Shamazing ruby vs java benchmark

App.java

package com.wendt.shamazing;

public class App {

	public static void main(String[] args) {

	  String sha = "9c2cddfaedaea9689a22e376aa20191041554fe8";
      int ITER = 1000000;
      long start = System.nanoTime();
      for (int i = 0 ; i < ITER ; i++)
      {
          Shamazing.getLongestStringInSha(sha);
      }
      long end = System.nanoTime();
      System.out.println(((double)(end - start) / 1000000000.0) + " seconds.");

	}
}

results.md

Calling Shamazing 1,000,000 times with '9c2cddfaedaea9689a22e376aa20191041554fe8'

ruby 1.9.3-p194

method	time
String	10.999024
Integer	11.975492

method	user	system	total	real
string	10.740000	0.040000	10.780000	(10.860089)
integer	11.670000	0.040000	11.710000	(11.773810)

Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_31-b04-415-10M3635)

Calling Shamazing 1,000,000 times

First iteration code.

method	time
String	20.323546 seconds.
Integer	21.794637 seconds.

After round of refactoring.

method	time
String	2.873166 seconds.
Integer	2.817243 seconds.

shamazing_bench.rb

#!/usr/bin/env ruby

require 'shamazing'
require 'benchmark'

sha = '9c2cddfaedaea9689a22e376aa20191041554fe8'

n = 1000000

start = Time.now
for i in 1..n; Shamazing.string(sha); end
puts "String - #{(Time.now - start)}"

start = Time.now
for i in 1..n; Shamazing.integer(sha); end
puts "Integer - #{(Time.now - start)}"

Benchmark.bm do |x|
  x.report("string")  { for i in 1..n; Shamazing.string(sha); end }
  x.report("integer") { for i in 1..n; Shamazing.integer(sha); end }
end