Last active
April 3, 2024 15:28
-
-
Save lars-tiede/01e5f5a551f29a5f300e to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
asyncio + multithreading: one asyncio event loop per thread
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
import asyncio | |
import threading | |
import random | |
def thr(i): | |
# we need to create a new loop for the thread, and set it as the 'default' | |
# loop that will be returned by calls to asyncio.get_event_loop() from this | |
# thread. | |
loop = asyncio.new_event_loop() | |
asyncio.set_event_loop(loop) | |
loop.run_until_complete(do_stuff(i)) | |
loop.close() | |
async def do_stuff(i): | |
await asyncio.sleep(random.uniform(0.1, 0.5)) # NOTE if we hadn't called | |
# asyncio.set_event_loop() earlier, we would have to pass an event | |
# loop to this function explicitly. | |
print(i) | |
def main(): | |
num_threads = 10 | |
threads = [ threading.Thread(target = thr, args=(i,)) for i in range(num_threads) ] | |
[ t.start() for t in threads ] | |
[ t.join() for t in threads ] | |
print("bye") | |
if __name__ == "__main__": | |
main() |
Thank you.
Thank you. I was just about to write something like this to debug a problem, but this helped me find it instantly.
You are a GENIUS, and saved me HOURS of struggle. THANK YOU.
Do you have any donation link? Because I want to tip you a coffee.
Thank you! That exactly what I had been looking for - simple and clean and it works perfectly.
@jayzhou215 Credits for you too, your code I also tested and it does what it should,
Good luck all!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Thanks for sharing. I try use thread pool and handle function result