A multi-agent conversational system requires awareness of the memory limitations of language models. Large models (GPT-4, Claude, Mistral, Gemini) do offer very wide context windows, but they still operate on a “sliding window” basis. This is illustrated in Fig. 1 – when the context window fills up, new tokens “push” older ones out of the model’s memory window, causing earlier information to be lost. In practice, this means that over time, during a long conversation the model can forget earlier turns, start repeating itself, or make coherence errors. This phenomenon is sometimes called Context Degradation Syndrome. After just a few dozen to a few hundred exchanges, the model can “lose the thread” and generate increasingly imprecise answers (Context Degradation Syndrome: When Large Language Models Lose the Plot) (Extending the Memory of Large Language Models). Since there is no built-in, long-term memory, LLMs rely solely on the current context window, and older parts of the conversation simply disappear (Context Degradation Syndrome: When Large Language Models Lose the Plot) (Extending the Memory of Large Language Models).
Fig. 1: Schematic of the sliding-window context mechanism in LLMs. As new tokens enter (new context), older conversation turns are pushed out of the active window and “forgotten” (left), leading to information loss.
Newer models have dramatically increased their supported context length, but they haven’t solved the “forgetting” problem. For example, GPT-4 traditionally offers about 8 K tokens (base) up to ~32 K tokens (extended); GPT-4 Turbo goes up to ~128 K tokens, yet accuracy sharply declines past ~64 K tokens (How accurate is ChatGPT: long-context degradation and model settings). Claude handles around 100 K tokens (Context Degradation Syndrome: When Large Language Models Lose the Plot). Open-source models like Mistral 7B stick to a classic 4 K token sliding window (mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1 · context window size), though the newest Mistral Small 3.1 supports up to 128 K tokens (Mistral Small 3.1 | Mistral AI). Google’s Gemini 1.5 Pro even accepts up to 2 million tokens in one input (Long context | Gemini API | Google AI for Developers). Theoretically, one could feed an entire library or years of chat in a single prompt.
Yet the core mechanism remains unchanged: LLMs do not build durable “understanding” beyond that sliding window. Even with millions of tokens available, earlier text is still pushed out as new data arrives. In practice, small inaccuracies accumulate (“snowball effect”)—minor misinterpretations early on can cascade into later responses, making long dialogues less coherent over time (Context Degradation Syndrome: When Large Language Models Lose the Plot) (How accurate is ChatGPT: long-context degradation and model settings). In short: larger context windows (GPT-4 Turbo, Gemini, new Mistral) extend the span during which a dialogue remains cohesive, but quality degradation in very long interactions persists (Context Degradation Syndrome: When Large Language Models Lose the Plot) (How accurate is ChatGPT: long-context degradation and model settings).
To mitigate this, practitioners use various context and memory management techniques that offload the model’s input window. Key approaches include:
-
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Instead of feeding the raw chat history, the system uses external sources. A memory module (semantic index) stores previously gathered information. For each query, the system first retrieves relevant documents from a static knowledge base and relevant past conversation snippets from the dynamic chat memory, then sends these alongside the user’s prompt to the LLM. After generation, the memory is updated (e.g., storing session summaries or key facts) so the system continually “learns on the fly.” RAG effectively circumvents strict context limits by pulling in only the most relevant information rather than the entire history (A Complete Guide to Implementing Memory-Augmented RAG) (Extending the Memory of Large Language Models).
-
Short-Term vs. Long-Term Memory: Architectures often split memory into working memory—the immediate context (recent user turns, model reasoning steps) stored in fast stores (e.g., Redis)—and long-term memory—persistent user profiles, preferences, and repeatedly relevant data stored in NoSQL or vector databases for semantic lookup (A Complete Guide to Implementing Memory-Augmented RAG).
-
Summarization (Chunking): Automatically summarize older conversation fragments to reduce token count. When the context window nears capacity, older messages are compressed into concise summaries or vector embeddings, then archived separately and only re-injected when needed (Extending the Memory of Large Language Models).
-
Token Selection / Pruning: Instead of passing every token to the model, filter out less relevant content. Systems may reserve indices in the window for key memory injections, deleting noise (e.g., digressions, emojis, lengthy quotes) to focus token budget on mission-critical information (Extending the Memory of Large Language Models).
-
Tool and Subagent Integration: In a multi-agent setup, each external agent/tool maintains its own log or memory. When an agent performs an asynchronous task (e.g., computations, data fetch), its result is stored in the conversational memory so that when the user revisits the topic, the main model can recall the context of that subtask.
-
Proactive Approach: Design memory and context-management components from the outset. This means planning vector/document databases, context retrieval algorithms, summarization modules, and information-prioritization logic. Proactive architectures (e.g., Mem0) minimize the risk of losing critical data in long dialogs by automatically indexing new information and compressing or migrating older content to persistent storage, enabling smooth long-session coherence ([2504.19413] Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory).
-
Reactive Approach: Focus initially on core functionality, adding memory layers only after degradation issues appear. While this simplifies early development, encountering quality-drop symptoms in stress tests or production may force significant architectural rewrites. Thus, for asynchronous multi-task systems, it’s generally safer to include context management from day one; LLMs won’t “remember” by themselves—you must provide the memory infrastructure (How to Setup Memory in an LLM Agent).
-
Quality degradation in very long conversations remains a real challenge. Even models with massive windows (GPT-4 Turbo 128K, Gemini 2M) can lose dialogue coherence at tens of thousands of tokens (Context Degradation Syndrome: When Large Language Models Lose the Plot) (How accurate is ChatGPT: long-context degradation and model settings).
-
Architectures should incorporate external memory and retrieval to offload LLM context. RAG with a vector database or rich conversation logs enables efficient storage and recall of past information (A Complete Guide to Implementing Memory-Augmented RAG) (Extending the Memory of Large Language Models).
-
Implement summarization and context pruning (chunking). Even simple periodic summaries or content filtering can greatly extend coherent dialogue length. Older segments can be replaced by short summaries or embeddings and re-injected only when relevant (Extending the Memory of Large Language Models).
-
From an architectural standpoint, we recommend a proactive approach. Build memory modules, databases, and retrieval mechanisms into your system from the start. Projects like Mem0 demonstrate that structured, persistent chat memory dramatically improves dialogue coherence and generation efficiency, avoiding costly retrofits and delivering a better user experience ([2504.19413] Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory) (How to Setup Memory in an LLM Agent).
In conclusion, context management remains a critical challenge, but modern AI architectures provide effective tools to address it. Adopting memory and retrieval mechanisms from day one ensures conversational agents can sustain long, coherent interactions and retain key information across tasks.
Sources: Latest publications and industry reports on model context capabilities (GPT-4, Claude, Mistral, Gemini) and RAG/memory techniques for LLMs (Context Degradation Syndrome: When Large Language Models Lose the Plot) (How accurate is ChatGPT: long-context degradation and model settings) (A Complete Guide to Implementing Memory-Augmented RAG) (Extending the Memory of Large Language Models) ([2504.19413] Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memory).