Got this recently:
Found hole ‘_view’ with type: t2 -> t3 -> t1
Where: ‘t1’ is a rigid type variable bound by
the inferred type of view :: t2 -> t3 -> t1
at src/Unison/Explorer.hs:38:11
‘t2’ is a rigid type variable bound by
the inferred type of view :: t2 -> t3 -> t1
at src/Unison/Explorer.hs:38:11
‘t3’ is a rigid type variable bound by
the inferred type of view :: t2 -> t3 -> t1
at src/Unison/Explorer.hs:38:11
Relevant bindings include
sel :: t3 (bound at src/Unison/Explorer.hs:38:21)
list :: t2 (bound at src/Unison/Explorer.hs:38:16)
view :: t2 -> t3 -> t1 (bound at src/Unison/Explorer.hs:38:11)
selection :: Dynamic t Int (bound at src/Unison/Explorer.hs:35:7)
responses :: Dynamic t s (bound at src/Unison/Explorer.hs:34:7)
actions :: Event t (Action (m s) (k, m a))
Pretty useless, and pretty typical for this feature. The actual type of view
is [(k, m a)] -> Int -> b
.