APIs are becoming an essential feature of modern web applications. Rails does a good job of helping your application provide an API using the same MVC structure you're accustomed to.
Let's work with the following example controller:
class ArticlesController < ApplicationController
def index
@articles = Article.all
end
def create
@article = Article.new(params[:article])
if @article.save
redirect_to article_path(@article), :notice => "Your article was created."
else
flash[:notice] = "Article failed to save."
render :action => :new
end
end
#...
end
We decide to service JSON and XML requests from these two actions. The index
will be triggered by a GET
request to /articles.json
or /articles.xml
. The create
will be triggered by a POST
request to the same paths.
The first step is to call respond_to
and list the formats our controller will respond to. This is typically done at the beginning of the controller:
class ArticlesController < ApplicationController
respond_to :html, :json, :xml
#...
end
Our controller will now attempt to respond to requests for HTML, JSON, or XML.
[Jeff's Says: When starting out with an API, I often forget the :html
in the respond_to
. The application will work at first because it will match an existing view template for the rendering. But once you start using respond_with
your responses will be blank unless you include :html
here.]
If you request /articles.json
you'll find that the application is still unsuccessfully trying to render a articles.json.erb
.
You can write a view template for JSON and one for XML, but that's a tremendous pain. Instead we'd like to render the data directly from the controller.
In the past we broke down each format response using respond_to
in the controller action:
def index
@articles = Article.all
respond_to do |format|
format.html
format.xml { render :xml => @articles }
format.json { render :json => @articles }
end
end
It led to a lot of repetition. In Rails 3, we can instead use respond_with
:
def index
@articles = Article.all
respond_with(@articles)
end
The respond_with
method will first attempt to render a matching view template for the response type, like index.json.erb
or index.html.erb
. If that template is not found, then the method will call .to_xml
or .to_json
on the object and render the result.
By combining respond_to
and respond_with
we can save a lot of boilerplate code that was prevalent in Rails 2.
But how is this technique used when we write a create
action that checks object validation? We started with this:
def create
@article = Article.new(params[:article])
if @article.save
redirect_to article_path(@article), :notice => "Your article was created."
else
flash[:notice] = "Article failed to save."
render :action => :new
end
end
We can achieve the same functionality using respond_with
:
def create
@article = Article.new(params[:article])
if @article.save
flash[:notice] = "Your article was created."
else
flash[:notice] = "Article failed to save."
end
respond_with @article
end
Then refactoring the branch into a ternary...
def create
@article = Article.new(params[:article])
flash[:notice] = @article.save ? "Your article was created." : "Article failed to save."
respond_with @article
end
When we pass @article
to respond_with
, it will actually check if the object is valid?
first. If the object is not valid, then it will call render :new
when in a create
or render :edit
when in an update
.
If the object is valid, it will automatically redirect to the show
action for that object.
Maybe you'd rather redirect to the index
after successful creation. You can override the redirect by adding the :location
option to respond_with
:
def create
@article = Article.new(params[:article])
flash[:notice] = @article.save ? "Your article was created." : "Article failed to save."
respond_with @article, :location => articles_path
end
Does that action feel too simple? Would you like to bring back some of the heavy syntax from Rails 2? Then override the response by output format:
def create
@article = Article.new(params[:article])
flash[:notice] = @article.save ? "Your article was created." : "Article failed to save."
respond_with @article do |format|
format.html { @article.valid? ? redirect_to(@article) : render(:new) }
format.json { render :json => @article }
format.xml { render :xml => @article }
end
end
When you use respond_with
to output JSON or XML it will, by default, dump all the attributes. Next we'll look at how to filter these attributes from the model layer.
ActionController::Responder
API: http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionController/Responder.html- AsciiCast on Rails 3 Controllers: http://asciicasts.com/episodes/224-controllers-in-rails-3
- PlatformaTec posts on
respond_with
: http://blog.plataformatec.com.br/tag/respond_with/
I deployed a Rails engine (packed as a gem) that is really useful to test APIs on rails. You just have to mount the engine and go to the url that you specified, i.e. “localhost:3000/api_explorer” to see it. It’s a way of documenting an API also, reading the webservices specification from a file.
The gem is named 'api_explorer' and the repo is http://www.github.com/toptierlabs/api_explorer
Any comments or help improving the api is welcome. :)