Comparison of Julia, NumPy and Octave

julia.jl

srand(0)
1:2:9 # implicit representation
2^2
a = zeros(10)
a = ones(10)
a = linspace(0, 1, 10)
A = eye(10)
A = rand(10, 10)
A = randn(10, 10)
B = [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10; 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20]
ndims(B)
size(B)
size(B, 1)
B[1:2, 2:5] # copies submatrix on assignment, sub(A, 1:2, 2:5) creates a view, slice(A, 1, 2:5) creates a view without keeping the first dimension of the array (of size 1)
B * A
B .* A[1:2, :] # .^, ./
A'
a'
inv(A)
pinv(A)
norm(A)
det(A)
A[1, 1]
A[end, end]
broadcast(+, A, a')
A[:]
reshape(A, 100)
exp(A)
indmax(A) # indmin, findmax, findmin
max(A) # min
w, v = eig(A)
chol(A*A')
U, s, V = svd(A) # U * diagm(s) * V' == A

JuliaOctaveNumpy.md

Comparison of Julia, Python and Octave

Overview

Julia is a new languange for technical computing. It is a mix of R, Matlab, Python and other similar languages. Its main advantage is its speed: it is just in time (JIT) compiled and almost as fast as C. Another advantage is its type inference, i.e. you do not have to specify types (although you can), but all variables are statically typed. It is a high level language that is fast as well. Here I compare the behavior to similar languages like Octave (Matlab) and Python (with NumPy).

Julia	Octave	Python (NumPy)
Storage Order
Column-major	Column-major	Row-major
Indexing
1 based	1 based	0 based

Storage Order

Julia's storage order is column major, numpy's storage order row major, i.e. A[:, 1] is faster in Julia and A[0, :] is faster in numpy because these vectors are contiguous chunks in memory.

Indexing

Julia's arrays start with index 1, loops over the range 1:N go over [1, N]. Pythons arrays start with index 0 and loops over range(N) go over [0, N-1].

Links

• NumPy for Matlab Users
• Assign blocks of multi-dimensional array

octave.m

randn('seed', 0)
1:2:9 # explicit representation
2^2
a = zeros(1, 10)
a = ones(1, 10)
a = linspace(0, 1, 10)
A = eye(10)
A = rand(10, 10)
A = randn(10, 10)
B = [[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]; [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]]
ndims(B)
size(B)
size(B, 1)
B(1:2, 2:5) # slices copy parts of arrays
B * A
B .* A(1:2, :) # .^, ./
A'
a'
inv(A)
pinv(A)
norm(A)
det(A)
A(1, 1)
A(end, end)
A + a # broadcasting only works sometimes (e.g. with randn but not with eye)
A(:)
reshape(A, 100)
exp(A)
[value, idx] = max(A(:)) # min
max(A(:)) # min
[w, v] = eig(A)
chol(A*A')
[U, s, V] = svd(A) # U * s * V' == A

python.py

import numpy
numpy.random.seed(0)
range(1, 10, 2) # explicit representation, (implicit with xrange(1, 10, 2))
2**2
a = numpy.zeros(10)
a = numpy.ones(10)
a = numpy.linspace(0, 1, 10)
A = numpy.eye(10)
A = numpy.random.rand(10, 10)
A = numpy.random.randn(10, 10)
B = numpy.array([[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]])
B.ndim
B.shape
B.shape[0]
B[:2, 1:5] # slices create views on original arrays
B.dot(A)
B * A[:2, :]
A.T
a[:, numpy.newaxis]
numpy.linalg.inv(A)
numpy.linalg.pinv(A)
numpy.linalg.norm(A)
numpy.linalg.det(A)
A[0, 0]
A[-1, -1]
A + a
A.T.ravel()
A.T.reshape(100)
numpy.exp(A)
A.argmax() # argmin
A.max()
w, v = numpy.linalg.eig(A)
numpy.linalg.cholesky(A.dot(A.T))
U, s, V = numpy.linalg.svd(A) # U.dot(numpy.diag(s)).dot(V) == A, V is not transposed!

Helpful, Thanks !!