According to discussions and trends on X (Twitter) and recent web sources in early 2026, for building small-scale TypeScript sites like landing pages, portfolio pages, company/agency/organization sites (2-3 pages), and especially those with a blog, the community strongly leans toward performance-first, content-oriented meta-frameworks.
The top contenders are Astro (often praised as the winner for this exact use case), Next.js (still the safe, versatile default), and SvelteKit (for joyful DX and tiny bundles). Remix appears less frequently for purely content/marketing sites.
Here's a breakdown focused on your needs (landing/portfolio + blog), including DX (developer experience), UX (end-user experience via speed/responsiveness), and SEO:
Astro dominates 2025–2026 discussions for content-heavy, mostly static sites like portfolios, marketing/landing pages, company sites, and blogs.
-
Why it fits perfectly:
- Zero-JS by default + Islands architecture → ship minimal client-side JavaScript, leading to blazing-fast loads (often 40-60% better Lighthouse scores than React-based sites).
- Excellent for static/SSG with optional dynamic parts.
- Supports TypeScript natively and first-class.
- Bring your own components (React, Svelte, Vue, etc.) for interactivity only where needed.
-
DX — Extremely clean and simple syntax (feels like enhanced HTML + frontmatter). Minimal boilerplate, fast builds, great for quick iteration on small sites. Many devs call it "joyful" for content/marketing work.
-
UX — Superior performance: instant page loads, tiny bundles → best possible user experience on mobile/first visit.
-
SEO — Outstanding out of the box (fully static HTML by default, no hydration issues, fast TTFB). Frequently called the SEO/performance king for blogs and landing pages.
Recent X chatter and articles confirm many teams migrate from Next.js to Astro for these exact site types, shocked by the speed gains.
Next.js remains the go-to in many 2026 stacks (especially React + TypeScript teams), powering most new React sites.
-
Why it's still strong:
- Mature ecosystem, huge community, tons of starters/boilerplates (e.g., with shadcn/ui, Tailwind).
- Supports SSG, SSR, ISR → flexible for blog + static pages.
- Full TypeScript support (first-class).
-
DX — Great tooling (Vercel integration, App Router), but heavier for simple sites (more config, React overhead).
-
UX — Very good with optimizations (Server Components, streaming), but ships more JS than Astro → slightly slower initial loads on content sites.
-
SEO — Excellent (strong SSR/SSG support), widely used for SEO-heavy sites, but not quite as lean as Astro for pure static content.
If you're already in the React ecosystem or want maximum hiring/resources, stick with Next.js.
SvelteKit is gaining traction for small-to-medium sites, especially if you want top-tier performance without React.
-
Why it fits:
- Compile-time magic → tiny bundles, no virtual DOM.
- Great for TypeScript (Svelte 5 improves it a lot).
- Built-in routing, SSR/SSG, perfect for blogs (Markdown support).
-
DX — Often called the most enjoyable (simple syntax, reactive by default, less boilerplate than React).
-
UX — Excellent speed and smooth animations/transitions.
-
SEO — Very strong (static by default possible, fast loads).
It's a favorite for devs tired of React complexity.
- Best overall for landing page + portfolio + 2-3 page site + blog in 2026 → Astro (especially with React/TypeScript islands for any interactivity). It delivers the best performance/SEO combo with excellent DX for content-focused sites.
- If you prefer React ecosystem → Next.js (most jobs, mature tools, still great for SEO).
- If you want the smoothest/most fun DX → SvelteKit.
Visual Examples of Sites Built with These
Here are some real-world examples to show how clean and fast these look in practice:
Many devs on X and blogs in late 2025/early 2026 say: for your exact needs (small, content + blog, SEO-focused), Astro is the meta in 2026 — fast, lightweight, and future-proof. Start with their TypeScript starters! 🚀
Here’s a practical, up-to-date (January 2026) guide on when to choose Astro, Next.js, or TanStack Start (currently in RC stage, rapidly maturing) for different project types.
All three are excellent with TypeScript, but they shine in very different scenarios. The community consensus from recent discussions (especially on X/Twitter and dev forums) is clear.
| Project Type | Best Choice | Why? (DX / Performance / SEO / Maturity) | Strong Alternatives | Typical Migration Stories / Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing page / Portfolio / Marketing site (static-heavy, 1–10 pages) | Astro | Zero-JS default → unbeatable speed & Lighthouse scores, partial hydration, islands for interactivity, fantastic SEO, minimal JS shipped | Next.js (if you need heavy React already) | Many teams migrated from Next.js → huge perf/SEO gains |
| Blog / Content site / Docs / Company site with blog | Astro | Static-first, MDX excellent, islands for dynamic bits, best SEO + performance combo, clean DX for content | Next.js (ISR) | "Shocked by speed gains" is common |
| SaaS / Dashboard / Admin panel / Internal tool (dynamic, auth, data-heavy) | TanStack Start | Client-first feel with SSR/streaming only when needed, isomorphic everything, built-in TanStack Query + Router (type-safe heaven), no hydration surprises, great middleware | Next.js (if you want Vercel magic) | Growing excitement: "breath of fresh air", "what Next.js should have been" |
| Full e-commerce marketplace / Complex CRUD app | TanStack Start or Next.js | TanStack Start → more control, better type-safety, less magic, excellent for data-heavy UIs Next.js → mature ecosystem, easier team onboarding |
— | Several reported successful migrations from Next.js (1–2 weeks effort) |
| Hybrid: Marketing site + heavy dashboard | Astro + TanStack islands or Astro + TanStack Start pages | Astro for static/marketing → best perf/SEO TanStack for interactive parts → best DX for React apps |
Next.js (App Router) | Community loves this combo (Astro + TanStack) |
| Anything if you need maximum hiring pool / ecosystem / stability right now | Next.js | Battle-tested, huge community, Vercel integration, tons of starters/boilerplates | — | "Still has my heart" – many devs say |
-
You want the fastest possible site + best SEO (landing, portfolio, marketing, company site, blog)
→ Choose Astro (still the undisputed king in 2026 for content/marketing)- Ships basically zero JavaScript by default
- Islands architecture = interactivity only where needed
- Excellent MDX/blog support
- Many 2025–2026 migrations from Next.js → "100 Lighthouse scores" stories are very common
-
You're building a mostly client-side, data-intensive app (dashboard, SaaS, admin panel, tools with auth/forms/tables)
→ Choose TanStack Start (the rising star — gaining serious momentum)- Client-first + SSR/streaming only on initial load
- Isomorphic loaders/actions → no more "oops whole page is client" surprises
- Built-in TanStack Query + Router = end-to-end type safety
- Feels like "React the way it should be" after Next.js complexity
- Deploy anywhere (Cloudflare, Netlify, etc.) — less vendor lock-in
- Real-world feedback: migrations from Next.js feel worth it for control & DX (though some report it's verbose)
-
You want the safest, most mature, ecosystem-rich choice (especially for teams or hiring)
→ Choose Next.js- Still dominates job market & ecosystem
- App Router + Server Components are production-proven
- Vercel makes deployment trivial
- Great for hybrid sites (SSR/ISR)
- Downside: more "magic", potential bloat, Vercel-leaning
Many devs now advocate:
Astro for the marketing/content/SEO-critical parts
TanStack Start (or TanStack Router + Vite) for the dynamic app/dashboard sections
→ You get the best of both worlds: insane performance where it matters + joyful React DX where you need complexity.
Bottom line in January 2026:
- Content/marketing/SEO-first → Astro wins
- Dynamic/data-heavy React app → TanStack Start is stealing hearts
- Need stability + ecosystem today → Next.js remains very hard to beat
Pick based on your project's primary need (perf/SEO vs dynamic control vs maturity) rather than hype. All three are excellent — the React ecosystem is in a really good place right now! 🚀