You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Staging ops: Image tag management, health probes, test user creation, local-goodies orchestration
Cadence & Consistency
jordotech committed on 13 of 14 days — consistent daily output across 7 repos.
jdkealy committed on 13 of 14 days — consistent daily output across 12 repos.
Both developers maintained near-identical cadence with essentially zero idle days.
Key Takeaways
Volume is comparable: Unlike the 14x gap seen in the 30-day jordotech vs aksubr comparison, jordotech and jdkealy are nearly matched on commit volume (172 vs 197) and active days (13 vs 13).
Different breadth profiles: jordotech focuses deeply on fewer repos (7), while jdkealy touches nearly twice as many (12) — driven by the chat agent feature spanning many services.
Complementary domains: jordotech owns SSO/Auth0 and infrastructure hardening; jdkealy owns the chat agent pipeline and MCP/Composio integration. Minimal overlap in feature work despite shared repos.
Shared repos, different concerns: In platform-api, jordotech works on SSO/org management while jdkealy works on chat agent routes. In gofigure_terraform, jordotech handles Auth0/XKS infra while jdkealy manages staging image deployments.
Lines of code: jdkealy has higher LOC (34.6k+ vs 22k+), largely driven by greenfield MCP server and agentic-backend work. jordotech's LOC is concentrated in Terraform and frontend SSO.