Proposal Schema for contribute.json

contribute.json

{
    // required
    "name": "Name of the project. (e.g. Bedrock)",
    "description": "Awesome website of sweetness",
    "repository": {
        "type": "git",
        "url": "https://github.com/mozilla/bedrock"
    },
    
    // optional
    "urls": {
        "wiki": "https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mozilla.org",
        "docs": "http://bedrock.readthedocs.org/",
        "mailing-list": "https://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/#dev-mozilla-org",
        "irc": "irc://irc.mozilla.org/#www",
        "introduction": "https://wiki.mozilla.org/Webdev/GetInvolved/mozilla.org",
        "tests": "https://ci.mozilla.org/job/bedrock/",
        "bugs-list": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&product=www.mozilla.org",
        "bugs-report": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=www.mozilla.org&component=Bedrock",
        "bugs-mentored": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?f1=bug_mentor&o1=isnotempty&query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&product=www.mozilla.org&list_id=10866041",
        "deployed-prod": "https://www.mozilla.org",
        "deployed-stage": "https://www.allizom.org",
        "deployed-dev": "https://www-dev.allizom.org"
    },
    "keywords": [
        "python",
        "less-css",
        "django",
        "html5",
        "jquery"
    ]
}

Do we even need deployed in there? Why not just

urls->stage, urls->production

I would have inferred that this is where code for those branches/tags/whatnot is deployed.

@peterbe I think the reason repository is not part of urls is because it is mandatory, and @pmclanahan wanted to keep all of those together in one place.

Also, might something like this work?

https://gist.github.com/ossreleasefeed/e0c52e9f1dac8bff943d/ff0821aaf35fcb39b34dcc2874379933a38a4498

perhaps even break out bugs into it's own group?

https://gist.github.com/ossreleasefeed/e0c52e9f1dac8bff943d

Some thoughts;

1. wiki - perhaps this should be homepage, (im stealing from package.json) but wiki seems tech dependent the idea here is where is the project hub.
2. introduction - this seems weird to me, this should be part of the project homepage or docs. Not sure if it's important or obvious enough to be in this.
3. +1 to https://gist.github.com/pmclanahan/a162224376ca110b4a40#comment-1270257 bugs{} me likes this approach.

Generally looks good, I like keeping this abstracted from our current tech choices (wiki bugzilla) and my comments are mostly around that.

I've created a real repo for this: https://github.com/mozilla/contribute.json

Let's continue the discussion there in issues or PRs. I'm finding it harder to follow the discussions here, and we can segment them into issues with specific areas there.