Ruby inject vs. tap vs. each_with_object. Inspired by http://phrogz.net/tap-vs-each_with_object

benchmark_dead_horse.rb

require 'benchmark'

N = 1000000
nums = N.times.map{ rand(N) }
enum = [1, 2, 'string', {}, [], false, true, nil]

def process(v)
  v
end

def i_want_this?(v)
  !v.nil?
end

Benchmark.bmbm do |x|
  x.report('inj') { enum.inject([]) { |arr, v|  arr << process(v) if i_want_this?(v); arr } }
  x.report('tap') { [].tap { |arr| enum.each { |v| arr << process(v) if i_want_this?(v) } } }
  x.report('ewo') { enum.each_with_object([]) { |v, arr|  arr << process(v) if i_want_this?(v) } }
  x.report('sel') { enum.select {|v| i_want_this?(v) }.map { |v| process(v) } }
  x.report('map') { enum.map { |v| process(v) if i_want_this?(v) }.reject { |v| !v } }
end


# Rehearsal ---------------------------------------
# inj   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000027)
# tap   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000017)
# ewo   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000023)
# sel   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000016)
# map   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000021)
# ------------------------------ total: 0.000000sec
# 
#           user     system      total        real
# inj   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000025)
# tap   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000024)
# ewo   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000026)
# sel   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000023)
# map   0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 (  0.000024)

The takeaway, obviously, is that you can hardly measure the time of any of them with a million iterations so it doesn't really matter. I tried using an array of 800 elements, too, and got nothing any different.