I

gistfile1.rs

    // XXX: this is *completely* bad and wrong. I feel bad.  Handling
    // of vtables is currently bogus for default methods, and changing
    // to an unflattented representation of vtables causes this to
    // show up in cases that it did not previously. We need to make
    // the vtables list be the same length as the substs.
    // This is nothing right about this. I really need to emphasize just
    // how wrong it is: it is completely wrong.
    // XXX: bad. -sully
    let vtables = do vtables.map |vtbls| {
        if vtbls.len() < substs.tps.len() {
            @(vec::from_elem(substs.tps.len() - vtbls.len(), @~[]) +
              **vtbls)
        } else if vtbls.len() > substs.tps.len() {
            @vec::tailn(**vtbls, vtbls.len() - substs.tps.len()).to_owned()
        } else {
            *vtbls
        }
    };