Relational databases like MySQL are generally optimized for both read and write operations, but their performance can vary based on several factors:
- Speed: Inserts can be fast, especially for bulk inserts, as relational databases are optimized for transaction management and can handle multiple inserts efficiently. However, performance can be impacted by factors like indexing, foreign key constraints, and the size of the dataset.
- Locking: During inserts, MySQL may lock rows or tables, which can lead to contention if many concurrent writes are occurring.
- Transaction Overhead: If you're using transactions, there may be some overhead that affects the speed of individual inserts.
- Speed: Reading data is typically very fast, especially if the necessary indexes are in place. Indexes allow the database to locate rows more efficiently without scanning the entire table.
- Caching: Many databases, including MySQL, utilize caching mechanisms (like query cache) to speed up read operations.
- Optimization: Read operations can be highly optimized through techniques like indexing, partitioning, and using appropriate query structures.
- Read vs. Write: In many applications, read operations are more frequent than write operations. As a result, relational databases are often tuned for read-heavy workloads.
- Database Design: The performance of both reads and writes can be significantly influenced by the design of the database schema, including normalization, indexing strategies, and data types used.
- Use Cases: Depending on the specific use case (e.g., transaction-heavy applications vs. reporting systems), the performance characteristics can vary.
In summary, while relational databases like MySQL can perform well for both reads and writes, they are generally faster at reading operations, especially when optimized with the right indexing strategies. However, they can handle insert operations efficiently as well, particularly with appropriate design and optimizations. For applications with high write volumes, careful consideration of schema design and indexing can help maintain performance.
there's also the alternative way where they data is temporarily placed in the cache for a while until the database connections have gone down.. but there's a need to measure how many users are currently using the system (is it possible via a middleware counter stored in redis that checks how many are reading from database at the past X minutes?)