Avoid truth assertions

**Avoid truth assertions**

We want the site to focus on questions about the text and the process of interpreting that. 
This relies on (at least) grammar, linguistics, history, archaeology, and comparison 
with other text. None of that is inherently religious, and that non-dependence on a 
religious foundation is what distinguishes BH from other sites in the SE network.

Because we are focused on the text and the process, not on religious application, 
assertions of religious truth ("dogma") are not helpful in answers: they can't be 
examined, proven or disproven, or dug into the same way that other factors cna be. 
In addition, their presence weakens the answer for any reader who does not agree with 
the truth of those assertions. At best such assertions boil down to "because I say so".

Our goal should be: (a) don't make truth statements unless your argument requires it, 
and (b) if your argument *does* require it, qualify those statements. "According to X" 
instead of just saying "X" provides important context that may not be otherwise obvious. 
It also leaves room for the same answer to then say "but according to Y" and 
"according to Z". An answer that can bring multiple perspectives and compare/contrast 
them is a very strong answer.

As noted in the question, no matter what we do some people will feel uncomfortable and leave. 
If we move toward this answer's goal then we will lose anyone who feels a strong conviction 
to present religious truth. One top user is on record as saying that if he has to qualify truth
statements he'd feel unable to participate according to his conscience. It is not clear how 
widespread this perspective is.

On the other hand, if we do not move toward this answer's goal then we will lose others. Two 
top users have posted about the problematic nature of a site that welcomes dogma, and several 
Jews who have declined to participate here have explained that this is a factor.

This is not about individuals. There is no outcome that will please everyone and we need to 
recognise that whatever we choose will suit some and alienate others. This is not the aim of 
course but must persue that best long-term goal for the site.