Created
August 5, 2018 17:33
-
-
Save miekg/e1a9779fcccec3378744986db0072f1b to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Network Working Group S. Bellovin | |
Internet-Draft AT&T Labs Research | |
Expires: 3 October 2018 1 April 2018 | |
The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header | |
Abstract | |
Firewalls, packet filters, intrusion detection systems, and the like | |
often have difficulty distinguishing between packets that have | |
malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. We define a | |
security flag in the IPv4 header as a means of distinguishing the two | |
cases. | |
Status of This Memo | |
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | |
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | |
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |
This Internet-Draft will expire on 3 October 2018. | |
Copyright Notice | |
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |
document authors. All rights reserved. | |
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/ | |
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. | |
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights | |
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components | |
extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text | |
as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are | |
provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. | |
Table of Contents | |
1. Introduction | |
2. Terminology | |
3. Syntax | |
4. Normative References | |
1. Introduction | |
Firewalls [\@!CBR03], packet filters, intrusion detection systems, | |
and the like often have difficulty distinguishing between packets | |
that have malicious intent and those that are merely unusual. The | |
problem is that making such determinations is hard. To solve this | |
problem, we define a security flag, known as the "evil" bit, in the | |
IPv4 [RFC0791] header. Benign packets have this bit set to 0; those | |
that are used for an attack will have the bit set to 1. | |
2. Terminology | |
The keywords <bcp14>:MUST, <bcp14>:MUST NOT, <bcp14>:REQUIRED, | |
<bcp14>:SHALL, <bcp14>:SHALL NOT, <bcp14>:SHOULD, <bcp14>:SHOULD NOT, | |
<bcp14>:RECOMMENDED, <bcp14>:MAY, and <bcp14>:OPTIONAL, when they | |
appear in this document, are to be interpreted as described in | |
[RFC2119]. | |
3. Syntax | |
The high-order bit of the IP fragment offset field is the only unused | |
bit in the IP header. Accordingly, the selection of the bit position | |
is not left to IANA. | |
The bit field is laid out as follows: | |
4. Normative References | |
[RFC0791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, | |
DOI 10.17487/RFC0791, September 1981, <https://www.rfc- | |
editor.org/info/rfc791>. | |
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | |
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | |
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc- | |
editor.org/info/rfc2119>. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment