gistfile1.txt

./simple/Channels/#analytics/2013-03-05.txt:[14:49:23] <dan>Ah interesting: Error: User: arn:aws:iam::512062111522:user/data-pipeline-prod is not authorized to perform: elasticmapreduce:RunJobFlow
./simple/Channels/#analytics/2013-03-05.txt:[14:53:29] <dan> <Message>User: arn:aws:iam::512062111522:user/data-pipeline-prod is not authorized to perform: iam:GetInstanceProfile on resource: instance profile prod-data-pipeline-ec2</Message>
./simple/Channels/#analytics/2013-03-05.txt:[14:56:03] <dan>Still can't launch with that role: :user/data-pipeline-prod is not authorized to perform: iam:GetRole on resource: role prod-data-pipeline-ec2
./simple/Channels/#analytics/2013-03-05.txt:[14:59:41] <dan>Same issue:   <Message>User: arn:aws:iam::512062111522:user/data-pipeline-prod is not authorized to perform: iam:GetRole on resource: role prod-data-pipeline-ec2</Message>
./simple/Channels/#analytics/2013-05-29.txt:[13:26:51] <moyer> hey dan, steven: I'm in the process of cleaning up IAM policies and it looks like the "data-pipeline-prod" might be legacy (replaced by the "prod-data-pipeline" role). Does that sound right?
./simple/Channels/#analytics/2013-05-29.txt:[13:27:04] <moyer> *the "data-pipeline-prod" user
./simple/Channels/#analytics/2013-05-29.txt:[13:27:43] <dan> The one I have creds for is 'data-pipeline-prod', but AFAIK, we haven't been using either.
./simple/Channels/#analytics/2013-05-29.txt:[13:28:58] <@steven> I don't believe we're using "data-pipeline-prod" anywhere.
./simple/Channels/#analytics/2013-05-29.txt:[13:35:11] <@mwhooker> is it possible that the data-pipeline-prod user is being used by doppler?
./simple/Channels/#security/2013-05-29.txt:[13:27:14] <mwhooker> time to grep through every line of code I've written for the word data-pipeline-prod
./simple (75D64)/Queries/wclayton/2013-05-29.txt:[11:29:37] <wclayton> did I need to be in the data-pipeline-prod directory when I ran that?