Created
April 18, 2012 05:08
-
-
Save mikelikesbikes/2411214 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
comparing frequency built using different enumerable methods
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| require 'benchmark' | |
| Enumerable.class_eval do | |
| def frequency_group_by | |
| group_by{|x| x}.map { |x, xs| [x, xs.length] } | |
| end | |
| def frequency_each | |
| h = Hash.new(0) | |
| each { |x| h[x] += 1 } | |
| h.to_a | |
| end | |
| def frequency_reduce | |
| reduce(Hash.new(0)) { |h, x| h[x] += 1; h }.to_a | |
| end | |
| end | |
| def run_benchmark(arr_size) | |
| arr = Array.new(arr_size) { rand(1000) } | |
| n = 1000 | |
| unless arr.frequency_each == arr.frequency_reduce && arr.frequency_reduce == arr.frequency_group_by | |
| puts "sanity check... failed." | |
| exit | |
| end | |
| Benchmark.bm do |x| | |
| x.report("freq w/ group_by: ") { n.times { arr.frequency_group_by }} | |
| x.report("freq w/ each: ") { n.times { arr.frequency_each }} | |
| x.report("freq w/ reduce: ") { n.times { arr.frequency_reduce }} | |
| end | |
| end | |
| run_benchmark(10000) | |
| # Output | |
| # user system total real | |
| # freq w/ group_by: 5.060000 0.140000 5.200000 ( 5.210313) | |
| # freq w/ each: 5.170000 0.040000 5.210000 ( 5.218802) | |
| # freq w/ reduce: 10.190000 0.090000 10.280000 ( 10.287221) |
Author
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'm very surprised by the difference in performance between each and reduce (the code is nearly identical... even using the same Hash structure). Any ideas why the order of magnitude difference?