Last active
November 13, 2019 09:16
-
-
Save okram/9cad1785386aef405e8f64aef8cb7b05 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
// Types in Tensors | |
// Types as "inclusion-predicates" or subspaces in {}-quantifier tensors // SIDENOTE: We need to be more strict on the quantifier ring -- ordered,ring,unity. max and min make life easier). | |
// mm-ADT instruction (mmlang 'assembly') | |
int{0,5} <= [start,int{5}][plus,5][mult,5][is,bool{5} <= [start,bool{5}][gt,5]][plus,100][is,bool{0,5} <= [start,int{0,5}][mult,45][minus,10][gt,0]] | |
// the above in "block form"-syntax | |
if(((int{5} + 5) * 5) > 5) { | |
bool{5} + 100 | |
if(((int{0,5} * 45) - 10) > 0) { | |
// this is a stream in int{0,5} (type inference as a consequence of the +/*-operators in the function and quantifier rings) | |
} | |
} | |
int{0,5} <= [start,int{5}][plus,5][mult,5] | |
[is,bool{5} <= [start,bool{5}][gt,5]][plus,100] | |
[is,bool{0,5} <= [start,int{0,5}][mult,45][minus,10][gt,0]] | |
// BELOW IS HAND CRAFTED NOTATION THAT ISOLATES A STRUCTURE IN THE INSTRUCTION ABOVE FOR THE DISCUSSION TO FOLLOW. | |
// initial | |
obj{0} * int{5} -> int{5} | |
int{5} * bool{5} -> int{0,5} | |
int{0,5} * bool{0,5} -> int{0,5} /// wild hit me thought: <= and -> are duals in some way | |
// Everything right of <= is operational semantics in "morphism space." /// function ring of SRT (instructions in mm-ADT) | |
// Everything left of <= is type semantics in "object space" /// coefficient ring of SRT (quantifiers in mm-ADT) | |
// Above is the instruction 'type' signature of the instruction sequence. X -> Y. | |
// In mm-ADT instruction domain/range objs constructed at moment of 'compose'. | |
/* Space Notes */ | |
/* Stardate 11.13.2019 */ | |
/* | |
Quantifiers define a tensor-space. | |
mm-ADT currently only supports 0D, 1D and 2D ("quantified" by the carrier set of the ring). | |
0D being possible because of degenerate/trivial 1-ring. | |
1D being {x} // not a type system (there is no index from a higher-dimension 'anchor point' (1-to-*)) | |
2D being {x,y} // this is the emergence of the type system. | |
The token "{,y}" denotes the union of the {1,y},{2,y},{3,y}...{inft,y} tokens. | |
x are the instances/elements. | |
y is the type/set. | |
---- modern type systems are N^2-systems (defined by a 2D int-ring). | |
[the ring algebra of the {,y}-"column" carrier set has one extra token "{,y}", thus |{,y}| + 1 = size of type+instances.] | |
[int + 4 has a meaning with ring operators the same as 2 + 4.] | |
[...what about...] | |
[int + bool ...that requires a functor. the functor's instruction definition is the path equation to the right of <=] | |
--- [branch,[a,int],[a,bool]] | |
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// | |
[I believe that I may be able to "*" across types algebraically without looking at their "instruction mappings."] | |
... The Magical | (or) | |
(I hypothesize there is a ring algebra closed over 2D containing 1D closed subrings.) /// that is "*" yields mm-ADT's intra-type algebra (cross column algebras) | |
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// | |
..................................................................................................................... | |
...this concept goes off the rails when you realize that (physical) quantum computing | |
... (single qubit as far as I have shown.) /// I don't understand entanglement and the wave function as a 2 "partcle system.") | |
...is in {complex,complex}. C^{2} for 1D-line quantum traversals/streaming. | |
...is in {complex,complex,complex,complex} for C^{4} for 2D-planar quantum traverals/streaming. | |
... | |
...When you go into C^{8} 4D-tensor, you get a "quamtum type system." with an algebra that works "downward" across all lower dimensional tokens. | |
Types as N-1 vectors in N tensor spaces. | |
*/ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.