Last active
May 12, 2022 15:13
-
-
Save nkt1546789/d4ffebb452fe738b8aaa8005fc08a068 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Learning Classifiers from positive and unlabeled data by sample weighting proposed by Elkan and Noto 2008.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
import numpy as np | |
from sklearn.linear_model import SGDClassifier | |
from sklearn.cross_validation import StratifiedKFold | |
from sklearn.grid_search import GridSearchCV | |
class PUClassifier(object): | |
def __init__(self, trad_clf=None, n_folds=2): | |
self.trad_clf = trad_clf | |
self.n_folds = n_folds | |
def fit(self, X, s): | |
if self.trad_clf is None: | |
self.trad_clf = GridSearchCV(SGDClassifier(loss="log", penalty="l2"), param_grid={"alpha": np.logspace(-4, 0, 10)}) | |
c = np.zeros(self.n_folds) | |
for i, (itr, ite) in enumerate(StratifiedKFold(s, n_folds=self.n_folds, shuffle=True)): | |
self.trad_clf.fit(X[itr], s[itr]) | |
c[i] = self.trad_clf.predict_proba(X[ite][s[ite]==1])[:,1].mean() | |
self.c = c.mean() | |
return self | |
def sample(self, X, s): | |
if not hasattr(self, "c"): | |
self.fit(X, s) | |
X_positive = X[s==1] | |
X_unlabeled = X[s==0] | |
n_positive = X_positive.shape[0] | |
n_unlabeled = X_unlabeled.shape[0] | |
X_train = np.r_[X_positive, X_unlabeled, X_unlabeled] | |
y_train = np.concatenate([np.repeat(1, n_positive), np.repeat(1, n_unlabeled), np.repeat(0, n_unlabeled)]) | |
self.trad_clf.fit(X, s) | |
p_unlabeled = self.trad_clf.predict_proba(X_unlabeled)[:,1] | |
w_positive = ((1 - self.c) / self.c) * (p_unlabeled / (1 - p_unlabeled)) | |
w_negative = 1 - w_positive | |
sample_weight = np.concatenate([np.repeat(1.0, n_positive), w_positive, w_negative]) | |
return X_train, y_train, sample_weight | |
if __name__ == '__main__': | |
import numpy as np | |
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt | |
import seaborn as sns | |
import itertools | |
from sklearn import metrics | |
np.random.seed(0) | |
n_positive = 100 | |
n_negative = 500 | |
n = n_positive + n_negative | |
mu1 = [0,0] | |
mu2 = [2,2] | |
Sigma1 = 0.1 * np.identity(2) | |
Sigma2 = 0.5 * np.identity(2) | |
X = np.r_[np.random.multivariate_normal(mu1, Sigma1, n_positive), | |
np.random.multivariate_normal(mu2, Sigma2, n_negative)] | |
y = np.concatenate([np.repeat(1, n_positive), np.repeat(0, n_negative)]) | |
n_unlabeled = int(n_positive * 0.7) | |
s = y.copy() | |
s[:n_unlabeled] = 0 | |
pu = PUClassifier(n_folds=5) | |
X_train, y_train, sample_weight = pu.sample(X, s) | |
alphas = np.logspace(-4, 0, 10) | |
class_weights = [{1:1}] | |
n_folds = 3 | |
best_score = -np.inf | |
best_alpha = None | |
best_class_weight = None | |
for alpha, class_weight in itertools.product(alphas, class_weights): | |
scores = np.zeros(n_folds) | |
for i, (itr, ite) in enumerate(StratifiedKFold(y_train, n_folds=n_folds, shuffle=True)): | |
clf = SGDClassifier(loss="hinge", penalty="l2", alpha=alpha, class_weight=class_weight).fit(X_train[itr], y_train[itr], sample_weight=sample_weight[itr]) | |
ypred = clf.predict(X_train[ite]) | |
scores[i] = metrics.accuracy_score(y_train[ite], ypred, sample_weight=sample_weight[ite]) | |
this_score = scores.mean() | |
print alpha, class_weight, this_score | |
if this_score > best_score: | |
best_score = this_score | |
best_alpha = alpha | |
best_class_weight = class_weight | |
print best_alpha, best_class_weight, best_score | |
clf = SGDClassifier(loss="hinge", penalty="l2", alpha=best_alpha, class_weight=best_class_weight).fit(X_train, y_train, sample_weight=sample_weight) | |
ypred = clf.predict(X[s==0]) | |
#ypred = pu.trad_clf.predict_proba(X[s==0])[:,1]>=0.5*pu.c # <- this can also be used. | |
trad_ypred = pu.trad_clf.predict(X[s==0]) | |
accuracy = metrics.accuracy_score(y[s==0], ypred) | |
trad_accuracy = metrics.accuracy_score(y[s==0], trad_ypred) | |
print "accuracy (traditional):", trad_accuracy | |
print "accuracy (non-traditional):", accuracy | |
# plot | |
ypred = clf.predict(X) | |
trad_ypred = pu.trad_clf.predict(X) | |
offset = 1.0 | |
XX, YY = np.meshgrid(np.linspace(X[:,0].min()-offset,X[:,0].max()+offset,100), | |
np.linspace(X[:,1].min()-offset,X[:,1].max()+offset,100)) | |
Z = clf.decision_function(np.c_[XX.ravel(),YY.ravel()]) | |
Z = Z.reshape(XX.shape) | |
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 10)) | |
plt.subplot(2, 2, 1) | |
colors = ["r", "b"] | |
plot_colors = [colors[yy] for yy in y==1] | |
plt.scatter(X[:,0], X[:,1], s=50, color=plot_colors) | |
plt.title("true") | |
plt.subplot(2, 2, 2) | |
colors = ["gray", "b"] | |
plot_colors = [colors[ss] for ss in s] | |
plt.scatter(X[:,0], X[:,1], s=50, color=plot_colors) | |
plt.title("positive and unlabeled data") | |
plt.subplot(2, 2, 3) | |
colors = ["r", "b"] | |
plot_colors = [colors[yy] for yy in trad_ypred] | |
plt.scatter(X[:,0], X[:,1], s=50, color=plot_colors) | |
plt.title("traditional (accuracy={})".format(trad_accuracy)) | |
plt.subplot(2, 2, 4) | |
colors = ["r", "b"] | |
plot_colors = [colors[yy] for yy in ypred] | |
plt.contour(XX, YY, Z, levels=[0.0], colors="green") | |
plt.scatter(X[:,0], X[:,1], s=50, color=plot_colors) | |
plt.title("non-traditional (accuracy={})".format(accuracy)) | |
plt.tight_layout() | |
plt.show() | |
#plt.savefig("pusampler_demo.png") |
bibekiit
commented
Apr 23, 2020
- Hi how does making 70% of positive unlabeled actually help in improving accuracy?
- The traditional classifier is given a data with only 30 pos and 570 neg. Does it help the classifier?
- How does assigning weights to pos and neg help ?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment