Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Show Gist options
  • Save johntday/141acaaf6e2d0b752b58b80cbff7531d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save johntday/141acaaf6e2d0b752b58b80cbff7531d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Based on the provided claims and references, there is no substantiated evidence supporting the statement that Senator Thom Tillis is 'deeply corrupt.' The first source (NBC News) references Senator Tillis discussing corruption in the context of Ukraine a

.@SenThomTillis ‘s deep corruption along with many more. CORRUPTION EXPOSURE 101 IN A NUTSHELL. 👇🏼

Claim Result Source Reference Source Quote
Senator Thom Tillis is deeply corrupt. rejected https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/luxury-yachts-myths-republican-lawmakers-echo-russian-propaganda-rcna147293 According to Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a strong supporter of arming Ukraine. “I think the notion of corruption came up because some have said we can’t do it, because people will buy yachts with the money,” Tillis told CNN. “[Zelenskyy] disabused people of those notions.”
Senator Thom Tillis is deeply corrupt. rejected https://www.nytimes.com/1998/05/24/opinion/the-bulworth-critique.html Senator Jay Bulworth, has to climb way up the manic curve before he can speak truth to a black audience about how he carries water for big donors. ''I'm votin' in the Senate the way they want me to, and I'm sendin' 'em my bills,'' he says in rap rhythms.

🤖 Conclusion [10/100]: Based on the provided claims and references, there is no substantiated evidence supporting the statement that Senator Thom Tillis is 'deeply corrupt.' The first source (NBC News) references Senator Tillis discussing corruption in the context of Ukraine aid, not personal corruption. The second source does not mention Tillis at all and is unrelated. There is no credible evidence here to suggest personal corruption by Senator Tillis, and the references do not support the accusation. Therefore, the truthfulness of the statement is very low, though not a zero, as it is theoretically possible further unreferenced evidence may exist.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment