Created
July 24, 2015 10:55
-
-
Save markomanninen/2eec41d340c0c0970c86 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Decimal expansion and notation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
##Decimal expansion and notation | |
###Background | |
For David's response on: | |
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1371400/four-mathematical-notations-for-fraction-1-999-and-how-to-show-present-they-ar/1372077#1372077 | |
I want to explain background of the numerical musings, which I was already pondering on other topics like: | |
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1365506/doubling-sequences-of-the-cyclic-decimal-parts-of-the-fraction-numbers | |
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1368968/how-to-notate-all-integers-gt-1-except-products-of-2-3-5 | |
http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1369596/are-there-more-convenient-ways-of-getting-the-number-of-digits-of-a-positive-int | |
First I looked up reciprocals of 7-rough numbers up to 100: | |
**1/7 142857** | |
1/11 09 | |
1/13 076923 | |
1/17 0588235294117647 | |
1/19 052631578947368421 | |
1/23 0434782608695652173913 | |
1/29 0344827586206896551724137931 | |
1/31 032258064516129 | |
1/37 027 | |
1/41 02439 | |
1/43 023255813953488372093 | |
1/47 0212765957446808510638297872340425531914893617 | |
**1/49 020408163265306122448979591836734693877551** | |
1/53 0188679245283 | |
1/59 0169491525423728813559322033898305084745762711864406779661 | |
1/61 016393442622950819672131147540983606557377049180327868852459 | |
1/67 014925373134328358208955223880597 | |
**1/71 01408450704225352112676056338028169** | |
1/73 01369863 | |
1/77 012987 | |
1/79 0126582278481 | |
**1/83 01204819277108433734939759036144578313253** | |
**1/89 01123595505617977528089887640449438202247191** | |
noticing some of the sequences were doubling, tripling, quadring, hexing and such, but some of them seemed to be arbitrary. So I wanted to know, what is going on behind. I decided to look up numbers up to 1000: | |
1/989 001011122345803842264914054600606673407482305358948432760364004044489383215369059656218402426693629929221435793731041456016177957532861476238624873609706774519716885743174924165824064711830131445904954499494438827098078867542972699696663296258847320525783619817997977755308392315470171890798786653185035389282103134479271991911021233569261880687563195146612740141557128412537917087967644084934277047522750252780586450960566228513650151668351870576339737108190091 | |
1/991 001009081735620585267406659939455095862764883955600403632694248234106962663975782038345105953582240161453077699293642785065590312815338042381432896064581231079717457114026236125126135216952573158425832492431886982845610494450050454086781029263370332996972754793138244197780020181634712411705348133198789101917255297679112008072653884964682139253279515640766902119071644803229061553985872855701311806256306760847628657921291624621594349142280524722502522704339051463168516649848637739656912209889 | |
1/997 0010030090270812437311935807422266800401203610832497492477432296890672016048144433299899699097291875626880641925777331995987963891675025075225677031093279839518555667 | |
Then I looked not only reciprocals of 7-rought numbers: | |
**1/999 001001001...** | |
**1/99 010101...** | |
**1/3 333333...** | |
### Realizing the pattern | |
And I realized there is an arithmetic pattern indeed. Every sequence starts with an exponent of 1 and depends on 10th multitude. Calculation would be something like this: | |
For $1/x$ take the full power of x (pardon my inability to phrase this well) and subtract x from it. for $1/9$ it means 9 -> 10 so $10 - 9 = 1$. Or for $1/49$ it means 49 -> 100 so $100 - 49 = 51$. Or for $1/997$, $1000 - 997 = 3$. Now take the result (r) and start adding it likewise: $r^k/full product^k+1$. For $1/49$ it means $(100-49)^k / 100^k+1$. And so on for any reciprocal prime number. Eventually I found that number can be any whole number, not just prime or 7-rough. | |
### Generalization | |
So that's how I ended up with the complicated summation: $$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{(10^{\lfloor\strut\log_{10}(p)\rfloor+1} - p)^{k-1}}{(10^{\lfloor\strut\log_{10}(p)\rfloor+1})^k}$$ | |
It doesn't make much sense at first, but it explains arbitrary sequences, how they evolve from simple start of 1. For example fibonacci sequence on $1/89$ is actually: | |
$100-89^n / 100^n+1 => 11^0/100^1 + 11^1/100^2 + 11^2/100^3 + ... => 1/100 + 11/10000 + 121/1000000 + ... => 0.01123595505617977528089887640449438202247191$ | |
Also sequence of $1/7$ would be ($10-7=3$): | |
$3^0 / 10^1 + 3^1 / 10^2 + 3^2 / 10^3 + ... => 1/10 + 3/100 + 9/1000 + ... => 0.142857...$ | |
Or the arbitrary looking $1/17$ ($100-17=83$): | |
$83^0 / 100^1 + 83^1 / 100^2 + 83^2 / 100^3 + ... => 1/100 + 83/10000 + 6889/100000 + ... => 0.0588235294117647...$ | |
Don't you think complicated summation on OT part d on StackExchange is still somewhat useful after this? I think it can argue arbitrary sequences of the decimal expansion and show how simple addition arithmetics causes some of the interesting sequences found like $1/7, 1/49, 1/89$ and such. And probably summation works for any base just by replacing 10 with b. And like you showed, not only reciprocals, but any $integer (x)/integer (y)$, if you prefix x before summation notation. | |
While "special" reciprocals in 10 base like x/2, x/5, x/3 have special decimal expansion, and they have more attracting summation method as you stated on your answer, they still fit to this, say more generic addition method. | |
> Written with [StackEdit](https://stackedit.io/) by [Marko Manninen](http://stackexchange.com/users/297440/markokram), 2015. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment