Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@kbastani
Created June 29, 2024 00:32
Show Gist options
  • Save kbastani/3ae7ceac67bda47761cc118328d59772 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save kbastani/3ae7ceac67bda47761cc118328d59772 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Fundamental Theory of Civilized Hominids

Fundamental Theory of Civilized Hominids

Core Principle: The "Civilization Gene" is a hypothetical cognitive scaling limitation that influences the development and evolution of complex social structures in hominids, including Homo sapiens. This gene likely arose from a confluence of evolutionary pressures that shaped primate behavior and drove adaptations in early hominids.

Terms and Definitions

  • Civilization Gene: A hypothetical gene or evolutionary factor that influences human social behavior and the development of civilizations, potentially impacting our cognitive capacity and our ability to manage complex social interactions.
  • Unsaid Moral Code: An evolutionary adaptation that influences group behavior and decision-making in both humans and other social animals. This code operates beyond explicit rules, relying heavily on unspoken norms and intuitions that guide interactions. This feature became an evolutionary biological structure in early hominid brains that made possible the scaling of tribe membership size, leading to a scaling law that maximized the fitness of a hominid species proportional to the size of the tribe.
  • Primate Mating Rights Framework: The 'mating rights agreement framework' in primates dictates mating access within a troop. This framework is deeply rooted in primate biology, serving as a foundational element of primate social organization.
  • Emigratory Selection: A form of group selection driven by the competitive pressures of migration, potentially influencing the development of the Civilization Gene.

Influences on the "Civilization Gene" and Complex Societies

  1. The Primate "Mating Rights Agreement Framework": At the root of this theory lies the foundation of primate behavior, specifically the "mating rights agreement framework". This biological framework, based on innate social instincts, established a complex interplay between mating access, dominance hierarchies, and group dynamics. This framework is a crucial component of primate social organization, influencing their survival strategies, group cohesion, and resource management.

  2. The Emergence of the "Unsaid Moral Code": As early hominids emerged from primate ancestors, they inherited these social instincts, but they needed to adapt them for larger and more complex groups. This adaptation led to the development of the "Unsaid Moral Code", a set of unwritten social rules that evolved from these innate biological instincts. This code is deeply ingrained in our biological nature and guides our behavior, facilitating cooperation and harmony within groups.

  3. Group Size, Social Dynamics, and the Unsaid Moral Code: The "Unsaid Moral Code" played a pivotal role in the success of early hominids. It provided a framework for navigating complex social interactions, managing conflicts, and ensuring group cohesion. However, the code's effectiveness is likely to reach a limit as group size increases. The cognitive burden of inferring and upholding a complex network of unspoken rules becomes overwhelming. As groups expand, the Unsaid Moral Code becomes increasingly difficult to maintain, and its ability to manage social dynamics weakens.

  4. The "Civilization Gene" and its Cognitive Limitations: This is where the "Civilization Gene" enters the picture. We hypothesize that this gene reflects a biological constraint on human cognition that impacts our ability to manage large groups and complex societies. As groups exceed a certain size, the cognitive load required to maintain the Unsaid Moral Code becomes too great, potentially leading to a breakdown of social cohesion. This cognitive limitation might be reflected in the cyclical rise and fall of civilizations, where complex societies ultimately struggle to maintain order and stability.

  5. Evolutionary Pressures and Shaping the "Civilization Gene": The development of the "Civilization Gene" was likely driven by several key evolutionary pressures:

  • Resource Storage: As hominids transitioned to a shelter-based lifestyle, the need to store and manage resources became increasingly crucial. This transition likely facilitated the evolution of complex social structures and the need for a more sophisticated Unsaid Moral Code to manage resource distribution.
  • Infectious Disease: Larger groups and increased migrations led to a greater risk of disease transmission. This pressure might have influenced the evolution of traits like less body hair, and it highlights the critical role of disease management in shaping social structures and potentially influencing the development of the "Civilization Gene."
  • Sexual Selection: Within larger groups, mating opportunities became more competitive. This led to a selective pressure for traits that enhanced survival rates and attracted mates, potentially impacting the development of the "Civilization Gene" and contributing to the evolution of social behaviors that further shaped human societies.
  • Migration: Migration played a significant role in the evolution of hominids, enabling them to adapt to new environments and expand their range. This process likely influenced the development of complex social structures, social networks, and communication systems, all of which are intertwined with the "Civilization Gene."

Consequences of the "Civilization Gene":

  1. The Unsaid Moral Code Breakdown: The theory suggests that exceeding the cognitive limitations of the Unsaid Moral Code, as influenced by the "Civilization Gene", contributes to societal instability and the emergence of crime. This breakdown disrupts the balance of social order and fosters a breakdown in collective cooperation.
  2. The Limits of Technology: Technological solutions, while valuable for addressing specific challenges, are unlikely to overcome the fundamental biological limitations imposed by the "Civilization Gene". Technology can enhance communication, improve resource management, and provide better insights into complex social dynamics. However, it's crucial to acknowledge that technology can also introduce new challenges and exacerbate existing problems if not carefully implemented and managed.

Future Directions:

  1. Refining the Framework: This initial version of the theory is a stepping stone. As we continue to explore, gather evidence, and refine our understanding, it's likely that the framework will evolve and expand. Further research into the "Civilization Gene" will be essential to understanding its impact on social structures and civilization.
  2. Evidence Gathering: We must delve deeper into historical and modern societies to gather data that supports or refutes the proposed framework. This involves studying the connections between crime rates, population size, and the evolution of governance structures. We can also analyze the impact of technology on social dynamics and explore the potential for new strategies that promote social resilience.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment