-
-
Save jodosha/229951 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
#!/usr/bin/env ruby -w | |
require "benchmark" | |
TIMES = 100_000 | |
ARRAY = (1..1_000).to_a | |
Benchmark.bm(30) do |b| | |
b.report "each" do | |
TIMES.times do |i| | |
ARRAY.each do |element| | |
end | |
end | |
end | |
b.report "for ... in" do | |
TIMES.times do |i| | |
for x in ARRAY | |
end | |
end | |
end | |
end | |
__END__ | |
user system total real | |
each 9.710000 0.010000 9.720000 ( 9.740620) | |
for ... in 7.460000 0.000000 7.460000 ( 7.475158) |
How could it be? I still think each
better than for
. Here my bench with ruby 1.9.3
user system total real
each 7.850000 0.000000 7.850000 ( 7.858244)
for ... in 9.270000 0.000000 9.270000 ( 9.287104)
and here for 2.0.0
user system total real
each 7.630000 0.000000 7.630000 ( 7.658610)
for ... in 9.010000 0.000000 9.010000 ( 9.024356)
2.1
user system total real
each 3.390000 0.000000 3.390000 ( 3.383373)
for ... in 3.720000 0.000000 3.720000 ( 3.718571)
Yup, each is faster.
With ruby 2.1.2, each is faster, but the good old i = 0; while i < limit; i+= 1; end
beats the lot hands down (ugly is still sometimes faster)!
Note, I assign the value from the array to make sure that it isn't optimised away.
#!/usr/bin/env ruby -w
require "benchmark"
TIMES = 100_000
ARRAY = (1..1_000).to_a
Benchmark.bm(30) do |b|
b.report "each" do
TIMES.times do |i|
t = 0
ARRAY.each do |element|
t = element
end
end
end
b.report "for ... in" do
TIMES.times do |i|
t = 0
for x in ARRAY
t = x
end
end
end
b.report "for ... in 0..limit" do
TIMES.times do |i|
limit = ARRAY.size - 1
t = 0
for i in 0..limit
t = ARRAY[i]
end
end
end
b.report "while i <ARRAY.size" do
TIMES.times do |i|
t = 0
i = 0
while i < ARRAY.size
t = ARRAY[i]
i += 1
end
end
end
b.report "while i <limit" do
TIMES.times do |i|
limit = ARRAY.size
t = 0
i = 0
while i < limit
t = ARRAY[i]
i += 1
end
end
end
end
I ran it three times to make sure, as the first time I had weird results, possibly from the cpu frequency ramping up. 2nd time
user system total real
each 4.400000 0.010000 4.410000 ( 4.400051)
for ... in 4.760000 0.010000 4.770000 ( 4.766783)
for ... in 0..limit 5.340000 0.000000 5.340000 ( 5.341970)
while i <ARRAY.size 3.040000 0.010000 3.050000 ( 3.040795)
while i <limit 2.720000 0.000000 2.720000 ( 2.715845)
3rd time
user system total real
each 4.540000 0.000000 4.540000 ( 4.532571)
for ... in 4.730000 0.010000 4.740000 ( 4.738334)
for ... in 0..limit 5.380000 0.000000 5.380000 ( 5.370768)
while i <ARRAY.size 3.050000 0.000000 3.050000 ( 3.058212)
while i <limit 2.710000 0.010000 2.720000 ( 2.704505)
user system total real
each 5.970000 0.030000 6.000000 ( 6.044845)
for ... in 6.170000 0.020000 6.190000 ( 6.244391)
ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877)
Ruby 2.2.0
user system total real
each 6.010000 0.020000 6.030000 ( 6.041084)
for ... in 6.450000 0.020000 6.470000 ( 6.498104)
for in limit 6.140000 0.020000 6.160000 ( 6.182828)
With JRuby 9.2.5.0:
user system total real
each 3.580000 0.000000 3.580000 ( 3.552550)
for ... in 3.410000 0.010000 3.420000 ( 3.368357)
for ... in 0..limit 4.390000 0.020000 4.410000 ( 4.285572)
while i <ARRAY.size 2.990000 0.010000 3.000000 ( 2.913514)
while i <limit 1.910000 0.010000 1.920000 ( 1.888160)
I tuned a bit the @ianheggie code because the JVM needs to be hot to give the best perfs possible:
#!/usr/bin/env ruby -w
require "benchmark"
TIMES = 100_000
ARRAY = (1..1_000).to_a
10.times do
Benchmark.bm(30) do |b|
b.report "each" do
TIMES.times do |i|
t = 0
ARRAY.each do |element|
t = element
end
end
end
b.report "for ... in" do
TIMES.times do |i|
t = 0
for x in ARRAY
t = x
end
end
end
b.report "for ... in 0..limit" do
TIMES.times do |i|
limit = ARRAY.size - 1
t = 0
for i in 0..limit
t = ARRAY[i]
end
end
end
b.report "while i <ARRAY.size" do
TIMES.times do |i|
t = 0
i = 0
while i < ARRAY.size
t = ARRAY[i]
i += 1
end
end
end
b.report "while i <limit" do
TIMES.times do |i|
limit = ARRAY.size
t = 0
i = 0
while i < limit
t = ARRAY[i]
i += 1
end
end
end
end
end
Message deleted because my comment wasn't relevent. See https://gist.github.com/jodosha/229951#gistcomment-2782034
This is more likely a side effect of how the JIT optimizes one block of code and then the other block of code. These two pieces of code compile to the exact same IR and bytecode.
ruby 2.5.1p57 (2018-03-29 revision 63029) [x86_64-linux]
user system total real
each 4.910000 0.000000 4.910000 ( 4.916322)
for ... in 6.780000 0.000000 6.780000 ( 6.783303)
for ... in 0..limit 8.390000 0.000000 8.390000 ( 8.396801)
while i <ARRAY.size 7.920000 0.000000 7.920000 ( 7.936485)
while i <limit 6.100000 0.000000 6.100000 ( 6.101939)
Ruby 2.7.0
each 2.158537 0.000000 2.158537 ( 2.159440)
for ... in 2.278251 0.000000 2.278251 ( 2.279027)
for ... in 0..limit 2.698481 0.000000 2.698481 ( 2.699452)
while i <ARRAY.size 1.650970 0.000000 1.650970 ( 1.651618)
while i <limit 1.560133 0.000000 1.560133 ( 1.560785)
ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux]
user system total real
each 2.767563 0.001415 2.768978 ( 2.769054)
for ... in 2.910278 0.000017 2.910295 ( 2.910301)
for ... in 0..limit 3.669667 0.000005 3.669672 ( 3.669689)
while i < ARRAY.size 2.346777 0.000007 2.346784 ( 2.346790)
while i < limit 1.973913 0.000000 1.973913 ( 1.973939)
ruby 3.1.2p20 (2022-04-12 revision 4491bb740a) [x86_64-linux]
user system total real
each 6.655506 0.011998 6.667504 ( 6.668422)
for ... in 7.203961 0.008000 7.211961 ( 7.212894)
for ... in 0..limit 8.075872 0.012000 8.087872 ( 8.088514)
while i <ARRAY.size 4.219771 0.008000 4.227771 ( 4.227991)
while i <limit 3.359660 0.003999 3.363659 ( 3.363865)
ruby 3.2.1 (2023-02-08 revision 31819e82c8) [x86_64-linux]
user system total real
each 2.052966 0.000207 2.053173 ( 2.053209)
for ... in 2.225467 0.000006 2.225473 ( 2.225489)
for ... in 0..limit 2.478339 0.000000 2.478339 ( 2.478365)
while i <ARRAY.size 1.727570 0.000000 1.727570 ( 1.727601)
while i <limit 1.469423 0.000001 1.469424 ( 1.469439)
ruby 3.2.2 (2023-03-30 revision e51014f9c0) [x64-mingw-ucrt]
user system total real
each 4.203000 0.000000 4.203000 ( 4.222868)
for ... in 4.562000 0.000000 4.562000 ( 4.583148)
for ... in 0..limit 5.047000 0.000000 5.047000 ( 5.050032)
while i <ARRAY.size 2.219000 0.000000 2.219000 ( 2.235048)
while i <limit 1.984000 0.000000 1.984000 ( 2.017428)
ruby 3.3.1 (2024-04-23 revision c56cd86388) [x86_64-linux]
user system total real
each 3.574591 0.000000 3.574591 ( 3.586114)
for ... in 3.879859 0.000000 3.879859 ( 3.892989)
for ... in 0..limit 4.631031 0.000000 4.631031 ( 4.637611)
while i <ARRAY.size 2.519849 0.000000 2.519849 ( 2.520258)
while i <limit 1.927129 0.000000 1.927129 ( 1.927600)
A lot closer for me.