| pr | 284 |
|---|---|
| title | Search-tab top-picks discovery list |
| branch | worktree-searchRecommendations |
| base | main |
| repo | jubishop/podhaven |
name: review description: >- Exhaustive, evidence-driven code review of the current branch's pull request. Surfaces every actionable issue (correctness, reliability, performance, maintainability, and architecture), walks the findings one at a time to collect a decision on each, then implements the chosen fixes with regression tests where a harness exists. Requires an open PR on the current branch. Use when the user asks to review, audit, or critique a PR. user_invocable: true
name: team-review description: >- Runs a multi-agent code review by launching focused review subagents, deduplicating their findings, and walking the user through each finding interactively. Defaults to the current PR when no review scope is given. Use when the user asks for /team-review, team-review, team review, parallel review, multi-agent review, review with subagents, or wants a deeper code review than a single-pass review. user_invocable: true
name: review description: >- Exhaustive, evidence-driven code review over any scope — staged or unstaged changes, a branch diff, a PR, a single commit, a commit range, selected files/modules, or the whole repository. Surfaces every actionable issue (correctness, reliability, performance, maintainability, and architecture), walks the findings one at a time to collect a decision on each, then implements the chosen fixes with regression tests where a harness exists. Use when the user asks to review, audit, or critique staged/unstaged changes, a
name: team-review description: >- Runs a multi-agent code review by launching focused review subagents, deduplicating their findings, and walking the user through each finding interactively. Defaults to the current PR when no review scope is given. Use when the user asks for /team-review, team-review, team review, parallel review, multi-agent review, review with subagents, or wants a deeper code review than a single-pass review. user_invocable: true
Last updated: 2026-05-23
Build a service that monitors TVW videos and transcripts, lets users track specific government activities, and notifies them when relevant things happen in a video.
The main technical challenge is not speech-to-text. It is assigning each spoken statement to the correct real-world speaker.
jubishop
/ agent-sdk-comparison.md
Created
May 10, 2026 06:32
Comparative breakdown: Cursor SDK vs OpenAI Codex SDK vs Claude Agent SDK
Prepared May 10, 2026.
This compares three coding-agent SDKs:
- Cursor TypeScript SDK: https://cursor.com/docs/sdk/typescript
- OpenAI Codex SDK: https://developers.openai.com/codex/sdk
- Claude Agent SDK: https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-sdk/overview
jubishop
/ project_nowplaying_desync_bug.md
Created
April 18, 2026 18:09
| name | NowPlayingInfo elapsed time desync bug |
|---|---|
| description | Recurring bug where iOS sends a stale backward scrub ~33s after AirPods-triggered background pause. 5 confirmed incidents; incident-3 fix (event-driven NowPlayingInfo writes) did NOT hold — bug reproduced 4/13 and 4/16. |
| type | project |
| originSessionId | 03a15cba-4c43-4960-b7e0-311fae53bf03 |
jubishop
/ SCREENING.md
Created
April 4, 2026 21:11
A systematic approach to identifying the best stocks for selling [put options][put-option] based on the divergence between [implied volatility][implied-volatility] and [historical volatility][historical-volatility]. The core thesis: when options are priced for significantly more volatility than a stock has actually exhibited, there is an edge in selling those options — the [volatility risk premium][volatility-risk-premium] tends to decay in the seller's favor.
Start with the top ~100 [S&P 500][sp500] stocks by [market cap][market-cap]. Large-cap stocks have the deepest [option markets][options-market] and the tightest [bid/ask spreads][bid-ask-spread]. Smaller index constituents often have options so illiquid that the spread alone wipes out any premium advantage.
jubishop
/ SCREENING.md
Created
April 4, 2026 21:10
A systematic approach to identifying the best stocks for selling [put options][put-option] based on the divergence between [implied volatility][implied-volatility] and [historical volatility][historical-volatility]. The core thesis: when options are priced for significantly more volatility than a stock has actually exhibited, there is an edge in selling those options — the [volatility risk premium][volatility-risk-premium] tends to decay in the seller's favor.
Start with the top ~100 [S&P 500][sp500] stocks by [market cap][market-cap]. Large-cap stocks have the deepest [option markets][options-market] and the tightest [bid/ask spreads][bid-ask-spread]. Smaller index constituents often have options so illiquid that the spread alone wipes out any premium advantage.
NewerOlder