Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@jdittrich
Created February 28, 2021 22:32
Show Gist options
  • Save jdittrich/b9c62c6ebfd4f0491995403a9b11656a to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save jdittrich/b9c62c6ebfd4f0491995403a9b11656a to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Notes for "Objectivity", Daston, Galison
18  Truth to nature (underlying form) → Objectivity (mechanical product) → Trained judgment
19 Working Objects: Atlas Images, Type Specimens, Lab processes
29 Objectivity used to mean the opposite. With Kant came the now familiar objective=nature
31f objectivity as part of the tradition to examine 'obstacles to knowledge'
34 ""Man of science" began to fret openly about a new kind of obstacle to knowledge: themselves"
36 Objectivity vs. Subjectivity
37 In other context, the "subject" was celebrated
37 Scientific self and scientific images vs. artistic self and artistic images
38 Scientific techniques of the self: Lab notebook, grid drawings, experimental observers, objective/subjective distinction, voluntary attention
39 religious overtones in scientific morals
44 'calibration of the eye' as essential
49 imagine changes as avalanche: Sometimes stones and branches don't do anything, but if the conditions are there, they can start a growing avalanche. But even if conditions are there, a falling branch might cause nothing.
51 Objectivity is often treated as an abstract concept without history and practices. Such, criticisms also switch between metaphysical and moral meanings of the term
52 "The ideal and ethos are gradually build up and bodied out by thousands of concrete actions…"
53 Objectivity is a value: violating it draws the attention of others [See Birth in…, Jordan]
58 Truth is not Objectivity
60 "The type was truer to nature…  more real… than any actual specimen
64 Before: improved taxidermy, drawings were the most lifelike impressions that could be brought from expeditions [→ drawing things together, latour]
67 Truth to nature: intervene to show the true form; mechanical objectivity: No human involvement plz!
77 Even as-if-is representation need intervention
81 Artist corrects natures imperfections
82 " To learn to see the typical was the achievement of a lifetime"
84 it is difficult too work with artists, they do things not as intended by the author/researcher
89 women  were excluded from history and religious painting, some of them did do illustrations (→97)
88ff struggle for visibility and primacy of work between the naturalists and the artists
95 related to 88f: Who is tool, who is master
95 artist as medium, not just 'subordinate'
96 Passivity metaphors: mirrors, wax, photo-plates (→95) see Mirror of Nature
98 Artists: this is drawn "after life"-but e.g. flower and fruit were represented in same drawing – which not the case in nature
99 drawing from copybooks
102 No conflict between focus both on nature and beauty
104 Drawing from nature means integrating from memories of nature, creating a beautifully and truthfully crafted image
105 Truth to nature continued to exist parallel to mechanical objectivity
121 Mechanical objectivity, non-intervention but ideally automated transcription of images
121 Total mechanical objectivity can not be achieved it is a normative ideal
122 Mechanical objectivity as a morally loaded aestheticism
123 Machines > People  see Brain as Computer, Birth of a Metaphor
123 Machines offer freedom from will (Hegel, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer and other will-focused philosophers?)
124 Illustrators are a check for scientist’s love for confirming their hypothesis.
130 Photography initially thought to be an efficient way to copy art
133 creating an "objective" image needs great skill
135 people were not concerned about fraud but subtle influence by wishes of the researcher
138 "No intelligence would disturb the image"
139 Aesthetic pleasure in identical objects
138f Machines said to deliver a standard outcome are better (tireless) workers and have no bias
161 holding back corrections, discard underlying mathematical models, beauty, symmetry, policing the process… mechanical objectivity is hard and painful.
169 Synthesis was a scientific virtue; Galton pushed it to be "artistic"
169 Automated Synthesis
171 Artistic interpretative - moved to→ routine/mechanical
174 serlf-surveillance
178ff photography was limited in depth of field, color, diagnostic utility… – but the epistemic value of objectivity had a strong pull
183 Seeing clearly as goal of science and character (see moral)
186 Atlas makers: Interpretation is bad (not objective) but without it you get irrelevance
the compromise is to show mechanically reproduced samples that are "normal" and have the reader construct the "type" intuitively.
187 mechanical objectivity value is non-intervention not verisimilitude.
188 people knew there was also intervention in photography; different light could change what is visible etc.
202 Class and gender: Hard work was bad (see also antique Greeks; unveiling nature)
203 Enlightenment: extract truth-to-nature from ore → colonialism
209 Scientific self and ethos
109 Kant can't be easily mapped to mind/worlds, yet his philosophy had great influence
213 Much progress but also weariness of changes and divisions of opinions
215 Change and discarded theories fueled the turn away from truth and towards objectivity
224 Temptations of the enlightenment self
223 fragmented self → will and coherent self
230 Scientists as both man of action and sacrificing and restraining
234ff Technologies of the scientific self: Observation (Posture, Waiting, Focus)
235 Memory ←→ Self ←→ Diary
236 Incoherent self, incoherent objects → held together by lab diary.
240 'the object as a whole shattered into a mosaic of details'
242 Attention= Civilized
242 Conflict: Observation and Experimentation
247 The interest of Haeckel in both science and art was "eccentric" (but see 102, where aesthetic and truth was not a conflict)
[STRUCTURAL OBJECTIVITY]
253 'Objectivity  lay in the invariable relations among sensations, read like the abstract signs of language rather than as image of the world'
254 Only structures can be conveyed
255 Communicate sciences "everywhere and always"
256 Objectivity is what survives translation, transmission, theory change
257 Mechanical Objectivity iis self-restrained, structural objectivity is giving up in favor for abstract structures
257 Subjectivity as common enemy of different forms of objectivity
258 Psychology showed how variables perception is. Hope: Structures exist beyond that
260 free of senses at all
263 Kant: a judgment is Objective is it is valid for everyone
264 Wundt: Self-observation-method no good
263, 265 looking for the ('primitive') origin of thought an mathematics  (267, 277, 281)
273 Colors are subjective, particles are real
288 Poincare: Only relationships are stay, theories come and go
296 Beyond humans
[Trained judgment]
311 Trained judgment needed hunches, not self-constraint
312 Intuition can be taught
314 'Intuition' became a thing
318 Recognizing Family Resemblance
321 Atlas is for "training the eye"
322 Truth-to-nature  found the underlying idea (e.g. Urpflanze); trained judgment trains to means to classify and to manipulate
325 Scientists became "more intellectual than Algorithmic"
326 Not only lectures; active learning up to drill on instruments like in the military
327 Training also protected against a diversity of approaches and methods; they made uniform and 'calibrates' students
328 'The expert (unlike the sage) can be trained
328 Reading images likened to reaching in an unfamiliar Language and script
328 "more of an empirical art than an exact science"
329 Not anti-high-tech. Trained judgment judged images that new tech produced.
336ff recognizing human races and the skilled judgment were often compared
347 Focus: Not Metaphysical truth but usefulness for teaching
354 Making lesions, characteristics obvious for the reader
360 Maker and reader more active (in trained judgment)
360 Rorschach as image(s) that speak only through the subject not by themselves
SEEING/MAKING IN ATLASES
380 Objectivity has many uses and meanings. all, however are in contrast to subjectivity
391 Nano-manipulation atlas as examples what can be made, not of what is out there
395 both science and engineering
402 the microscopes both manipulated, staged AND depicted
402 Art and science in nanoscience and fluid dynamics.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment