The Specification-to-Code Framework (S2C) creates software specifications in Markdown format containing complete implementation guidance. All specifications must be written in Markdown using English language exclusively to ensure consistent formatting, version control compatibility, universal readability across development tools and platforms, and clear communication across international development teams.
The objective is eliminating the gap between requirements and code by ensuring specifications include sufficient technical detail for developers to implement software without additional requirements gathering or clarification requests. S2C establishes standards for implementation-complete specifications that enable developers to immediately understand what code to write, which technologies to use, implement all interfaces without guesswork, handle all error conditions, and write validating tests.
Specifications are implementation-ready when they achieve complete requirement definition, comprehensive testability, and objective verifiability. Complete requirement definition means every functional and technical requirement specifies exact implementation steps, business logic includes decision trees covering all branches, data processing defines precise transformation algorithms, and interface contracts provide complete schemas with validation rules.
Comprehensive testability requires every requirement includes measurable acceptance criteria that translate directly to automated test cases, performance targets specify exact measurement procedures and success thresholds, error scenarios define specific validation methods and expected responses, and integration points provide complete test procedures for all interaction patterns.
Objective verifiability ensures all requirements can be validated through concrete testing without subjective interpretation, success criteria are measurable with specific metrics and conditions, implementation correctness can be determined through automated verification, and system behavior can be confirmed against specification requirements through repeatable testing procedures.
Implementation-ready specifications contain complete business logic with decision trees covering all branches, algorithms with step-by-step guidance, exact data transformation rules, complete interface contracts with schemas, and architecture specifications with explicit technology choices and implementation examples.
Every specification contains six sections in order: System Overview & Scope, Functional Implementation Requirements, System Interface Specifications, Performance & Quality Requirements, Technical Implementation Guide, and Integration Contracts & Protocols.
System Overview & Scope defines what to build and implementation boundaries. Functional Implementation Requirements specifies exact behaviors and business logic to code. System Interface Specifications describes all interaction points requiring implementation. Performance & Quality Requirements establishes measurable targets constraining implementation. Technical Implementation Guide provides technology choices and architecture decisions. Integration Contracts & Protocols defines precise interface implementations.
Sections form a logical progression mirroring development process. System Overview establishes boundaries informing all technical decisions. Functional Requirements define behaviors determining needed interfaces. Interface Specifications constrain performance considerations. Performance Requirements influence architecture decisions. Technical Implementation Guide enables precise integration specifications.
Developers follow specifications start-to-finish as complete implementation guides. Each section builds upon previous information while providing foundation for subsequent details.
Define implementation boundaries precisely so developers determine what code to write versus exclude. Specify all platforms, environments, databases, external services, and integration boundaries affecting implementation. Document programming language requirements, framework choices, deployment platforms, and technology limitations guiding coding decisions. Establish technical terminology with precise meanings used throughout specification.
Translate business needs into implementable specifications using pseudocode and logical descriptions. Include complete user stories with technical context, detailed business logic with decision trees covering all branches using structured pseudocode, exact data processing with input validation rules, transformation algorithms described logically, and output formatting specifications. Cover all failure scenarios with exact error response patterns, codes, and recovery procedures described algorithmically. Define all system states, transition logic using state diagrams or pseudocode, and persistence requirements. Write acceptance criteria as testable conditions translating directly to test cases using Given/When/Then format or equivalent logical structures.
Provide complete implementation guidance for all interaction points using technology-agnostic descriptions. Include exact screen layouts with responsive breakpoints, interaction patterns with specific flows, component specifications with styling requirements, and accessibility requirements. Contain complete endpoint definitions with HTTP methods, URL patterns, headers, request/response schemas with validation rules using standard formats like JSON Schema, and authentication patterns. Include conceptual database schemas with entity relationships, attribute definitions, constraint specifications, and query patterns described logically rather than in specific SQL dialects. Document authentication flows with protocol descriptions, data exchange formats with schema definitions using standard notation, error handling patterns for integration failures, and timeout/retry logic described algorithmically.
Specify measurable targets constraining implementation approaches. Include specific millisecond targets for operations under defined load conditions, requests per second capacity with concurrent user limits, and scaling behavior. Specify exact authentication methods with protocols, authorization patterns with roles, data encryption for storage/transmission, input validation preventing vulnerabilities, and audit logging with retention policies. Define uptime targets with availability percentages, failure recovery with maximum downtime, backup procedures, and monitoring with alerting thresholds.
Provide concrete technical decisions eliminating implementation guesswork through language-agnostic requirements and specific implementation guidelines. Requirements must specify exact programming language versions, framework selections with constraints, database choices with drivers, deployment platforms, and required libraries with versions. Specify design patterns with logical descriptions, system component relationships with interaction patterns, data flow through system layers using diagrams and pseudocode, and integration patterns for external services described conceptually.
Include complete algorithmic specifications using structured pseudocode that translates to any programming language, input validation procedures described logically, step-by-step processing logic, error handling patterns within algorithms, and performance optimization guidance described conceptually. Separate language-agnostic business logic from technology-specific implementation constraints to enable clear understanding of what to build versus how to build it.
Define precise interface implementations using standard specifications and pseudocode rather than implementation-specific code. Include complete API definitions using OpenAPI or similar standard formats with endpoint paths, HTTP methods, schemas, authentication patterns, error formats, and working examples. Specify database requirements using conceptual schemas, entity relationships, query patterns described logically, transaction requirements, connection patterns, and migration procedures. Define message formats using standard schema notation, queue naming conventions, routing patterns described algorithmically, and error handling procedures. Include authentication flows with protocol descriptions, API client patterns described logically, retry logic using pseudocode, circuit breaker patterns, and monitoring requirements specified conceptually.
Single-file specifications work for projects with fewer than five major features, clear boundaries, limited integrations, straightforward logic, and teams under five developers. Multi-file becomes necessary when features exceed manageable document size, multiple teams work on different features, features have distinct technical requirements, or specifications exceed 10,000 words.
Main files contain system-wide architecture, shared technology stack, common interface patterns, cross-cutting performance requirements, shared data models, and integration protocols. Feature files contain detailed functional requirements for individual features, feature-specific interfaces, unique business logic, specialized integrations, and feature-specific error handling.
Include complete System Overview & Scope covering entire system, shared Technical Implementation Guide with technology stack and architecture patterns, common Performance & Quality Requirements applying across features, shared data models and database schemas, and Integration Contracts for external services used by multiple features.
Each feature file includes Feature Overview & Scope defining boundaries and system relationship, detailed Functional Implementation Requirements, Feature Interface Specifications covering UIs and APIs, feature-specific Performance & Quality Requirements, Feature Implementation Details with algorithms and processing logic, and Feature Integration Requirements for connections to other features.
Feature files must reference shared architectural decisions, link to common patterns and data models, reference shared performance and security requirements, and identify dependencies on other features with specific interface requirements. Main files must include complete feature indexes, cross-reference maps showing dependencies, shared component usage, and common integration patterns.
Use specific, quantifiable criteria replacing subjective descriptions. Include exact version numbers, configuration values, and measurable targets with metrics and conditions. Provide complete schemas generating working code stubs. Include sufficient algorithm detail for identical implementations across developers. Specify exact error codes, HTTP statuses, messages, and handling procedures.
Use active voice with clear subject-verb-object structure. Define technical terminology consistently with maintained glossary. Use RFC 2119 keywords: MUST/SHALL for absolute requirements, SHOULD for strong recommendations, MAY for optional features, MUST NOT/SHALL NOT for prohibitions. Write requirements in present tense as implementation statements using imperative mood for guidance.
Use pseudocode and language-agnostic examples for business logic and algorithmic specifications while providing concrete technology guidance for implementation constraints. Provide algorithmic descriptions using structured pseudocode that translates to any programming language. Include complete request/response examples with realistic data using standard formats like JSON schemas. Specify database requirements using conceptual schemas and query patterns described logically rather than specific SQL dialects. Include configuration requirements with parameter definitions and technology-specific examples where implementation guidance is needed. Demonstrate edge cases and error conditions using logical descriptions for business rules and concrete examples for technology integration patterns.
Include acceptance criteria directly convertible to automated test cases. Specify exact inputs, expected outputs, and measurable success conditions covering normal operation, boundary conditions, errors, and integration points. Use Given/When/Then format defining test preconditions, actions, and expected results. Ensure each criterion is measurable and verifiable through objective testing.
Follow consistent Markdown formatting with hierarchical heading structure and section numbering. Maintain consistent terminology throughout documents. Use tables for structured data and code blocks for technical examples. Use explicit linking with descriptive text. Include version numbers for external references.
Clearly distinguish between meta requirements governing the specification document itself and implementation requirements defining what software to build. Meta requirements include specification formatting standards, document structure requirements, version control procedures, review processes, and change management protocols. Implementation requirements define functional behaviors, technical constraints, interface contracts, performance targets, and system architecture.
Meta requirements appear in specification headers, change logs, document structure guidelines, and process documentation. Implementation requirements appear in the six core sections defining what developers must build. Never mix meta requirements into functional specifications or include specification management details in implementation guidance.
Use hybrid change management combining integrated changelogs with change request files. Minor updates including clarifications, formatting improvements, error corrections, example updates, and terminology refinements use integrated changelog entries within specification documents. Major changes including new features, architectural modifications, technology stack changes, interface contract changes, and requirement additions or deletions require separate change request files.
Change request files must include change identifier with sequential numbering, change description with specific modifications, business justification explaining necessity, technical impact analysis covering affected components, implementation timeline with milestones, affected specification sections with detailed modifications, migration requirements for existing implementations, risk assessment with mitigation strategies, and approval signatures with dates.
Change request files use naming convention change_request_XXX.md where XXX is zero-padded sequential number. After approval, change requests merge into specification changelog with reference to original change request file. Maintain change request archive in change_requests/ directory for historical reference and audit trail.
Changelog entries include version number, date, change type, affected sections, brief description, and change request reference for major changes. Version numbering follows semantic versioning with major.minor.patch format where major indicates breaking changes, minor indicates feature additions, and patch indicates clarifications or corrections.
Use snake_case for all specification file names with descriptive, consistent naming patterns. Main specification files use format system_name_specification.md for single-file projects. Multi-file projects use main_specification.md for core file and feature_name_specification.md for feature files. Change request files use change_request_XXX.md with zero-padded sequential numbering.
Directory structure for multi-file projects follows pattern: main specification in root directory, feature specifications in features/ subdirectory, change requests in change_requests/ subdirectory, and shared assets in assets/ subdirectory. Use consistent internal linking with relative paths and descriptive anchor text following pattern [descriptive text](relative/path/to/file.md#section-anchor).
All cross-references must use explicit Markdown linking with descriptive link text rather than generic phrases like "see here" or "click this." Internal links use relative paths with section anchors where applicable. External references include specific version numbers or publication dates. Maintain link consistency across all specification files using standardized reference patterns.
Link format follows pattern [Specific Topic Description](file_path.md#section-heading) for internal references and [Resource Title v1.2.3](https://example.com/resource) for external references. Create bidirectional references where features depend on each other, ensuring navigation works in both directions.
Specifications must integrate with Git version control using conventional commit messages, meaningful commit descriptions, and proper branching strategies. Use commit message format type(scope): description where type includes feat, fix, docs, refactor, and scope indicates affected specification area.
Branch naming follows pattern feature/feature_name for new features, fix/issue_description for corrections, and docs/update_description for documentation updates. Tag releases using semantic versioning matching specification version numbers. Include specification version in file headers and maintain version history through Git tags and changelog entries.
Before implementation begins, specifications must pass completeness validation ensuring all six required sections are present and complete, all requirements include measurable acceptance criteria, all interfaces have complete contracts with schemas, all algorithms provide sufficient pseudocode detail, all error scenarios specify handling procedures, and all cross-references link correctly to existing content.
Validation checklist includes structural completeness with all sections present, requirement precision with measurable criteria, interface completeness with schemas and examples, testability verification with clear acceptance criteria, cross-reference integrity with working links, and terminology consistency throughout all documents. Failed validation requires specification updates before implementation approval.
Implementation is complete when all specification requirements are fulfilled and verified through comprehensive testing and quality assurance. The Definition of Done requires all automated tests pass including unit tests covering individual functions, integration tests validating component interactions, and end-to-end tests confirming complete user workflows against acceptance criteria.
Code quality standards must be met through automated linting using project-defined rules for code style, formatting, and best practices. All code must pass automated formatting checks ensuring consistent style across the codebase. For compiled languages, all code must compile successfully without errors or warnings in the target environment.
Specifications must define explicit code quality standards including linting rules configuration specifying code style requirements, naming conventions, complexity limits, and best practice enforcement. Formatting standards must specify automated formatting tool configuration, indentation rules, line length limits, and whitespace handling. For compiled languages, compilation requirements must specify target compiler versions, warning levels treated as errors, and build configuration standards.
Test coverage requirements must specify minimum code coverage percentages, critical path coverage requirements, edge case testing standards, and integration test coverage for all specified interfaces. Performance testing must validate all specified performance targets under defined load conditions. Security testing must verify all specified security requirements and vulnerability prevention measures.
Implementation is considered complete only when all tests pass, code quality checks pass, compilation succeeds without warnings for compiled languages, all acceptance criteria are demonstrably met, and system behavior matches specification requirements through repeatable verification procedures.
Verify all requirements are implementable with specified technology constraints. Confirm all necessary implementation guidance is present. Ensure terminology and technical approaches are uniform. Pass handoff test where qualified developers begin implementation without clarification questions. Track developer comprehension rate, clarification frequency, implementation consistency, and requirement traceability.
Claude prompt: