Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@iregina
Last active June 18, 2025 06:37
Show Gist options
  • Save iregina/854f9ecff67605994293e278d8ac3ef3 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save iregina/854f9ecff67605994293e278d8ac3ef3 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
========== TEST GRADE REPORT ==========
Test file: test/roast/workflow/workflow_initializer_test.rb
FINAL GRADE:
Score: 83/100
Letter Grade: B
RUBRIC SCORES:
Line Coverage (10% of grade):
Value: 8.0
Score: 8/10 - "The source file has 93.33% line coverage, which is good coverage with only minor or edge case code paths remaining untested."
Method Coverage (10% of grade):
Value: 10.0
Score: 10/10 - "The source file has 100% method coverage, indicating all methods are being tested."
Branch Coverage (30% of grade):
Value: 8.0
Score: 8/10 - "The source file has 72.97% branch coverage, indicating some conditional branches are not fully tested, but most are covered."
Test Helpers Usage (10% of grade):
Value: 10.0
Score: 10/10 - "The test does not rely on custom test helpers, avoiding potential misuse or over-abstraction, which keeps the tests clear and straightforward."
Mocks and Stubs Usage (10% of grade):
Value: 8.0
Score: 8/10 - "Mocks and stubs are used judiciously primarily for external dependencies and configuration states, and they accurately reflect the real implementations, minimizing brittleness."
Test Readability (10% of grade):
Value: 8.0
Score: 8/10 - "Test method names are descriptive and clearly communicate the intent, with a logical structure and clear assertions, though some tests could benefit from more explicit context or grouping."
Test Maintainability (10% of grade):
Value: 7.0
Score: 7/10 - "Tests focus mostly on behavior rather than implementation details, but some stubbing of configuration and internal state introduces moderate coupling that could require updates if internals change."
Test Effectiveness (10% of grade):
Value: 8.0
Score: 8/10 - "The tests cover a wide range of positive and negative scenarios, including error handling and edge cases, providing strong validation of expected behaviors."
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment