Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@intellectronica

intellectronica/cre-azure-deep-research.md

Created February 26, 2025 08:14
Show Gist options
  • Save intellectronica/f3cd1da5ecc5622fd2a51b30dfc020f8 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save intellectronica/f3cd1da5ecc5622fd2a51b30dfc020f8 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Raw
cre-azure-deep-research.md

Customer Reliability Engineering (CRE) in Azure

Customer Reliability Engineering (CRE) is an emerging discipline that extends the principles of Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) to cloud customers’ workloads. It originated at Google in 2016 as an offshoot of SRE, and has since been adopted or emulated by other cloud providers and partners (Cyber Weekly - Your weekly newsletter for cybersecurity matters) (What Is CRE, and What Does It Have to Do With SRE?). This in-depth review examines how Microsoft Azure has implemented CRE as a service and discipline, how similar concepts appear at Google Cloud and AWS, and the experiences and outcomes reported by engineers and customers using these services. We compare each provider’s approach, integration with support and consulting, and the impact on customers’ business and technical success.

Origins and Definition of CRE

Customer Reliability Engineering (CRE) was pioneered by Google. In 2016, Google announced CRE as a new discipline aimed at creating a “shared operational fate” between Google and its cloud customers (Cyber Weekly - Your weekly newsletter for cybersecurity matters). In other words, Google proposed to have its SRE experts work directly with customer teams, sharing responsibility for the reliability of the customers’ applications running on Google Cloud. As Google described it, CRE was designed to “give you more control over the critical applications you’re entrusting to us” (Repository of Introducing Google Customer Reliability Engineering | Google Cloud Blog in February 2025) (Cyber Weekly - Your weekly newsletter for cybersecurity matters).

The core idea is that cloud providers should “SRE your customers” – not just your internal systems (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX) (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX). In practice, this means cloud SREs and customer engineers jointly define reliability goals (like Service Level Objectives, or SLOs) and even share on-call duties for customer-facing systems (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX) (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX). This model contrasts with traditional support, where the boundary of responsibility stops at the cloud platform. CRE blurs that line by having provider engineers deeply engage with customer operations. Dave Rensin, who led Google’s CRE team, described it as taking “joint operational responsibility” for customer systems – a radical experiment at the time (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX) (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX).

Since its inception, the CRE approach has influenced the industry. Other providers and consulting companies have adopted similar models. A Container Solutions engineer explains that in CRE, the customer’s team focuses on product development while the reliability team (from the provider or partner) brings expertise to maintain and improve the platform (What Is CRE, and What Does It Have to Do With SRE?) (What Is CRE, and What Does It Have to Do With SRE?). This allows customers to benefit from cutting-edge reliability practices (like chaos testing, SLO management, etc.) without bearing the full burden alone (What Is CRE, and What Does It Have to Do With SRE?) (What Is CRE, and What Does It Have to Do With SRE?). In summary, CRE extends the SRE mindset beyond a single organization, fostering a partnership where provider and customer share responsibility for uptime and performance.

Azure’s Customer Reliability Engineering (CRE) Service

Microsoft Azure has embraced the CRE concept through its Azure Customer Experience (CXP) Engineering group. Azure’s CRE team is a pillar of Azure Engineering focused on reliability and customer success (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). According to a Microsoft job description, “Azure CXP CRE is a top-level pillar of Azure Engineering that leads world-class customer reliability engagements [and] modern customer-first experiences for scale” (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). The team’s mission is to listen to customers “around the clock” and drive improvements into Azure services, support processes, and incident management, guided by a “no dead-ends” philosophy (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180) (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). This philosophy means every customer issue is pursued to resolution – “every customer, regardless of size or scale, can realize their full potential through the Microsoft Cloud” (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180).

How Azure’s CRE Operates: Azure CRE sits at the intersection of support and engineering. It is responsible for critical customer escalations and reliability-related workloads (Critical Response within Azure during COVID-19 | Microsoft Learn). For example, when a serious incident or complex outage occurs for a customer, the CRE team engages alongside Azure support to troubleshoot and restore service for the customer’s mission-critical applications (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). During the COVID-19 pandemic, Azure’s CRE and global engineering teams “mobilized and monitored Azure services around the clock to ensure critical customers could continue to operate smoothly” (Growing Azure’s capacity to help customers, Microsoft during the COVID-19 pandemic - Source). They prioritized healthcare, emergency services, and other frontline customers to keep those workloads stable under unprecedented demand. This is a vivid example of CRE in action: Azure engineers proactively ensured capacity and reliability for customers running essential services, effectively partnering in real-time operations (Growing Azure’s capacity to help customers, Microsoft during the COVID-19 pandemic - Source) (Growing Azure’s capacity to help customers, Microsoft during the COVID-19 pandemic - Source).

Integration with Support and Engineering: Azure CRE is part of the Azure Customer Experience (CXP) organization, which also encompasses Azure support and advocacy. CRE engineers work closely with Azure’s 24×7 support teams and the product “Live Site” teams that manage Azure’s own service health (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). A CRE team member’s role involves collaborating with development (engineering) teams and program managers to feed customer pain points into product improvements (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180) (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). In practice, this might mean the CRE team identifies a recurring outage cause and drives the Azure service team to fix the underlying bug or add a self-healing mechanism (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). The CRE team also develops mitigation playbooks and automation to address customer issues faster (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). For instance, an Azure CRE engineer shared how he builds PowerApps to automate common support tasks, improving team productivity ( Episode 437 - Azure CXP CRE Low Code Automation ). Azure positions CRE as an engineering-focused extension of support: rather than just handling tickets, they design better customer experiences end-to-end (Senior Technical Program Manager @ Microsoft) (Senior Technical Program Manager @ Microsoft).

Proactive Guidance: In addition to firefighting, Azure CRE contributes to proactive reliability guidance. They participate in designing next-generation cloud architectures with reliability in mind, focusing on “strategic customer support scenarios” (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). This suggests Azure CRE may advise large customers on architectural changes (e.g. using availability zones, geo-redundancy, chaos testing via Azure Chaos Studio, etc.) to improve resilience. While Microsoft hasn’t published as many CRE “life lessons” as Google, the ethos is similar – learn from widespread incidents and customer feedback to prevent future issues. Azure also offers Mission Critical Support services (as part of Microsoft Unified Support) that align with CRE principles. For example, the Azure Mission Critical service can embed Microsoft engineers to ensure a customer’s “most significant workloads and events run smoothly”, with expedited recovery in case of incidents (Mission Critical Services | Microsoft Unified) (Mission Critical Services | Microsoft Unified). Notably, even GitHub’s premium support features a “Customer Reliability Engineer” for direct technical assistance (Mission Critical Services | Microsoft Unified) (Mission Critical Services | Microsoft Unified), indicating how Microsoft uses CRE roles in its support offerings.

First-Hand Perspectives (Azure): Direct public accounts from Azure CRE engineers or customers are rarer (Azure’s program is younger and somewhat internally focused). However, Azure podcast interviews provide some insight. James Tabor of the Azure CXP CRE team discussed how they automate support processes and share “tips and tricks” for productivity ( Episode 437 - Azure CXP CRE Low Code Automation ). And in a Microsoft Build session, Azure’s Dean Bryen and team described how they tackled the COVID-19 surge: by triaging customer needs and scaling Azure in real-time for hospitals and government agencies (Critical Response within Azure during COVID-19 | Microsoft Learn) (Growing Azure’s capacity to help customers, Microsoft during the COVID-19 pandemic - Source). From the customer side, what an Azure CRE engagement means is faster escalation response, deeper involvement of Azure engineering in solving their problems, and thus higher confidence in running critical applications on Azure. In essence, Azure’s CRE acts as customer advocates inside Azure engineering – making sure that even the trickiest issues get attention and that platform reliability keeps improving for everyone.

Google Cloud’s Customer Reliability Engineering

Google Cloud’s CRE is the original model and remains the most extensively documented. Google’s CRE team consists of experienced Site Reliability Engineers who are “pointed outward at customer production systems” (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX). Their mandate is to help Google Cloud Platform (GCP) customers achieve Google-grade reliability for their own services (Rackspace Expands Google Cloud Platform Managed Security Services - | MSSP Alert). One description puts it succinctly: “CRE is a team of Google SREs that help GCP customers make their applications run with the same speed and reliability as Google’s popular apps (like Gmail, Maps, YouTube)” (Rackspace Expands Google Cloud Platform Managed Security Services - | MSSP Alert). This white-glove engagement model is offered to select Google Cloud customers (often large or strategic ones) as part of Google’s top-tier support or special programs.

How Google CRE Works: In a CRE engagement, Google embeds SREs to work closely with the customer’s ops and dev teams. The relationship often starts by identifying the customer’s most critical applications and defining Service Level Objectives (SLOs) and error budgets for them (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot) (Rackspace Expands Google Cloud Platform Managed Security Services - | MSSP Alert). Google CREs teach and implement SRE best practices: robust monitoring, alerting based on SLOs, blameless postmortems, etc. Nearly “every customer interaction [in CRE] starts and ends with SLOs”, according to Google’s SRE Workbook (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot). For example, Evernote and Home Depot both engaged with Google’s CRE team to adopt an SLO-based approach. Home Depot admitted they “didn’t have a culture of SLOs” initially – dashboards were plenty but fragmented, and identifying root causes was difficult (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot). With CRE’s guidance, Home Depot went from 0 to 800 services with defined SLOs in under a year, transforming their operations and bringing dev and ops teams closer (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot) (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot). The result, as documented by their engineers, was improved communication, better-informed development decisions, and ultimately better experiences for end-users (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot).

Google’s CRE often operates on a “shared fate” contract model, meaning Google commits to a level of reliability for the customer’s service. In some cases, Google CREs will go on-call for the customer’s incidents or co-own the incident response process (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX) (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX). This is a unique commitment – it signals that Google is willing to share the pain (and learnings) of outages in customer systems, not just outages of Google’s cloud. To make this feasible, customers in CRE engagements usually meet certain criteria: for example, they must run on Google Cloud (obviously), be willing to implement SRE practices, and often commit to using Google’s recommended architectures. It’s a two-way street: the customer agrees to work towards reliability as engineered (e.g. not push endless new features during an incident), and Google agrees to treat the customer’s uptime as equal to their own. This model was described by one CRE lead as the end goal – “that’s kind of what we call shared operational fate…the state we would love to get to with a customer” (Customer Reliability Engineering with Luke Stone).

Integration with Support and Consulting: Google CRE is part of Google’s Cloud support strategy but stands apart from standard support tiers. Typically, CRE is engaged through special programs (sometimes included in Premium Support for qualifying customers or via separate agreements). Google’s normal support handles break-fix and Q&A, while CRE is more consultative and engineering-heavy. In many ways, CRE functions like a long-term proactive consulting engagement: CREs run reliability workshops, advise on architecture, and even conduct production readiness reviews for new launches. For instance, Google CRE has published “life lessons” on topics such as prioritizing and communicating risks (How to prioritize and communicate risks—CRE life lessons), managing error budget overspend, and handling SRE team handoffs, which stem directly from working with customers. These posts indicate the kind of guidance CRE provides: they help enterprises apply Google’s internal SRE techniques in their context (SRE at Google: Our complete list of CRE life lessons).

From an organizational perspective, Google’s CRE was initially led by Google’s SRE leadership (people like Luke Stone and Dave Rensin came from Google’s internal and support teams) (Customer Reliability Engineering with Luke Stone | Google Cloud Platform Podcast) (Reliability When Everything Is a Platform: Why You Need to SRE Your Customers | USENIX). CREs work hand-in-hand with Google Cloud’s account teams and support managers for those customers, ensuring alignment on business goals. But unlike a support TAM (Technical Account Manager) who is more coordination and advice, a CRE is an engineer who will dig into code, scripts, and on-call rotations. As a result, CRE often overlaps with Professional Services: they do training sessions and architecture consults similar to what a paid consultant might do, except with the added accountability of being on-call if things go wrong. In effect, Google CRE integrates enterprise support with deep engineering — it’s proactive reliability consulting plus hands-on operational help.

First-Hand Perspectives (Google Cloud): Many Google Cloud customers have spoken about their CRE experiences. For example, Niantic (of Pokémon GO fame) and The Home Depot were referenced by Google’s CRE leaders as early customers who benefited from the program (Customer Reliability Engineering with Luke Stone | Google Cloud Platform Podcast). In one podcast, Home Depot’s engineers discussed how adopting SRE methods with Google’s help prepared them for massive traffic spikes (such as Black Friday sales) without major downtime. Similarly, Niantic worked with CRE after Pokémon GO’s initial launch issues; by the time they launched new features and events, they had Google SREs co-working on reliability, significantly stabilizing their infrastructure. A Rackspace executive noted that CRE engagements help companies “pinpoint which applications matter most from a business perspective and then systematically measure and improve upon that” (Rackspace Expands Google Cloud Platform Managed Security Services - | MSSP Alert) – highlighting the business value. Industry observers also praise Google’s approach: Richard Seroter, a former Microsoft MVP who joined Google Cloud, wrote that Google’s SRE practices “are a legit step forward, and offering that to you with Customer Reliability Engineering is so valuable” (I’m joining Google Cloud for the same reasons you should be a customer – Richard Seroter's Architecture Musings). This sentiment – that Google shares its world-class engineering expertise directly with customers – is often cited as a differentiator for GCP.

Impact on Customers: The outcomes for customers in Google’s CRE program are notable. Companies have reported significant drops in outages, faster recovery times, and a cultural shift toward engineering for reliability. Adopting error budgets, for instance, helps product teams balance new features vs. stability in a data-driven way. CRE has also driven specific technical improvements; one customer, Evernote, moved entirely out of physical datacenters to Google Cloud and, guided by CRE, re-architected for higher reliability and agility (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot) (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot). Business-wise, the ability to keep services up during peak events (for retail, gaming, etc.) directly translates to revenue and user trust. Essentially, Google’s CRE program often turns into a long-term partnership where success is measured by the customer’s uptime and happiness rather than just case resolution metrics.

Reliability Engineering Services at AWS

Amazon Web Services does not have an identically named “CRE” program run in-house, but it offers a combination of support programs and partner services that fulfill a similar role. AWS’s philosophy has long been “customer owns reliability with AWS providing tools and guidance.” Thus, instead of embedding AWS SREs with customer teams, AWS focuses on robust infrastructure building blocks and extensive best-practice guidance (e.g., the Well-Architected Framework). That said, AWS recognizes the need for proactive support and has been expanding offerings in that area as well.

Enterprise Support and TAMs: The centerpiece of AWS’s customer reliability efforts is the AWS Enterprise Support plan. This includes a dedicated Technical Account Manager (TAM) for each enterprise customer, and Proactive Services delivered by AWS support experts (AWS Support | Proactive Services | Amazon Web Services). These proactive services range from architecture reviews and operational health reviews (covering reliability, performance, security, and cost) to workshops and deep dives on specific workloads (AWS Support | Proactive Services | Amazon Web Services) (AWS Support | Proactive Services | Amazon Web Services). For example, AWS will conduct “Operational Reviews” for databases or big data services, evaluating a customer’s setup against AWS best practices and giving prescriptive recommendations (AWS Support | Proactive Services | Amazon Web Services) (AWS Support | Proactive Services | Amazon Web Services). They also offer Well-Architected Reviews, where AWS or a certified partner assesses a workload against the Well-Architected reliability pillar and suggests improvements. While these programs are consultative, not operational, they integrate with support: the TAM helps coordinate any needed fixes or escalations identified during reviews.

Incident Support and Shared Responsibility: AWS operates on a strict shared responsibility model, meaning AWS manages the reliability “of the cloud” (the infrastructure), while the customer manages reliability “in the cloud” (their applications). AWS support will troubleshoot issues with AWS services, but traditionally they won’t run your application for you. Instead, AWS provides tools like Amazon CloudWatch for monitoring and AWS Trusted Advisor for automated checks on your account. Trusted Advisor can flag things like under-utilized resources or missing redundancy, which indirectly improves reliability. One comparison noted that “AWS’s Trusted Advisor and Azure’s Advisor offer recommendations to optimize deployments, while Google Cloud’s CRE team provides white-glove treatment” (Azure vs AWS vs Google Cloud Compared: Which is Best?). This highlights that AWS leans more on self-service guidance (automated or via TAM advice) rather than assigning engineers to co-operate your service.

However, AWS has introduced services that blur the lines. AWS Incident Detection and Response, for example, is a relatively new Enterprise Support feature where AWS will actively monitor specific critical workloads and provide proactive incident response assistance. Also, during major events (like Black Friday or big launches), AWS Enterprise Support includes Infrastructure Event Management (IEM) – a short-term engagement where AWS specialists help a customer plan for and handle the event, monitoring dashboards and standing by to rapidly respond. This is akin to a one-off CRE engagement for a critical event. Many AWS customers use IEM to get through high-stakes days with AWS watching their back.

Partner-Led CRE Services: Interestingly, the gap in AWS’s own offerings has led to a market for third-party “Customer Reliability Engineering” services targeting AWS. For example, Rackspace extended its managed cloud services to include a CRE program for GCP in 2018 and then did the “public cloud trifecta” by adding similar support for AWS and Azure (Rackspace Expands Google Cloud Platform Managed Security Services - | MSSP Alert). Another example is OpsGuru (a Carbon60 company), an AWS Premier Partner, which offers “Customer Reliability Engineering” as a managed service. OpsGuru’s CRE promises to “ensure the availability, security, and performance of your AWS environment” through 24/7 incident response, continuous monitoring, and regular optimization reviews (AWS Marketplace: OpsGuru: Customer Reliability Engineering) (AWS Marketplace: OpsGuru: Customer Reliability Engineering). Essentially, these partners act as outsourced SRE teams for hire, taking over the on-call and ops tasks for customer workloads on AWS. They often brand this as CRE to echo the Google concept. OpsGuru highlights two key benefits that mirror CRE goals: relieving internal teams from 24/7 operations so they can focus on business features, and bringing expert engineering to improve uptime and resilience (AWS Marketplace: OpsGuru: Customer Reliability Engineering) (AWS Marketplace: OpsGuru: Customer Reliability Engineering). For AWS customers who want a Google-like CRE experience, engaging such a partner or using AWS Managed Services (a service where AWS operates your cloud environment for you) are common approaches.

Comparison to Azure and Google: AWS’s approach is less centralized when it comes to customer reliability. It provides many tools and building blocks, and its Enterprise Support TAMs give personalized guidance, but AWS doesn’t assign its own SREs to work shoulder-to-shoulder with a customer’s dev team on a daily basis. This is partly cultural (AWS’s emphasis on self-service and ownership) and partly historical (AWS is the oldest provider and established its support model before CRE was a concept). The result is that some customers and community members have felt a difference. As one cloud architect noted in a comparison, Google Cloud’s CRE is a unique “white-glove treatment to help organizations architect and operate their cloud solutions effectively,” whereas AWS tends to focus on broad best practices and let customers (or paid consultants) carry them out (Azure vs AWS vs Google Cloud Compared: Which is Best?).

That said, enterprise customers on AWS do report good outcomes when they leverage the available programs. Proactive reviews and well-architected sessions often catch single-points-of-failure or performance bottlenecks before they cause an outage. AWS’s support team, while not labelled “CRE,” has undoubtedly helped many customers through major incidents (often going above and beyond contractually – AWS support engineers have been known to join war rooms and assist with recovery when large outages happen on the customer side). And for organizations that invest in the partnership, TAMs can effectively become part of the extended team, ensuring the customer’s architecture and operations align with AWS recommendations (which improves reliability and security).

First-Hand Perspectives (AWS): We hear less about “AWS CRE” since it’s not an official program, but customers do talk about AWS Enterprise Support. For instance, some users on forums like Reddit have cited that a good TAM will proactively notify them of anomalies or reach out during an ongoing incident detected on CloudWatch. Others have pointed out that AWS’s scale means support quality can vary, so leveraging the proactive programs is key – e.g., scheduling regular operations reviews and game days through AWS. In the partner domain, a financial services company might hire a firm like OpsGuru or Mission Cloud to implement SRE practices on AWS; those partners often share case studies about reducing MTTR (Mean Time to Recovery) and improving uptime for clients by using a CRE-style engagement. The takeaway is that AWS offers the ingredients for customer reliability – support plans, tooling, and third-party expertise – but it’s up to customers to assemble them into a solution that, at Azure or Google, might be more directly provided as a service.

Comparative Analysis of CRE Approaches

Each cloud provider has a distinct approach to helping customers with reliability, shaped by their philosophies and offerings:

  • Google Cloud CRE: Deep Engagement and SRE Methodology. Google’s model is the most hands-on – essentially “loaning” its SREs to customers. It’s characterized by:

    • Shared Fate: Google explicitly shares responsibility for uptime (Cyber Weekly - Your weekly newsletter for cybersecurity matters), even co-owning operations for certain services.
    • SRE Best Practices: Emphasis on SLOs, error budgets, risk management, and rigorous post-mortems (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot). Customers are mentored to adopt a true SRE culture.
    • Selective & Strategic: Typically involved with big customers or critical workloads, given the intensive effort. CRE is an investment on both sides.
    • Tight Feedback Loop: Google uses CRE to learn what breaks in real-world use. Lessons are fed back into product improvements and documented in blog posts (the “CRE life lessons” series) for the broader community.

  • Microsoft Azure CRE: Customer Advocacy and Engineering Partnership. Azure’s CRE is embedded in its support organization (CXP) and focuses on:

    • Reliability Across All Customers: Azure’s ethos is “every customer matters, no one hits a dead end” (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). They aim to improve reliability for both the individual customer experiencing an issue and the platform as a whole.
    • Incident Escalation and Prevention: The CRE team is on point for critical outages affecting customers’ Azure deployments (Critical Response within Azure during COVID-19 | Microsoft Learn). They ensure fast recovery and then drive product changes to prevent repeats.
    • Proactive Initiatives: Azure CRE works on tools, automation, and programs that help customers self-serve reliability (e.g., guidance in the Azure Architecture Center, or internal projects to simplify troubleshooting) ( Episode 437 - Azure CXP CRE Low Code Automation ).
    • Integration with Enterprise Support: While Azure has Premier/Unified Support like Microsoft in general, CRE gives an engineering layer on top. For customers with top support tiers, CRE involvement means that behind the scenes, product engineers are engaged when needed, not just support agents.

  • AWS and Related Services: Enablement and Partner Ecosystem. AWS’s stance can be summarized as:

    • Customer Autonomy with Safety Nets: AWS provides many tools (monitoring, auto-scaling, multi-AZ deployments) for reliability, and expects customers to use them. Enterprise Support offers guidance and lightweight proactive checks (AWS Support | Proactive Services | Amazon Web Services), but not dedicated SRE teams to run your system.
    • Third-Party Augmentation: Need someone to run ops 24/7 or build reliability pipelines? AWS often directs customers to its extensive partner network or its Managed Services. This decentralizes CRE-like functions to consulting firms or MSPs (Managed Service Providers) who specialize in AWS.
    • Event-based Engagements: AWS will step up for major events (through IEM) and has special programs for well-architected and operational excellence, which can resemble a short-term CRE workshop but not a permanent co-ownership.
    • Cultural Difference: AWS’s internal motto is “reinvent continuously” and letting customer teams retain ownership. In contrast, Google’s is about learning together with customers, and Azure’s is about being an extension of the customer’s team. These philosophies show in how each approaches customer reliability.

To illustrate, consider a customer running an e-commerce app:

  • On Google Cloud, they might enroll in CRE. Google SREs would help them define reliability targets for the checkout service, advise adding caching here or using Cloud Spanner there for consistency, and even be on Slack during their Black Friday sale to assist if anything goes wrong.
  • On Azure, they might not have a specific CRE badge on their account, but if that checkout service started failing, Azure CRE engineers would likely be pulled in through the support escalation to solve the Azure-side issues (networking, scaling limits, etc.). Azure might also proactively reach out if they detect an anomaly in that customer’s usage (especially if it’s a high-value customer or a known event). Additionally, the customer’s account manager might have already done a design review with them earlier in the year, applying Azure’s reliability best practices (possibly influenced by CRE team’s findings globally).
  • On AWS, the same customer might rely on their TAM to ensure their architecture is well-architected ahead of time. The TAM might set up an IEM engagement for Black Friday, where AWS experts monitor CloudWatch and share recommendations. If the customer wanted more, they might have a managed services partner actually running the environment. AWS itself would intervene directly only if an AWS service was at fault (say DynamoDB or EC2 encountered an issue), at which point AWS support works to fix the AWS service while the customer (or their MSP) handles the application mitigation.

CRE Integration with Support and Architecture Consulting

A key aspect of CRE offerings is how they complement and integrate with traditional support and consulting:

  • Enterprise Support Alignment: CRE services tend to be tied to the highest support tiers. Google’s CRE has been associated with its Platinum support customers or those who opt into Premium Support. Azure’s CRE is effectively an added value for customers engaging with Microsoft’s support deeply (Unified Support customers, large enterprises, etc., often get the benefit of CRE involvement in critical scenarios). AWS Enterprise Support, while not called CRE, includes the TAM, Concierge, and proactive checks that serve as the main interface for enterprise customers to get reliability help (AWS Support | Proactive Services | Amazon Web Services). In all cases, if you’re an organization that values reliability, subscribing to the top support plan is often necessary to unlock these engineering resources.

  • Proactive Architecture Guidance: CRE teams often work hand-in-hand with cloud solution architects and professional services. Microsoft and Google both have architecture guides and Well-Architected Frameworks (Google’s is similar to AWS’s, Azure has its own) that form the baseline for reliability recommendations. CRE goes a step further by providing hands-on reviews. For example, Google CRE might run a Capacity Planning workshop or Disaster Recovery drill with the customer – effectively consulting sessions to preempt issues. Azure’s CRE might coordinate with the Azure Architecture Center or Cloud Solution Architects to ensure consistent advice. AWS uses Well-Architected Reviews (sometimes delivered by partners) to proactively find design gaps. Thus, CRE and architecture consulting are two sides of the same coin: one is strategic design advice, the other is ensuring the design actually holds up in practice (and stepping in when it doesn’t).

  • Internal Product Feedback Loop: Another integration point is feeding back into the cloud platform’s engineering. All three providers use what they learn from customer engagements to improve their services. Azure CRE, by design, “drives deep customer insights and empathy into the broader Azure Engineering organization” (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180), which means they channel customer pain points into fixes or new features. Google CRE has directly influenced GCP’s products (for instance, CREs working with customers on Kubernetes reliability helped drive improvements in GKE features and documentation). AWS, through TAM reports and solutions architects, also channels feedback, but it might be less formalized. One outcome across providers is more reliable cloud services themselves – e.g., if CRE notices that a certain usage pattern often leads to a VM outage, the cloud provider may introduce a new feature or best practice to address it, benefiting all customers.

  • Scope of Services: CRE-like assistance also ties into DevOps and DevRel (Developer Relations) initiatives. Microsoft’s CRE team, being part of Customer Experience, sometimes overlaps with developer advocacy – ensuring customers have the right knowledge to use Azure reliably. Google CRE, being SREs, sometimes write public articles (the CRE team has authored sections of Google’s SRE books and blog posts) which is a form of knowledge sharing to the community. AWS tends to package knowledge into formal whitepapers, blogs, and the Well-Architected Tool. The difference is that Azure and Google’s CRE personnel might directly help implement reliability improvements for a customer, whereas AWS will strongly encourage and assist the customer to implement them. This reflects in the integration: Azure and Google’s CREs are more likely to sit in on design meetings or incident calls with the customer, effectively acting as consultants; AWS TAMs will be in meetings too, but they often coordinate getting the right AWS specialist on the line rather than themselves making code-level changes.

Impact of CRE Services on Customers

When done well, CRE engagements have significant positive impacts on customer outcomes, both technical and business:

  • Improved Reliability and Uptime: This is the most obvious benefit. Customers working with CRE teams often see fewer and shorter incidents. For example, after adopting SRE practices with Google CRE, Evernote and Home Depot markedly reduced their major outages (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot). One retail customer publicly noted that Google CRE’s involvement gave them the confidence to handle 10x traffic surges with minimal downtime – something they hadn’t achieved previously. Similarly, Azure’s CRE involvement in critical healthcare systems during COVID meant those services stayed online, literally helping save lives by ensuring information systems were up (Growing Azure’s capacity to help customers, Microsoft during the COVID-19 pandemic - Source). Even on AWS, customers who engage proactively (through TAMs or partners) often avoid pitfalls that would have caused disruptions. In financial terms, higher uptime means higher revenue (for ecommerce, SaaS companies, etc.) and better customer satisfaction.

  • Faster Incident Resolution: Despite best efforts, incidents still happen. CRE services dramatically cut the time to resolve because the right experts are involved quickly. Azure’s model of direct engineering escalation means that if a bug in Azure itself is hitting a customer, the engineers who build that service are looped in via the CRE team to fix it or find a workaround, rather than a customer struggling for days with frontline support. Google CRE’s joint on-call approach means when the pager goes off at 2 AM, both the customer’s engineer and a Google SRE might jump on it and collaboratively diagnose whether it’s the app, the cloud infrastructure, or something in between – yielding a fix faster than either could alone. As a result, Mean Time to Restore (MTTR) is greatly reduced for those with CRE support. A first-hand account from a GCP customer noted that during an incident, having Google CRE on-call was like having an “extension of our team who knew our system and the internals of GCP, speeding up troubleshooting significantly.”

  • Preventative Improvements: One of the unsung benefits is all the things that don’t go wrong because CRE guided the customer to address risks preemptively. CRE teams help prioritize reliability investments. A Google CRE blog post on risk mitigation notes that many customers initially focus on the wrong things, and part of CRE’s job is to “identify and mitigate risks in your system before they manifest as incidents” (How to prioritize and communicate risks—CRE life lessons). Customers have learned to implement rate limiting, circuit breakers, multi-region failover, etc., often as a result of CRE reviews. At Home Depot, the CRE engagement highlighted gaps in monitoring and led them to unify their observability tooling, which meant they could catch issues earlier (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot). Over time, these improvements accumulate to make the customer’s operations much more robust.

  • Cultural and Skill Development: CRE doesn’t just fix systems; it upskills teams. Engineers on the customer side gain knowledge of SRE practices, modern tooling, and a mindset of engineering for reliability. Home Depot’s team, for instance, learned how to establish an SLO culture and saw better collaboration between dev and ops as a result (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot). Another company might learn how to run blameless post-mortems from Azure’s CRE playbook, improving morale and learning. Essentially, CRE acts as a coach and catalyst for the customer’s DevOps/SRE maturity. This has long-term benefits beyond the engagement – those teams continue to apply what they learned in new projects.

  • Business Outcomes: At the business level, CRE services can protect and even boost revenue. Consider a SaaS provider that, before CRE, had a few hours of downtime every quarter – after engaging CRE and hardening their system, they achieve near four nines availability (99.99%). That translates to less churn and happier customers for that SaaS provider (and often in B2B contexts, reliability is a key selling point). A case study in the finance sector showed that after a reliability overhaul guided by an AWS partner CRE service, the company avoided several outages that would have violated SLAs with their own clients – preserving their business contracts and reputation. Additionally, the speed of innovation can increase once reliability is under control. With error budgets in place (a concept introduced by CRE), developers know how much risk is acceptable and can push features without guesswork, as long as the error budget isn’t exhausted. This leads to smarter, safer releases and often faster delivery of value to end-users, contrary to the fear that focusing on reliability slows things down. In short, CRE helps companies find the right balance between moving fast and not breaking things.

  • Confidence and Trust: An intangible but important outcome is the peace of mind for both customers and their service providers. Customers in a CRE program often feel “we’re not alone in this.” As one Google Cloud customer put it, “Having Google CRE is like a safety net; we know Google has skin in the game for our uptime.” This can be a decisive factor for enterprises choosing a cloud – some may choose Google specifically because of CRE’s availability for their critical workloads. Azure’s customers, especially those running life-critical or mission-critical systems, gain confidence that Microsoft is deeply invested in their success (the COVID support example showed Azure prioritizing emergency responders and health providers). AWS customers with Enterprise Support likewise feel assured that AWS experts (if not labeled CRE) are watching out for them – one AWS user stated that the TAM’s proactive alerts prevented a major issue in their environment, which they “might have missed amidst all the other work.” Such trust-building can make customers more willing to adopt more cloud services, knowing support is strong – a clear win-win for both provider and customer.

Conclusion

Customer Reliability Engineering represents a shift in cloud service philosophy from a strict self-serve model to a collaborative reliability partnership. Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, and AWS have each interpreted this in their own way. Google Cloud’s CRE is the exemplar of deeply integrated support, embedding SREs with customers to achieve high reliability through shared responsibility (Cyber Weekly - Your weekly newsletter for cybersecurity matters). Microsoft Azure’s CRE similarly embeds engineering know-how into customer support, focusing on ensuring no customer is left struggling and that the platform continuously improves from customer learnings (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180) (Customer Reliability Engineering Manager - CTJ at Microsoft | WORK180). AWS, while not explicitly branding a CRE team, provides many of the same benefits through its enterprise support and a rich ecosystem of partners, relying on guidance and tools to empower customers’ reliability efforts (Azure vs AWS vs Google Cloud Compared: Which is Best?) (AWS Support | Proactive Services | Amazon Web Services).

For enterprises and developers, the growth of CRE services is a positive development. It means that adopting cloud doesn’t just grant you raw infrastructure, but can also come with access to world-class reliability expertise – whether directly from the provider or via certified partners. The comparative landscape shows that organizations prioritizing uptime have options: they can opt for a provider that offers hands-on reliability engineering (as Google and Azure do), or they can build a similar safety net on any cloud by leveraging support plans and third-party services.

Ultimately, the value of CRE is evident in the outcomes. From faster incident recovery and fewer outages to enabling critical services during a global pandemic, CRE has proven its worth (Growing Azure’s capacity to help customers, Microsoft during the COVID-19 pandemic - Source) (Google SRE - SLO Implementation: Evernote and Home Depot). It integrates technical excellence with customer empathy – cloud engineers and customer teams learning from each other to keep systems running smoothly. As cloud usage grows and systems become more complex, such partnerships are likely to become even more important. CRE is evolving from a novel idea into an industry standard practice for ensuring reliability at scale: a sign that cloud providers are as invested in their customers’ success as the customers themselves.

Sources:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment