Created
September 25, 2013 04:36
-
-
Save johanoloflindberg/6695201 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
<markdown> | |
# Usage Guidelines: Using Omnifocus # | |
[Omnifocus](http://www.omnigroup.com/products/omnifocus/) is a great tool, but | |
not as intuitive as e.g. [Things](http://culturedcode.com/things/). This is | |
not necessarily a bad thing as this is what happens when you give the user the | |
freedom of tailoring an application to his or her needs. | |
As a note to myself and perhaps a guide to others trying to figure out how to | |
use Omnifocus, I have written this short list of usage guidelines. | |
## Folders are *Areas of Responsibilities* ## | |
When I first started to use Omnifocus, I had a hard time keeping my Folders | |
from becoming Contexts and sometimes seeing the difference between Folders and | |
Contexts. The reason for this is because the labels used for Folders and | |
Contexts overlap. They do however not represent the same concepts. For | |
example, I might have a Folder called "University" and a context called | |
"University". This does not mean that I am doing something wrong, it just | |
means that I have an *Area of Responsibility* connected to the University | |
organization and that there is a place called "University" where I can perform | |
certain actions. | |
Folders are used hierarchically. Below is an excerpt of my | |
Project side bar. Leaves in the tree are projects. | |
* Home | |
* Home (Single tasks) | |
* Me | |
* Me (Single tasks) | |
* Webb | |
* Work | |
* University | |
* Teaching | |
* Company | |
## Contexts are *Places where I can/should perform the action* ## | |
Contexts are also used hierarchically. Contexts work a bit different than | |
folders, as folders are containers of projects, whereas contexts are | |
containers of contexts which means that both leaves and branches of the | |
contexts tree are equally valid contexts, not just the leaves in the project | |
tree. Below is an excerpt of my Context side bar. | |
* waiting for | |
* phone | |
* anywhere | |
* work | |
* mac | |
* steve | |
* lisa | |
* university | |
* company office | |
* home | |
* mac | |
* shopping | |
* Tech Store | |
* Food Mart | |
* online | |
One thing to note is that I have multiple "mac" contexts. The reason for this | |
is that I have one laptop that I carry around. Some tasks on my mac are work | |
related and some are home related and I want to be able to hide home related | |
tasks at work and vice versa. | |
## GTD specifics ## | |
* *waiting for* is a context with a due date for when to check up on what I am | |
waiting for | |
* *someday/maybe* is set by not giving a task a start date i.e. if the task | |
has no start date, it is a someday/maybe task | |
## Single tasks ## | |
One thing I liked about Things was the notion of having tasks not linked to a | |
project, but to an *Area of Responsibility*. Basically all "single tasks" I | |
have are such tasks - tasks I have to do because I have a certain *Area of | |
Responsibility*. Since folders cannot store tasks, and my folders are *Areas | |
of Responsibilities* I use a project with the same name as my *Area of | |
Responsibility* to store my single tasks. | |
## Using Perspectives ## | |
I use perspectives a lot in Omnifocus, i.e. I use different Perspectives in | |
Omnifocus for different uses of Omnifocus. Here is a list of the Perspectives | |
I use, what they show, and what I use them for. | |
* **Due list**: Hides the side bar, grouping and sorting by "Due date", filter | |
by "Due Soon", any duration, any flag state. I use this perspective when | |
working. If I have nothing more due today or over due, I move on to my Start | |
list (see below). | |
* **Start list**: Grouping and sorting by "Start", filter by "Remaining", any | |
duration, any flag state. I use this perspective when I do not have any | |
tasks due or overdue today. The list shows me which tasks are remaining and | |
active (i.e. they have a start date today or before today). I usually | |
collaps the groups "Start any time" (which was equivalent to | |
"Someday/Maybe"), and "Start within the next week". | |
* **Due list**: Grouping by "Due", sorting by "Start", filter by "Remaining", | |
any duration, any flag state. I use this list to get an overview of what is | |
coming up in the future and perhaps modify the start dates of tasks. | |
## List keeping ## | |
One thing Omnifocus is not good at is keeping track of general lists. I | |
discovered this when I read a [review of Pocket Docket on Smoking | |
Apples](http://smokingapples.com/iphone/pocket-docket/) a couple of weeks | |
back. Examples of lists that I do not like to have in Omnifocus (since they do not | |
necessarily have a context) are: | |
* Books to read in the future | |
* Movies to watch in the future | |
* Music to listen to in the future | |
* Food to try | |
* Wishlists | |
* ... I think you get the idea | |
## Scheduling tasks ## | |
One thing I feel is missing from Omnifocus is the notion of a **Scheduled | |
date**. This might be a result of my way of using Omnifocus, but I really liked | |
it in Things. A *Scheduled Date* is different from a "Start Date" because a | |
"Start Date" is when the task becomes available. A *Scheduled Date* is when I | |
plan on doing the task. I would find this useful as I would like to balance | |
the number of tasks I do each day when I am planning my work. | |
You could argue that I could just get rid of the "Start Date" usage and use | |
"Start Date" as a *Scheduled Date*. But I like having "Start Date" because it | |
gives me an idea of how long the task has been on my list. For example, if I | |
see a task that has a "Start Date" two months in the past and no due date, I | |
might just remove the "Start Date" which would make it a *Someday/Maybe* task. | |
</markdown> |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment