Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@metaperl
Created August 27, 2009 12:40
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save metaperl/176255 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save metaperl/176255 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<meta name="generator" content="AsciiDoc 8.3.1" />
<title>My Dhamma Friend Program Experience</title>
<style type="text/css">
/* Debug borders */
p, li, dt, dd, div, pre, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
/*
border: 1px solid red;
*/
}
body {
margin: 1em 5% 1em 5%;
}
a {
color: blue;
text-decoration: underline;
}
a:visited {
color: fuchsia;
}
em {
font-style: italic;
color: navy;
}
strong {
font-weight: bold;
color: #083194;
}
tt {
color: navy;
}
h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
color: #527bbd;
font-family: sans-serif;
margin-top: 1.2em;
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
line-height: 1.3;
}
h1, h2, h3 {
border-bottom: 2px solid silver;
}
h2 {
padding-top: 0.5em;
}
h3 {
float: left;
}
h3 + * {
clear: left;
}
div.sectionbody {
font-family: serif;
margin-left: 0;
}
hr {
border: 1px solid silver;
}
p {
margin-top: 0.5em;
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
}
ul, ol, li > p {
margin-top: 0;
}
pre {
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
span#author {
color: #527bbd;
font-family: sans-serif;
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 1.1em;
}
span#email {
}
span#revision {
font-family: sans-serif;
}
div#footer {
font-family: sans-serif;
font-size: small;
border-top: 2px solid silver;
padding-top: 0.5em;
margin-top: 4.0em;
}
div#footer-text {
float: left;
padding-bottom: 0.5em;
}
div#footer-badges {
float: right;
padding-bottom: 0.5em;
}
div#preamble,
div.tableblock, div.imageblock, div.exampleblock, div.verseblock,
div.quoteblock, div.literalblock, div.listingblock, div.sidebarblock,
div.admonitionblock {
margin-right: 10%;
margin-top: 1.5em;
margin-bottom: 1.5em;
}
div.admonitionblock {
margin-top: 2.5em;
margin-bottom: 2.5em;
}
div.content { /* Block element content. */
padding: 0;
}
/* Block element titles. */
div.title, caption.title {
color: #527bbd;
font-family: sans-serif;
font-weight: bold;
text-align: left;
margin-top: 1.0em;
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
}
div.title + * {
margin-top: 0;
}
td div.title:first-child {
margin-top: 0.0em;
}
div.content div.title:first-child {
margin-top: 0.0em;
}
div.content + div.title {
margin-top: 0.0em;
}
div.sidebarblock > div.content {
background: #ffffee;
border: 1px solid silver;
padding: 0.5em;
}
div.listingblock {
margin-right: 0%;
}
div.listingblock > div.content {
border: 1px solid silver;
background: #f4f4f4;
padding: 0.5em;
}
div.quoteblock {
padding-left: 2.0em;
}
div.quoteblock > div.attribution {
padding-top: 0.5em;
text-align: right;
}
div.verseblock {
padding-left: 2.0em;
}
div.verseblock > div.content {
white-space: pre;
}
div.verseblock > div.attribution {
padding-top: 0.75em;
text-align: left;
}
/* DEPRECATED: Pre version 8.2.7 verse style literal block. */
div.verseblock + div.attribution {
text-align: left;
}
div.admonitionblock .icon {
vertical-align: top;
font-size: 1.1em;
font-weight: bold;
text-decoration: underline;
color: #527bbd;
padding-right: 0.5em;
}
div.admonitionblock td.content {
padding-left: 0.5em;
border-left: 2px solid silver;
}
div.exampleblock > div.content {
border-left: 2px solid silver;
padding: 0.5em;
}
div.imageblock div.content { padding-left: 0; }
div.imageblock img { border: 1px solid silver; }
span.image img { border-style: none; }
dl {
margin-top: 0.8em;
margin-bottom: 0.8em;
}
dt {
margin-top: 0.5em;
margin-bottom: 0;
font-style: normal;
color: navy;
}
dd > *:first-child {
margin-top: 0.1em;
}
ul, ol {
list-style-position: outside;
}
div.olist > ol {
list-style-type: decimal;
}
div.olist2 > ol {
list-style-type: lower-alpha;
}
div.compact ul, div.compact ol,
div.compact p, div.compact p,
div.compact div, div.compact div {
margin-top: 0.1em;
margin-bottom: 0.1em;
}
div.tableblock > table {
border: 3px solid #527bbd;
}
thead {
font-family: sans-serif;
font-weight: bold;
}
tfoot {
font-weight: bold;
}
td > div.verse {
white-space: pre;
}
p.table {
margin-top: 0;
}
/* Because the table frame attribute is overriden by CSS in most browsers. */
div.tableblock > table[frame="void"] {
border-style: none;
}
div.tableblock > table[frame="hsides"] {
border-left-style: none;
border-right-style: none;
}
div.tableblock > table[frame="vsides"] {
border-top-style: none;
border-bottom-style: none;
}
div.hdlist {
margin-top: 0.8em;
margin-bottom: 0.8em;
}
div.hdlist tr {
padding-bottom: 15px;
}
dt.hdlist1.strong, td.hdlist1.strong {
font-weight: bold;
}
td.hdlist1 {
vertical-align: top;
font-style: normal;
padding-right: 0.8em;
color: navy;
}
td.hdlist2 {
vertical-align: top;
}
div.hdlist.compact tr {
margin: 0;
padding-bottom: 0;
}
@media print {
div#footer-badges { display: none; }
}
div#toctitle {
color: #527bbd;
font-family: sans-serif;
font-size: 1.1em;
font-weight: bold;
margin-top: 1.0em;
margin-bottom: 0.1em;
}
div.toclevel1, div.toclevel2, div.toclevel3, div.toclevel4 {
margin-top: 0;
margin-bottom: 0;
}
div.toclevel2 {
margin-left: 2em;
font-size: 0.9em;
}
div.toclevel3 {
margin-left: 4em;
font-size: 0.9em;
}
div.toclevel4 {
margin-left: 6em;
font-size: 0.9em;
}
/* Workarounds for IE6's broken and incomplete CSS2. */
div.sidebar-content {
background: #ffffee;
border: 1px solid silver;
padding: 0.5em;
}
div.sidebar-title, div.image-title {
color: #527bbd;
font-family: sans-serif;
font-weight: bold;
margin-top: 0.0em;
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
}
div.listingblock div.content {
border: 1px solid silver;
background: #f4f4f4;
padding: 0.5em;
}
div.quoteblock-attribution {
padding-top: 0.5em;
text-align: right;
}
div.verseblock-content {
white-space: pre;
}
div.verseblock-attribution {
padding-top: 0.75em;
text-align: left;
}
div.exampleblock-content {
border-left: 2px solid silver;
padding-left: 0.5em;
}
/* IE6 sets dynamically generated links as visited. */
div#toc a:visited { color: blue; }
/* Because IE6 child selector is broken. */
div.olist2 ol {
list-style-type: lower-alpha;
}
div.olist2 div.olist ol {
list-style-type: decimal;
}
</style>
<script type="text/javascript">
/*<![CDATA[*/
window.onload = function(){generateToc(4)}
/* Author: Mihai Bazon, September 2002
* http://students.infoiasi.ro/~mishoo
*
* Table Of Content generator
* Version: 0.4
*
* Feel free to use this script under the terms of the GNU General Public
* License, as long as you do not remove or alter this notice.
*/
/* modified by Troy D. Hanson, September 2006. License: GPL */
/* modified by Stuart Rackham, October 2006. License: GPL */
function getText(el) {
var text = "";
for (var i = el.firstChild; i != null; i = i.nextSibling) {
if (i.nodeType == 3 /* Node.TEXT_NODE */) // IE doesn't speak constants.
text += i.data;
else if (i.firstChild != null)
text += getText(i);
}
return text;
}
function TocEntry(el, text, toclevel) {
this.element = el;
this.text = text;
this.toclevel = toclevel;
}
function tocEntries(el, toclevels) {
var result = new Array;
var re = new RegExp('[hH]([2-'+(toclevels+1)+'])');
// Function that scans the DOM tree for header elements (the DOM2
// nodeIterator API would be a better technique but not supported by all
// browsers).
var iterate = function (el) {
for (var i = el.firstChild; i != null; i = i.nextSibling) {
if (i.nodeType == 1 /* Node.ELEMENT_NODE */) {
var mo = re.exec(i.tagName)
if (mo)
result[result.length] = new TocEntry(i, getText(i), mo[1]-1);
iterate(i);
}
}
}
iterate(el);
return result;
}
// This function does the work. toclevels = 1..4.
function generateToc(toclevels) {
var toc = document.getElementById("toc");
var entries = tocEntries(document.getElementsByTagName("body")[0], toclevels);
for (var i = 0; i < entries.length; ++i) {
var entry = entries[i];
if (entry.element.id == "")
entry.element.id = "toc" + i;
var a = document.createElement("a");
a.href = "#" + entry.element.id;
a.appendChild(document.createTextNode(entry.text));
var div = document.createElement("div");
div.appendChild(a);
div.className = "toclevel" + entry.toclevel;
toc.appendChild(div);
}
if (entries.length == 0)
document.getElementById("header").removeChild(toc);
}
/*]]>*/
</script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="header">
<h1>My Dhamma Friend Program Experience</h1>
<span id="author">Terrence Brannon</span><br />
<span id="email"><tt>&lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;</tt></span><br />
12/20/08
<div id="toc">
<div id="toctitle">Table of Contents</div>
<noscript><p><b>JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to display the table of contents.</b></p></noscript>
</div>
</div>
<h2 id="_introduction">1. Introduction</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p><a href="http://www.vipassanadhura.com/">Vipassana Dhura</a> is an organization
that offers Insight Meditation instruction. They have an online
program that you can participate in remotely known as the "Dhamma
Friend" program.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>This document chronicles my participation in this program with the
intent of helping future participants in the program.</p></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_i_start_the_program">2. I start the program</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>On 11/16/08 I started the program. Cynthia Thatcher sent me an
orientation email. Now the key thing in this email is this:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>As you may know, insight meditation differs from concentration
(tranquility or samatha) practice. Instead of just calming the mind,
through the practice of mindfulness you develop the insight and wisdom
to see reality as it is. This results in a gradual purification of the
mind, which culminates in freedom from suffering.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Since Vipassana emphasizes mindfulness rather than concentration, the
experience and results are accordingly different than in concentration
practice. With concentration (samatha) practice one can develop very
peaceful or pleasant states in meditation. Although these occasionally
occur in vipassana, often you may feel bored during practice or may
feel that it isn&#8217;t working. (Actually, though, it will
be). This is to be expected. It does not mean you are practicing
incorrectly. The insight meditation method is just to observe whatever
is happening right now, in the body and mind, whether good or bad.</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>Vipassana Dhura Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Now, the words above should not be taken lightly because they
predict precisely how I fell into a trap. Summarily put, one day I got
curious in Ramana Maharishi&#8217;s Self-Inquiry practice and decided to try
it. One thing they say in that practice is that happiness comes when
thought stops and they stop thought by paying attention to the root
thought which is "I am this body."</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But let&#8217;s see what happened over this 4-week period as it certainly
has some interesting effects.</p></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_emotional_drama">3. Emotional drama</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>2 days after starting the program, I had a huge upset with a sexual
partner. It set my head on fire. I kept doing the practice, but it
seemed that my worries about this would never end.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>At this point, it is worthwhile to note that you have to take some
precepts for these 12 weeks, one of which is not to engage in sex
outside of wedlock.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I decided (wihout prior permission of my Dhamma Instructor) to use
something I read in Nyanaponika Thera&#8217;s "The Power of Mindfulness" to
combat my jealousy. I would sit down and bring up the feelings of
jealousy, misunderstanding, and mis-treatment and then apply bare
attention.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>What I didn&#8217;t realize is that I should&#8217;ve been doing that Cynthia says
in the email below, even though it seems like it wasn&#8217;t working:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Good, I&#8217;m glad the section on emotions answers your question. Just
notice and label whatever emotions arise, without clinging to them,
using impartial awareness.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>That&#8217;s very good that you practiced the hand motions exercise even
though your mind was disturbed (that&#8217;s the right approach; we are not
supposed to wait until the mind has calmed down to practice; that&#8217;s
like a sick person waiting to take medicine until he&#8217;s better). It&#8217;s
also very good that you were able to keep most of your attention on
the exercise.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>In daily life these thoughts and emotions will come up - that&#8217;s
natural when there are still mental effluents (impurities) in the
mind. You can apply the same technique to deal with them as during
meditation. Just be aware of the emotion, but don&#8217;t get involved in
it. Disengage the mind from it.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>11/18/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_knowing_the_knower_mental_factors_versus_mental_objects">4. Knowing the knower (mental factors versus mental objects)</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>I was reading
<a href="http://www.vipassanadhura.com/apprehendreality.html">Apprehend Reality</a>
by Achan Sobin Namto and had the following question:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Achan Sobin Sopako Bodhi states: """To
practice insight meditation is be mindful of the Four
Foundations of Mindfulness: the body, feelings,
consciousness, and mental objects."""</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>However, a bit earlier, he states: """Nama
(mind) is similar: one aspect of mind is consciousness and
the other is mental <strong>factors</strong>."""</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>So, my question is: is there a difference between mental
factors and mental objects? Or, can we say that there are 3
foundations of mindfulness, body, feelings and mind. And
that the mind aspect breaks down into consciousness and
mental objects/factors.</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>11/17/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Terrence Brannon
</div></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The response was:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>"Mental objects" includes a wider group than "mental factors." It&#8217;s a
bit confusing because, according to the satipatthana sutta, the last
foundation includes some rupa objects, i.e., the 6 sense-impressions:
color, sound, etc.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>"Mental objects" is sometimes translated as "dhamma objects." I don&#8217;t
know that this is any clearer, however.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The important thing is not how we categorize the various objects, but
just that we understand what they are. It&#8217;s important to understand
that a consciousness object is different from a fourth-foundation
object. When you observe consciousness per se you&#8217;re just observing
thinking or you&#8217;re observing the knower. When observing mental objects
you&#8217;re noticing either greed, anger, etc.: mental factors in the
mind.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Feeling is pretty clear.
Rupa objects boil down to the six sense impressions: color, sound,
smell, tactile form and taste. But the main rupa we observe is motion,
which can be included under tactile impressions. Posture also can be
included here, because we experience it tactilely.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I will definitely re-visit this topic later in this review, but what
is noteworthy is that you can know the knower. Right now, this is just
a theoretical understanding, but this technique really does allow you
to cut through tons of mental dross and know the knower, if you do it
as instructed with no additional effort or additional embellishments
on your point.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>And certainly with no worries about outcome&#8230; just keep doing it!</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>And dont try to be "knowing" or "aware" or anything like that&#8230; most
of that is just coarse mental activity and has nothing to do with
fine-tuned geniune supramental mindfulness.</p></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_hey_nothing_is_happening">5. "Hey nothing is happening"</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>While the purpose of this meditation is <strong>not</strong> to develop tranquility,
and you certainly will produce a ton of agitation during this
practice, occasionally a pocket of relaxation will show up. During the
rising-falling meditation, when this happens you may have a period
after the exhale where the inhale does not start immediately.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>When this happened to me, I was unsure about what to do. Cynthia had
the answer for me:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>If you mean there is a gap between the last falling movement and
before the next rising movement happens, then you can add "sitting" in
between falling and rising to fill in the moment, as it were. (please
see website).</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>If you mean that you don&#8217;t perceive any objects whatsoever during that
time, and if it does not happen necessarily during the space btwn fall
and rise (i.e., rising-falling seems to go away completely for
awhile), it&#8217;s a bit of a different case. This happens from an
imbalance of concentration (again, I&#8217;m still not sure which condition
is happening to you). If there are no perceptible objects, observe the
fact there are no objects. Actually, in this case there is still
mental activity going on but it is very subtle. There is mental
activity b/c you are aware that you cannot find any objects. So that
is what to observe until other objects appear again.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>11/18/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_my_first_raptururous_realization">6. My first raptururous realization</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Now don&#8217;t think this was a legitimate realization. All the rapture I
had then is not happening now. Neither is the turmoil and stress I
encountered from that girl I mentioned earlier. Neither phenomonon has
lasting presence.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But anyway, one day when I was doing the rising-falling technique I
noticed how the fall of the abdomen inexorably follows the rise. I
then began to mentally see thoughts as "mental inhalations" and
realized that they would "exhale" on their own.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>This led to much deeper and longer breathing and I got fairly blissed
out. And of course I wrote to my Dhamma Friend confident that I had
obtained the Nectar of Enlightenment.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But the fact of the matter is that both the rise and fall of the belly
are rupa, or known objects of mindfulness, which means they will both
come and go. As an aside, the world mindfulness is somewhat weird
because in this practice all aspects of the mind can be rupa. Which to
me means something other than mind is observing mind.</p></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_from_coarse_to_subtle">7. From coarse to subtle</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Vipassana takes the simplest, most obvious physical actions as initial
objects of mindfulness. It would seem like an insult to tell someone
to do the hand motions. And for one single round of the hand motions,
you might do them just fine. But try for even 5 rounds and you will be
off arguing with your old girlfriend before you know it.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>And that is when your golden opportunity kicks in. You simply label
it. And then of course the mind will scream that you just failed. You
did not fight back. But in fact you did, because you interrupted the
habit stream, lightly and gently!</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Vipassana does not go right for the root of the problem
immediately. In truth, you are nothing but a collection of aggregates
that you put together under the fundamental delusion "I am this body."
And all of your worries stem from this lack of true
self-knowledge. That being said, mental apprehension of true
self-knowledge is just good for motivating practice, because your mind
must be purified as well. Because Vipassana is basically
disintegrating boulders via erosion, the results are not immediately
obvious like some more active practices. And doing body practices when
the deeper foundations of mindfulness (such as emotions) are giving
you hell, can be tough and apparently non-rewarding, but you have to
give it time and see. And before you know it, you may have a lasting
stronger mindfulness to apply to the same situation.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Cynthia explains that and much more:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Yes, I agree you should not add "sitting" if it is confusing. If adding sitting is confusing, it means that it is not the case you perceive a "gap" between the rising-falling, or else adding sitting would have helped. So please just stick with the rising-falling technique, without "sitting".</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It is important to understand the reason and procedure for labeling thoughts. If this practice is done correctly it will not give thoughts more "life." On the contrary, it will do the opposite. Labeling is simply a technique to help keep your mind in the present moment, on the objects occurring in the present. If it is not used in the beginning, it is very easy for the mind to wander around thinking all the time. This practice actually cuts down on thinking if done correctly, because it helps you to be aware as soon as the mind has wandered off, at which point you can return it to the primary object. If you aren&#8217;t aware early enough it will be very difficult to stop a train of thought before it builds into bigger and bigger emotion.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The arising and vanishing of phenomena is not the same as the rise and fall of the abdomen, although the latter also arises and passes away. We have to be careful about confusing these 2 terms.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>If you are going to deliberately focus on jealousy for 20 minutes so as to see what it&#8217;s like, I recommend you do it outside of your normal meditation session. This may be a helpful technique in some cases, but in truth when you do this you are not staying in the present moment or with a present-moment object at all. To do this is to use an object from memory. It can be useful, but is not vipassana. Be careful, because when calling up a certain emotion deliberately to watch it, there is a real danger of making it bigger if you aren&#8217;t extremely careful and skilled. This is a case when you may ingest it with more life if not careful, as opposed to the labeling technique which, if done correctly, will not make the thought or emotion bigger at all but will do the opposite.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The way to "starve out" unwholesome emotions is by not feeding them with your thoughts and reactions, specifically reactions of liking and disliking. The Buddha clearly said this. To keep replaying something unwholesome is what he called "unwise attention." But if you patiently keep noting it every time it comes back naturally, just note it without any reaction, then keep returning to your principal object, it will gradually fade out.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The problem here is that you are not simply noting the jealousy. Every time it comes back you get upset about it. You are reacting by disliking it. This is to lose double. First there is the jealousy, then on top of it you are upset about the jealousy, which causes double the suffering. The more you want it to go away, the longer it will stick around. If you can let go of your desire to want to get rid of it, it will fade out naturally. With true noting there will not be a reaction to the emotion, but just a bare registering of it.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>This is why we need stronger mindfulness, not simply concentration to block out the emotion. When mindfulness is strong it will catch an emotion at an extremely early point in its arising. When you can catch it this early, it will immediately disperse. You will not then be able to feel upset about the negative emotion because it will immediately vanish the instant you see it. Mindfulness disperses things instantly. This does not happen from intention, but from the power of mindfulness and insight. Achan Sobin says, "first you take care of mindfulness; then mindfulness will take care of you." But it takes a lot of training to get mindfulness this strong. Hence the training methods such as the labeling technique.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But sometimes talking to yourself wisely, reminding yourself about the true nature of the emotion - its impermanence, etc., can help. Just beware of confusing that with actual vipassana practice. The former is called "skillful means." So you could try observing the jealousy for 20 minutes outside of normal practice; then during vipassana meditation I recommend simply noting and letting go. This is what vipassana is all about; impartial awareness. You don&#8217;t note the jealousy so as to make it go away, but just notice whatever appears, good or bad.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It doesn&#8217;t matter whether you like the object or not. There is always a temptation to find a more active technique in which we can use our control or somehow force the objects to be better, to be the way we want them to, instead of patiently observing whatever arises, good or bad. Instead of just watching the jealousy whenever it comes up, you want to make it go away because it&#8217;s bothering you. The problem is not one of finding a better technique, but of seeing that you are disliking the jealousy. The suffering is coming from your aversion, not from the jealousy per se. If you remove your disliking for it, instead of worrying about removing the jealousy, there won&#8217;t be any problem. Mindfulness doesn&#8217;t care if the object is pleasant or unpleasant. It is only the defilements in the mind (greed, hatred and delusion) who care whether the object is pleasant or not. Mindfulness is happy to observe jealousy just as any other object.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It is very hard not to dislike painful emotions, I know. It has to happen from the strength of insight and mindfulness in order to be real, not just from intention. Still, it greatly helps to recognize our own dislike, which is a big step along the way of letting go of it. Vipassana is about seeing what is ACTUALLY PRESENT rather than trying to change the situation. So it will help if you can notice and label your aversion to the jealousy. When you see it just note, "aversion," or "disliking." If you can see it when it arises, your awareness of mental activity will have gone up a notch.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It is important to stay with knowing body-objects more (but not exclusively) in the beginning, because these will be more clear than emotional states at first. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s important to note rising-falling.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It does not necessarily mean you are practicing incorrectly if you feel bliss; the problem comes if you like the feeling, which is to have become attached to it, instead of just impartially noting it.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Mahasi Sayadaw wrote: "The practice of continuously noting the object as it becomes evidentthat alone is the way of insight." This applies to everything, good or bad.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Good luck with your practice.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>11/20/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_movement_is_the_primary_rupa_the_hand_on_the_belly_helps">8. Movement is the primary rupa. The hand on the belly helps</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>I was reading one of the
<a href="http://www.vipassanadhura.com/when-do-you-see.html">articles</a>
and Achan Namto said that you could put your hand on your
belly if you were having problems following the movement. This did wonders. It deepened my experience of what
was happening. And thoughts were a completely different
experience. I could clearly discern and label rising and
falling versus thought.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Cynthia replied:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Yes. The "How to Meditate" article also mentions doing this. I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s helping. It&#8217;s good you can now separate the actual movements from your thoughts. This is important. As I said in my other email, try to stick with movement as an object more than thought. Movement should be the primary object. But when you&#8217;re aware of your mind drifting into thinking, label "thinking" and come back to the movement.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>11/20/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_mental_noting">9. mental noting</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>To clarify the noting procedure: you don&#8217;t have to mentally note every single thing you experience during meditation (but you do have to "know" all of it with bare attention; there&#8217;s a difference.) Only those phenomena that make greed, hatred or delusion arise should be labeled with a mental note. Most of your attention should stay on the rising-falling movements, and you should label those. When other objects occur that do not disturb your mind or take it away from that primary object, it isn&#8217;t necessary to note them. For instance, if there&#8217;s a quiet background sound but it doesn&#8217;t bother you, just ignore it and keep your focus on rising-falling. Unobtrusive objects do not have to be noted. If you jump around too much you won&#8217;t be able to develop concentration with the primary object.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>11/20/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_what_is_delusion">10. What is delusion?</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Again we see the coarse-to-subtle approach of vipassana. Before we saw
it with the foundations of mindfulness --- most of our initial work is
with the denser layers of being. Now, we see that we work with our
obvious greed and hatred instead of going right for the delusion -
taking anything to be the self when all things are non-self.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I suppose my hunger to destroy delusion led to me trying
self-inquiry. And for one day, it was really satisfying to me. And the
same day (see below) I quit the Dhamma Friend program. But the
self-inquiry seemed to backfire after that. And I have not experienced
any bliss from Self-inquiry since! Impermanence rides home to victory
once more!</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>We have a lot of things that we have latched onto. Physically
dis-avowing them will not necessarily eliminate our penchant for
them.</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Whenever we take something to be self, delusion is involved, because the Buddha taught that all things are nonself. You are right that suffering arises from delusion, because we suffer when we cling to various things as being self.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>In Buddhism, in the broad sense, delusion means ignorance of the Four Noble Truths. Practically during meditation it means you can&#8217;t see each moment arising and passing away, which is the natural state of things; you can&#8217;t see the impermanence, suffering (dukkha) and nonself nature of rupa and nama.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But delusion is very difficult to see; it is the subtlest of the defilements and the last one to be eliminated. The main thing is to notice when greed or aversion arises during practice. When an object "hooks" you by causing greed or aversion, that&#8217;s when you need to label it, so that the desire or aversion does not increase. If the object is innocuous and does not trigger any greed or aversion, just ignore it (but you are still aware that it occurred) and continue noting the principal object, the rising-falling motions. There are many objects going on all the time during meditation but you should try to stick with the principal object unless, as I said, something "hooks" you and causes defilements to arise.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>11/21/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_week_1_summary">11. Week 1 Summary</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>I include my Week 1 Summary and Cynthia&#8217;s response without comment.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>When I do the hand and rising-falling exercises, I look at the target of
mindfulness. I find that my mind wanders too much when I close my eyes
and simply try to focus there.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>This is a very uncomfortable practice. It is not a joyride. But it
appears to be working slowly from the outside in. Some systems work from
the inside-out. For example, Eckhart Tolle is a popular teacher of
<em>presence</em>, as is Sailor Bob Adamson. They teach only about what the
Vipassana Dhura website calls <em>The Country of Now</em>.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But I was never successful entirely with being given the absolute truth.
And from studying the Vipassana Dhura website (actually more from doing
this for the past week), it is clear why. Hearing about non-delusion is
not the same as getting rid of your own greed, hatred and delusion.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Here I am slowly being shown how fleeting sensation can be if I simply
keep paying attention. If I keep up Vipassana, I will be as free of the
body as
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th%C3%ADch_Qu%E1%BA%A3ng_%C4%90%E1%BB%A9c">Quang
Duc</a>.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Now, I am running into a serious philosophical issue with Buddhism. A
successful Vipassana practitioner develops the power to not gain
rebirth. Now, to the New Age Community, to the <em>create the life you
desire</em> community, and to many other spiritual communities, life on
earth is a Good Thing, we just need to learn to be more wholesome. They
think we are supposed to be here, but that we need to <em>raise our
consciousness</em>.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Personally, I want to get to the point of where this body is a chess
piece. Then it wont matter whether we are supposed to be here or not. If
we are supposed to be here, then I can operate the body in a wholesome
fashion, operating from the 4 brahma vihara. If we aren&#8217;t supposed to be
here, then I simply leave the chess piece behind and dont come back.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Many people are trying to lose themselves in their senses. For me, that
was never satisfying. But the struggle to climb out of the quicksand of
sensory indulgence is not easy. But it seems necessary unless I want to
remain a slave to former and potential mental imagery.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Being able to put your mind on something is basic test of sanity if
nothing else. If I can&#8217;t sit somewhere and observe a process without
getting lost in thought, I am clearly not in control of myself.</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Dear Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Thanks for your update.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Just to clarify: please do not look at the abdomen when observing rising-falling. This is not correct. The practice is to just watch the motion with your mind. However, if it&#8217;s difficult to observe the movements you can put your hand on your stomach as you have already tried. If the mind still wanders, don&#8217;t worry about it. This is natural. Just KNOW it is wandering. This practice takes patience. If you keep doing it your mind will eventually be able to stay with the object better and better. Thinking and wandering will calm down. But you can&#8217;t force it. This has to happen naturally.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It&#8217;s ok to keep your eyes open if you want to, but don&#8217;t deliberately look at the abdomen when you do that. Don&#8217;t pay attention to what is being seen with the eyes at all. You need to focus your mind on the movements.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>If you look with your eyes it will confuse mindfulness because you&#8217;ll have 2 objects in the present moment (a visual image and motion), and mindfulness won&#8217;t know which one to focus on. Mindfulness needs a clear object. It&#8217;s important to stick just with the motion object primarily until mindfulness gains concentration with that object.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>In vipassana we always observe only one object at a time (that is, one object per moment.)</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Can you please tell me: are you able to focus cleary on the movements (when your mind doesn&#8217;t wander)?</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It&#8217;s good that you are understanding how fleeting sensation can be if you look at it in the present without elaborating or adding your own concepts or judgments to it. That&#8217;s the way things truly are.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Yes, this practice is sometimes uncomfortable. However, it will get easier. You don&#8217;t have to force yourself too much. You are correct that when we can&#8217;t keep the mind where we want to, it reveals our own basic lack of sanity. This is what the Buddha taught. This is due to the effluents (greed, hatred and delusion) in the mind. The problem is that we cannot get rid of these through mere intention. So it&#8217;s not correct to force your mind too much. But the fact that you can SEE the present craziness of the mind is already a very good sign. This is what should occur in the beginning. In truth, everyone&#8217;s mind is crazy until they eliminate delusion. Everyone is in the same boat. A beginning meditator will usually feel dismayed when he actually sees how out of control his mind is. This is a sign you are beginning to wake up. That&#8217;s very good.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But the approach is to eliminate delusion over the long haul. We have to be skillful in many ways because delusion is tricky and has all kinds of ways of fooling us. So you don&#8217;t need to use excessive force to keep your mind in the present or keep it on the object. The important point is to KNOW everything; to KNOW every time it wanders off. If it&#8217;s going to wander, ok, let it wander; don&#8217;t get upset about it or struggle. But you have to know that it is doing so. Just keep knowing what mind and body are doing at all times.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>This in itself is already much different from what normally occurs in the minds of nonmeditators. If you try to force the mind to be better it will react even more. Vipassana meditation is a very delicate procedure, and we have to be careful to keep a balance. With practice you will learn what is the right amount of effort and when you are trying to force it too much. Remember to always let go. You have to know, but you also have to let go. That means that you let go of caring whether the mind is the way you want it to be or not and just know what is going on. Even if the mind seems crazy, all you have to do is know that it&#8217;s so. You don&#8217;t have to step in and change it. The change will happen automatically if you keep up the knowing and make it habitual.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>If you continue this practice you will eventually feel that the body is a chess piece, exactly as you said. This will certainly happen. In other words, you will no longer take the body to be your self at all. You won&#8217;t need to get involved about it or feel bad when (for instance) it gets old or sick and dies.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Keep up the good work.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>11/23/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
<h3 id="_week_1_continued">11.1. Week 1 continued</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I had a few questions about her response, so I wrote back:</p></div>
<div class="ulist"><ul>
<li>
<p>
Ok, I will go back to one object of mindfulness
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Ok, I will just keep noting. I will let the razorpoint
attention
required to delve into the Country of Now develop over time
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Regarding open eyes, I suppose I will just keep them
closed
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
I receive bodywork for my left arm. I also did some
buddhist
concentration meditation this weekend. These 2 things
combined put me in
this state of bliss. I almost quit doing vipassana, but sat
down to do
it anyway. The first time I tried, there was a tremendous
amount of
unrest, so I got up to quit. Then I realized: "the
unrest is bobbing up
and down like a cork in water!" --- it is possible to
note the change is
the bliss wave as well as the tremendous amount of unrest.
So, I did my
practice anyway. I cant say I left the vipassana practice
in a joyful
state, but I do understand that this is about perceiving
impermanence,
not swimming in bliss!
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
I ordered some books from your website, but have not
received them
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Are you a 501(c)(3) organization? What is your tax id
number?
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Yes, I can focus clearly on the movements
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Are there no requirements for what to do during everyday
life? While
driving, walking, standing in elevator, etc?
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Well, off for another session of noting change!
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
I do this vipassana practice exactly as prescribed in
your online
documents&#8230; I am vipassana-izing my concentration
practice. I sit down
and watch one cycle of inhale-exhale. Then direct my
attention else
where. Then another one cycle. I do not mix these
practices. I do them
one after the other or at different times of the day.
</p>
</li>
</ul></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Thanks for your email. I will check with the person who sends out the books and make sure yours have been shipped. I am sure we received your order.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Yes, we are a California 501c3 corporation. Our tax ID number is: C1529490.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I just wanted to add about mental noting: you were correct before when you said you don&#8217;t want to inject more "life" into certain objects by noting them. I think maybe I did not explain the procedure very well. If the secondary object is very innocuous, faint, and does not "hook" your attention, it is not necessary to label it with a mental note. Just keep noting the primary object and let the unobtrusive secondary ones be on the "periphery." But if a secondary object hooks you - i.e., takes your attention away from the primary object and causes liking or disliking - then it&#8217;s very important to note it w/ the mental note.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>You can experiment w/ keeping eyes open or closed. It sounds like you have good concentration, so it might be ok to keep eyes open at times.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Your experience about noting the unrest is very good. That&#8217;s exactly correct. I&#8217;m glad you didn&#8217;t give up on the vipassana. In this practice we have to know whatever&#8217;s going on, even if we don&#8217;t like it. It is good that you were not attached to the bliss. In a case like that, when the mind is very agitated, you should use the mental notes: note the unrest, and especially note the agitation (desire) in your mind that wants to change the unrest. It is this agitation or resistance or wanting to change something that is suffering. The problem is the desire, not the unrest itself. That is the second Noble Truth: that desire is the cause of suffering (and, more than that, is suffering itself; is synonymous with it).</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>We cannot see that fact unless we also note unpleasant conditions of mind. If we&#8217;re always blissed out it&#8217;s impossible to see how desire causes agitation and suffering, which means we then are not motivated to "disband" the desire and free ourselves. Achan Chah wrote that the peace that comes from insight is very different from the peace/bliss of concentration. He said the peace of insight transcends happiness and unhappiness, so that no matter what kind of feeling (vedana) is occurring- pleasant or unpleasant - the mind can still be peaceful and free of agitation. This is a much superior but different kind of happiness from what we normally call "happiness;" the latter is only a matter of pleasant feeling. But vedana is never stable. It&#8217;s always arising and passing away. That&#8217;s why, when our happiness depends on pleasant feeling we&#8217;re really in for a lot of suffering. The goal of vipassana is to transcend these changing conditions and be able to free
the mind, which results in "happiness" no matter what the conditions of body or what thoughts and mental factors are going on in the mind.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Have a Happy Thanksgiving.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>11/25/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_predictive_vipassana_why_the_mind_wanders">12. Predictive vipassana, why the mind wanders</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>I began to wonder why I should wonder what is going to happen next,
when I know full well what is going to happen next. I also began to
get some ideas about why the mind wandered. I wrote on these two
things to dhamma friend. Cynthia&#8217;s reply had a direct warning about
the trap that I fell into. She makes it clear that the mind will say:
"vipassana is not as good as bliss" --- and nonetheless I fell prey to
the trap 3 weeks later.</p></div>
<h3 id="_predictive_vipassana">12.1. predictive vipassana</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>There are two ways to do anything. One is to simply
<em>stumble</em> into it. The other is to set your mind to
the task beforehand. Until last night, I was stumbling
through these exercises. But last night I was preparing my
mind for each step just before it began. For example,
let&#8217;s assume that my belly has just risen. I then expect
the fall and wait for it. I dont just sit there and wait for
it to happen. I am actively preparing myself to observe
falling in a second or two. Likewise, let&#8217;s say I have
just turned the hand 90 degrees. Next, I set my intention to
observe it rising. I dont just simply raise it and observe
the raising. I set the intention for that observation first.</p></div>
<h3 id="_the_mind_cares_about_survival">12.2. The Mind Cares About Survival</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I just realized why my mind wanders when doing this
practice. It takes the mind about 2 or 3 seconds of watching
me do this practice before it decides that something else is
more useful to its immediate survival. So then it distracts
my attention onto that something else in the name of
it&#8217;s own personal welfare. For instance, if I dont have
enough vegetables to make soup, the mind will bring that up
because the soup is more vital to its survival than sitting
on the ground and observing motion.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>So, what I do prior to each exercise is remember how you
said that I can be happy even if the body gets old, sick, or
dies&#8230;. in other words, I turn this exercise into a
survival act of the highest importance because currently, I
do not want to get old, sick or die&#8230; I am AFRAID of all 3
and this practice is a chance to master them all. So
hopefully over time my mind will find an urgency about
vipassana and cooperate with this process of no apparent
survival value.</p></div>
<h3 id="_reply_to_my_comments_on_prediction_and_survival">12.3. Reply to my comments on prediction and survival</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,
Vipassana is a very delicate balance. If we use too much intention it
will actually slow down mindfulness and we will not be staying
precisely in the present moment. Often it is important to give up
trying to control the situation and, as Achan Sobin says, "just do
it." It will not be perfect in the beginning, but it&#8217;s a matter of
gradually developing mindfulness, concentration and insight over time
until mindfulness is strong enough to cut through delusion by itself
without any interference from us. Achan Kor writes that there is
knowing that happens from intention and knowing that happens without
any intention, automatically. It is this latter kind of knowing that
is the valuable, genuine knowing of the higher levels of vipassana
knowledge, and it cannot be willed. As a meditator your job is not to
make each moment clear or this or that but simply to recognize
whatever is going on, even if the thing going on is confusion,
fogginess, or whatever.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>You should not be trying to do anything to what you are
experiencing. This is a difficult point to grasp because normally we
are always interfering and trying to direct everything.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The point where effort comes in is that you keep just doing it,
despite thoughts like, "this isn&#8217;t getting anywhere." In other words,
you don&#8217;t need to inject more effort or intention into each
individual moment of knowing; but over the long term you need to
sustain the effort of simply knowing what&#8217;s going on. This is much
harder to do than forcing a whole lot of effort in a few moments. If
you do the latter you&#8217;ll be using too much effort and will unbalance
the whole delicate procedure. On the other hand, if you just follow
all your thoughts and moods, you&#8217;ll easily give up the practice. The
effort needs to be made in the area of LETTING GO of various thoughts
and desires instead of following them, especially the ones that
whisper to you that vipassana is not as good as bliss, it&#8217;s
pointless, it&#8217;s boring, and so forth. Just allow those thoughts to be
there but resist following them. Keep practicing anyway, in a relaxed
but persistent
manner.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>If you prepare yourself for the falling or rising movement, you are
absolutely not staying in the present moment anymore, because you are
anticipating. Even if your anticipation is only one second prior to
the event, it&#8217;s long enough that it&#8217;s taken you completely out of the
present. In vipassana we don&#8217;t want to anticipate anything, for any
length of time. Eventually you want to get so you are right with each
split second of the present, which cannot possibly happen if you&#8217;re
anticipating. You have to let go and trust the method and trust that
mindfulness will eventually be strong enough to handle whatever comes
at you, because in time it absolutely will.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It is a little different with a deliberate action like moving the hand
or walking. It&#8217;s true we say to observe "intending to walk" at the end
of the walking turn. But in this case you are knowing something
actually happening; that is, you are knowing the intention that is
occur in the mind right in that split-second. Moreover, that is only
done once at the end of each path, not before each step. The point of
doing this is to see the connection between the intention and the
physical movement. This is important for realizing the cause-effect
relationship btwn. mind and body (but that doesn&#8217;t apply with
rising-falling, because it&#8217;s an automatic movement.) In any case, to
note the intention before every single movement is too much and will
bog you down. When mindfulness is faster you will be able to see the
intentions arise and disappear very fast, but without labeling the
action.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It is very good to remind yourself prior to each exercise about the
importance of vipassana; this is skillful means as long as you are not
doing it often during the actual exercise. Beforehand is a very good
idea.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Also it&#8217;s very good you can see the reason the mind wanders
off. That&#8217;s very important. You could call it survival; in some cases
that&#8217;s true, but most of the time it&#8217;s just desire, because a lot of
the things we want have nothing to do with our actual survival. But
the mind (rather, desire in the mind) always paints a dire picture
and convinces us that we&#8217;ll absolutely die or somehow suffer if we
don&#8217;t get this/that, no matter how small the thing is. It is amazing
to see how tricky and stubborn it can be in this regard. Ironically,
the reason we suffer is not at all because we fail to follow the
urging of desire; in fact, desire is itself the very culprit. It is
because we feel this pressure or mental agitation or mental burning
called desire that we suffer. It is truly amazing that the thing
causing our suffering somehow convinces us that it has our best
interests at heart, when the opposite is the case. It tries to point
the finger elsewhere while all the time being the source of the problem.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>When you meditate longer you will be able to see this clearly; it is
quite astonishing to realize. Right now you are using skillful means
to convince yourself of the urgency of the practice. That&#8217;s a smart
thing to do. But later, when insight is stronger, you won&#8217;t need to do
this. You will actually see, right in the present, the way that desire
is making you suffer. When this happens you will be amazed and feel as
if you had previously made a mistake about everything about where you
formerly thought happiness could be found. At that point you will
readjust yourself and set yourself to eliminate this desire no matter
what it takes. You won&#8217;t have to do anything to convince yourself
then, because it will be very clear.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>When we really see what is causing our suffering, it&#8217;s the most
natural thing in the world to take steps to eliminate that cause. The
Buddha gave a wonderful example in the suttas. A fisherman thought
he&#8217;d caught an eel in his net, and pulled it out. When he looked at
the creature clearly, however, he saw it was a poisonous snake, not an
eel. Instantly he threw it back in the water. When you really see the
trouble that attachment and desire causes, you will want to just drop
or disband those things immediately, because you will see that to
attach to this and that truly causes a lot of suffering instead of
offering happiness as you thought before. Even if you cant let go of
all attachments yet, you will be much more circumspect and keep making
an effort to let go all the time, because you&#8217;ll see the danger
there. Seeing this danger is a good thing, not bad, because it is the
way to freedom. Then eventually, the suttas tell us, you&#8217;ll be able to
let go of attachment to the body-mind and reach the stage of regarding
it as a chess piece, as I know you want to do.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Well, keep up the good work.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>Dhamma Friend Program 11/30/08</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_week_2">13. Week 2</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Here is my week 2 summary and response.</p></div>
<h3 id="_summary">13.1. Summary</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I started on the Week 3 exercises today. There are 5 topics listed below, in order of importance. If you dont have any comments about issue 4, then that is fine.</p></div>
<h4 id="_willful_vipassana_crumbles_to_the_law_of_impermanence">13.1.1. Willful Vipassana crumbles to the law of impermanence</h4>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It&#8217;s funny. I managed to do my practice for 1 day in that willful fashion. I basically forgot the willfull approach and also forgot to motivate my mind by telling it vipassana is a survival tool. Impermanence wins again!</p></div>
<h4 id="_just_sitting">13.1.2. Just sitting</h4>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I find the instructions for this exercise <a href="http://www.vipassanadhura.com/howtomeditate.htm#d">http://www.vipassanadhura.com/howtomeditate.htm#d</a> to be contradictory in a few places.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>First, the instructions for this say: """With your mind you are going to look repeatedly at the body&#8217;s posture in the present moment.""" but then later they say: """It&#8217;s not necessary to see the entire shape from head to toe. Focus on one point, such as your hands in your lap."""</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I&#8217;m pretty sure choosing a focal point supercedes the initial instructions about body&#8217;s posture, but I did find it confusing.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>In another place we are told /"""Observe "sitting" for one moment, let it go, then bring the mind back to it. Watch this action - i.e., the action of the mind as it turns to look at the sitting object, again and again."""/ but if you look at sentence #1 versus sentence #2, they are giving slightly different instructions. In sentence #1 there is no "meta-observer", there is simply a person focusing on the hands, then zoning out for a second and then going back. In sentence #2, there is a meta-observer: not only is the focus-let go cycle occuring, but there is a meta-observer of the focus let-go cycle.</p></div>
<h4 id="_rising_falling_of_abdomen">13.1.3. Rising - falling of abdomen</h4>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I want to return to a former comment of yours: """</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The arising and vanishing of phenomena is not the same as the rise and fall of the abdomen, although the latter also arises and passes away. We have to be careful about confusing these 2 terms."""</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Yes, I agree with this, having read a bit of the text <em>Moment to Moment Mindfulness</em>. On p.107 to be exact. The rising of the abdomen rises and falls. And the falling of the abdomen rises and falls. It is for this reason, that I would prefer a different term for these two motions, such as <em>expanding</em> and <em>contracting</em> or <em>opening</em> and <em>closing</em> or <em>filling</em> and <em>emptying</em>. But those terms are second-order terms. In other words, they involve thinking about perception (which is a form of thinking). We want to stay as close to raw perception as possible. So, I dont see why just calling both abdomen motions <em>moving</em> is not OK.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But I really want to stay away from the terms <em>rising</em> and <em>falling</em> if at all possible.</p></div>
<h4 id="_meditation_in_daily_life">13.1.4. Meditation in daily life</h4>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I have asked about doing insight in places such as the grocery line, driving, etc twice before and you have never answered! I&#8217;m not sure if you are missing the questions or just what. But personally, I am glad to only have to do this on the cushion for now. And actually, I am starting to disintegrate certain gestalts automatically. For instance, when I hear a fan, normally it is just one roaring sound. Now, I can hear certain rises and falls within that one sound. Or when water hits a bowl of liquid, I can hear individual splashes instead of just one continuous splash.</p></div>
<h4 id="_interference_or_the_power_to_be_the_creator">13.1.5. interference or the power to be the Creator</h4>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I would like to start this section off with a quote from your last writing to me: """</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>In vipassana we don&#8217;t want to anticipate anything, for any length of time.
"""</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I would like to note that there are a number of spiritual systems where they mold reality to their liking by using creative visualization and imagination. The underlying philosophy of these systems is: """the creator wants us to live our lives with passion, integrity and purpose. He enjoys the cosmic play and wants us to create.""" In essence, every alteration of reality they are doing could be considered anticipation of interference in what would have happened if they had done nothing.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>From their viewpoint it would seem that vipassana is trying to turn me into a door mat or lifeless sponge! Someone with no ability to control or create reality, but only to accept it.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>On the other hand, even my short regular practice of vipassana is starting to make the creative arts look shallow. For instance let&#8217;s take a hit song. I realized that what people are doing when they enjoy a musical piece is hearing a bunch of notes and holding the notes in memory and piling up attraction after attraction (contrast with aversion or equanimity).</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>So the question(s) become:
- are we supposed to be on this earth? It seems that the goal of a vipassana practitioner is to never take rebirth. I personally have to wonder if I would get bored of not having a body&#8230; I mean, no soccer. No movies. No birthday parties. Just pure awareness with nothing to do. I personally think that would feel limiting and boring after awhile.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Now, I can anticipate your answer:
- people who want things are slaves of desire. Creating your reality, having a body are desires. Once you see that desires cause you to suffer, you will not follow any of them, including having a body.
- people who want things actually are identified with their body. The same people who gain pleasure from getting certain things for their body will experience equal (or greater) pain when they are given the opposite thing or cant have what they want. They will whine like a little baby with the pacifier snatched from their mouth. They are just bigger more powerful slaves of desire, able to create pacifiers in the form of Lamborghinis, hot women, or large mansions.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But I&#8217;m really curious about the idea of having a body. Supposedly in the 4 heavenly realms there are beings with bodies as well. I&#8217;m really curious about what I am supposed to be, do and have.</p></div>
<h3 id="_reply_from_dhamma_friend">13.2. Reply from Dhamma Friend</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="olist"><ol>
<li>
<p>
Its good you are able to see impermanence.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
If it&#8217;s confusing, I think it&#8217;s best you don&#8217;t practice the sitting exercise now. Just stick with rising-falling and the hand motions. Instead of following the website schedule, we can just go week by week and do a more individualized schedule. The sitting exercise can help beginners gain more concentration, but you already have pretty good concentration because you said you&#8217;ve gone into bliss states.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Yes, I agree the rising-falling terms can be confusing. That&#8217;s find if you want to use your own term: "moving," or "knowing." You are right we do not want to think or conceptualize about the perception, but stick as close to the raw sense-datum as possible. Actually, when the book speaks of "rising and passing away" it should be "arising," as in, coming into being.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
Sorry I skipped this question earlier. We can&#8217;t usually have the same detailed mindfulness in daily life as in vipassana practice. In daily life we can use more general mindfulness and clear comprehension. The latter means understanding the reason and purpose for our actions and speech; thinking beforehand about whether or not each action is worthwhile to do or is wholesome or not. This understanding helps us keep the five precepts in daily life. On occasion you can still observe the abdominal motions, such as when waiting in line or other occasions when you aren&#8217;t occupied with a complex task.
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
The Buddhist doctrine of conditioned dependent arising is essentially opposite to the popular new agey "create your reality" through visualization and positive thinking idea. However, it doesn&#8217;t mean you become a doormat or cannot affect your future. Achan Chah said that a meditator looks the same on the outside, but inside he&#8217;s very different. Outwardly he can still be as active as anyone, yet in the mind he does not attach to things and therefore doesn&#8217;t suffer.
We can mold our futures by having wholesome thoughts, speech and actions which always result in happiness of one kind or another, whereas unwholesome acts inevitably result in suffering. The actions we perform in the present give a corresponding result in the future. So we are by no means helpless. You might want to check out accesstoinsight.org, look up "karma" or "kamma" and read some of the Buddha&#8217;s suttas on this topic. He explained the specific paths to becoming, respectively, beautiful, wealthy, intelligent, healthy and influential in future lifetimes. Also there are some articles on kamma on our website; I recommend you read them.
</p>
</li>
</ol></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>What you said about hearing music and piling up attraction from moment to moment through the use of memory is quite a deep understanding. That&#8217;s exactly right. And it does seem shallow when one sees it for what it is.
Yes, the ultimate goal of vipassana is to purify the mind of greed, hatred and delusion in order to be free of suffering, which entails not taking rebirth in samsara any longer. But this is a really far-off goal. We have to focus on the shorter-term first. Even those who&#8217;ve reached the first level of enlightenment continue to be reborn as human beings for as many as 7 lifetimes. Once you reach that level and have experienced Nibbana you will be able to know whether, in comparison, the happiness that comes from having a body is better or not. Right now you have nothing to compare to. So wait until you have a superior object or different object, then you can decide. Even reaching the first level of enlightenement is quite a lofty goal, but it is possible to attain in this lifetime if we work diligently. But as long as you still want to have a body, be assured you will continue to be reborn with one. However, when you reach the higher vipassana insights
(even before realizing Nibbana) you might change your mind.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_neigbor_interruptions">14. Neigbor interruptions</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>About 1/2 way through my abdomen observation practice, my
neighbor started with his music. At that point, I continued
my observation. Once, I caught myself lost in internal
thought. And then I went back to abdomen observation.
However, a bit later, I got irritated by his music then went
back to observation. Overall, I would say that last 10
minutes were not very productive.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I did not get a chance to redo the abdomen observation&#8230;
or rather, I failed to remain vigilant and return to the
practice later that night.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I dont think 10 "missed" minutes of practice is
going to make or break me over a 3-month period. In fact, I
learned a lot about time scheduling from this incident and I
did complete well over 75% of the practice for that day</p></div>
<h3 id="_dhamma_friend_reply">14.1. Dhamma Friend reply</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>That&#8217;s fine, Terrence. Don&#8217;t worry about the ten minutes. As long as you were aware - you knew - you were irritated, it wasn&#8217;t a waste. That means you had mindfulness to see the irritation. In any case, you were making right effort. It is good to see how anger or desire is directly triggered by objects, following laws of cause and effect.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>12/3/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_what_is_clinging">15. What is clinging?</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>I had been wondering about meditation off the cushion. I told Cynthia
that I tend to not whether my mind is attaching or rejecting during
day-to-day life&#8230; the response:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Dear Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Yes, what you are doing is correct. It is true that both attachment and aversion are forms of clinging.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>12/5/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_a_breakthrough">16. A breakthrough</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>The following happened on 12/5/08:</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>During the hand exercises, I was really flubbing. Many times
I did not pause. And my mind wandered. But I did keep noting
all this.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Then I got to sitting meditation. And I was doing nothing
more than noting thoughts when they arose and noting the
rise and fall of the belly.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Then this pocket sort of opened up. My mind was not working
so hard to do this exercise. I was actually waiting for
things to happen so I could note them instead of creating
thoughts.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>This was a very calming session. I know we are not supposed
to fall into tranquil abiding, but I dont think my calm was
because I assumed a mental state or emotion. I simply was
doing my best to allow myself to observe what was happening.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>That was a satisfying session for me.</p></div>
<h3 id="_the_reply">16.1. The reply</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Yes, that&#8217;s correct just to observe whatever is going on instead of trying to control it or anticipate what is going to arise next. But don&#8217;t expect your meditation will always be this way from now on. Next time it may change again. That&#8217;s one manifestation of impermanence. Even mindfulness is impermanent. So you don&#8217;t need to feel annoyance or aversion in case your next meditation session is less satisfying. Just know whatever&#8217;s going on.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_taking_a_phone_call">17. Taking a phone call</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>I had to take a phone call during meditation on 12/8/08. I learned that it is
best to start over if possible. If not, just continue from where you
left off. If possible you should try to let the calls go to your
answering machine or voicemail during practice. But thay not always be
possible.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_week_3_summary">18. Week 3 Summary</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>I repeat my summary verbatim:</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I find it unusual that the easiest exercise, requiring the least amount
of concentration or insight (observing "sitting" by looking at the hands
for 2 to 3 seconds at a time) is offered in the 3rd week. The hand
exercise and rising falling are much more demanding exercises from my
standpoint.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Anyway, I will take your advice and drop the observing "sitting" So
given that I am in week 4, what should the time breakdown be? I&#8217;m
guessing the 5 minutes for sitting gets moved to the hands, making 20
minutes for hands (10 each hand) and 20 minutes for rising-falling.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Also, it is amazing how relaxed I get from doing this even though I am
glum most of the time.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>What I am starting to see is that the depression is an active act, being
re-created moment by moment by my tendencies:</p></div>
<div class="olist"><ol>
<li>
<p>
I think: "I dont have a job"
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
I get depressed
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
I think: "man, it&#8217;s cold here"
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
I get depressed
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
I think: "my friend has a job"
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
I get jealous
</p>
</li>
</ol></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>And then the samsaric cycle repeats itself.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>So basically I can throw some noticing of my footsteps in there or
something as I&#8217;m walking to break up the apparent rock solid wall of
gloom. It&#8217;s all good to say you arent the body as long as the body has a
job (grin).
Actually simply noting the sense of gloom is useful. Because later it
will switch to a feeling of depression. Then hopelessness. Then
sometimes I laugh&#8230;</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>And presumably the law of kamma is at work. Some time long ago, perhaps
I made someone else suffer in the cold or lose a job. I couldnt tell
you.</p></div>
<h3 id="_the_reply_from_dhamma_friend">18.1. The reply from Dhamma Friend</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Dear Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Again, I feel it might be better for you not to practice <em>sitting</em>
as I mentioned in a previous email. I would recommend that for now you
stick to the hand motions and rising-falling, because you already have
strong enough concentration. If you want to try out the sitting
exercise occasionally that&#8217;s all right, but for your regular practice
I would suggest sticking with the other two exercises.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It&#8217;s good you were able to see your mind clinging, then labeled the thinking. That&#8217;s fine. You are doing exactly the right thing. It doesn&#8217;t matter how many times you have to do this. Sometimes we have to do it over and over for the whole session.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>P.S. I was sorry to hear you&#8217;d lost your job. I guess it&#8217;s very hard times for almost everyone right now, given the precarious state of the economy.</p></div>
<h3 id="_a_further_reply_from_me">18.2. A further reply from me</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I accidentally did hand positions before observing sitting this
morning, but no biggie. Tomorrow, I start on Week 4, which means a
longer time of observing the hands.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The sitting meditation is a joy to go to after doing the other exercises&#8230; it has so few moving parts, so you can really sink in.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Now today, unfortunately, my mind was trying to create the former states of open-ness it had experienced. And each time I would be focused, it would start clinging to that relaxation. So I had to basically label the mind thinking about being aware many times.</p></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_bettie_page_died_at_age_85">19. Bettie Page died at age 85</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Sex symbol Bettie Page had a painful bought with disease in her old
age and now she is dead.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Here is what I said about her death on 12/12/08:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>I tend to think of superstars as immortal and disease-free. But Bettie
Page had been suffering from pneumonia and then a heart attack and then
was placed on life support. Now she is deceased. Her final years were
spent in great pain. And also were a blow to her ego, no doubt. Her
early years were nothing but "living it up".</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>She made her body her temple and filled it with adoration and pleasure.
And then it broke down on her and left her in the cold, helpless and in
pain.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Pleasure and pain are two sides of the same coin --- I will never forget
being told that, but it&#8217;s only theory as long as you can have more
pleasure, like this tasty ice cream I&#8217;m having right now.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It&#8217;s such a shame that it&#8217;s so hard to decide to seek permanent bliss.
It&#8217;s so easy to want the adoration of millions. Millions of dollars.
Nice houses, etc.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But maybe it&#8217;s worth it. Maybe we are supposed to climb as high as we
can even if we plummet to the chasm below eventually? Maybe the risks of
reproduction (birth defect, death in labor, etc) are worth it to keep
populating the Earth? We keep improving as a species. We have better
cars. Nicer heating and air conditioning. The internet, etc. Evolution
and the urge to improve quality of living is obvious. Clearly, we are
all striving for comfort. Some do it by control of the senses. Others do
it by giving the senses what they demand!</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Well, I&#8217;m just staying the middle way for now. For 3 months, sexual
impropriety is not allowed and I am not married.</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>http://groups.google.com/group/odd-musings/browse_thread/thread/3c9a11e6e761e61e/f8b1e03ec067a06e?lnk=gst&q=dhamma+friend#f8b1e03ec067a06e</em><br />
&#8212; Terrence Brannon
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_a_very_significant_progress_milepost">20. A Very Significant Progress Milepost</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>On 12/14/08, I had an unusual experience.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I had done 7 minutes of one hand. Then 8 minutes of the other hand. And
I was doing my 30 minutes of rising-falling. During the 30 minutes of
rising-falling, I was away floating in these thoughts. This happens
often and normally I just note them and return to the breath.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>But what was odd this time is that I became aware of two apparently
independant processes. I heard some voice in my head going:
"rising-falling&#8230; rising-falling&#8230;" which was keeping track of the
belly movements. And then there was the brain just rattling off thought
after thought.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>And then there was me there seeing both! And then I remembered how the
Dhamma Friend instructor
said that mindfulness must be gently cultivated. It cannot be forced,
but can only happen over time.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>So there is like this little me. But the little me will grow if I attach
to the thoughts. Or the little me will trance out if absorbed in belly
action.</p></div>
<h3 id="_instructor_reply">20.1. Instructor Reply</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>This is good. You said, "And then there was me there seeing both!"
This is the the knower or as Achan Sobin calls it, "the one who
knows." It is very good you were able to see the knowing as separate
from the abdominal movements, the labels for those movements, and your
thoughts. You are definitely on the right track here. This is what
vipassana is all about, as opposed to the feelings of bliss we can
experience with concentration techniques.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>When you attach to your thoughts, this knower disappears; it cannot be
seen as separate, because it becomes the thoughts, so to speak. This
happens when we get hooked by our thoughts and desires. We become
completely involved in them and the separate knower is lost. This is
what most people do all day long, their whole lives; they get
completely involved in the object. At the same time, they cannot see
that their thoughts, feelings, etc., are not their "selves" because
they cannot separate them from the knowing. When you can see that a
thought is separate from the knowing, it gives you a new perspective.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>When the knower can stay separate, it is possible to view all objects
with equanimity and not get involved in liking or disliking them. This
truly protects the mind from suffering, even when unpleasant things
are occurring. I&#8217;m glad you had this experience.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>With Metta
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>Dhamma Friend Program 12/15/08</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_issues_with_labelling">21. Issues with labelling</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>The label of the action is supposed to cover the entire duration of
that action. For instance, if you are turning the hand, the word
turning should last as long as the turn.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The problem I was having was that I would note <em>turning</em> but only be 5
percent done with the actual motion!</p></div>
<h3 id="_reply_from_instructor">21.1. Reply from Instructor</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Instead of labeling each action multiple times, try stretching out the label so as to make it last as long as the movement by saying it more slowly. Most of your attention should be on the actual movement, not the word.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The purpose of labeling is to develop momentary concentration. Once you have more concentration with the movement you&#8217;ll be able to drop the label and your mind will not wander so much as you just observe the motion.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>It is not bad that you have thoughts during the movement as long as you know they&#8217;re there. Now you can see more clearly how many thoughts there always are. They come very fast, in a split second. The wandering of the mind takes place in very short increments as you are finding out. That means you have more mindfulness now or you wouldn&#8217;t be able to see this.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>You can keep experimenting with using the label and dropping it to see what the difference is.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_i_meet_my_downfall">22. I meet my downfall</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>One day I spent all day reading a book on Self-Inquiry. It talked
about how happiness occurs when thought stops. It said that all
thoughts from an "I" thought.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I decided to try a bit of this meditation and was jazzed! I felt so
good! And I noticed how I was not thinking.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I still had not done my vipassana for that day. I became very loathe
to do so. I was thinking the very thoughts Cynthia warned me about:
* "oh this vipassana isnt really working"
* "there is no way I am going to spend a whole hour of my day doing
this"
* "vipassana is a big waste of time."</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I had also forgotten about Cynthia&#8217;s warnings about bliss systems. I
hastily turned in my resignation letter.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>As always, Cynthia was very accomodating of my decision and responded
with equanimity:</p></div>
<div class="quoteblock">
<div class="quoteblock-content">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Terrence,</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Good luck. I&#8217;m sorry I couldn&#8217;t be of more help to you.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Metta,
Cynthia</p></div>
</div>
<div class="quoteblock-attribution">
<em>12/18/08 Dhamma Friend Program</em><br />
&#8212; Cynthia Thatcher
</div></div>
<h3 id="_how_sad">22.1. How sad</h3><div style="clear:left"></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Can you believe that? All the time and effort she put into me for FREE
and <strong>she</strong> was sorry she couldn&#8217;t be of more help to <strong>me</strong>.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Of course I felt like an ingrateful pig for doing this.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>The method will <em>most assuredly work</em> as Cynthia said. You just have
to have the persistence. I had already made some useful
breakthroughs. The windows into <em>The Country of Now</em> had been cracked
open twice in just a 4-week period.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Just imagine how open it would be after 12 weeks.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>You really have to have your sights set on <strong>EXACTLY</strong> what this program
has to offer to begin with.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>If you are thinking about quitting, instead do your practice for that
day and <strong>COMMUNICATE</strong> with the instructor why you want to quit and
listen to that advice with an open mind.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Don&#8217;t rush and quit. And don&#8217;t rush and get involved.</p></div>
</div>
<h2 id="_conclusion">23. Conclusion</h2>
<div class="sectionbody">
<div class="paragraph"><p>Be sure to get a copy of "Moment to moment mindfulness" because it has
pictures of a lot of the practice positions.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>A Dhamma Friend 12-week program is highly recommended for anyone who
wants to get rid of the clinging mind once and for all.</p></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>I finished 1/3 of the 12-week dhamma friend program before falling
prey to a mental trap. Therefore, it is not
recommended for the following types of people (at least not by me)</p></div>
<div class="ulist"><ul>
<li>
<p>
people who want to use heightened awareness to "create the life they
desire"
</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>
people who want a bliss joyride. If you read Achan Sobin Namto&#8217;s
"Insight Meditation: Practical Steps to Ultimate Truth" there is a
section which lists the stages of insight. It clearly enumerates an
increasing ladder of painful sensations which will wrack your body
as your mindfulness increases. If you aren&#8217;t fully confident in the
power of mindfulness and not fully prepared to deal with a hailstorm
of distracting thoughts and discomfort to make your way to the final
goal, then find something else to do.
</p>
</li>
</ul></div>
<div class="paragraph"><p>Metta!
Terrence</p></div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
<div id="footer-text">
Last updated 2008-12-21 22:32:38 EDT
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment