This document describes xnu's use of the ARMv8.3-PAuth extension. Specifically, xnu uses ARMv8.3-PAuth to protect against Return-Oriented-Programming (ROP) and Jump-Oriented-Programming (JOP) attacks, which attempt to gain control flow over a victim program by overwriting return addresses or function pointers stored in memory.
It is assumed the reader is already familar with the basic concepts behind ARMv8.3-PAuth and what its instructions do. The "ARMv8.3-A Pointer Authentication" section of Google Project Zero's "Examining Pointer Authentication on the iPhone XS" provides a good introduction to ARMv8.3-PAuth. The reader may find more comprehensive background material in:
-
The "Pointer authentication in AArch64 state" section of the ARMv8 ARM describes the new instructions and registers associated with ARMv8.3-PAuth.
-
LLVM's Pointer Authentication documentation outlines how clang uses ARMv8.3-PAuth instructions to harden key C, C++, Swift, and Objective-C language constructs.
Pointer authentication's threat model assumes that an attacker has found a gadget to read and write arbitrary memory belonging to a victim process, which may include the kernel. The attacker does not have the ability to execute arbitrary code in that process's context. Pointer authentication aims to prevent the attacker from gaining control flow over the victim process by overwriting sensitive pointers in its address space (e.g., return addresses stored on the stack).
Following this threat model, xnu takes a two-pronged approach to prevent the attacker from gaining control flow over the victim process:
-
Both xnu and first-party binaries are built with LLVM's
-arch arm64e
flag, which generates pointer-signing and authentication instructions to protect addresses stored in memory (including ones pushed to the stack). This process is generally transparent to xnu, with exceptions discussed below. -
On exception entry, xnu hashes critical register state before it is spilled to memory. On exception return, the reloaded state is validated against this hash.
The "xnu PAC infrastructure" section discusses how these hardening techniques are implemented in xnu in more detail.
ARMv8.3-PAuth implementations may use an implementation defined cipher. Apple CPUs implement an optional custom cipher with two key-generation changes relevant to xnu.
Apple's optional cipher adds a per-boot diversifier. In effect, even if xnu
initializes the "ARM key" registers (APIAKey
, APGAKey
, etc.) with constants,
signing a given value will still produce different signatures from boot to boot.
Apple CPUs also contain a second diversifier known as KERNKey
. KERNKey
is
automatically mixed into the final signing key (or not) based on the CPU's
exception level. When xnu needs to sign or authenticate userspace-signed
pointers, it uses the ml_enable_user_jop_key
and ml_disable_user_jop_key
routines to manually enable or disable KERNKey
. KERNKey
allows the CPU to
effectively use different signing keys for userspace and kernel, without needing
to explicitly reprogram the generic ARM keys on every kernel entry and exit.
For historical reasons, the xnu codebase collectively refers to xnu + iOS's pointer authentication infrastructure as Pointer Authentication Codes (PAC). The remainder of this document will follow this terminology for consistency with xnu.
Binaries with PAC instructions are not fully backwards-compatible with non-PAC CPUs. Hence LLVM/iOS treat PAC-enabled binaries as a distinct ABI "slice" named arm64e. xnu enforces this distinction by disabling the PAC keys when returning to non-arm64e userspace, effectively turning ARMv8.3-PAuth auth and sign instructions into no-ops (see the "SCTLR_EL1" heading below for more details).
xnu is built with -arch arm64e
, which causes LLVM to automatically sign and
authenticate function pointers and return addresses spilled onto the stack. This
process is largely transparent to software, with some exceptions:
-
During early boot, xnu rebases and signs the pointers stored in its own
__thread_starts
section (seerebase_threaded_starts
inosfmk/arm/arm_init.c
). -
As parts of the userspace shared region are paged in, the page-in handler must also slide and re-sign any signed pointers stored in it. The "Signed pointers in shared regions" section discusses this in further detail.
-
Assembly routines must manually sign the return address with
pacibsp
before pushing it onto the stack, and use an authenticatingretab
instruction in place ofret
. xnu provides assembly macrosARM64_STACK_PROLOG
andARM64_STACK_EPILOG
which emit the appropriate instructions for both arm64 and arm64e targets.Likewise, branches in assembly to signed C function pointers must use the authenticating
blraa
instruction in place ofblr
. -
Signed pointers must be stripped with
ptrauth_strip
before they can be compared against compile-time constants likeVM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS
.
xnu contains tests for each manually qualified data pointer that should be
updated as new pointers are qualified. The tests allocate a structure
containing a __ptrauth qualified member, and write a pointer to that member.
We can then compare the stored value, which should be signed, with a manually
constructed signature. See ALLOC_VALIDATE_DATA_PTR
.
Tests are triggered by setting the kern.run_ptrauth_data_tests
sysctl. The
sysctl is implemented, and BSD structures are tested, in bsd/tests/ptrauth_data_tests_sysctl.c
.
Mach structures are tested in osfmk/tests/ptrauth_data_tests.c
.
xnu generally tries to avoid reprogramming the CPU's PAC-related registers on kernel entry and exit, since this could add significant overhead to a hot codepath. Instead, xnu uses the following strategies to manage the PAC register state.
Userspace processes' A keys (AP{IA,DA,GA}Key
) are derived from the field
jop_pid
inside struct task
. For implementation reasons, an exact duplicate
of this field is cached in the corresponding struct machine_thread
.
A keys are randomly generated at shared region initialization time (see "Signed
pointers in shared regions" below) and
copied into jop_pid
during process activation. This shared region, and hence
associated A keys, may be shared among arm64e processes under specific
circumstances:
-
"System processes" (i.e., processes launched from first-party signed binaries on the iOS system image) generally use a common shared region with a default
jop_pid
value, separate from non-system processes.If a system process wishes to isolate its A keys even from other system processes, it may opt into a custom shared region using an entitlement in the form
com.apple.pac.shared_region_id=[...]
. That is, two processes with the entitlementcom.apple.pac.shared_region_id=foo
would share A keys and shared regions with each other, but not with other system processes. -
Other arm64e processes automatically use the same shared region/A keys if their respective binaries are signed with the same team-identifier strings.
-
posix_spawnattr_set_ptrauth_task_port_np()
allows explicit "inheriting" of A keys duringposix_spawn()
, using a supplied mach task port. This API is intended to support debugging tools that may need to auth or sign pointers using the target process's keys.
Each process is assigned a random set of "B keys" (AP{IB,DB}Key
) on process
creation. As a special exception, processes which inherit their parents' memory
address space (e.g., during fork
) will also inherit their parents' B keys.
These keys are stored as the field rop_pid
inside struct task
, with an exact
duplicate in struct machine_thread
for implementation reasons.
xnu reprograms the ARM B-key registers during context switch, via the macro
set_process_dependent_keys_and_sync_context
in cswitch.s
.
xnu uses the B keys internally to sign pointers pushed onto the kernel stack, such as stashed LR values. Note that xnu does not need to explicitly switch to a dedicated set of "kernel B keys" to do this:
-
The
KERNKey
diversifier already ensures that the actual signing keys are different between xnu and userspace. -
Although reprogramming the ARM B-key registers will affect xnu's signing keys as well, pointers pushed onto the stack are inherently short-lived. Specifically, there will never be a situation where a stack pointer value is signed with one
current_task()
, but needs to be authed under a different activecurrent_task()
.
As discussed above, xnu disables the ARM keys when returning to non-arm64e
userspace processes. This is implemented by manipulating the EnIA
, EnIB
,
and EnDA
, and EnDB
bits in the ARM SCTLR_EL1
system register. When
these bits are cleared, auth or sign instruction using the respective keys
will simply pass through their inputs unmodified.
Initially, xnu cleared these bits during every exception_return
to a
non-arm64e process. Since xnu itself uses these keys, the exception vector
needs to restore the same bits on every exception entry (implemented in the
EL0_64_VECTOR
macro).
Apple A13 CPUs now have controls that allow xnu to keep the PAC keys enabled at
EL1, independent of SCTLR_EL1
settings. On these CPUs, xnu only needs to
reconfigure SCTLR_EL1
when context-switching from a "vanilla" arm64 process to
an arm64e process, or vice-versa (pmap_switch_user_ttb_internal
).
Each userspace process has a shared region mapped into its address space,
consisting of code and data shared across all processes of the same processor
type, bitness, root directory, and (for arm64e processes) team ID. Comments at
the top of osfmk/vm/vm_shared_region.c
discuss this region, and the process of
populating it, in more detail.
As the VM layer pages in parts of the shared region, any embedded pointers must
be rebased. Although this process is not new, PAC adds a new step: these
embedded pointers may be signed, and must be re-signed after they are rebased.
This process is implemented as vm_shared_region_slide_page_v3
in
osfmk/vm/vm_shared_region.c
.
xnu signs these embedded pointers using a shared-region-specific A key
(sr_jop_key
), which is randomly generated when the shared region is created.
Since these pointers will be consumed by userspace processes, xnu temporarily
switches to the userspace A keys when re-signing them.
xnu saves register state into kernel memory when taking exceptions, and reloads this state on exception return. If an attacker has write access to kernel memory, it can modify this saved state and effectively get control over a victim thread's control flow.
xnu hardens against this attack by calling ml_sign_thread_state
on exception
entry to hash certain registers before they're saved to memory. On exception
return, it calls the complementary ml_check_signed_state
function to ensure
that the reloaded values still match this hash. ml_sign_thread_state
hashes a
handful of particularly sensitive registers:
pc, lr
: directly affect control-flowcpsr
: controls process's exception levelx16, x17
: used by LLVM to temporarily store unauthenticated addresses
ml_sign_thread_state
also uses the address of the thread's arm_saved_state_t
as a diversifier. This step keeps attackers from using ml_sign_thread_state
as a signing oracle. An attacker may attempt to create a sacrificial thread,
set this thread to some desired state, and use kernel memory access gadgets to
transplant the xnu-signed state onto a victim thread. Because the victim
process has a different arm_saved_state_t
address as a diversifier,
ml_check_signed_state
will detect a hash mismatch in the victim thread.
Apart from exception entry and return, xnu calls ml_check_signed_state
and
ml_sign_thread_state
whenever it needs to mutate one of these sensitive
registers (e.g., advancing the PC to the next instruction). This process looks
like:
- Disable interrupts
- Load
pc, lr, cpsr, x16, x17
values and hash from thread'sarm_saved_state_t
into registers - Call
ml_check_signed_state
to ensure values have not been tampered with - Mutate one or more of these values using only register-to-register instructions
- Call
ml_sign_thread_state
to re-hash the mutated thread state - Store the mutated values and new hash back into thread's
arm_saved_state_t
. - Restore old interrupt state
Critically, none of the sensitive register values can be spilled to memory
between steps 1 and 7. Otherwise an attacker with kernel memory access could
modify one of these values and use step 5 as a signing oracle. xnu implements
these routines entirely in assembly to ensure full control over register use,
using a macro MANIPULATE_SIGNED_THREAD_STATE()
to generate boilerplate
instructions.
Interrupts must be disabled whenever ml_check_signed_state
or
ml_sign_thread_state
are called, starting before their inputs (x0
--x5
)
are populated. To understand why, consider what would happen if the CPU could
be interrupted just before step 5 above. xnu's exception handler would spill
the entire register state to memory. If an attacker has kernel memory access,
they could attempt to replace the spilled x0
--x5
values. These modified
values would then be reloaded into the CPU during exception return; and
ml_sign_thread_state
would be called with new, attacker-controlled inputs.
The thread_set_state
call lets userspace modify the register state of a target
thread. Signed userspace state adds a wrinkle to this process, since the
incoming FP, LR, SP, and PC values are signed using the userspace process's
key.
xnu handles this in two steps. First, machine_thread_state_convert_from_user
converts the userspace thread state representation into an in-kernel
representation. Signed values are authenticated using pmap_auth_user_ptr
,
which involves temporarily switching to the userspace keys.
Second, thread_state64_to_saved_state
applies this converted state to the
target thread. Whenever thread_state64_to_saved_state
modifies a register
that makes up part of the thread state hash, it uses
MANIPULATE_SIGNED_THREAD_STATE()
as described above to update this hash.
xnu provides ptrauth_utils_sign_blob_generic
and ptrauth_utils_auth_blob_generic
to sign and authenticate arbitrary blobs of data. Callers are responsible for
storing the pointer-sized signature returned. The signature is a rolling MAC
of the data, using the pacga
instruction, mixed with a provided salt and optionally
further diversified by storage address.
Use of these functions is inherently racy. The data must be read from memory before each pointer-sized block can be added to the signature. In normal operation, standard thread-safety semantics protect from corruption, however in the malicious case, it may be possible to time overwriting the buffer before signing or after authentication.
Callers of these functions must take care to minimise these race windows by using them immediately preceeding/following a write/read of the blob's data.