For most maps, detailed hydrography isn't important, which means OSM works just fine. For the finer scale, restoration oriented maps than I need to create for SHARE, the OSM data is not up to snuff.
The benefits of NHD data are:
- Lines for ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial streams. OSM data data does not even consist of a network, just the outlines of larger water bodies.
- It's a continuous network, with appropriate hunctions.
Things that suck:
- There are SO many line-strings
- Labelling is tough.
The saving grace of NHD data, is that each line has an FCode attribute. Here are the relevant data:
- 55800 - Artificial paths (larger rivers)
- 46003 - Intermittent streams
- 46006 - Perennial streams
waterway=river
waterway=stream
intermittent=yes
natural-spring
waterway=dam