CGIAR.txt

Received: from CIATMB2.CIAT.CGIARAD.ORG ([fe80::3d36:2c21:c794:d6a6]) by
 CIATHUB2.CIAT.CGIARAD.ORG ([198.93.225.118]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001;
 Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:23:41 -0500

From: "Jarvis, Andrew (CIAT-CCAFS)" <redacted>
To: Peter Karich <redacted>

Hi peter,

Apologies for delay getting back to you.  Your proposed use is fine, so tak=
e this as permission to use our topography data for GraphHopper.

Andy.

From: Peter Karich [mailto:<redacted>]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Jarvis, Andrew (CIAT-CCAFS)
Cc: Cgiar-csi
Subject: Re: SRTM 90m Website

Dear Mr Jarvis,

would you mind to look into my request? I think both projects could benefit=
 from this. Feel free to ask me if something is not clear. Also I want to n=
ote, that GraphHopper is not that unimportant and will get more popularity =
I guess and hope. E.g. I'll have a talk at FOSDEM<https://fosdem.org/2014/s=
chedule/event/graphdevroom_graphhopper/> and elsewhere.

Kind Regards,
Peter.



Hi there,

I'm the author of GraphHopper<http://graphhopper.com/maps/> a new and fast =
Open Source routing engine based on OpenStreetMap (OSM) data. I have some q=
uestions. I would like to integrate elevation data in two ways:

 1. change distance and speed information per road segment to make e.g. rou=
ting around hills possible
 2. display the height data for every calculated route

For 1. this is derived work of OSM and so it would be required that I relea=
se the produced work (i.e. my routing files) under the ODbl-license.

For 2. the original height data would be necessary but as this is a separat=
e database it would not be necessary to release the produced work under ODb=
l.

Would you allow such usage for GraphHopper? And do you allow such usage for=
 commercial projects? If a license is required, what would it cost? I'm ask=
ing as I would like to decide if I should use SRTMv3 or your data.

Kind Regards,
Peter.