Last active
January 9, 2019 11:23
-
-
Save jdegoes/6842d471e7b8849f90d5bb5644ecb3b2 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Modeling higher-kinded types in a language without them.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
class Option<A> { | |
protected Option() { } | |
} | |
interface App<F, A> { | |
F proof(); | |
} | |
class OptionF { | |
private OptionF() {} | |
private static class AppOption<A> implements App<OptionF, A> { | |
public final Option<A> value; | |
AppOption(Option<A> value) { | |
this.value = value; | |
} | |
public OptionF proof() { | |
return new OptionF(); | |
} | |
} | |
public static <A> App<OptionF, A> fromOption(Option<A> v) { | |
return new AppOption(v); | |
} | |
public static <A> Option<A> toOption(App<OptionF, A> v) { | |
return (((AppOption<A>)v).value); | |
} | |
} | |
interface Function<A, B> { | |
B apply(A a); | |
} | |
interface Functor<F> { | |
<A, B> App<F, B> map(Function<A, B> f, App<F, A> fa); | |
} |
Damn access methods. If only Java had protected[this]
! Or an abstract private method that could be implemented and seen only by subclasses...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@jdegoes, I don't think so. My original counter-example still produce a ClassCastException:
https://gist.github.com/jdegoes/6842d471e7b8849f90d5bb5644ecb3b2#gistcomment-1818237