-
-
Save jackdouglas/6761088 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
**Bring your own framework** | |
We want a site that allows contributors to speak from within their framework. Overall, | |
this broadens the appeal of the site, and it preserves the richness of expression when | |
answers are given in the natural context of the one giving the answer, even if this | |
means expressing one's framework or opinions as unqualified facts. | |
Our aim is to be 'expert' in the context of the internet. This will not be the best | |
home for those who do not think deeply about the texts or those who cannot communicate | |
clearly and effectively. But it is not our aim to be home only to academics or full-time | |
theologians: that would narrow the user-base too far and not be sustainable. | |
Under this option is is generally OK to make statements that assert 'truth', omitting | |
qualifications such as 'Group X believes…'. | |
This outcome is where we are currently heading. This is not a reason in itself for it to be | |
chosen, but it is the least risky option. It's clear our traffic is growing, and | |
although traffic can't be the only gauge of success on an expert site, it *is* necessary | |
for the site to be viable: | |
![Quantcast](http://i.stack.imgur.com/ET7KZ.png) | |
This is not about individuals. There is no outcome that will please everyone and we need to | |
recognise that whatever we choose will suit some and alienate others. This is not the aim of | |
course but we must pursue the best long-term goal for the site. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment