Created
September 30, 2009 04:25
-
-
Save perigrin/197775 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| 20:49 < szabgab> some time ago there was a post on how Java allows ISVs and | |
| many people to make money while Perl (and in general other OS | |
| languages) not ; Can someone point me at that post? | |
| 20:53 < szabgab> oh, I knew I have to come here and ask it | |
| 20:53 < szabgab> as I just found it :-) | |
| 20:53 < szabgab> http://mechanicalrevolution.com/blog/dynamic_languages_and_money.html | |
| 20:58 < mst> it's an interesting concept | |
| 20:58 < mst> the ecosystem is definitely different for OSS based languages | |
| 21:00 < szabgab> I wonder how we in the Perl community could help others to | |
| make money on Perl and on CPAN modules | |
| 22:14 -!- szabgab [~gabor@dsl91EC736B.pool.t-online.hu] has quit [Quit: Leaving] | |
| 22:49 -!- castaway [~castaway@91.84.53.6] has quit [Read error: Connection | |
| reset by peer] | |
| 22:55 -!- castaway [~castaway@91.84.53.6] has joined #epo-ironman | |
| 23:30 < perigrin> That article has a *huge* blind spot in it. | |
| 23:30 < perigrin> "Why would Apple's Objective C gain such popularity � because | |
| Apple has made efforts to ensure that the developers that use | |
| it can make (a lot of) money" | |
| 23:30 < perigrin> ObjectiveC made in-roads because Apple decided it was *the* | |
| language for the iPhone | |
| 23:31 < perigrin> they then pushed that ecosystem | |
| 23:31 < perigrin> "you want to write iPhone apps here's how..." | |
| 23:31 < perigrin> exactly the same story with .NET and Microsoft | |
| 23:32 < perigrin> the whole middle of that article about certificates and | |
| whatnot is a huge red herring | |
| 23:32 < perigrin> you want to make Perl as popular as ObjectiveC or .NET | |
| 23:33 < perigrin> you find a vendor with an incredibly popular platform | |
| 23:33 < perigrin> and convince them to make Perl the defacto standard for that | |
| platform | |
| 23:34 < perigrin> and you do things like "The actual tender documentation has | |
| been prepared by external consultants who are in turn | |
| certified Microsoft/Sun/IBM partners." | |
| 23:41 -!- rindolf [~shlomi@62.219.139.216] has joined #epo-ironman | |
| 23:42 < arcanez> perigrin: you've said too much | |
| 23:43 < perigrin> I'm sure I have. | |
| 23:43 < perigrin> People keep glomming onto certification like the only reason | |
| they don't have a job is because they didn't get a gold | |
| enough star. | |
| 23:44 < perigrin> I know people with no formal education who make six figures, | |
| and people with graduate degrees who don't. | |
| 23:45 < perigrin> The problem isn't that you're not certified enough, the | |
| problem is that whoever set the bar doesn't want *you* and is | |
| using the certification as an excuse. | |
| 23:45 * perigrin is done. | |
| 23:45 * perigrin takes this to a strongly worded text file. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment