-
-
Save micahgodbolt/2936775 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
//Proposed Susy syntax to create "The Fonmon" asymmetric grid layout. http://gridsetapp.com/specs/fonmon.php?gridset=show | |
$total-columns: 5; | |
$column-width: 200px, 96px, 96px, 96px, 200px; | |
// could use relative units: 1, 1 would be 50/50%. 1, 2 would be 33/66%, 1, 1, 1 would be 33/33/33% | |
$columns: column padding, column padding, column padding, column padding, …; //suggested multi dimensional syntax | |
$gutter-width: 30px; | |
//with relative units gutter width needs a reference, like 30px at 960px...this needs work |
Could even have a multi-dimensional list for different padding on different columns.
$default-padding: 0;
$grid: column padding, column padding, column padding, column padding, …;
$grid: 1, 3 1em, 2;
Are gutters typically part of the column width, or in addition to the column width?
If the container width is 1000px and it's 5 equal columns with 20px margin, do we describe it as 200px , 20px margin? Or do we say 180px with 20px margin. Wow, I can see now why getting these grid layouts ironed out can be quite a challenge.
Wish there was a like button for that multi-dimensional list idea. I was wondering what would happen if each grid column needed a different gutter.
Yeah, variable width gutters are super problematic. Cool idea if it can be pulled off tho.
If the container width is 1000px and it's 5 equal columns with 20px margin, do we describe it as 200px , 20px margin?
I was thinking about making the value independent for padding. Gutters would need to speak the same language as columns though.
Wrote some initial logic to figure this out here: https://github.com/scottkellum/Singularity/blob/grid-refactor/stylesheets/singularity/_grid.sass
To keep this thread updated: http://singularity.gs/
Thinking about making it unit agnostic and counting the number of columns in the list.
makes 4 equal columns
makes two columns, one that is 2x the last one.
If a user is more comfortable with pixels or percents these both will yield the same result. With a 300px wrapper the px example will be pixel-perfect.