This is a list of issues or discrepencies between the wording or intention of PSR-2 itself and the CodeSniffer PSR-2 ruleset.
Add suggestions in the comments or tweet me (@philsturgeon) if you have more inconsistencies to report.
This is a list of issues or discrepencies between the wording or intention of PSR-2 itself and the CodeSniffer PSR-2 ruleset.
Add suggestions in the comments or tweet me (@philsturgeon) if you have more inconsistencies to report.
Here is one I call "The Multi-line Argument Conundrum".
Status: Fixed
A normal function declaration with some arguments.
somefunction($foo, $bar, $baz, $ban);
PSR-2: Valid
CodeSniffer "PSR-2": Valid
As PSR-2 Section 4.6 says, if you'd like to split this argument list onto multiple lines (with the intended meaning being to avoid super-wide declarations), you can chose to drop each argument onto its own line, and indent each one with an extra paragraph.
somefunction(
$foo,
$bar,
$baz,
$ban
);
PSR-2: Valid
CodeSniffer "PSR-2": Valid
What SHOULD be a perfectly valid example of PSR-2 code (and is considered by many PSR-2 members to be perfectly valid), is the option of one of your arguments being a multi-line argument.
somefunction($foo, $bar, [
// ...
], $ban);
PSR-2: Valid
CodeSniffer "PSR-2": Invalid
Or, the same type of example taken right from the Silex homepage:
$app->get('/hello/{name}', function($name) use($app) {
return 'Hello '.$app->escape($name);
});
PSR-2: Valid
CodeSniffer "PSR-2": Invalid
Now, a multi-line argument is assumed to be treated as a single argument and so this example is technically no different from Example #1, and as such should not automatically trigger 4.6. By triggering 4.6 you are forced against your will to suddenly drop everything onto new lines and indent everything, and then it looks like...:
This nasty-ass shit which is forced upon you by using CodeSniffer/CS-Fixer. This is ugly as sin, and not ever what anyone was talking about when PSR-2 was written.
somefunction(
$foo,
$bar,
[
// ...
],
$ban
);
PSR-2: Valid
CodeSniffer "PSR-2": Valid
$app->get(
'/hello/{name}',
function($name) use($app) {
return 'Hello '.$app->escape($name);
}
);
PSR-2: Valid
CodeSniffer "PSR-2": Valid
Check this one out:
Fuck that noise.
Avoid PHP CodeSniffers wrath by assigning multi-line arguments to their own variable, which essentially makes Example #5 into Example #1 or Example #2:
$arr = [
// ...
];
somefunction(
$foo,
$bar,
$arr,
$ban
);
PSR-2: Valid
CodeSniffer "PSR-2": Valid
Yay for uneccessary code.
You can avoid all of this with a standards file:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ruleset name="PHP_CodeSniffer">
<description>PHP_CodeSniffer configuration</description>
<rule ref="PSR2">
<exclude name="PEAR.Functions.FunctionCallSignature"/>
<exclude name="PEAR.Functions.FunctionCallSignature.SpaceAfterCloseBracket"/>
</rule>
</ruleset>
Shove it in Jenkins, or reference it in Sublime Text with:
"phpcs_additional_args": {
"--standard": "/Users/foo/phpcs.xml",
"-n": ""
},
Further Reading
This is another "PSR-2 doesn't care but CodeSniffer says it does" situation.
Status: Fixed
<?php
namespace Test;
class MyClass
{
public function someFunction(
MyType $param1,
LongTypeName $param2,
array $param3
) {
// code ...
}
}
CodeSniffer should have no reason to care about anything in this code. The text is here:
4.4. Method Arguments
In the argument list, there MUST NOT be a space before each comma, and there MUST be one space after each comma.
Method arguments with default values MUST go at the end of the argument list.
...some code...
Argument lists MAY be split across multiple lines, where each subsequent line is indented once. When doing so, the first item in the list MUST be on the next line, and there MUST be only one argument per line.
When the argument list is split across multiple lines, the closing parenthesis and opening brace MUST be placed together on their own line with one space between them.
Nothing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 2 ERROR(S) AFFECTING 2 LINE(S)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 | ERROR | Expected 1 space between type hint and argument "$param1"; 7
| | found
10 | ERROR | Expected 1 space between type hint and argument "$param3"; 8
| | found
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report as CodeSniffer Bug
Props to Tom Oram for catching this one.
This is another "PSR-2 doesn't care but CodeSniffer says it does" situation.
Status: Waiting on confirmation of being fixed
<?php
// Do something if yes
if ($foo === true) {
echo "Yep"
// Do something if nope
} elseif ($foo !== true) {
echo "Nope";
// Fuck knows
} else {
die("Universe Implosion");
}
Sadly CodeSniffer is not letting comments sit next to their appropriate constrol structure keyword.
Nothing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 2 ERROR(S) AFFECTING 2 LINE(S)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 | ERROR | Line indented incorrectly; expected at least 4 spaces, found 0
11 | ERROR | Line indented incorrectly; expected at least 4 spaces, found 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg is on the job in the comments.
When using the new Foo::class CodeSniffer gets all confused.
Status: Fixed
<?php
call_user_func(Foo::class);
Nothing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
FOUND 2 ERROR(S) AND 2 WARNING(S) AFFECTING 2 LINE(S)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
1 | ERROR | The closing brace for the class must go on the
next line after
| | the body
3 | WARNING | Possible parse error: class missing opening or
closing brace
3 | WARNING | Possible parse error: class missing opening or
closing brace
3 | ERROR | Each class must be in a namespace of at least one
level (a
| | top-level vendor name)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Reported as CodeSniffer Bug
PSR-2 didn't ever mention what to do if you want to extend multiple interfaces in an interface, but CodeSniffer will tell you you're wrong.
Status: Waiting on Errata Pull Request
<?php
namespace Test;
interface MyInterface extends
Interface1,
Interface2
{
}
Not entirely sure. We'll work it out on the mailing list.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOUND 2 ERROR(S) AFFECTING 2 LINE(S)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 | ERROR | Expected 1 space before "Interface1"; 4 found
7 | ERROR | Expected 1 space before "Interface2"; 4 found
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Poll the FIG to see if we can (or need to) make this Errata. If so, make errata. If not... bug?
I prefer the following style of comment alignment (using the exact example above):
<?php
if ($foo === true) {
// Do something if yes
echo "Yep"
} elseif ($foo !== true) {
// Do something if nope
echo "Nope";
} else {
// Fuck knows
die("Universe Implosion");
}
PSR-2: Valid (Doesn't care)
CodeSniffer: Valid
@philsturgeon is there any movement on the number 3, comment alignment issue?
We totally agree at work, but are stuck with it being broken every time, especially when using cs fixer. Does anyone have a ruleset that would allow this to be overridden in the meantime?