Last active
February 7, 2024 19:33
-
-
Save karenpayneoregon/89ac896a1a935f4e706b937e710ccc96 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
reduced source path
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| <PropertyGroup> | |
| <PathMap>$([System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath('$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)'))=./</PathMap> | |
| </PropertyGroup> |
When I made the changes I mentioned previously, I got the benefit of reduced short path with the additional benefit of having correct code coverage calculation using coverlet.
@karenpayneoregon : if you need further info, please let me know. The project in question is closed source but I can try to spin up a minimal one in my GitHub repo if necessary.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Sure!
When running tests, I use xUnit and coverlet.msbuild / coverlet.collector to calculate the code coverage and later I use ReportGenerator tool to generate a nice HTML report.
After I adopted in my projects - to test your idea that I found very useful - the PathMap configuration, calculation of code coverage presented a bug.
This is the bug during code coverage calculation - I assume changing paths also affected the way coverlet.msbuild interacted with build artifacts.
This is the normal code coverage calculation.
And I run tests through tasks in VS Code, chained with other tasks to generate code coverage report, but the command in the end is (full project path were ommited since it is a closed source project):
dotnet.exe test Tests\Tests.csproj -v:Minimal -c:Debug -p:CollectCoverage=true -p:CoverletOutputFormat=opencover -p:CoverletOutput=Tests\coverage.opencover.xml -p:ThresholdType=Branch -p:Threshold=70 --no-build