure requirements and anti-fraud provisions under these laws."
},
{
"change": "Add a disclaimer for material facts.",
"explanation": "To align with Cal. Corp. Code § 25401 and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c, the clause should include a disclaimer that it does not permit the omission of any material facts necessary to make the statements made not misleading. This will help ensure compliance with state laws that prohibit misleading statements in securities transactions."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VII.08. Governing Law; Submission to Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "Trial.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "28 U.S.C. § 1332",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "28 U.S.C. § 1332 deals with diversity jurisdiction, which is relevant to the submission to jurisdiction clause as it outlines the conditions under which federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving parties from different states.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part4/chapter85&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "7 U.S.C. § 2305",
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "7 U.S.C. § 2305 provides that certain disputes under the Agricultural Fair Practices Act cannot be waived, which could conflict with a waiver of jury trial clause in contracts involving agricultural products.",
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title7/chapter56&edition=prelim",
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1646",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1646",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 1646 determines the governing law based on the place of performance or the place where the contract was made, which is relevant to the governing law clause."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 501",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVP/501",
"relevance": "New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 501 allows parties to agree to the jurisdiction of New York courts, which aligns with the submission to jurisdiction clause."
},
{
"state": "Texas",
"citation": "Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 17.42",
"url": "https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/BC/htm/BC.17.htm#17.42",
"relevance": "Texas Business and Commerce Code § 17.42 prohibits waiver of certain consumer rights, which could conflict with a waiver of jury trial clause in consumer contracts."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"reason": "To ensure compliance with 7 U.S.C. § 2305, which prohibits the waiver of certain disputes under the Agricultural Fair Practices Act, the clause should explicitly state that the waiver of jury trial does not apply to disputes covered under this Act.",
"change": "Add a sentence to the waiver of jury trial segment: 'Notwithstanding the foregoing, this waiver of jury trial shall not apply to disputes arising under the Agricultural Fair Practices Act as per 7 U.S.C. § 2305.'"
},
{
"reason": "To avoid potential conflicts with Texas Business and Commerce Code § 17.42, which prohibits the waiver of certain consumer rights, the clause should clarify that the waiver of jury trial does not apply to consumer contracts governed by Texas law.",
"change": "Add a sentence to the waiver of jury trial segment: 'This waiver of jury trial shall not apply to consumer contracts governed by Texas law, in accordance with Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 17.42.'"
},
{
"reason": "To align with California Civil Code § 1646, which determines the governing law based on the place of performance or the place where the contract was made, the clause should specify that the governing law will be determined in accordance with this statute for contracts involving California.",
"change": "Add a sentence to the governing law segment: 'For contracts involving California, the governing law shall be determined in accordance with Cal. Civ. Code § 1646.'"
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(a) All matters arising out of or relating to this/This Agreement shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of STATE
without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the
State of STATE or any other jurisdiction). Any Action arising out of or related to this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby may be instituted in the federal courts
of the United States of America or the courts of the State of STATE in each case located
in the city of RELEVANT CITY and county of RELEVANT COUNTY, and each
party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in any such Action.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "28 U.S.C. § 1332",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "28 U.S.C. § 1332, which governs diversity jurisdiction, is relevant as it allows federal courts to hear cases where the parties are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. This aligns with the clause's provision for federal court jurisdiction.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part4/chapter85&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1646",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&sectionNum=1646",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 1646 provides that a contract is to be interpreted according to the law and usage of the place where it is to be performed or, if it does not indicate a place of performance, according to the law and usage of the place where it was made. This is relevant as it may affect the interpretation of the governing law clause if the contract is performed in California."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-1401",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GOB/5-1401",
"relevance": "New York General Obligations Law § 5-1401 allows parties to a contract to agree that New York law will govern their rights and duties, regardless of whether the contract has a reasonable relation to New York. This is relevant as it supports the enforceability of the governing law clause if New York is chosen as the governing law."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"description": "Specify the State for Governing Law",
"reason": "The clause currently uses placeholders 'State of STATE' and 'RELEVANT CITY' and 'RELEVANT COUNTY'. These placeholders need to be replaced with the actual state, city, and county names to ensure clarity and enforceability. For example, if the state is California, it should be explicitly mentioned to avoid ambiguity."
},
{
"description": "Consider the Impact of California Civil Code § 1646",
"reason": "If the contract is to be performed in California, California Civil Code § 1646 may affect the interpretation of the governing law clause. The clause should explicitly state that the governing law is the internal laws of the specified state, regardless of the place of performance, to avoid potential conflicts."
},
{
"description": "Align with New York General Obligations Law § 5-1401",
"reason": "If New York is chosen as the governing law, the clause should reference New York General Obligations Law § 5-1401 to reinforce the enforceability of the choice of New York law, even if the contract does not have a reasonable relation to New York."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) EACH PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY
CONTROVERSY WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO
INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES AND, THEREFORE, EACH
PARTY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST
EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A
TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS
AGREEMENT, INCLUDING ANY EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES ATTACHED TO
THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT: (I) NO
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY
OR OTHERWISE, THAT THE OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT SEEK TO ENFORCE
THE FOREGOING WAIVER IN THE EVENT OF A LEGAL ACTION; (II) EACH
PARTY HAS CONSIDERED THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER; (III) EACH
PARTY MAKES THIS WAIVER KNOWINGLY AND VOLUNTARILY; AND (IV)
EACH PARTY HAS BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY,
AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN
THIS SECTION.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "9 U.S.C. § 2",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) under 9 U.S.C. § 2 supports the enforceability of arbitration agreements, which often include waivers of jury trials. This law aligns with the clause as it upholds the validity of such waivers in contracts.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title9&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "28 U.S.C. § 1861",
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "The Jury Selection and Service Act under 28 U.S.C. § 1861 emphasizes the right to a jury trial as a fundamental aspect of the American legal system. This law negatively aligns with the clause as it underscores the importance of preserving the right to a jury trial, which the clause seeks to waive.",
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title28/part5/chapter121&edition=prelim",
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 631",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=631.&lawCode=CCP",
"relevance": "California law under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 631 allows for the waiver of a jury trial but requires specific procedures to be followed, such as a written agreement or oral stipulation in open court. This law is relevant as it provides the conditions under which a jury trial waiver is enforceable in California."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 4102",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/CVP/4102",
"relevance": "New York law under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 4102 permits the waiver of a jury trial through a written agreement. This statute is relevant as it outlines the enforceability of such waivers in New York, aligning with the clause's intent."
},
{
"state": "Texas",
"citation": "Tex. R. Civ. P. 216",
"url": "https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/SDocs/RULES_CIVIL_PROCEDURE.pdf",
"relevance": "Texas law under Tex. R. Civ. P. 216 allows for the waiver of a jury trial if the parties agree in writing. This rule is relevant as it supports the enforceability of jury trial waivers in Texas, consistent with the clause."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a provision that specifies the waiver must be in writing and signed by both parties.",
"reason": "To comply with state laws such as California's Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 631, New York's N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 4102, and Texas's Tex. R. Civ. P. 216, which require a written agreement for the waiver of a jury trial to be enforceable."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause that the waiver is made in accordance with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) under 9 U.S.C. § 2.",
"reason": "To ensure the enforceability of the waiver under federal law, which supports the validity of arbitration agreements and related waivers of jury trials."
},
{
"change": "Include a statement that the waiver is made in compliance with the Jury Selection and Service Act under 28 U.S.C. § 1861.",
"reason": "To address potential conflicts with federal law that emphasizes the right to a jury trial, ensuring that the waiver is made knowingly and voluntarily, and is legally sound."
},
{
"change": "Specify that the waiver is subject to the fullest extent permitted by applicable state and federal law.",
"reason": "To acknowledge and respect the limitations imposed by state laws and federal statutes, ensuring that the waiver does not overreach legal boundaries."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section V.02. Director and Officer Indemnification Liability.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) Buyer agrees that all rights to indemnification, advancement of expenses
and exculpation by the Company now existing in favor of each Person who is now, or has
been at any time prior to the date hereof, an officer or director of the Company, as
provided in the certificate of incorporation or by-laws of the Company, in each case as in
effect on the date of this Agreement, or pursuant to any other agreements in effect on the
date hereof and disclosed in Section 5.02(a) of the Disclosure Schedules, shall survive the
Closing Date and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with their
respective terms.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 145 (2023)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This Delaware General Corporation Law section provides the statutory basis for indemnification and advancement of expenses for corporate officers and directors, aligning with the rights and obligations outlined in the clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc04/index.html",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 317 (2023)",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=317",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code provides similar provisions for indemnification and advancement of expenses for corporate officers and directors, which may be relevant if the Company operates in California."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 722 (2023)",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/BSC/722",
"relevance": "This section of the New York Business Corporation Law outlines the indemnification and advancement of expenses for corporate officers and directors, which may be relevant if the Company operates in New York."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of indemnification and advancement of expenses to ensure compliance with Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 145 (2023).",
"explanation": "The clause should explicitly state that indemnification and advancement of expenses are subject to the limitations and conditions set forth in Delaware General Corporation Law. This ensures that the clause is not interpreted in a way that exceeds the statutory provisions."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision addressing the potential applicability of state laws where the Company operates, such as California and New York.",
"explanation": "If the Company operates in states like California or New York, the clause should acknowledge and comply with relevant state laws (Cal. Corp. Code § 317 and N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 722). This ensures that the indemnification and advancement of expenses are valid and enforceable in those jurisdictions."
},
{
"change": "Specify that the indemnification and advancement of expenses are provided to the fullest extent permitted by law.",
"explanation": "Adding this language ensures that the clause is interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed under applicable laws, including any future amendments to those laws."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) The Company shall, and Buyer shall cause the Company to (i) maintain in
effect for a period of six (6) years after the Closing Date, if available, the current policies
of directors' and officers' liability insurance maintained by the Company immediately
prior to the Closing Date (provided that the Company may substitute policies, of at least
the same coverage and amounts and containing terms and conditions that are not less
advantageous to the directors and officers of the Company when compared to the
insurance maintained by the Company as of the date hereof), or (ii) obtain as of the
Closing Date \"tail\" insurance policies with a claims period of six (6) years from the
Closing Date with at least the same coverage and amounts, and containing terms and
conditions that are not less advantageous to the directors and officers of the Company, in
each case with respect to claims arising out of or relating to events which occurred on or
prior to the Closing Date (including in connection with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement).",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 77k",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Securities Act of 1933 pertains to the liability of directors and officers for false statements in registration statements, which underscores the importance of maintaining liability insurance for directors and officers.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section77k&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "8 Del. C. § 145",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc04/index.html",
"relevance": "Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) § 145 provides for the indemnification of directors and officers, which is relevant to the requirement for maintaining liability insurance."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 317",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=317.",
"relevance": "California Corporations Code § 317 outlines the indemnification of corporate agents, including directors and officers, which aligns with the need for liability insurance."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the availability condition for maintaining current policies",
"explanation": "The clause states that the Company must maintain current policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance for six years after the Closing Date 'if available.' This condition should be clarified to specify what constitutes 'availability' to avoid potential disputes. For example, it could specify that 'availability' means commercially reasonable terms and conditions."
},
{
"change": "Specify the governing law for the insurance obligations",
"explanation": "Given the potential conflicts with state laws such as Delaware General Corporation Law § 145 and California Corporations Code § 317, it is advisable to specify which jurisdiction's laws will govern the insurance obligations. This will help in resolving any conflicts between state laws and the obligations outlined in the clause."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision for changes in law",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with any future changes in relevant laws, the clause should include a provision that allows for adjustments to the insurance obligations if required by changes in federal or state laws. This will help in maintaining the clause's enforceability over the six-year period."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) The obligations of Buyer and the Company under this Section 5.02 shall
not be terminated or modified in such a manner as to adversely affect any director or
officer to whom this Section 5.02 applies without the consent of such affected director or
officer (it being expressly agreed that the directors and officers to whom this Section 5.02
applies shall be third-party beneficiaries of this Section 5.02, each of whom may enforce
the provisions of this Section 5.02).",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "18 U.S.C. § 1514A",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "18 U.S.C. § 1514A, also known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, provides protections for whistleblowers and ensures that directors and officers are not adversely affected without their consent, aligning with the clause's requirement for consent before termination or modification.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section1514A&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Lab. Code § 1102.5",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1102.5&lawCode=LAB",
"relevance": "California Labor Code § 1102.5 provides protections for employees, including directors and officers, against retaliation for whistleblowing, which aligns with the clause's requirement for consent before adverse actions."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Lab. Law § 740",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/740",
"relevance": "New York Labor Law § 740 protects employees from retaliatory actions for reporting violations of laws, rules, or regulations, which is relevant to the clause's protections for directors and officers."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include explicit reference to federal and state whistleblower protections.",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with 18 U.S.C. § 1514A (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) and relevant state laws such as California Labor Code § 1102.5 and New York Labor Law § 740, the clause should explicitly reference these protections. This will make it clear that the obligations of the Buyer and Company include adherence to these laws, thereby protecting directors and officers from adverse actions without their consent."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'adversely affect' in the context of termination or modification.",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions, the clause should clarify what constitutes 'adversely affect' in the context of termination or modification. This will help ensure that the clause is interpreted consistently with state laws that protect employees, including directors and officers, from retaliatory actions."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision for periodic review and update of the clause.",
"explanation": "Given the evolving nature of federal and state laws regarding whistleblower protections and employee rights, the clause should include a provision for periodic review and update. This will ensure ongoing compliance with any changes in the legal landscape and protect the interests of directors and officers."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(d) In the event Buyer, the Company or any of their respective successors or
assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other Person and shall not be the
continuing or surviving corporation or entity in such consolidation or merger or (ii)
transfers all or substantially all of its properties and assets to any Person, then, and in
either such case, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and assigns of
Buyer or the Company, as the case may be, shall assume all of the obligations set forth in
this Section 5.02.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78n (Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 14)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "This section of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 deals with the regulation of proxy solicitations and mergers, which is relevant to the clause as it addresses the obligations and continuity of entities involved in mergers and asset transfers.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78n&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 259",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc09/index.html",
"relevance": "This section of the Delaware General Corporation Law addresses the effects of mergers and consolidations, including the transfer of obligations to the surviving or resulting entity, which is directly relevant to the obligations outlined in Section 5.02."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 1107",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=1107",
"relevance": "This section of the California Corporations Code deals with the effects of mergers, including the assumption of obligations by the surviving entity, aligning with the requirements of Section 5.02."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to compliance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Section 14 (15 U.S.C. § 78n)",
"explanation": "To ensure that the clause explicitly aligns with federal regulations governing proxy solicitations and mergers, it is advisable to reference this law directly. This will provide clarity and reinforce the legal obligations of the parties involved."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision to address potential conflicts with state laws, particularly Delaware General Corporation Law (Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 259) and California Corporations Code (Cal. Corp. Code § 1107)",
"explanation": "Given that state laws may have specific requirements regarding the transfer of obligations in mergers and consolidations, it is prudent to include a clause that acknowledges and ensures compliance with relevant state laws. This will help prevent any legal conflicts and ensure that the obligations are properly assumed by the successors or assigns in accordance with state regulations."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.15. Environmental Matters.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) The terms: (i) \"Environmental Laws\" means all Laws, now or hereafter
in effect, in each case as amended or supplemented from time to time, relating to the
regulation and protection of human health, safety, the environment and natural resources,
including any federal, state or local transfer of ownership notification or approval
statutes; and (ii) \"Hazardous Substances\" means: (A) \"hazardous materials,\" \"hazardous
wastes,\" \"hazardous substances,\" \"industrial wastes,\" or \"toxic pollutants,\" as such terms
are defined under any Environmental Laws; (B) any other hazardous or radioactive
substance, contaminant or waste; and (C) any other substance with respect to which any
Environmental Law or Governmental Authority requires environmental investigation,
regulation, monitoring or remediation.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) is highly relevant to the clause as it governs the cleanup of hazardous substances and the liability of parties involved in the release of such substances, aligning with the definitions and regulatory requirements outlined in the clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title42/chapter103&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25300 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayexpandedbranch.xhtml?tocCode=HSC&division=20.&title=&part=&chapter=&article=",
"relevance": "The California Hazardous Substances Account Act (HSAA) is relevant as it mirrors CERCLA at the state level, governing the cleanup of hazardous substances and the liability of responsible parties."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Envtl. Conserv. Law § 27-1301 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ENV/A27T13",
"relevance": "The New York State Superfund Program is relevant as it addresses the identification, investigation, and cleanup of sites contaminated with hazardous substances, similar to CERCLA."
},
{
"state": "Texas",
"citation": "Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 361.001 et seq.",
"url": "https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/HS/htm/HS.361.htm",
"relevance": "The Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act is relevant as it regulates the management and cleanup of hazardous substances and waste, aligning with the principles of CERCLA."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to CERCLA (42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.) within the definition of 'Environmental Laws'.",
"explanation": "Explicitly referencing CERCLA will ensure that the clause is clearly aligned with federal regulations governing hazardous substances, thereby reducing ambiguity and potential legal disputes."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause that addresses compliance with state-specific hazardous substance laws, such as the California Hazardous Substances Account Act (Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25300 et seq.), the New York State Superfund Program (N.Y. Envtl. Conserv. Law § 27-1301 et seq.), and the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 361.001 et seq.).",
"explanation": "Including a clause that mandates compliance with relevant state laws will help avoid conflicts with state regulations and ensure comprehensive legal compliance across different jurisdictions."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Governmental Authority' to include federal, state, and local agencies.",
"explanation": "This clarification will ensure that the clause encompasses all relevant regulatory bodies, thereby aligning with the multi-jurisdictional nature of environmental laws and hazardous substance regulations."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) Except as set forth in Section 3.15(b) of the Disclosure Schedules, or as
would not have a Material Adverse Effect, to Seller's knowledge, the Company is in
compliance with all Environmental Laws and neither the Company nor Seller has
received notice from any Person that the Company, its business or assets, or any Real
Property currently owned, leased, or used by the Company is in violation of any
Environmental Law or any applicable Law regarding Hazardous Substances.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) is highly relevant as it governs the liability of parties involved in the release of hazardous substances and the cleanup of contaminated sites, which aligns with the clause's focus on compliance with Environmental Laws and the handling of Hazardous Substances.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title42/chapter103&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25300 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayexpandedbranch.xhtml?tocCode=HSC&division=20.&title=&part=&chapter=6.8.&article=",
"relevance": "The California Hazardous Substances Account Act (HSAA) is relevant as it mirrors CERCLA at the state level, governing the cleanup of hazardous substance releases and the liability of responsible parties."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Envtl. Conserv. Law § 27-1301 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ENV/A27T13",
"relevance": "The New York State Superfund Program is relevant as it addresses the identification, investigation, and cleanup of sites contaminated with hazardous substances, similar to the federal CERCLA."
},
{
"state": "Texas",
"citation": "Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 361.001 et seq.",
"url": "https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/HS/htm/HS.361.htm",
"relevance": "The Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act is relevant as it includes provisions for the management and cleanup of hazardous waste, aligning with the clause's focus on compliance with Environmental Laws."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Seller's knowledge'",
"explanation": "The clause currently states 'to Seller's knowledge,' which may be too vague and could lead to disputes. It would be beneficial to define the extent of the Seller's knowledge, such as specifying that it includes the knowledge of key employees or officers responsible for environmental compliance."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to specific federal and state laws",
"explanation": "To ensure comprehensive compliance, the clause should explicitly reference key federal laws like CERCLA (42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.) and relevant state laws such as the California Hazardous Substances Account Act (Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25300 et seq.), the New York State Superfund Program (N.Y. Envtl. Conserv. Law § 27-1301 et seq.), and the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 361.001 et seq.). This will provide clear guidance on the legal standards that must be met."
},
{
"change": "Address potential conflicts with state laws",
"explanation": "The clause should include a provision that acknowledges the potential for conflicts with state laws and stipulates that in the event of such conflicts, the more stringent law will apply. This ensures that the Company remains in compliance with both federal and state regulations."
},
{
"change": "Specify the types of notices received",
"explanation": "The clause mentions that neither the Company nor Seller has received notice from any Person regarding violations. It would be prudent to specify the types of notices (e.g., administrative orders, lawsuits, or regulatory citations) to avoid ambiguity and ensure all relevant communications are covered."
},
{
"change": "Include a materiality threshold for violations",
"explanation": "While the clause mentions 'Material Adverse Effect,' it would be beneficial to include a materiality threshold for violations of Environmental Laws. This would help in distinguishing between minor infractions and significant breaches that could impact the Company's operations or financial standing."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) Except as set forth in Section 3.15(c) of the Disclosure Schedules, or as
would not have a Material Adverse Effect, to Seller's knowledge, there has not been any
spill, leak, discharge, injection, escape, leaching, dumping, disposal or release of any kind
of any Hazardous Substances in violation of any Environmental Law with respect to the
business or assets of the Company or any Real Property currently owned, leased or used
by the Company. Neither the Company nor Seller received notice from any Person that
any Real Property currently owned, leased or used by the Company has been
contaminated with any Hazardous Substances which would reasonably be expected to
result in an environmental claim against, or a violation of Environmental Laws by, Seller
or the Company.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) is highly relevant as it governs the cleanup of sites contaminated with hazardous substances and holds parties responsible for releases of hazardous substances.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title42/chapter103&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25300 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayexpandedbranch.xhtml?tocCode=HSC&division=20.&title=&part=&chapter=6.8.&article=",
"relevance": "The California Hazardous Substances Account Act (HSAA) is relevant as it mirrors CERCLA at the state level, governing the cleanup of hazardous substance sites and holding responsible parties liable for contamination."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Envtl. Conserv. Law § 27-1301 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ENV/A27T13",
"relevance": "The New York State Superfund Program is relevant as it addresses the identification, investigation, and cleanup of sites contaminated with hazardous substances, similar to CERCLA."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Seller's knowledge'",
"explanation": "To ensure compliance with CERCLA (42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.), it is important to define the extent of 'Seller's knowledge' regarding environmental violations. This can help avoid ambiguity and potential legal disputes about what the Seller knew or should have known about hazardous substance contamination."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision for compliance with state-specific laws",
"explanation": "Given the relevance of state laws such as the California Hazardous Substances Account Act (Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25300 et seq.) and the New York State Superfund Program (N.Y. Envtl. Conserv. Law § 27-1301 et seq.), the clause should explicitly state that the Seller and Company will comply with applicable state laws in addition to federal laws. This ensures that the agreement is comprehensive and legally sound across different jurisdictions."
},
{
"change": "Specify the process for addressing environmental claims",
"explanation": "To align with CERCLA and state laws, the clause should detail the procedures for handling environmental claims, including investigation, reporting, and remediation processes. This will provide clear guidance on the steps to be taken if an environmental issue arises, ensuring timely and effective compliance with legal requirements."
},
{
"change": "Define 'Material Adverse Effect' in the context of environmental matters",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts and ensure clarity, the term 'Material Adverse Effect' should be explicitly defined in relation to environmental matters. This will help in determining the threshold for what constitutes a significant environmental issue that could impact the agreement."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(d) The representations and warranties set forth in this Section 3.15 are the
Seller's sole and exclusive representations and warranties regarding environmental
matters.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) is highly relevant as it governs liability for environmental contamination and cleanup, which directly pertains to the representations and warranties regarding environmental matters in the clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title42/chapter103&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Health & Safety Code § 25300 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayexpandedbranch.xhtml?tocCode=HSC&division=20.&title=&part=&chapter=6.8.&article=",
"relevance": "California's Hazardous Substances Account Act (HSAA) is similar to CERCLA and governs the cleanup of hazardous substances, making it relevant to the environmental representations and warranties in the clause."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Envtl. Conserv. Law § 27-1301 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ENV/A27T13",
"relevance": "New York's Environmental Conservation Law includes provisions for the cleanup of hazardous waste sites, aligning with the environmental representations and warranties in the clause."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify Scope of Representations and Warranties",
"explanation": "The clause should explicitly state that the representations and warranties regarding environmental matters are made in accordance with applicable federal and state laws, including CERCLA and relevant state laws such as California's HSAA and New York's Environmental Conservation Law. This ensures that the clause is comprehensive and legally compliant."
},
{
"change": "Include Compliance with State Laws",
"explanation": "Given the potential conflict with state laws, the clause should include a provision that the Seller's representations and warranties also comply with state-specific environmental regulations. This would mitigate any legal risks arising from non-compliance with state laws like California's HSAA and New York's Environmental Conservation Law."
},
{
"change": "Add a Disclaimer for Local Jurisdictions",
"explanation": "To address potential conflicts with local jurisdictions, the clause should include a disclaimer that the Seller's representations and warranties are subject to compliance with local environmental laws and regulations. This would provide a safeguard against any unforeseen local legal requirements."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section VI.04. Certain Limitations",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "The party making a claim under this ARTICLE VIis referred to as the \"Indemnified Party,\" and the party against whom such claims are asserted
under this Article VI is referred to as the \"Indemnifying Party.\" The indemnification provided
for in Section 6.02 and Section 6.03 shall be subject to the following limitations:(a) The Indemnifying Party shall not be liable to the Indemnified Party for
indemnification under Section 6.02(a) or Section 6.03(a), as the case may be, until the
aggregate amount of all Losses in respect of indemnification under Section 6.02(a) or
Section 6.03(a) exceeds $NUMBER/NUMBER% of the Purchase Price (the
\"Deductible\"), in which event the Indemnifying Party shall only be required to pay or be
liable for Losses in excess of the Deductible.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78u-4",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 provides guidelines for indemnification in securities litigation, which can be relevant to the indemnification clauses in contracts involving the purchase of securities.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78u-4&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 145",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title8/c001/sc04/index.html",
"relevance": "Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) Section 145 provides the framework for indemnification of corporate directors, officers, employees, and agents, which can be relevant to indemnification clauses in corporate contracts."
},
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 317",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=317.",
"relevance": "California Corporations Code Section 317 outlines the indemnification of corporate agents, which can be relevant to indemnification clauses in contracts involving California corporations."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Specify the exact threshold amount or percentage for indemnification.",
"explanation": "The clause currently uses a placeholder 'NUMBER/NUMBER%' for the threshold amount or percentage of the Purchase Price. This needs to be specified to ensure clarity and enforceability. Without a specific threshold, the clause may be considered vague and could lead to disputes."
},
{
"change": "Ensure compliance with Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) Section 145.",
"explanation": "If the agreement involves a Delaware corporation, the indemnification clause should be reviewed to ensure it aligns with DGCL Section 145. This section provides specific guidelines for indemnification of corporate directors, officers, employees, and agents. Any deviation from these guidelines could render the indemnification provisions unenforceable under Delaware law."
},
{
"change": "Ensure compliance with California Corporations Code Section 317.",
"explanation": "If the agreement involves a California corporation, the indemnification clause should be reviewed to ensure it aligns with California Corporations Code Section 317. This section outlines the indemnification of corporate agents and any inconsistency with these provisions could lead to legal challenges."
},
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'Losses' covered under indemnification.",
"explanation": "The term 'Losses' should be clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. This includes specifying whether it covers direct, indirect, consequential, or punitive damages. Clear definitions help in aligning the clause with relevant federal and state laws and prevent potential disputes."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) The aggregate amount of all Losses for which an Indemnifying Party shall
be liable pursuant to Section 6.02(a) or Section 6.03(a), as the case may be, shall not
exceed $NUMBER/NUMBER% of the Purchase Price.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78u-4",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 sets limitations on damages and liability, which is relevant to the clause's limitation on the aggregate amount of losses.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78u-4&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25501.5",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=CORP&sectionNum=25501.5",
"relevance": "California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 includes provisions that limit the liability of certain parties in securities transactions, which is relevant to the clause's limitation on the aggregate amount of losses."
},
{
"state": "Delaware",
"citation": "Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-1101",
"url": "https://delcode.delaware.gov/title6/c018/sc11/index.html",
"relevance": "Delaware's Limited Liability Company Act includes provisions that allow for the limitation of liability in LLC agreements, which is relevant to the clause's limitation on the aggregate amount of losses."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Specify the exact percentage or dollar amount for the maximum liability.",
"explanation": "The clause currently uses placeholders ($NUMBER/NUMBER%) for the maximum liability. To ensure compliance and clarity, the exact percentage or dollar amount should be specified. This will also help in aligning with the limitations set forth under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4, which requires clear and specific limitations on damages and liability."
},
{
"change": "Ensure compliance with California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 and Delaware's Limited Liability Company Act.",
"explanation": "The clause should be reviewed to ensure it does not conflict with state laws such as Cal. Corp. Code § 25501.5 and Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 18-1101. These laws include provisions that limit the liability of certain parties in securities transactions and LLC agreements, respectively. The clause should be tailored to comply with these state-specific limitations to avoid potential legal conflicts."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) In no event shall any Indemnifying Party be liable to any Indemnified
Party for any punitive, incidental, consequential, special or indirect damages, including
loss of future revenue or income, loss of business reputation or opportunity relating to the
breach or alleged breach of this Agreement, or diminution of value or any damages based
on any type of multiple.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 351 (1981)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 351 addresses the foreseeability of damages and generally supports the limitation of liability for consequential damages, aligning with the clause's exclusion of such damages.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://www.ali.org/publications/show/contracts/",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 45",
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 45, which addresses unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices, could be interpreted to negatively align with the clause if the exclusion of certain damages is deemed to be unfair or deceptive in the context of consumer protection.",
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section45&num=0&edition=prelim",
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Civ. Code § 1668",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1668.&lawCode=CIV",
"relevance": "California Civil Code § 1668 states that contracts which exempt anyone from responsibility for their own fraud, willful injury, or violation of law are against public policy. This could negatively align with the clause if the exclusion of certain damages is seen as an attempt to exempt liability for such actions."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-1401",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GOB/5-1401",
"relevance": "New York General Obligations Law § 5-1401 allows parties to a contract to agree that New York law will govern their contract, even if the contract has no reasonable relation to New York. This could be relevant if the parties wish to ensure that New York's more permissive stance on limitation of liability clauses applies."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"reason": "To ensure compliance with California Civil Code § 1668, which states that contracts cannot exempt anyone from responsibility for their own fraud, willful injury, or violation of law, the clause should explicitly state that the exclusions do not apply in cases of fraud, willful misconduct, or violations of law.",
"suggested_change": "Add a proviso to the clause: 'provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply to damages arising from the Indemnifying Party's fraud, willful misconduct, or violation of law.'"
},
{
"reason": "To address potential conflicts with 15 U.S.C. § 45, which deals with unfair or deceptive acts or practices, the clause should clarify that the exclusions are not intended to limit liability in a manner that would be considered unfair or deceptive under applicable consumer protection laws.",
"suggested_change": "Add a clarification: 'Nothing in this clause shall be construed to limit liability in a manner that would be considered unfair or deceptive under applicable consumer protection laws.'"
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(d) Seller shall not be liable under this ARTICLE VI for any Losses based
upon or arising out of any inaccuracy in or breach of any of the representations or
warranties of Seller contained in this Agreement if Buyer had knowledge of such
inaccuracy or breach prior to the Closing.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "15 U.S.C. § 78u-4",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 is relevant as it addresses the issue of liability and knowledge of inaccuracies or breaches in representations and warranties, which is central to the clause in question.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title15-section78u-4&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Corp. Code § 25401",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=25401&lawCode=CORP",
"relevance": "California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968, under Cal. Corp. Code § 25401, addresses the issue of misrepresentation and omission of material facts in securities transactions, which is relevant to the clause concerning inaccuracies or breaches in representations and warranties."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/GBS/352-C",
"relevance": "New York's Martin Act, under N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c, deals with fraudulent practices in the sale of securities, which is pertinent to the clause regarding liability for inaccuracies or breaches in representations and warranties."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the extent of 'knowledge' required for the Buyer to be exempt from liability.",
"explanation": "The clause should specify what constitutes 'knowledge' of the inaccuracy or breach by the Buyer. This is crucial to ensure compliance with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) under 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4, which emphasizes the importance of clear definitions in liability and knowledge of inaccuracies or breaches in representations and warranties."
},
{
"change": "Include a provision addressing the materiality of the inaccuracy or breach.",
"explanation": "To align with California's Corporate Securities Law of 1968 (Cal. Corp. Code § 25401) and New York's Martin Act (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 352-c), the clause should specify that the inaccuracy or breach must be material. This ensures that minor or insignificant inaccuracies do not lead to disproportionate liability."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause for dispute resolution or arbitration.",
"explanation": "Given the potential for conflicts with state laws such as California's and New York's securities laws, it is advisable to include a dispute resolution mechanism. This can help manage any legal conflicts that arise from differing state interpretations of misrepresentation and breach of warranty."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
{
"section_header": "Section III.16. Employee Benefit Matters.",
"analysis": [
{
"clause": "(a) Section 3.16(a) of the Disclosure Schedules contains a list of each material
benefit, retirement, employment, consulting, compensation, incentive, bonus, stock
option, restricted stock, stock appreciation right, phantom equity, change in control,
severance, vacation, paid time off, welfare and fringe-benefit agreement, plan, policy and
program, whether or not reduced to writing, in effect and covering one or more
employees or directors of the Company or the beneficiaries or dependents of any such
Persons, and is maintained, sponsored, contributed to, or required to be contributed to by
the Company, or under which the Company has any material liability for premiums or
benefits (each, a \"Benefit Plan\").",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans. The clause in question pertains to various benefit plans maintained by the Company, which would be subject to ERISA regulations.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter18&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "California Labor Code § 2800 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&division=3.&title=&part=1.&chapter=2.&article=1.",
"relevance": "California's labor laws include provisions that require employers to indemnify employees for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred in direct consequence of the discharge of their duties. This can include certain benefits and compensation plans."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "New York Labor Law § 190 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/190",
"relevance": "New York labor laws govern the payment of wages and benefits, including the timing and frequency of payments, which can impact the administration of benefit plans described in the clause."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"recommendation": "Include a specific reference to ERISA compliance within the clause.",
"explanation": "Given that the clause pertains to various benefit plans maintained by the Company, it is essential to explicitly state that these plans must comply with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) to ensure legal adherence and provide protection for individuals in these plans."
},
{
"recommendation": "Add a provision for compliance with state-specific labor laws.",
"explanation": "To avoid potential conflicts with state laws, such as California Labor Code § 2800 et seq. and New York Labor Law § 190 et seq., the clause should include a statement that the Company will ensure compliance with relevant state labor laws regarding benefit plans, compensation, and indemnification of employees."
},
{
"recommendation": "Clarify the scope of 'material liability' to align with both federal and state regulations.",
"explanation": "The term 'material liability' should be clearly defined to ensure it encompasses all obligations under both federal (ERISA) and state laws. This will help in avoiding any ambiguity and ensure that the Company’s liabilities are fully understood and compliant with all applicable regulations."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(b) Except as set forth in Section 3.16(b) of the Disclosure Schedules, or as
would not have a Material Adverse Effect, to Seller's knowledge, each Benefit Plan and
related trust complies with all applicable Laws (including the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (as amended, and including the regulations thereunder,
\"ERISA\") and the Code. Each Benefit Plan that is intended to be qualified under Section
401(a) of the Code (a \"Qualified Benefit Plan\") has received a favorable determination
letter from the Internal Revenue Service, or with respect to a prototype plan, can rely on
an opinion letter from the Internal Revenue Service to the prototype plan sponsor, to the
effect that such Qualified Benefit Plan is so qualified and that the plan and the trust
related thereto are exempt from federal income Taxes under Sections 401(a) and 501(a),
respectively, of the Code, and, to Seller's knowledge, nothing has occurred that could
reasonably be expected to cause the revocation of such determination letter from the
Internal Revenue Service or the unavailability of reliance on such opinion letter from the
Internal Revenue Service. Except as set forth in Section 3.16(b) of the Disclosure
Schedules, or as would not have a Material Adverse Effect, all benefits, contributions
and premiums required by and due under the terms of each Benefit Plan or applicable
Law have been timely paid in accordance with the terms of such Benefit Plan, the terms
of all applicable Laws and GAAP. With respect to any Benefit Plan, to Seller's
knowledge, no event has occurred or is reasonably expected to occur that has resulted in
or would subject the Company to a Tax under Section 4971 of the Code or the assets of
the Company to a lien under Section 430(k) of the Code.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "ERISA sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established pension and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans. The clause's compliance requirements align with ERISA's provisions.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter18&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "California Labor Code § 2800 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&division=3.&title=&part=1.&chapter=2.&article=1.",
"relevance": "California's labor laws include provisions that require employers to indemnify employees for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred in direct consequence of the discharge of their duties, which can include compliance with benefit plans."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "New York Labor Law § 200 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/200",
"relevance": "New York's labor laws mandate that employers provide a safe working environment and comply with all applicable laws, which includes adherence to benefit plan regulations."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'applicable Laws' to explicitly include both federal and state laws.",
"reason": "While the clause references compliance with 'all applicable Laws,' it would be prudent to explicitly mention both federal and state laws to ensure comprehensive compliance. This is particularly important given the potential conflicts with state laws such as California Labor Code § 2800 et seq. and New York Labor Law § 200 et seq., which have specific requirements related to benefit plans and employee indemnification."
},
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to the requirement for employers to indemnify employees for necessary expenditures or losses incurred in compliance with benefit plans.",
"reason": "California Labor Code § 2800 et seq. mandates that employers indemnify employees for necessary expenditures or losses incurred in direct consequence of the discharge of their duties. Including this requirement in the clause would ensure alignment with California state law and provide additional protection for employees."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision ensuring that the Benefit Plan complies with state-specific labor laws where the company operates.",
"reason": "New York Labor Law § 200 et seq. requires employers to provide a safe working environment and comply with all applicable laws, including benefit plan regulations. Adding a provision to ensure compliance with state-specific labor laws would mitigate the risk of non-compliance in jurisdictions with stringent labor laws."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(c) Except as set forth in Section 3.16(c) of the Disclosure Schedules, no
Benefit Plan: (i) is subject to the minimum funding standards of Section 302 of ERISA or
Section 412 of the Code; or (ii) is a \"multiemployer plan\" (as defined in Section 3(37) of
ERISA). Except as would not have a Material Adverse Effect, neither Seller nor the
Company: (i) has withdrawn from any pension plan under circumstances resulting (or
expected to result) in a liability to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation; or (ii) has
engaged in any transaction which would give rise to a liability of the Company or Buyer
under Section 4069 or Section 4212(c) of ERISA.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "ERISA sets the minimum standards for most voluntarily established pension and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans. The clause references specific sections of ERISA, indicating its relevance to the regulation of Benefit Plans.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter18&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "California Labor Code § 4700 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&division=4.&title=&part=3.&chapter=2.&article=1.",
"relevance": "California's labor laws include provisions that affect employee benefit plans, particularly in the context of workers' compensation and disability benefits, which can intersect with ERISA regulations."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "New York Consolidated Laws, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) § 500 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ERISA",
"relevance": "New York state laws provide additional regulations and protections for employee benefit plans that complement federal ERISA standards, ensuring comprehensive coverage for employees."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'Material Adverse Effect' within the clause.",
"explanation": "The term 'Material Adverse Effect' is often subject to interpretation and can vary significantly in different jurisdictions. Providing a clear definition within the clause will ensure that all parties have a mutual understanding of what constitutes a material adverse effect, thereby reducing potential legal disputes."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to compliance with state-specific laws, such as California Labor Code § 4700 et seq. and New York Consolidated Laws, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) § 500 et seq.",
"explanation": "While the clause references federal ERISA standards, it is important to acknowledge and ensure compliance with relevant state laws that may impose additional requirements or protections. This will help avoid potential conflicts and ensure comprehensive legal compliance."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision addressing the potential impact of state laws on the obligations and liabilities under the Benefit Plans.",
"explanation": "State laws, such as those in California and New York, may impose additional obligations or liabilities that are not covered under federal ERISA standards. Including a provision that addresses the interplay between federal and state laws will help clarify the parties' responsibilities and mitigate the risk of non-compliance."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(d) Except as set forth in Section 3.16(d) of the Disclosure Schedules and
other than as required under Section 4980B of the Code or other applicable Law, no
Benefit Plan provides benefits or coverage in the nature of health, life or disability
insurance following retirement or other termination of employment (other than death
benefits when termination occurs upon death).",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "26 U.S.C. § 4980B",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "Section 4980B of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) pertains to the continuation of health coverage, commonly known as COBRA. This law is highly relevant as it mandates that certain employers must offer continued health insurance coverage to employees and their families after events such as termination of employment, which aligns with the exceptions noted in the clause.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section4980B&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "Cal. Ins. Code § 10128.50",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=INS&sectionNum=10128.50",
"relevance": "California's continuation coverage requirements, often referred to as 'Cal-COBRA,' extend the federal COBRA coverage for smaller employers and provide additional protections, making it relevant to the clause's exceptions."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "N.Y. Ins. Law § 3221(m)",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ISC/3221",
"relevance": "New York law mandates continuation of health insurance coverage similar to COBRA but includes additional state-specific provisions, aligning with the clause's exceptions."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the scope of 'other applicable Law' to explicitly include state continuation coverage laws such as California's Cal-COBRA (Cal. Ins. Code § 10128.50) and New York's continuation coverage requirements (N.Y. Ins. Law § 3221(m)).",
"reason": "To ensure compliance with state-specific continuation coverage requirements that may extend beyond federal COBRA provisions, thereby avoiding potential legal conflicts."
},
{
"change": "Specify that the clause does not override any mandatory continuation coverage requirements under state laws.",
"reason": "To prevent any misinterpretation that the clause could be used to circumvent state-mandated continuation coverage, which could lead to legal disputes or non-compliance issues."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(e) Except as set forth in Section 3.16(e) of the Disclosure Schedules, or as
would not have a Material Adverse Effect: (i) there is no pending or, to Seller's
knowledge, threatened action relating to a Benefit Plan; and (ii) no Benefit Plan has
within the three/NUMBER years prior to the date hereof been the subject of an
examination or audit by a Governmental Authority.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans. The clause's reference to Benefit Plans and the conditions regarding audits and examinations by Governmental Authorities align with ERISA's regulatory framework.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter18&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "California Labor Code § 750 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&division=2.&title=&part=1.&chapter=10.&article=",
"relevance": "California's laws on employee benefit plans often provide additional protections and requirements beyond federal ERISA standards, which may impact the conditions and exceptions noted in the clause."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "New York Labor Law § 200 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/200",
"relevance": "New York's labor laws include provisions that may affect the administration and regulation of employee benefit plans, aligning with the clause's focus on Benefit Plans and governmental audits."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Clarify the definition of 'Benefit Plan' to ensure it aligns with the definitions provided under ERISA.",
"explanation": "ERISA has specific definitions and requirements for what constitutes a 'Benefit Plan.' Ensuring that the clause's definition aligns with ERISA will help avoid any legal ambiguities and ensure compliance with federal law."
},
{
"change": "Include a reference to compliance with both federal and applicable state laws regarding Benefit Plans.",
"explanation": "While the clause references federal law implicitly through the conditions, explicitly stating that the Benefit Plans must comply with both federal (ERISA) and applicable state laws (such as California Labor Code § 750 et seq. and New York Labor Law § 200 et seq.) will provide clarity and ensure comprehensive legal compliance."
},
{
"change": "Add a provision addressing the potential for more stringent state regulations.",
"explanation": "State laws, such as those in California and New York, may impose additional requirements or protections beyond federal ERISA standards. Including a provision that acknowledges and commits to adhering to these more stringent state regulations will help mitigate potential legal conflicts and ensure full compliance."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(f) Except as set forth in Section 3.16(f) of the Disclosure Schedules, or as
would not have a Material Adverse Effect, no Benefit Plan exists that could: (i) result in
the payment to any employee, director or consultant of any money or other property; (ii)
accelerate the vesting of or provide any additional rights or benefits (including funding of
compensation or benefits through a trust or otherwise) to any employee, director or
consultant, except as a result of any partial plan termination resulting from this
Agreement; or (iii) limit or restrict the ability of Buyer or its Affiliates to merge, amend
or terminate any Benefit Plan, in each case, as a result of the execution of this
Agreement. Neither the execution of this Agreement nor the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby will result in \"excess parachute payments\" within the
meaning of Section 280G(b) of the Code.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "I.R.C. § 280G(b)",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "Section 280G(b) of the Internal Revenue Code addresses 'excess parachute payments,' which are relevant to the clause as it ensures that the execution of the Agreement and the consummation of the transactions will not result in such payments.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title26-section280G&num=0&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [],
"recommendation": [
{
"recommendation": "Clarify the Definition of 'Material Adverse Effect'",
"explanation": "The clause references 'Material Adverse Effect' without providing a clear definition. To ensure compliance and avoid ambiguity, it is recommended to define 'Material Adverse Effect' explicitly within the agreement or refer to a section where it is defined."
},
{
"recommendation": "Specify the Scope of 'Benefit Plan'",
"explanation": "The term 'Benefit Plan' should be clearly defined to include all relevant plans, programs, and arrangements. This will ensure that there is no confusion about what constitutes a 'Benefit Plan' under this clause."
},
{
"recommendation": "Include a Compliance Statement with Section 280G(b) of the Code",
"explanation": "While the clause states that the execution of the Agreement and the consummation of the transactions will not result in 'excess parachute payments' within the meaning of Section 280G(b) of the Code, it is advisable to include a compliance statement that explicitly confirms adherence to this section of the Code. This will provide additional legal assurance."
},
{
"recommendation": "Review for Potential State Law Conflicts",
"explanation": "Although the clause addresses federal law compliance, it is important to review the clause for potential conflicts with state laws or local jurisdictions. Different states may have varying regulations regarding employee benefits and compensation, and ensuring compliance with both federal and state laws is crucial."
}
]
}
]
}
},
{
"clause": "(g) The representations and warranties set forth in this Section 3.16 are the
Seller's sole and exclusive representations and warranties regarding employee benefit
matters.",
"reasoning": {
"US_code_and_contract_law": [
{
"relevant_federal_law": "Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.",
"relevance_of_federal_law": "The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established pension and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans. This law is highly relevant as it governs employee benefit matters, which are the subject of the representations and warranties in Section 3.16.",
"url_of_relevant_federal_law": "https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title29/chapter18&edition=prelim",
"potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"relevance_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"url_of_potentially_conflicting_federal_law": null,
"state_laws": [
{
"state": "California",
"citation": "California Labor Code § 2800 et seq.",
"url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=LAB&division=3.&title=&part=1.&chapter=2.&article=1.",
"relevance": "California Labor Code § 2800 et seq. includes provisions that may impact employee benefit matters, particularly in relation to employer obligations and employee rights, which could be relevant to the representations and warranties in Section 3.16."
},
{
"state": "New York",
"citation": "New York Labor Law § 190 et seq.",
"url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/LAB/A6",
"relevance": "New York Labor Law § 190 et seq. governs wage payment and employee benefits, which may intersect with the employee benefit matters addressed in the representations and warranties in Section 3.16."
}
],
"recommendation": [
{
"change": "Include a specific reference to ERISA compliance within the representations and warranties in Section 3.16.",
"explanation": "Given that ERISA sets minimum standards for employee benefit plans, it is crucial to explicitly state that the Seller's representations and warranties comply with ERISA requirements. This ensures clarity and legal compliance."
},
{
"change": "Add a clause addressing compliance with relevant state laws, such as California Labor Code § 2800 et seq. and New York Labor Law § 190 et seq.",
"explanation": "State laws may impose additional obligations on employee benefit matters. Including a clause that ensures compliance with relevant state laws can prevent potential legal conflicts and ensure comprehensive coverage of employee benefit matters."
},
{
"change": "Specify any known exceptions or limitations to the representations and warranties regarding employee benefit matters.",
"explanation": "To avoid potential legal disputes, it is advisable to clearly outline any known exceptions or limitations to the Seller's representations and warranties. This transparency can help manage expectations and reduce the risk of future litigation."
}
]
}
]
}
}
]
}
marcfawzi
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment