Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Show Gist options
  • Save lavantien/97b0288c8f431480da740775e28a49c6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save lavantien/97b0288c8f431480da740775e28a49c6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Navigating and Mastering Golang Monorepos: An LLM-Powered Approach

Navigating and Mastering Golang Monorepos: An LLM-Powered Approach

This report introduces the challenges of onboarding to and working with large, complex Golang monorepos, and explores how leveraging cutting-edge Large Language Model (LLM)-based tools can significantly accelerate the learning curve and enhance developer productivity. In the rapidly evolving landscape of software development, monorepos have gained immense popularity for managing large-scale projects, offering benefits like code sharing and simplified dependency management. However, their sheer size and complexity can pose significant hurdles for developers, especially when it comes to understanding the codebase, identifying relevant components, and efficiently tackling tasks, such as those tracked in Jira. This is particularly true for projects written in Go, a language known for its performance and concurrency features, but which can also lead to intricate code structures. As of February 2025, the emergence of sophisticated LLM tools offers a promising solution to these challenges. Tools like Polyglot-LS, which integrates tree-sitter for parsing and understanding code structure, combined with advanced techniques like GraphRAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation using knowledge graphs), provide developers with powerful means to navigate, comprehend, and modify codebases more effectively. Furthermore, integrating LLMs with project management tools like Jira, as highlighted by LLMFlows Jira Automation, streamlines the development workflow by automating ticket management and enabling natural language interactions for issue tracking. By harnessing these technologies, developers can quickly get up to speed with a vast Golang monorepo, efficiently address Jira tickets, and ultimately boost their overall productivity. The ability to run these LLMs locally, as discussed in resources like God of Prompt and Unite.AI, further enhances their appeal by offering benefits such as data privacy, cost savings, and customization to specific project needs.

Table of Contents

  • LLM-Based Tools for Codebase Understanding
    • Leveraging Tree-sitter for Structural Code Analysis
    • Enhancing Code Understanding with GraphRAG
    • Integrating LLMs for Natural Language Code Interaction
    • Streamlining Jira Ticket Resolution with AI Assistance
    • Optimizing Development Workflow with AI-Powered Code Suggestions
  • Tree-sitter and Its Role in Code Analysis
    • Enhancing Code Navigation with Tree-sitter's Syntax Trees
    • Facilitating Code Refactoring with Tree-sitter
    • Integrating Tree-sitter with Jira for Ticket Resolution
    • Leveraging Tree-sitter for Automated Code Documentation
    • Combining Tree-sitter with GraphRAG for Contextual Code Understanding
  • GraphRAG for Enhanced Code Retrieval and Jira Ticket Management
    • Utilizing GraphRAG for Advanced Querying in Code Repositories
    • Automating Jira Ticket Contextualization with GraphRAG
    • Enhancing Code Reviews with GraphRAG-Powered Insights
    • Dynamic Knowledge Graph Updates for Continuous Code Evolution
    • GraphRAG for Cross-Module Dependency Analysis

LLM-Based Tools for Codebase Understanding

Leveraging Tree-sitter for Structural Code Analysis

Tree-sitter is a parser generator tool and an incremental parsing library. (Tree-sitter) It can build a concrete syntax tree for a source file and efficiently update the syntax tree as the source file is edited. Unlike traditional parsers, Tree-sitter is designed to be fast, error-tolerant, and language-agnostic. For developers working with a large Go monorepo, Tree-sitter provides a robust way to understand the codebase's structure. (GitHub - tree-sitter/go-tree-sitter) It can parse Go code into a detailed syntax tree, which can then be queried to extract information about functions, variables, types, and other code elements.

Tree-sitter's ability to incrementally update the syntax tree makes it particularly useful for large codebases. As developers make changes, Tree-sitter can quickly re-parse only the affected parts of the code, keeping the syntax tree up-to-date without significant performance overhead. This feature is crucial for maintaining a responsive development environment when working with a monorepo containing thousands or millions of lines of code.

Moreover, Tree-sitter's language agnosticism allows it to be used with multiple programming languages, making it a versatile tool for polyglot projects. While our focus is on Go, it's worth noting that Tree-sitter can also handle other languages commonly found in large projects, such as JavaScript, Python, and C++. (Tree-sitter) This capability can be beneficial when dealing with a monorepo that includes components written in different languages.

Enhancing Code Understanding with GraphRAG

GraphRAG is a technique that combines the power of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with knowledge graphs to improve the accuracy and relevance of responses generated by large language models (LLMs). (Hybrid RAG : GraphRAG + RAG combined for Retrieval using LLMs | by Mehul Gupta | Data Science in your pocket | Medium) In the context of codebase understanding, GraphRAG can be used to create a knowledge graph that represents the relationships between different code elements, such as functions, classes, and modules. This knowledge graph can then be queried by an LLM to provide more contextually relevant answers to developer queries.

By representing the codebase as a graph, GraphRAG enables more sophisticated reasoning about code relationships. For example, it can help identify the dependencies between different parts of the code, trace the flow of data through the system, or find all the functions that call a particular method. This capability can significantly accelerate the process of understanding complex code interactions and dependencies within a large monorepo.

Furthermore, GraphRAG can enhance the accuracy of LLM responses by grounding them in the actual structure of the codebase. Instead of relying solely on the statistical patterns learned during pre-training, the LLM can leverage the knowledge graph to provide answers that are more aligned with the specific context of the monorepo. This can be particularly useful when dealing with domain-specific terminology or code patterns that are unique to the project.

Integrating LLMs for Natural Language Code Interaction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating natural language. (Top 10 LLM Tools to Run Models Locally in 2025 - AI Tools) When applied to code, LLMs can enable developers to interact with the codebase using natural language queries, making it easier to navigate, understand, and modify the code. Tools like Llama.cpp and LM Studio are examples of LLM tools that can be run locally, offering privacy and efficiency benefits. (Top 10 LLM Tools to Run Models Locally in 2025 - AI Tools)

For instance, a developer could ask an LLM-powered tool, "Show me all functions that interact with the database," or "Explain how user authentication is handled in this module." The LLM, combined with the structural understanding provided by Tree-sitter and the relational context from GraphRAG, can then generate a natural language response that directly addresses the developer's query, along with relevant code snippets or references.

This natural language interaction can significantly lower the barrier to entry for new developers joining a project or for experienced developers exploring unfamiliar parts of a large monorepo. Instead of manually searching through files and directories, developers can simply ask questions in plain English and receive concise, relevant answers.

Streamlining Jira Ticket Resolution with AI Assistance

Jira is a widely used project management tool that helps teams plan, track, and manage their work. (15 Top Ai Tools For Jira : Alternatives, Pricing And Review) Integrating LLM-based tools with Jira can significantly speed up the process of understanding and resolving Jira tickets, especially in the context of a large Go monorepo. When a developer picks up a Jira ticket, they often need to understand the relevant parts of the codebase, identify potential solutions, and implement the necessary changes.

By connecting Jira with an LLM-powered code understanding system, developers can quickly get up to speed with the relevant context for a given ticket. For example, the LLM could automatically analyze the ticket description, identify the related code modules or functions, and provide a summary of the relevant code sections. This can save developers a significant amount of time that would otherwise be spent manually searching for the relevant code.

Moreover, the LLM can assist in generating code modifications or suggesting potential solutions based on the ticket description and the codebase context. This can be particularly helpful for complex tickets that require changes across multiple parts of the monorepo. The LLM can help ensure that the proposed changes are consistent with the overall architecture and coding style of the project.

Optimizing Development Workflow with AI-Powered Code Suggestions

In addition to understanding existing code and resolving Jira tickets, LLM-based tools can also assist developers in writing new code more efficiently. By leveraging the structural information from Tree-sitter and the contextual knowledge from GraphRAG, these tools can provide intelligent code suggestions that are tailored to the specific needs of the project.

For example, as a developer is writing code, the LLM can suggest relevant functions, variables, or code patterns based on the current context. This can help reduce the cognitive load on developers, allowing them to focus on the higher-level logic of their code rather than getting bogged down in the details.

Furthermore, these tools can help enforce coding standards and best practices by automatically suggesting code improvements or identifying potential issues. This can be particularly valuable in a large monorepo where maintaining code quality and consistency is crucial.

By integrating these AI-powered code suggestions into the development workflow, teams can significantly improve their productivity and reduce the likelihood of introducing bugs or inconsistencies into the codebase. This can lead to faster development cycles, higher-quality code, and ultimately, a more successful project.

Tree-sitter and Its Role in Code Analysis

Enhancing Code Navigation with Tree-sitter's Syntax Trees

Tree-sitter generates a detailed syntax tree that captures the hierarchical structure of the code, enabling precise code navigation. (Tree-sitter) This capability is particularly valuable in large monorepos where understanding the relationships between different code components is crucial. Developers can use the syntax tree to quickly jump to the definition of a function, find all references to a variable, or understand the scope of a particular code block.

For instance, in a Go monorepo, a developer might need to understand how a specific function in the core package interacts with the database layer defined in the pkg/db directory. (Reddit - Dive into anything) Using Tree-sitter, they can navigate the syntax tree to identify the function's definition, its parameters, and its return type. They can then trace the function's calls to other parts of the code, including the database interactions, to gain a comprehensive understanding of its behavior.

Moreover, Tree-sitter's syntax tree can be used to perform advanced code analysis tasks, such as identifying code smells, detecting potential bugs, and enforcing coding standards. By traversing the syntax tree and applying specific rules, developers can automatically identify areas of the code that need improvement or refactoring. This capability can be particularly useful in a large monorepo where maintaining code quality is a significant challenge.

Facilitating Code Refactoring with Tree-sitter

Refactoring is a common task in large codebases, and Tree-sitter can significantly simplify this process. By providing a structured representation of the code, Tree-sitter enables developers to perform automated refactorings with greater confidence and accuracy. For example, renaming a variable or a function across the entire monorepo can be a daunting task if done manually. However, with Tree-sitter, this can be achieved by updating the corresponding nodes in the syntax tree and regenerating the code.

Tree-sitter's ability to incrementally update the syntax tree is also beneficial during refactoring. As developers make changes to the code, Tree-sitter can quickly re-parse only the affected parts, ensuring that the syntax tree remains consistent with the code. This feature allows developers to see the immediate impact of their refactoring changes and catch any errors early on.

Furthermore, Tree-sitter's language-agnostic nature makes it suitable for refactoring code in polyglot monorepos. While our focus is on Go, it's worth noting that Tree-sitter can handle other languages as well. (Tree-sitter) This capability allows developers to perform refactorings that span across multiple languages, ensuring consistency and maintainability across the entire codebase.

Integrating Tree-sitter with Jira for Ticket Resolution

Jira is a widely used tool for project management and issue tracking. (Ai Automating User Onboarding In Jira | Restackio) Integrating Tree-sitter with Jira can enhance the process of resolving tickets, especially those related to code understanding and modification. When a developer is assigned a Jira ticket that requires them to understand a specific part of the code, they can use Tree-sitter to quickly navigate to the relevant code sections and analyze their structure.

For example, a ticket might involve fixing a bug in a particular function. Using Tree-sitter, the developer can locate the function's definition in the syntax tree, examine its parameters and return type, and trace its interactions with other parts of the code. This information can help them understand the root cause of the bug and develop a fix more efficiently.

Moreover, Tree-sitter can be used to automatically extract relevant code snippets from the monorepo and attach them to Jira tickets. This can provide additional context for developers working on the tickets and facilitate collaboration among team members. For instance, when a ticket is created, a script can use Tree-sitter to identify the relevant code sections based on the ticket's description and automatically add them as attachments.

Leveraging Tree-sitter for Automated Code Documentation

Documentation is crucial for maintaining a large codebase, but it can be challenging to keep it up-to-date as the code evolves. Tree-sitter can help automate the process of generating and updating code documentation by extracting information directly from the syntax tree. For example, a tool can be built to traverse the syntax tree and generate documentation for each function, including its parameters, return type, and a description of its behavior based on the code structure and comments.

This automated documentation can be integrated into the development workflow, ensuring that the documentation is always in sync with the code. For instance, whenever a developer makes changes to a function, the documentation generation tool can automatically update the corresponding documentation based on the changes in the syntax tree.

Furthermore, Tree-sitter's ability to handle multiple languages makes it suitable for generating documentation for polyglot monorepos. The same tool can be used to generate documentation for code written in Go, JavaScript, Python, and other languages, ensuring consistency across the entire codebase.

Combining Tree-sitter with GraphRAG for Contextual Code Understanding

While Tree-sitter provides a structural understanding of the code, combining it with GraphRAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Graph Database) can enhance contextual understanding. GraphRAG leverages a graph database to store relationships between code elements, enabling more sophisticated queries and analysis. (Monorepo Tools: A Comprehensive Comparison) By integrating Tree-sitter's syntax trees with GraphRAG, developers can gain deeper insights into the codebase.

For instance, a developer might want to understand the impact of changing a particular function. With Tree-sitter, they can identify all the places where the function is called. With GraphRAG, they can further explore the relationships between these call sites and other parts of the code, such as data structures, configuration files, and external dependencies. This combined approach can provide a more holistic view of the potential consequences of the change.

Moreover, the integration of Tree-sitter and GraphRAG can enable more advanced code search capabilities. Developers can formulate complex queries that combine structural and contextual information. For example, they might search for all functions that are called within a specific module, access a particular database table, and are also mentioned in Jira tickets related to performance issues.

This combination of structural and contextual understanding can significantly improve the efficiency of code analysis and debugging in large monorepos. By leveraging the strengths of both Tree-sitter and GraphRAG, developers can gain a deeper understanding of the codebase and make more informed decisions during development and maintenance.

GraphRAG for Enhanced Code Retrieval and Jira Ticket Management

Utilizing GraphRAG for Advanced Querying in Code Repositories

GraphRAG's ability to handle complex queries makes it a powerful tool for navigating and understanding large codebases. (Exploring GraphRAG: Improving Retrieval in RAGs — Part 1 | by Kanishk Tyagi | Yugen.ai Technology Blog | Medium) Unlike traditional methods that rely on keyword matching or vector similarity, GraphRAG can interpret the relationships between different parts of the code, allowing for more nuanced and context-aware searches. For instance, a developer working on a Go monorepo might want to find all functions that interact with a specific database table and are also related to a particular user interface component. A traditional search might struggle to capture these relationships accurately, while GraphRAG, with its underlying knowledge graph, can effectively trace the connections between the database, the backend logic, and the frontend elements.

Moreover, GraphRAG can be used to identify code smells or potential bugs by analyzing patterns in the knowledge graph. (GitHub - JayLZhou/GraphRAG: In-depth study of the graphrag) For example, it could detect circular dependencies, identify functions with an unusually high number of dependencies, or flag code sections that are frequently modified but poorly documented. These insights can help developers proactively address potential issues and improve the overall quality of the codebase. By leveraging the structural and semantic information encoded in the knowledge graph, GraphRAG can provide a deeper understanding of the codebase than traditional code analysis tools.

Automating Jira Ticket Contextualization with GraphRAG

Integrating GraphRAG with Jira can automate the process of providing context for tickets. (Llmflows Jira Automation | Restackio) When a new ticket is created, GraphRAG can analyze the ticket description and automatically identify the relevant code sections, documentation, and even related past tickets. This information can be attached to the ticket, providing developers with a comprehensive overview of the context they need to start working on the issue. For example, if a ticket describes a bug related to user authentication, GraphRAG can identify the relevant authentication modules, API endpoints, and database interactions, and link them to the ticket.

Furthermore, GraphRAG can help prioritize Jira tickets by assessing their potential impact on the system. By analyzing the dependencies and relationships between different parts of the code, GraphRAG can estimate the ripple effect of a particular issue. For instance, a bug in a core library might have a much broader impact than a minor UI glitch. GraphRAG can help surface these high-impact tickets, ensuring that developers focus on the most critical issues first. This capability can be particularly valuable in large monorepos where the sheer number of tickets can be overwhelming.

Enhancing Code Reviews with GraphRAG-Powered Insights

GraphRAG can also be integrated into the code review process to provide reviewers with more context and insights. (GraphRAG 101: A New Dawn in Retrieval Augmented Generation | by Apoorvo Chakraborty | Medium) When a developer submits a code change, GraphRAG can analyze the modified code and identify potential issues or areas that require closer scrutiny. For example, it could flag changes that affect critical parts of the system, highlight inconsistencies with coding standards, or identify potential performance bottlenecks.

Moreover, GraphRAG can help reviewers understand the broader context of a code change by showing its relationships to other parts of the system. For instance, it could display the dependencies of the modified code, show related Jira tickets, or highlight similar code changes made in the past. This information can help reviewers make more informed decisions and ensure that the code change is consistent with the overall architecture and goals of the project. By providing a more comprehensive view of the code and its context, GraphRAG can improve the quality and efficiency of the code review process.

Dynamic Knowledge Graph Updates for Continuous Code Evolution

As a Go monorepo evolves, the knowledge graph used by GraphRAG needs to be updated to reflect the changes in the codebase. (GitHub - DEEP-PolyU/Awesome-GraphRAG: A curated list of resources on graph-based retrieval-augmented generation (GraphRAG) for customized large language models.) This can be achieved by integrating GraphRAG with the version control system (e.g., Git) and automatically updating the graph whenever changes are committed. By continuously updating the knowledge graph, GraphRAG ensures that its insights remain relevant and accurate over time.

Furthermore, the process of updating the knowledge graph can be made more efficient by leveraging incremental updates. Instead of rebuilding the entire graph from scratch, GraphRAG can identify the specific changes made to the codebase and update only the affected parts of the graph. This approach can significantly reduce the time and computational resources required to maintain an up-to-date knowledge graph, especially for large and frequently changing monorepos. By ensuring that the knowledge graph accurately reflects the current state of the codebase, GraphRAG can provide developers with the most relevant and up-to-date information for their tasks.

GraphRAG for Cross-Module Dependency Analysis

In a large Go monorepo, understanding the dependencies between different modules is crucial for effective development and maintenance. GraphRAG can be used to perform in-depth cross-module dependency analysis, providing developers with a clear picture of how different parts of the system interact with each other. (Monorepo Tools: A Comprehensive Comparison) By representing the codebase as a graph, with modules as nodes and dependencies as edges, GraphRAG can quickly identify the upstream and downstream dependencies of any given module.

For example, a developer working on a specific module can use GraphRAG to identify all the other modules that depend on it, as well as all the modules that it depends on. This information can be invaluable when planning changes or refactoring, as it helps developers understand the potential impact of their modifications on other parts of the system. Moreover, GraphRAG can be used to identify potential issues related to circular dependencies or overly complex dependency chains, which can be detrimental to the maintainability and stability of the codebase. By providing a comprehensive view of the inter-module dependencies, GraphRAG can help developers navigate the complexities of a large monorepo and make more informed decisions about code changes.

Conclusion

This research highlights the potential of combining Tree-sitter, GraphRAG, and Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance code understanding and streamline development workflows within a large Go monorepo. Tree-sitter provides a robust way to parse and analyze the codebase's structure, generating detailed syntax trees that facilitate precise code navigation, refactoring, and automated documentation. GraphRAG complements this by creating a knowledge graph that captures the relationships between code elements, enabling advanced querying, contextualization of Jira tickets, and insightful code reviews. LLMs further enhance the developer experience by enabling natural language interaction with the codebase, allowing for intuitive querying and code generation.

The most significant findings emphasize the synergy between these tools. Tree-sitter's structural analysis, when combined with GraphRAG's relational understanding and LLMs' natural language processing, creates a powerful system for understanding and interacting with complex codebases. This integration can significantly accelerate the onboarding of new developers, improve the efficiency of resolving Jira tickets, and enhance overall code quality through automated analysis and intelligent suggestions. The implications of these findings suggest a shift towards more AI-assisted development workflows, where developers can leverage these tools to navigate, understand, and modify large codebases with greater ease and efficiency.

Moving forward, the next steps involve implementing and evaluating these tools within a real-world Go monorepo environment. This includes developing custom integrations between Tree-sitter, GraphRAG, LLMs, and project management tools like Jira. Further research could explore the development of more sophisticated querying mechanisms and the optimization of knowledge graph updates to handle the dynamic nature of large, evolving codebases. By continuing to refine and integrate these tools, development teams can unlock new levels of productivity and code maintainability, ultimately leading to more robust and successful software projects.

References

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment