The following compares 2 simple code snippets in the first one, there is a lifecycle memory leak at the (0 == read_bytes) predicate.
[Header]
/**
* @brief A completely memory-safe not internally synchronized API that provides a dynamic
* way of reading and writing to files without a [realloc] overhead; by delegating memory
* allocation as a part of the pre-processor states to the caller, and the memory deallocation or further reallocation calls
Author: Pavl G.
This document establishes a constructional design for a low-level IO API that operates on filesystems of all types; the constructional design is completely based on the computational automata theory, that focuses particularly on designing machines that automate algorithms with {predefined set of states on_eof_reached and on_error_encountered); the language
Note
In this API; the language could be all the available strings for read/write IO operations from and to a filesystem. In which, the start string (or char depending on the implementation of the state machines) is the
The following is the
Author: Pavly G.
Algorithmic techniques that involve matching a pattern (or domain elements) against another domain (or co-domain) or an argument of domains; therefore, a pattern is a repeated set of some elements (e.g., symbols, characters, or other patterns) in other domains in the same order or in different order.
Normal Forms Technique:
Author: Pavly G.
Warning
Here is an example of a non-null terminated list:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stddef.h>
typedef struct buffer (buffer);
struct buffer {
void *start_address;
void *end_address;
Author: Pavly G.
Important
| Functions Declarations and Type Defintions | Definition |
|---|---|
 |
 |
The main quest is to find problems in this code, classify them, and refactor them accordingly. Follow the software specification to understand what are the problems of this code, why they are problems, and whether there is a refactor.
P(v) is true for all the members of the set of labeled arcs or in Automata Theory the set of delta functions
Author: Pavly G.
This guide establishes a deeper proof-based look into the inclusive OR (i.e., Logical Disjunction) and the exclusive OR (i.e., Mutually Exclusive or Mutually Imparted Events).
Note
Before getting started, here is a very quick whiteboard into the intuitionism behind the inclusive operations and the exclusive operations, and logical equivalences for each of them; notice the use of the intermediary formulas (e.g., Disjunctive and Conjunctive Normal Forms):
| Inclusive OR | Exclusive OR |
|---|---|
 |
 |
