-
-
Save josephdpurcell/1c78367cedc15a075e4231a5a685ced9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
# This file customizes the steps that DrupalCI will use when testing this project. | |
# | |
# The primary customization provided here is to check for deprecation errors. It is recommended | |
# to do this only when you've used https://github.com/mglaman/drupal-check/ to verify any | |
# existing deprecation errors are addressed. | |
# | |
# Learn to make one for your own drupal.org project: | |
# https://www.drupal.org/drupalorg/docs/drupal-ci/customizing-drupalci-testing | |
build: | |
assessment: | |
validate_codebase: | |
phplint: | |
container_composer: | |
phpcs: | |
# phpcs will use core's specified version of Coder. | |
sniff-all-files: true | |
halt-on-fail: false | |
testing: | |
# run_tests task is executed several times in order of performance speeds. | |
# halt-on-fail can be set on the run_tests tasks in order to fail fast. | |
# suppress-deprecations is false in order to be alerted to usages of | |
# deprecated code. | |
run_tests.standard: | |
types: 'Simpletest,PHPUnit-Unit,PHPUnit-Kernel,PHPUnit-Functional' | |
testgroups: '--all' | |
suppress-deprecations: false | |
run_tests.js: | |
types: 'PHPUnit-FunctionalJavascript' | |
testgroups: '--all' | |
suppress-deprecations: false | |
nightwatchjs: { } |
# This file customizes the steps that DrupalCI will use when testing ths project.
This made sense to me, @webchick. And I didn't even notice the typo ths
until I pasted it in here and saw my spellchecker underline it!
Also, based on conversation in Slack, adding suppress-deprecations: false
to drupalci.yml files right is not encouraged. It takes a lot of system resources and would run on every patch. So adding it to every contrib project would drastically increase the budget for testbots.
@heddn I don't think suppress-deprecations: false
is expensive. It's if you turn on the drupal-check implementation - i.e. you enable phpstan code checking.
I think the point made (by @goba) was that suddenly turning DrupalCI on for thousands of new projects (if we ask sprinters to add patches for the "known good" modules) would be the resource hog.
Here's a stab.
Does suppressing deprecations fail the build or is it soft? I can see an issue with wanting to maintain compatibility with current Drupal 8 releases that only have the deprecated code (ConfigurableInterface being a notable example that will break if used now on 8.6 sites).