** Disclaimer: All subject to review, change, and overall better scrappiness **
- Self study group that follows hungry academy course
- Pick one open source project to contribute to
- Invite Ruby community members to weekly meetings as mentors
- Prone to action
- Write code, we don't care if it sucks, we'll get better
- Building over talking
- Disagreements are settled with code
- Have fun along the way!
- Collaborative
- 3 months
- Start in the first two weeks of March
- Meet at least once a week
- Remote pair sessions
- Complete 2-4 full day hackathons in 3 months
- Something specific i.e. Open source, Focused learning, etc.
- Collaborative
- Tools
- Chatroom (Campfire/Hipchat)
- Forum
- Github
- Integrate into local meetups with evening learn/hacks
- Sponsorships to cover space and/or offer stuff (dinner, beer, etc) as a thanks to mentors
- My current strategy is to use this material heavily. I have worked through some of the material and it was helpful.
- This is a heavy rails course that would overlap with the jumpstartlab materials.
- For pure Ruby tutorials, I have used it and found it to be enjoyable. +1 for making it easy for folks picking of their first programming language.
- For learning front end dev (CSS, Sass, js, etc.)
-
http://schneems.com/beginner-to-builder-2011
- 8 one hour classes followed by assigned course work from Agile Web Development with Rails version 4
-
- Learning git
- Living Social / Hungry Academy
Week One:
- http://tutorials.jumpstartlab.com/projects/jsmerchant.html
- Provide notes on difference in Rails 2.3 to 3.0 way, help fill in gaps, and note bugs/errors
- What else?
Scrappy Acadamy naming credit goes to @tourdedave
The experience level varies. We have people moving past intermediate and others that are completely new to Ruby/Rails. I was looking through Agile Web Development, my suggestion is to have folks new to Ruby/Rails start working with the book. Some Ruby fundamentals are going to needed along the way. Any thoughts to those who have worked through the examples? I have only read the first chapter myself.
Given the different skill levels present, I see two issues we will want to address:
Here are some questions to get things going:
I'd like to have a minimal structure for us to give us a 'We did this' each week. What about an un-conferance style for objectives? Everyone shows up and write down what they would like to accomplish. We then organize study groups around these objectives and plan ways for us to mix the groups up a bit to get some cross collaboration going? We can review the next meeting to see how it went.
And yes, there are more questions than answers right now, but that is cool. Everyone is really motivated, let's keep the goals in mind and see where we end up.