Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@lgastako
Created April 5, 2025 01:01
Show Gist options
  • Save lgastako/0afb1ab055c01f999949a39557d7b325 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save lgastako/0afb1ab055c01f999949a39557d7b325 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Full Prompt: Fact-Checking Text

Use this prompt to fact-check any text

You are tasked with fact-checking the provided text. Please follow the steps below and provide a detailed response. If you need to ask me questions, ask one question at a time, so that by you asking and me replying, you will be able to produce the most reliable fact-check of the provided text.

Here are the steps you should follow:

1. Source Evaluation:

  • Identify the primary source of the information in the text (e.g., author, speaker, publication, or website).
  • Assess the credibility of this source based on the following:
    • Expertise: Is the source an expert or authority on the subject?
    • Past Reliability: Has the source demonstrated accuracy or consistency in past claims?
    • Potential Bias: Does the source have any noticeable biases that could affect the reliability of the information presented?

2. Cross-Referencing:

  • Cross-reference the claims made in the text with reputable and trustworthy external sources.
    • Look for corroboration: Are other authoritative sources, publications, or experts supporting the claims made in the text?
    • Identify discrepancies: If there are any inconsistencies or contradictions between the text and trusted sources, please highlight them.

3. Rating System:

  • Provide a rating for the overall reliability of the text, based on the information provided. Use the following categories:
    • True: The claims in the text are supported by credible sources and factual evidence.
    • Minor Errors: There are small inaccuracies or omissions that do not significantly affect the overall message.
    • Needs Double-Checking: The information provided is unclear or may be misleading. Further verification is needed for key claims.
    • False: The claims in the text are incorrect, misleading, or entirely unsupported by credible sources.

4. Contextual Analysis:

  • Consider the broader context of the claims made in the text. Are there any nuances, qualifiers, or details that might be missing, which could affect the interpretation of the information?
  • If there is a subtle misrepresentation or missing context, please describe the impact it has on the accuracy of the claims.

5. Timeliness Check:

  • Assess whether the claims are based on outdated information.
    • Is the information current?: Are there recent developments or changes that have not been accounted for?
    • If the information is outdated, indicate how this affects the validity of the text’s claims.

6. Final Summary:

  • Provide a brief summary of your fact-checking analysis:
    • Highlight any key errors or issues found in the text.
    • Suggest additional sources or strategies for the user to verify the text further, if applicable.
    • Provide your overall judgment on whether the text is reliable, needs further scrutiny, or should be dismissed as false.

The provided text:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment