| #!/usr/bin/env bash | |
| # | |
| # test_claude_sprite.sh | |
| # | |
| # Pressure-test the full PrBot flow using ONLY the Sprites CLI + gh + git | |
| # and one provider CLI in stream-JSON mode. | |
| # | |
| # Validates: sprite lifecycle, env injection, gh auth, git clone, branch, | |
| # provider streaming prompt, provider code change, commit, push, PR, comment. | |
| # |
| #!/usr/bin/env bash | |
| # | |
| # test_amp_sprite.sh | |
| # | |
| # Pressure-test the full PrBot flow using ONLY the Sprites CLI + gh + git | |
| # and one provider CLI in stream-JSON mode. | |
| # | |
| # Validates: sprite lifecycle, env injection, gh auth, git clone, branch, | |
| # provider streaming prompt, provider code change, commit, push, PR, comment. | |
| # |
Source: Codex archived thread 019c5d6d-702c-7133-90b9-a88fad081eed
Date context in thread: February 14-15, 2026
The thread’s conclusion was: Bedrock is architecturally promising for distributed durable state, but should be treated as pre-production for critical durability workloads until a few correctness/durability gaps are closed.
Create a new package, jido_bedrock, that provides distributed durable persistence for Jido agents and Jido signals on Bedrock without requiring Postgres or a larger external DB.
The package will implement three adapter surfaces:
Jido.Storage for checkpoints + thread journals used by Jido.Persist.Jido.Agent.Store for InstanceManager hibernate/thaw persistence.Jido.Signal.Journal.Persistence for signal docs, causality edges, conversation indexes, checkpoints, and DLQ.
| #!/usr/bin/env bash | |
| set -euo pipefail | |
| usage() { | |
| cat <<'USAGE' | |
| Usage: scripts/ralph_wiggum_loop.sh [options] | |
| Runs the "Ralph Wiggum" story loop: | |
| - one Codex execution per story card | |
| - one commit per successful story |
V1 had two extremes: the fully-structured Runic DAG (deterministic but brittle) and the pure ReAct agent (adaptive but unreliable on lifecycle). V2 takes the best of both:
Runic owns the lifecycle. ReAct owns the investigation.
The outer Runic workflow guarantees that Sprites get created, repos get cloned, results get pushed to GitHub, and Sprites get destroyed — deterministically, with per-step observability and retry semantics. The inner ReAct agent gets delegated the creative, adaptive work: directing Claude Code to actually fix the bug, iterating on test failures, and composing the investigation report.
No Runic DAG. No structured pipeline. No orchestrator. Just a Jido.AI.Agent with tools and a good prompt. The LLM decides what to do, in what order, and how to recover from errors — exactly like a human developer would.
mix jido.triage https://github.com/agentjido/jido/issues/42
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
Integration analysis of nshkrdotcom/agent_session_manager (ASM) onto Jido's existing architecture.
ASM provides session lifecycle management, event logging, transcript reconstruction, provider adapters (Claude/Codex/Amp), policy enforcement, routing/circuit-breaking, and concurrency limiting for LLM agent interactions.
Jido already has equivalents for ~80% of this. The remaining ~20% (provider-specific LLM execution, workspace instrumentation, and a convenience session API) can be added as plugins, custom directives, and thin glue modules — no new runtime or parallel process hierarchy needed.
Implements the Recursive Language Model pattern using native Jido/BEAM semantics. No regex parsing. No Python subprocess. No
exec().Supersedes RLM_STRATEGY.md. See RLM_STRATEGY_CRITIQUE.md for rationale.
This proposal argues that Jido.Identity — and eventually other "reserved key" primitives like __thread__, __memory__, and __strategy__ — should be implemented as default plugins rather than ad hoc reserved keys with standalone helper modules. The goal is to keep the agent core minimal (four functions: new/1, set/2, validate/2, cmd/2) while proving that the plugin system is robust enough to serve as the universal composition layer for both framework primitives and user extensions.