Created
February 28, 2021 22:32
-
-
Save jdittrich/b9c62c6ebfd4f0491995403a9b11656a to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Notes for "Objectivity", Daston, Galison
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
18 Truth to nature (underlying form) → Objectivity (mechanical product) → Trained judgment | |
19 Working Objects: Atlas Images, Type Specimens, Lab processes | |
29 Objectivity used to mean the opposite. With Kant came the now familiar objective=nature | |
31f objectivity as part of the tradition to examine 'obstacles to knowledge' | |
34 ""Man of science" began to fret openly about a new kind of obstacle to knowledge: themselves" | |
36 Objectivity vs. Subjectivity | |
37 In other context, the "subject" was celebrated | |
37 Scientific self and scientific images vs. artistic self and artistic images | |
38 Scientific techniques of the self: Lab notebook, grid drawings, experimental observers, objective/subjective distinction, voluntary attention | |
39 religious overtones in scientific morals | |
44 'calibration of the eye' as essential | |
49 imagine changes as avalanche: Sometimes stones and branches don't do anything, but if the conditions are there, they can start a growing avalanche. But even if conditions are there, a falling branch might cause nothing. | |
51 Objectivity is often treated as an abstract concept without history and practices. Such, criticisms also switch between metaphysical and moral meanings of the term | |
52 "The ideal and ethos are gradually build up and bodied out by thousands of concrete actions…" | |
53 Objectivity is a value: violating it draws the attention of others [See Birth in…, Jordan] | |
58 Truth is not Objectivity | |
60 "The type was truer to nature… more real… than any actual specimen | |
64 Before: improved taxidermy, drawings were the most lifelike impressions that could be brought from expeditions [→ drawing things together, latour] | |
67 Truth to nature: intervene to show the true form; mechanical objectivity: No human involvement plz! | |
77 Even as-if-is representation need intervention | |
81 Artist corrects natures imperfections | |
82 " To learn to see the typical was the achievement of a lifetime" | |
84 it is difficult too work with artists, they do things not as intended by the author/researcher | |
89 women were excluded from history and religious painting, some of them did do illustrations (→97) | |
88ff struggle for visibility and primacy of work between the naturalists and the artists | |
95 related to 88f: Who is tool, who is master | |
95 artist as medium, not just 'subordinate' | |
96 Passivity metaphors: mirrors, wax, photo-plates (→95) see Mirror of Nature | |
98 Artists: this is drawn "after life"-but e.g. flower and fruit were represented in same drawing – which not the case in nature | |
99 drawing from copybooks | |
102 No conflict between focus both on nature and beauty | |
104 Drawing from nature means integrating from memories of nature, creating a beautifully and truthfully crafted image | |
105 Truth to nature continued to exist parallel to mechanical objectivity | |
121 Mechanical objectivity, non-intervention but ideally automated transcription of images | |
121 Total mechanical objectivity can not be achieved it is a normative ideal | |
122 Mechanical objectivity as a morally loaded aestheticism | |
123 Machines > People see Brain as Computer, Birth of a Metaphor | |
123 Machines offer freedom from will (Hegel, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer and other will-focused philosophers?) | |
124 Illustrators are a check for scientist’s love for confirming their hypothesis. | |
130 Photography initially thought to be an efficient way to copy art | |
133 creating an "objective" image needs great skill | |
135 people were not concerned about fraud but subtle influence by wishes of the researcher | |
138 "No intelligence would disturb the image" | |
139 Aesthetic pleasure in identical objects | |
138f Machines said to deliver a standard outcome are better (tireless) workers and have no bias | |
161 holding back corrections, discard underlying mathematical models, beauty, symmetry, policing the process… mechanical objectivity is hard and painful. | |
169 Synthesis was a scientific virtue; Galton pushed it to be "artistic" | |
169 Automated Synthesis | |
171 Artistic interpretative - moved to→ routine/mechanical | |
174 serlf-surveillance | |
178ff photography was limited in depth of field, color, diagnostic utility… – but the epistemic value of objectivity had a strong pull | |
183 Seeing clearly as goal of science and character (see moral) | |
186 Atlas makers: Interpretation is bad (not objective) but without it you get irrelevance | |
the compromise is to show mechanically reproduced samples that are "normal" and have the reader construct the "type" intuitively. | |
187 mechanical objectivity value is non-intervention not verisimilitude. | |
188 people knew there was also intervention in photography; different light could change what is visible etc. | |
202 Class and gender: Hard work was bad (see also antique Greeks; unveiling nature) | |
203 Enlightenment: extract truth-to-nature from ore → colonialism | |
209 Scientific self and ethos | |
109 Kant can't be easily mapped to mind/worlds, yet his philosophy had great influence | |
213 Much progress but also weariness of changes and divisions of opinions | |
215 Change and discarded theories fueled the turn away from truth and towards objectivity | |
224 Temptations of the enlightenment self | |
223 fragmented self → will and coherent self | |
230 Scientists as both man of action and sacrificing and restraining | |
234ff Technologies of the scientific self: Observation (Posture, Waiting, Focus) | |
235 Memory ←→ Self ←→ Diary | |
236 Incoherent self, incoherent objects → held together by lab diary. | |
240 'the object as a whole shattered into a mosaic of details' | |
242 Attention= Civilized | |
242 Conflict: Observation and Experimentation | |
247 The interest of Haeckel in both science and art was "eccentric" (but see 102, where aesthetic and truth was not a conflict) | |
[STRUCTURAL OBJECTIVITY] | |
253 'Objectivity lay in the invariable relations among sensations, read like the abstract signs of language rather than as image of the world' | |
254 Only structures can be conveyed | |
255 Communicate sciences "everywhere and always" | |
256 Objectivity is what survives translation, transmission, theory change | |
257 Mechanical Objectivity iis self-restrained, structural objectivity is giving up in favor for abstract structures | |
257 Subjectivity as common enemy of different forms of objectivity | |
258 Psychology showed how variables perception is. Hope: Structures exist beyond that | |
260 free of senses at all | |
263 Kant: a judgment is Objective is it is valid for everyone | |
264 Wundt: Self-observation-method no good | |
263, 265 looking for the ('primitive') origin of thought an mathematics (267, 277, 281) | |
273 Colors are subjective, particles are real | |
288 Poincare: Only relationships are stay, theories come and go | |
296 Beyond humans | |
[Trained judgment] | |
311 Trained judgment needed hunches, not self-constraint | |
312 Intuition can be taught | |
314 'Intuition' became a thing | |
318 Recognizing Family Resemblance | |
321 Atlas is for "training the eye" | |
322 Truth-to-nature found the underlying idea (e.g. Urpflanze); trained judgment trains to means to classify and to manipulate | |
325 Scientists became "more intellectual than Algorithmic" | |
326 Not only lectures; active learning up to drill on instruments like in the military | |
327 Training also protected against a diversity of approaches and methods; they made uniform and 'calibrates' students | |
328 'The expert (unlike the sage) can be trained | |
328 Reading images likened to reaching in an unfamiliar Language and script | |
328 "more of an empirical art than an exact science" | |
329 Not anti-high-tech. Trained judgment judged images that new tech produced. | |
336ff recognizing human races and the skilled judgment were often compared | |
347 Focus: Not Metaphysical truth but usefulness for teaching | |
354 Making lesions, characteristics obvious for the reader | |
360 Maker and reader more active (in trained judgment) | |
360 Rorschach as image(s) that speak only through the subject not by themselves | |
SEEING/MAKING IN ATLASES | |
380 Objectivity has many uses and meanings. all, however are in contrast to subjectivity | |
391 Nano-manipulation atlas as examples what can be made, not of what is out there | |
395 both science and engineering | |
402 the microscopes both manipulated, staged AND depicted | |
402 Art and science in nanoscience and fluid dynamics. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment