You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hernan G. Garcia, Jané Kondev, Nigel Orme, Julie A. Theriot, Rob Phillips,
"A First Exposure to Statistical Mechanics for Life Scientists".
arXiv:0708.1899
Alex H. Lang, Charles K. Fisher, Thierry Mora, Pankaj Mehta,
"Thermodynamics of statistical inference by cells".
arXiv:1405.4001
DNA
Cristian Micheletti, Marco Di Stefano, Henri Orland,
"The unknotted strands of life: knots are very rare in RNA structures".
arXiv:1410.1549
Sandro Bottaro, Francesco Di Palma, Giovanni Bussi,
"The Role of Nucleobase Interactions in RNA Structure and Dynamics".
arXiv:1410.1271
C. Manuel Carlevaro, Ramiro M. Irastorza, Fernando Vericat,
"Quaternionic representation of the genetic code".
arXiv:1505.04656
Elisabeth Rieper, Janet Anders, Vlatko Vedral
"Quantum entanglement between the electron clouds of nucleic acids in DNA".
arXiv:1006.4053
Everything related to (classical & quantum) gravity and quantum cosmology.
Classical Gravity
V. Bozza,
"Alternatives to Schwarzschild in the weak field limit of General Relativity".
Eprint arXiv:1502.05178
Mathematical Theorems
Alan D. Rendall,
"Theorems on existence and global dynamics for the Einstein equations".
arXiv:gr-qc/0505133
Edward Witten,
"Light Rays, Singularities, and All That".
arXiv:1901.03928, 99 pages
Energy Conditions
We would like the stress-energy tensor in GR to satisfy the basic intuition that "energy should be positive". Without any such condition, it is impossible to write down any singularity theorem.
This involves examining the sign of a scalar obtained by contracting the stress-energy tensor T_{\mu\nu} with future time-like or light-like vectors x^{\mu}. There are 4 possible conditions:
Weak
Dominant = Weak + extra condition
Strong (independent of either weak or dominant conditions)
Null = Strong + extra condition = Dominant + extra condition
Erik Curiel,
"A Primer on Energy Conditions".
arXiv:1405.0403, 52 pages.
Maulik Parikh,
"Two Roads to the Null Energy Condition".
arXiv:1512.03448, 11 pages.
Solutions which satisfy energy conditions
Paul Tod,
"Asymptotically $AdS_2\times S^2$ metrics satisfying the Null Energy Condition".
arXiv:1809.01374, 17 pages
Symmetries
Casey Cartwright, Alex Flournoy,
"Background-Independence from the Perspective of Gauge Theory".
arXiv:1512.03808, 6 pages.
BMS Symmetries
For asymptotically flat spacetime, we expect to recover something that "looks like" Poincare symmetry "at" spatial infinity. It turns out we do get symmetries, a group called the BMS (Bondi-Metzner-Sachs) group. It turns out to be surprisingly useful for many qualitative statements. Hawking claims to have "solved" the information paradox using BMS symmetries. As far as I know, this has been studied in 3 and 4 dimensions.
Carles Batlle, Victor Campello, Joaquim Gomis,
"Canonical Realization of BMS3".
arXiv:1703.01833, 23 pages.
Temple He, Vyacheslav Lysov, Prahar Mitra, Andrew Strominger,
"BMS supertranslations and Weinberg's soft graviton theorem".
arXiv:1401.7026, 14 pages.
Thomas Mädler, Jeffrey Winicour,
"Bondi-Sachs Formalism".
arXiv:1609.01731, 31 pages. Good introduction to the ambient formalism for discussing BMS symmetries.
Andrew Strominger, Alexander Zhiboedov,
"Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems".
arXiv:1411.5745, 18 pages.
Related Symmetries
D. D. McNutt, M. T. Aadne,
"I-Preserving Diffeomorphisms of Lorentzian Manifolds".
arXiv:1901.04728, 20 pages
In 2+1 dimensions
Blagoje Oblak,
"BMS Particles in Three Dimensions".
arXiv:1610.08526, 437 pages.
Glenn Barnich, Blagoje Oblak,
"Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: I. Induced representations".
arXiv:1403.5803, 33 pages
Glenn Barnich, Blagoje Oblak,
"Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions: II. Coadjoint representation".
arXiv:1502.00010, 22 pages.
Censorship Hypothesis
Weak Form. The only singularities are either black holes or the Big Bang, and black holes are "protected" by an "armour" we call the event horizon. Anything underneath that armour "cannot be seen".
Strong Form. GR is a classical field theory, hence it is "deterministic" in the sense that given initial data, we can uniquely determine its time-evolution.
James Isenberg,
"On Strong Cosmic Censorship".
arXiv:1505.06390, 20 pages.
Mihalis Dafermos, Jonathan Luk,
"The interior of dynamical vacuum black holes I: The $C^0$-stability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon".
arXiv:1710.01722, 217 pages.
Alternatives & Modifications to GR
Kirill Krasnov, Roberto Percacci,
"Gravity and Unification: A review".
arXiv:1712.03061, 84 pages; discusses many different actions describing gravity
Peter Peldan,
"Actions for Gravity, with Generalizations: A Review".
arXiv:gr-qc/9305011
H.F. Westman, T.G. Zlosnik,
"An introduction to the physics of Cartan gravity".
arXiv:1411.1679
Sarita Rosenstock, Thomas William Barrett, James Owen Weatherall,
"On Einstein Algebras and Relativistic Spacetimes".
arXiv:1506.00124, 19 pages.
Daniela Kunst, Tomáš Ledvinka, Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Jonathan Seyrich,
"Comparing Hamiltonians of a spinning test particle for different tetrad fields".
arXiv:1506.01473
Newton-Cartan Geometry
So, basically this is the geometric version of Newtonian gravity.
Note that when quantized, this is closely related to the Schrodinger-Newton equations. See also Quantum Newton Gravity.
Dieter Van den Bleeken,
"Torsional Newton-Cartan gravity from the large c expansion of General Relativity".
arXiv:1703.03459, 25 pages.
Michael Geracie, Kartik Prabhu, Matthew M. Roberts
"Curved non-relativistic spacetimes, Newtonian gravitation and massive matter".
arXiv:1503.02682
Christian Rueede, Norbert Straumann,
"On Newton-Cartan Cosmology".
arXiv:gr-qc/9604054
Xavier Bekaert, Kevin Morand,
"Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity I. An intrinsic view".
arXiv:1412.8212, 79 pages.
Xavier Bekaert, Kevin Morand,
"Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity II. An ambient perspective".
arXiv:1505.03739, 71 pages.
Leo Rodriguez, James St.Germaine-Fuller, Sujeev Wickramasekara,
"Newton-Cartan Gravity in Noninertial Reference Frames".
arXiv:1412.8655, 16 pages
T.Dereli, S.Kocak, M.Limoncu,
"Newton-Cartan connections with torsion".
arXiv:gr-qc/0402116, 11 pages.
Roel Andringa, Eric Bergshoeff, Sudhakar Panda, M. de Roo,
"Newtonian Gravity and the Bargmann Algebra".
arXiv:1011.1145, 20 pages.
James Owen Weatherall,
"Are Newtonian Gravitation and Geometrized Newtonian Gravitation Theoretically Equivalent?".
arXiv:1411.5757, 22 pages, focuses more on what "equivalent theories" means in physics.
James Owen Weatherall,
"What is a Singularity in Geometrized Newtonian Gravitation?".
arXiv:1308.1722, 16 pages.
MOND
Dimitris M. Christodoulou, Demosthenes Kazanas,
"Gauss's Law and the Source for Poisson's Equation in Modified Gravity with Varying G".
arXiv:1901.02589, 6 pages
Spinors in Spacetime
Özgür Açık,
"Field equations from Killing spinors".
arXiv:1705.04685
Piotr Chruściel, Romain Gicquaud,
"Bifurcating solutions of the Lichnerowicz equation".
arXiv:1506.00101
BF Gravity
General relativity may be thought of as a constrained BF theory. A BF theory has an action that looks like
S = \int\tr(B\wedge F)
where B is a 2-form taking values in the adjoint representation of a fixed gauge group G, F = dA + A\wedge A is the field strength 2-form for the gauge field A (under the same gauge group G). Add constraints, and presto, you got GR...or something that resembles it.
Although we can have BF theories in any dimension, in 4 dimensions it is a topological field theory.
Merced Montesinos, Mariano Celada,
"Canonical analysis with no second-class constraints of BF gravity with Immirzi parameter".
arXiv:1912.02832, 7 pages.
NOTE: Merced Montesinos and Mariano Celada seem to write quite a bit about BF gravity.
Kaluza-Klein Models
V H Satheesh Kumar, P K Suresh,
"Gravitons in Kaluza-Klein Theory".
Eprint arXiv:gr-qc/0605016, 12 pages
Composite Gravity
Christopher D. Carone, Joshua Erlich, Diana Vaman,
"Composite gravity from a metric-independent theory of fermions".
arXiv:1812.08201, 16 pages.
Geodesics
Eva Hackmann,
"Geodesic equations and algebro-geometric methods".
arXiv:1506.00804
Eva Hackmann, Claus Lämmerzahl,
"Analytical solution methods for geodesic motion".
arXiv:1506.00807
Eva Hackmann, Claus Lämmerzahl,
"Analytical solutions for geodesics in black hole spacetimes".
arXiv:1506.01572
Canonical Structure
We could think of GR as the "time evolution" of "spatial hypersurfaces". As long as we're not tied to one particular choice of time-slicing, we haven't violated diffeomorphism invariance. This is a deep field with heavy mathematics, so...be warned!
Maximilian Demmel, Andreas Nink,
"On connections and geodesics in the space of metrics".
arXiv:1506.03809
(?) Jürgen Struckmeier, "Generic Theory of Geometrodynamics from Noether's theorem for the Diff$(M)$ symmetry group". arXiv:1807.03000, 25 pages.
Einstein-Hilbert-Palatini Action
If we treat the connection as an independent variable from the metric, we end up with the Palatini formalism. The solution for the Palatini connection differs from the expected Levi-Civita connection, but is related by a projective transformation AND this is well-known "folklore" (see Dadhich and Pons for the sordid details). The usefulness of the Palatini formalism is that we may generalize it to different geometries quite easily (and ostensibly treat it completely algebraically) --- see Martins and Biezuner for their presentation.
Naresh Dadhich, Josep M. Pons,
"On the equivalence of the Einstein-Hilbert and the Einstein-Palatini formulations of general relativity for an arbitrary connection".
arXiv:1010.0869, 18 pages
Yuri X. Martins, Rodney J. Biezuner,
"Topological and Geometric Obstructions on Einstein--Hilbert--Palatini Theories".
arXiv:1808.09249, 24 pages
Merced Montesinos, Ricardo Escobedo, Jorge Romero, Mariano Celada,
"Canonical analysis involving first-class constraints only of the n-dimensional Palatini action".
arXiv:1912.01019
Meriem Hadjer Lagraa, Mohammed Lagraa, Nabila Touhami,
"On the Hamiltonian formalism of the tetrad-gravity".
arXiv:1606.06918, 33 pages.
Luca Lusanna,
"Canonical ADM Tetrad Gravity: from Metrological Inertial Gauge Variables to Dynamical Tidal Dirac observables".
arXiv:1108.3224, 37 pages
Holst Action
Basically, as I understand it, tetrads + Palatini action = Holst action.
Alberto S. Cattaneo, Michele Schiavina,
"The reduced phase space of Palatini-Cartan-Holst theory".
arXiv:1707.05351, 31 pages.
Alberto S. Cattaneo, Michele Schiavina,
"BV-BFV approach to General Relativity: Palatini-Cartan-Holst action".
arXiv:1707.06328, 28 pages.
Hamiltonian Formalism for Linearized Gravity
I brush under this heading also Newtonian limits of spacetime splitting.
Oliver Lindblad Petersen,
"On the Cauchy problem for the linearised Einstein equation".
Eprint arXiv:1802.06028, 31 pages.
Maik Reddiger,
"An Observer's View on Relativity: Space-Time Splitting and Newtonian Limit".
Eprint arXiv:1802.04861, 109 pages
Mathematical Aspects
Olaf Müller, Miguel Sánchez,
"Lorentzian manifolds isometrically embeddable in L^N".
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.363 (2011), 5367-5379; arXiv:0812.4439.
Proves it is equivalent for (i) a spacetime to be foliated into spatial hypersurfaces, and (ii) a spacetime admits an isometric embedding into an N-dimensional Minkowski spacetime (for some "large enough" N).
Derivations
Alberto S. Cattaneo, Michele Schiavina,
"BV-BFV approach to General Relativity, Einstein-Hilbert action".
arXiv:1509.05762, 16 pages.
Eric Gourgoulhon,
"3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity".
arXiv:gr-qc/0703035, 220 pages.
Regge Calculus
Seth K. Asante, Bianca Dittrich, Hal M. Haggard,
"The Degrees of Freedom of Area Regge Calculus: Dynamics, Non-metricity, and Broken Diffeomorphisms".
arXiv:1802.09551, 31 pages
Philipp A. Hoehn
"Canonical linearized Regge Calculus: counting lattice gravitons with Pachner moves".
arXiv:1411.5672, 26+13 pages
Barak Shoshany,
"At the Corner of Space and Time".
arXiv:1912.02922, 162 pages. PhD Thesis.
Restrictions on underlying Manifold
Spacetime is a manifold, but it has to allow a Lorentzian signature. Further, we appear to have, e.g., chiral fermions...which requires additional structure on the manifold.
A. Carlini, J. Greensite.
"Why is Spacetime Lorentzian?".
Phys.Rev.D49 (1994) 866-878.
Eprint arXiv:gr-qc/9308012, 26 pages.
Deloshan Nawarajan, Matt Visser,
"Global properties of physically interesting Lorentzian spacetimes".
Eprint arXiv:1601.03355, 19 pages.
(Turns out spacetime ought to be parallelizable, and there's an almost-unavoidable globally defined "almost complex structure".)
Wick Rotations
It is folklore that Wick rotations...well, there are subtle problems with doing it in general relativity as cavalier as we do it in quantum field theory. We can transform Lorentzian manifolds into Euclidean manifolds just fine, but the inverse transformation is not well-defined: it's a one-way trip to Euclidean spacetime, with no return ticket.
Generically, an "instanton" is a static, stable solution to the Euclidean field equations such that the solution has finite energy. It's also a "packet" in the sense that at infinity, the solution is pure gauge. Gravitational instantons are defined analogously, they are asymptotically Euclidean solutions to the Wick rotated field equations with finite action. For more on Yang-Mills instantons, Rubakov's Classical Theory of Gauge Fields is a great reference.
G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking,
"Classification of gravitational instanton symmetries".
Comm. Math. Phys.66 no.3 (1979), 291-310.
Eprint
Time-Independent Spacetimes
Robert Beig, Bernd G. Schmidt,
"Time-Independent Gravitational Fields".
arXiv:gr-qc/0005047, 47 pages, review article.
Joseph Katz, Donald Lynden-Bell, Jiri Bicak,
"Gravitational energy in stationary spacetimes".
arXiv:gr-qc/0610052, 24 pages, published in Classical and Quantum Gravity.
Empirical Aspects
Gravitational Waves Constraints on Extra-Dimensions
Kris Pardo, Maya Fishbach, Daniel E. Holz, David N. Spergel,
"Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817".
Eprint arXiv:1801.08160
Quantum Gravity
Semiclassical Quantum Gravity
Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime
There seems to be two types of texts in this field: (i) the more "Euler-esque" approaches, (ii) those based on "Axiomatic Field Theory". The former I call "QFT in curved space", the latter I call "Axiomatic QFT (or Constructive QFT) on arbitrary manifolds". Needless to say, we need to work out calculations in position-space, and -- in the words of a friend -- "it's really disgusting" (but I find it kinda beautiful).
Christopher J. Fewster,
"On the spin-statistics connection in curved spacetimes".
arXiv:1503.05797
Marco Benini, Claudio Dappiaggi,
"Models of free quantum field theories on curved backgrounds".
arXiv:1505.04298
For the more historic "Euler-esque" approaches, see:
Hanno Gottschalk, Daniel Siemssen,
"The Cosmological Semiclassical Einstein Equation as an Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical System".
arXiv:1809.03812, 33 pages
Eanna Flanagan, Robert Wald,
"Does backreaction enforce the averaged null energy condition in semiclassical gravity?".
arXiv:gr-qc/9602052, 54 pages. (Discusses deviations from full quantum gravity in Sect. II.B.)
Dirac Equation
Peter Collas, David Klein,
"The Dirac equation in general relativity, a guide for calculations".
arXiv:1809.02764, 59 pages
Scattering in Curved Spacetime
Antoine Folacci, Mohamed Ould El Hadj,
"Regge pole description of scattering of scalar and electromagnetic waves by a Schwarzschild black hole".
arXiv:1901.03965, 14 pages
Algebraic QFT in Curved Spacetime
Christopher J. Fewster, Rainer Verch,
"Algebraic quantum field theory in curved spacetimes".
arXiv:1504.00586, 62 pages.
Dependence on choice of Time-Slices
So, the functional Schrodinger picture requires great care when working with different time-slicing schemes, and even the slightest bit of sloppiness can cause problems. Torre and Varadarajan's arXiv:hep-th/9811222 investigates what happens when we consider the time-evolution in Minkowski spacetime between two space-like Cauchy surfaces, but with two different time-slicings. It appears that only in (1+1)-spacetime dimensions there is no problem (which was investigated earlier in arXiv:hep-th/9707221), but for d>2-spacetime dimensions...there is a problem. Stoyanovsky seems to have a way around it, but the approach seems coordinate-dependent in a bad way (arguably the Schrodinger picture is "coordinate dependent", but when changing coordinates the results should transform appropriately --- Stoyanovsky's solution does not appear to "transform appropriately", hence it is "badly coordinate dependent").
Born's Rule also has some subtleties. I need to read the Lienert and Tumulka paper a bit more, but I am immediately distressed with their citations to Wikipedia as opposed to...any actual book or paper or preprint.
A. V. Stoyanovsky,
"Quantization on space-like surfaces".
arXiv:0909.4918
C. G. Torre, M. Varadarajan,
"Quantum Fields at Any Time".
arXiv:hep-th/9707221, 42 pages
C. G. Torre, M. Varadarajan,
"Functional Evolution of Free Quantum Fields".
arXiv:hep-th/9811222, 21 pages.
Nonlocality
Xavier Calmet, Djuna Croon, Christopher Fritz,
"Non-locality in Quantum Field Theory due to General Relativity".
arXiv:1505.04517
Pair Production
Ram Brustein, A.J.M. Medved,
"Constraints on the quantum state of pairs produced by semiclassical black holes".
arXiv:1503.05351
L. P. Pitaevskiî and Ya. B. Zeldoviĉ,
"On the possibility of the creation of particles by a classical gravitational field".
Comm. Math. Phys.23 no.3 (1971) 185-188, eprint.
Renormalization of the Stress-Energy Tensor
Christopher J. Fewster,
"Energy Inequalities in Quantum Field Theory".
arXiv:math-ph/0501073
F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, G. P. Vacca, G. Venturi,
"Adiabatic regularization of the graviton stress-energy tensor in de Sitter space-time".
arXiv:gr-qc/0407101; Finelli, et al., have written other interesting works on the arXiv
Aitor Landete, Jose Navarro-Salas, Francisco Torrenti,
"Adiabatic regularization for spin-1/2 fields".
arXiv:1305.7374
Tommi Markkanen, Anders Tranberg,
"A Simple Method for One-Loop Renormalization in Curved Space-Time".
arXiv:1303.0180
Thomas-Paul Hack, Valter Moretti,
"On the Stress-Energy Tensor of Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetimes - Comparison of Different Regularization Schemes and Symmetry of the Hadamard/Seeley-DeWitt Coefficients".
J.Phys. A: Math.Theor.45 (2012) 374019.
Eprint arXiv:1202.5107.
Yu. V. Pavlov,
"The n-wave procedure and dimensional regularization for the scalar field in a homogeneous isotropic space".
arXiv:gr-qc/0403008
Robert T. Thompson, José P. S. Lemos,
"DeWitt-Schwinger Renormalization and Vacuum Polarization in d Dimensions".
arXiv:0811.3962
Robert T. Thompson, José P.S. Lemos,
"DeWitt-Schwinger Renormalization of 〈φ2⟩ in d Dimensions".
arXiv:1011.2598
Adiabatic Regularization
Aitor Landete, Jose Navarro-Salas, Francisco Torrenti,
"Adiabatic regularization for spin-1/2 fields".
arXiv:1305.7374
Wolfgang Junker,
"Adiabatic Vacua and Hadamard States for Scalar Quantum Fields on Curved Spacetime".
arXiv:hep-th/9507097, 72 pages
Wolfgang Junker, Elmar Schrohe,
"Adiabatic vacuum states on general spacetime manifolds: Definition, construction, and physical properties".
arXiv:math-ph/0109010
Joachim Lindig,
"Not all adiabatic vacua are physical states".
arXiv:hep-th/9808133, 13 pages
Adrian del Rio, Jose Navarro-Salas,
"On the equivalence of Adiabatic and DeWitt-Schwinger renormalization schemes".
arXiv:1412.7570
Unruh Effect
Basically, consider in Minkowski space a detector coupled to a scalar field. Suppose there is no source for the scalar field, and in an inertial frame the detector registers 0 particles. When the detector experiences uniform acceleration, it begins registering particles. This "thermal bath" of particles is the Unruh effect.
(Well, the Unruh effect is more general than this, but it's a good "particular example" of the more general phenomena.)
If we ask "Well, which one is right?", then as with most paradoxes the answer is "Both".
Lee Hodgkinson,
"Particle detectors in curved spacetime quantum field theory".
arXiv:1309.7281 PhD Thesis, 232 pages.
M. Socolovsky,
"Rindler Space and Unruh Effect".
arXiv:1304.2833
Daniel Hümmer, Eduardo Martin-Martinez, Achim Kempf,
"Renormalized Unruh-DeWitt Particle Detector Models for Boson and Fermion Fields".
arXiv:1506.02046
Jorma Louko, Alejandro Satz,
"Transition rate of the Unruh-DeWitt detector in curved spacetime".
arXiv:0710.5671
Luis C. B. Crispino, Atsushi Higuchi, George E. A. Matsas,
"The Unruh effect and its applications".
arXiv:0710.5373, 53 pages. Good review.
Energy Inequalities
Christopher J. Fewster,
"Lectures on quantum energy inequalities".
arXiv:1208.5399, 50 pages.
Black Hole Thermodynamics
Nikolaos Kalogeropoulos,
"Embolic aspects of black hole entropy".
arXiv:1712.02978, 9 pages; discusses mescoscopic aspects of BH entroy.
Effective Field Theory
C.P. Burgess,
"Quantum Gravity in Everyday Life: General Relativity as an Effective Field Theory".
arXiv:gr-qc/0311082, 56 pages.
John F. Donoghue, Barry R. Holstein,
"Low Energy Theorems of Quantum Gravity from Effective Field Theory".
arXiv:1506.00946, 35 pages.
Asymptotic Safety
Using a scale-dependent effective action, the functional renormalization group flow is computed for a truncated action (usually of the form $L_{EH} + (bonus parts as a polynomial in Ricci tensor and metric)$). Certain statements can be made about quantum gravity, e.g., at "sufficiently small scales" spacetime (in some appropriate sense) "appears 2-dimensional".
Frank Saueressig, Giulia Gubitosi, Chris Ripken,
"Scales and hierachies in asymptotically safe quantum gravity: a review".
arXiv:1901.01731, 18 pages.
Gravitons
Johannes Noller, James H.C. Scargill, Pedro G. Ferreira,
"Interacting spin-2 fields in the Stueckelberg picture".
arXiv:1311.7009
J. F. Donoghue, T. Torma,
"Infrared behavior of graviton-graviton scattering".
arXiv:hep-th/9901156, 12 pages
Path Integral Approach
J. David Brown, James W. York
"The Microcanonical Functional Integral. I. The Gravitational Field".
arXiv:gr-qc/9209014
Causal Dynamical Triangulations
The path integral approach...blows up, so we do what we always do: use a lattice! There are two ways to do this: causal dynamical triangulations, and quantum Regge calculus. The former works with a fixed tetrahedron, but a variable number of them. The quantum Regge calculus consists of varying the edge lengths. It looks like CDT is the "right" approach.
J. Ambjorn, A. Goerlich, J. Jurkiewicz, H. Zhang,
"The microscopic structure of 2D CDT coupled to matter".
arXiv:1503.01636
J. Ambjorn, A. Goerlich, J. Jurkiewicz, R. Loll,
"Wilson loops in CDT quantum gravity".
arXiv:1504.01065, 30 pages
J. Ambjorn, Y. Watabiki,
"A model for emergence of space and time".
arXiv:1505.04353
Euclidean Dynamical Triangulations
This actually pre-dates CDT, but never caught on because it resulted in polymer universes.
Tobias Rindlisbacher, Philippe de Forcrand,
"Euclidean Dynamical Triangulation revisited: is the phase transition really 1st order?".
arXiv:1503.03706
Discrete Approaches to Gravity
Benjamin Bahr, Bianca Dittrich,
"Improved and Perfect Actions in Discrete Gravity".
arXiv:0907.4323
Bianca Dittrich, Wojciech Kaminski, Sebastian Steinhaus
"Discretization independence implies non-locality in 4D discrete quantum gravity".
arXiv:1404.5288, 18 pages.
Canonical Quantization Schemes
I.V. Kanatchikov,
"On precanonical quantization of gravity".
arXiv:1407.3101
Wheeler-DeWitt Equation
Carlo Rovelli,
"The strange equation of quantum gravity"
arXiv:1506.00927
Loop Quantum Gravity
Originally, this began from a quantization using a different choice of variables. It has since blossomed into a unique field that seems distinct from the previous canonical quantization schemes, probably due to the (i) Loop quantization scheme, (ii) use of spin foams.
Kinematical Phase Space
If we have a system with constraints, one way to approach quantizing it is to treat the constraints as operators acting on the "kinematical Hilbert space". The kernel of the constraint operators is the "physical Hilbert space".
Kristina Giesel,
"The kinematical Setup of Quantum Geometry: A Brief Review".
arXiv:1707.03059, 46 pages.
Weak Coupling Limit
Lee Smolin,
"The G_Newton --> 0 Limit of Euclidean Quantum Gravity".
Class.Quant.Grav.9 (1992) 883-894. Eprint arXiv:hep-th/9202076
Madhavan Varadarajan,
"The constraint algebra in Smolins' G→0 limit of 4d Euclidean Gravity".
Eprint arXiv:1802.07033, 123 pages
Spin Networks
Jerzy Lewandowski, Andrzej Okolow, Hanno Sahlmann, Thomas Thiemann,
"Uniqueness of diffeomorphism invariant states on holonomy-flux algebras".
arXiv:gr-qc/0504147. Basically a uniqueness theorem saying spin foams all describe "the same" theory of quantum gravity. The assumptions for the theorem appear to be (i) irreducibility, (ii) the requirement that spatial diffeomorphisms act as automorphisms and leave the vacuum invariant, and (iii) the requirement that fluxes exist either as operators
or as a weakly continuous operator family of exponentiated fluxes.
Bianca Dittrich, Marc Geiller,
"Flux formulation of loop quantum gravity: Classical framework".
Class. Quantum Grav.32 (2015) 135016.
Eprint arXiv:1412.3752; an example of a spin network algebra that violates one of the assumptions of the LOST theorem, but in some sense describes an algebra "dual" to the usual Ashtekar-Lewandowski-Isham algebra.
Classical Limit
Bianca Dittrich,
"The continuum limit of loop quantum gravity - a framework for solving the theory".
arXiv:1409.1450
Bianca Dittrich, Marc Geiller,
"Flux formulation of loop quantum gravity: Classical framework".
arXiv:1412.3752
...and Noncommutative Geometry
Johannes Aastrup and Jesper M. Grimstrup appear to be examining Ashtekar variables in the noncommutative geometry formalism, and it looks fascinating. When time allows, I should read this further.
Johannes Aastrup, Jesper M. Grimstrup,
"Quantum Holonomy Theory".
arXiv:1504.07100
2+1-Dimensional Gravity
Alejandro Corichi, Irais Rubalcava-Garcia,
"Energy in first order 2+1 gravity".
arXiv:1503.03030
Simone Giombi, Alexander Maloney, Xi Yin,
"One-loop Partition Functions of 3D Gravity".
arXiv:0804.1773
Black Hole Entropy
Yasunori Nomura, Sean J. Weinberg,
"The Entropy of a Vacuum: What Does the Covariant Entropy Count?".
arXiv:1310.7564
Alioscia Hamma, Ling-Yan Hung, Antonino Marciano, Mingyi Zhang,
"Area Law from Loop Quantum Gravity".
arXiv:1506.01623
Joy Christian,
"Exactly Soluble Sector of Quantum Gravity".
arXiv:gr-qc/9701013, 83 pages
Maciej Dunajski, James Gundry,
"Non-relativistic twistor theory and Newton--Cartan geometry".
arXiv:1502.03034
Eric Bergshoeff, Jan Rosseel, Thomas Zojer,
"Newton-Cartan (super)gravity as a non-relativistic limit".
arXiv:1505.02095, 28 pages
Schrodinger-Newton Equation
C Duval, Serge Lazzarini,
"On the Schrödinger-Newton equation and its symmetries: a geometric view".
arXiv:1504.05042, 28 pp.
C. C. Gan, C. M. Savage, S. Scully,
"Experimental semiclassical gravity"
arXiv:1512.04183, 7 pages. Discusses experimental aspects of many-body Schrodinger-Newton problem.
Problem of Time
W.G. Unruh and R.M. Wald,
"Time and the interpretation of canonical quantum gravity."
Phys. Rev. D40 (1989) 2598--2614, eprint, proved that if time is treated as a quantum observable, then the Hamiltonian becomes unbounded from below.
Christopher Isham,
"Canonical Quantum Gravity and the Problem of Time".
arXiv:gr-qc/9210011, 125 pages. Authoritative review, still today one of the best.
Sandra Ranković, Yeong-Cherng Liang, Renato Renner,
"Quantum clocks and their synchronisation - the Alternate Ticks Game".
arXiv:1506.01373
Minisuperspace and Midisuperspace Models
We can use symmetry to simplify many models in quantum gravity. When the symmetry kills boils everything down to a finite number of parameters, we have a "minisuperspace model". If we have a finite number of functions, we have a "midisuperspace model".
J. Fernando Barbero G. and Eduardo J. S. Villaseñor,
"Quantization of Midisuperspace Models".
Living Rev. Relativity13 (2010), 6 - Eprint
C. G. Torre,
"Midi-superspace Models of Canonical Quantum Gravity".
arXiv:gr-qc/9806122
Miscellaneous
Rafael A. Araya-Gochez,
"On the Geometry of Spacetime I: baby steps in quantum ring theory".
arXiv:1411.1728
Bob Holdom, Jing Ren,
"A QCD analogy for quantum gravity".
arXiv:1512.05305
Vassilis Anagiannis, Miranda C. N. Cheng,
"TASI Lectures on Moonshine".
arXiv:1807.00723, 78 pages.
John F. R. Duncan, Michael J. Griffin, Ken Ono,
"Moonshine".
arXiv:1411.6571, 67 pages.
Robert L. Griess Jr., Ching Hung Lam,
"A moonshine path from E8 to the monster".
arXiv:0910.2057, 42 pages
Robert L. Griess Jr., Ching Hung lam,
"Moonshine paths for 3A and 6A nodes of the extended E8-diagram".
arXiv:1205.6017, 40 pages
Theo Johnson-Freyd,
"The Moonshine Anomaly".
arXiv:1707.08388, 16 pages.
Hiroki Shimakura,
"An E8-approach to the moonshine vertex operator algebra".
arXiv:1009.4752, 25 pages
Finite Groups
Nick Gill, Pablo Spiga,
"Binary permutation groups: alternating and classical groups".
arXiv:1610.01792, 43 pages.
Nick Gill, Francesca Dalla Volta, Pablo Spiga,
"Cherlin's conjecture for sporadic simple groups".
arXiv:1705.05150, 11 pages. The paper on binary permutation groups has useful background terminology needed to understand this paper.
Ilya Gorshkov, Ivan Kaygorodov, Andrei Kukharev, Aleksei Shlepkin,
"On Thompson's conjecture for finite simple exceptional groups of Lie type".
arXiv:1707.01963, 6 pages
Robert A Wilson,
"There is no Sz(8) in the Monster".
arXiv:1508.04996, 9 pages
Combinatorics
Darij Grinberg, Victor Reiner,
"Hopf Algebras in Combinatorics".
arXiv:1409.8356, 186 pages.
Dániel T. Soukup, Lajos Soukup,
"Infinite combinatorics plain and simple".
arXiv:1705.06195, 29 pages.
Differential Geometry
Manuel Gutiérrez, Olaf Müller,
"Compact Lorentzian holonomy".
Eprint arXiv:1502.05289.
Proves: If a Lorentzian manifold M has its holonomy group Hol(M) have compact closure, then M is "locally isometric" to ℝ × N. Not too surprising that locally M looks like (time)×(space)...
Liviu Popescu,
"Geometrical structures on the cotangent bundle".
arXiv:1410.1118
Toshikazu Miyashita,
"Realization of globally exceptional Riemannian $4$-symmetric space $E_8/(E_8)^{σ'_{4}}$".
arXiv:1506.03575
Zafar Ahsan, Musavvir Ali, Sirajuddin,
"On a Curvature Tensor for the Spacetime of General Relativity".
arXiv:1506.03476
Lorentzian Geometries
Abdelghani Zeghib,
"Geometry of warped products".
arXiv:1107.0411, 25 pages.
In Infinite Dimensions
Johannes Wittmann,
"The Banach manifold C^k(M,N)".
arXiv:1802.07548
Martins Bruveris,
"The L^2-metric on C^∞(M,N)".
arXiv:1804.00577, 16 pages
Finite Geometry
Marko Orel,
"On Minkowski space and finite geometry".
arXiv:1410.1979
Rings and Things
Alonso Castillo-Ramirez, Justin McInroy, Felix Rehren,
"Code algebras, axial algebras and VOAs".
arXiv:1707.07992, 30 pages
Miodrag C. Iovanov, Zachary Mesyan, Manuel L. Reyes,
"Infinite-dimensional diagonalization and semisimplicity".
Eprint arXiv:1502.05184
Number Theory
Minhyong Kim,
"Arithmetic Gauge Theory: A Brief Introduction".
Eprint arXiv:1712.07602
Logic
Alex Citkin, Alexei Muravitsky,
"Lindenbaum Method".
arXiv:1901.05411
Automated Theorem Provers
Thomas C. Hales,
"Developments in Formal Proofs".
Eprint
Martin Hoffman,
"Syntax and Semantics of Dependent Types".
Eprint
Lawrence Paulson,
"Computational Logic: Its Origins and Applications".
arXiv:1712.04375
Lambda Calculus
Typed lambda calculus turns out to be a critical component of most automated theorem provers.
Peter Selinger,
"Lecture notes on the lambda calculus".
arXiv:0804.3434, 120 pages.
Goal: provide a computational justification for notions from HomotopyType Theory and Univalent Foundations, in particular the univalenceaxiom and higher inductive types.
Specifically, design a type theory with good properties (normalization, decidability of type checking, etc.) where the univalence axiom computesand which has support for higher inductive types.
Cyril Cohen, Thierry Coquand, Simon Huber, Anders Mörtberg,
Cubical Type Theory: a constructive interpretation of the univalence axiom
Cyril Cohen, Thierry Coquand, Simon Huber, Anders Mörtberg,
"Cubical Type Theory: a constructive interpretation of the univalence axiom".
arXiv:1611.02108, 34 pages
Evan Cavallo, Robert Harper,
"Parametric Cubical Type Theory".
arXiv:1901.00489, 47 pages.
Topology
Algebraic Topology
Cohomology
Matvei Libine,
"Lecture Notes on Equivariant Cohomology".
arXiv:0709.3615, 72 pages.
Particle physics and Quantum Field Theory papers, including stuff related to GUTs and the group theory of the standard model.
Quantum Field Theory
Methods of Quantization
There are three pictures: the Heisenberg picture, which is usually taught as "the canonical approach"; the functional Schrodinger picture, which is rarely discussed; and the Feynman path integral approach.
Functional Schrodinger Picture
Alejandro Corichi, Jeronimo Cortez, Hernando Quevedo
"On the Relation Between Fock and Schroedinger Representations for a Scalar Field".
arXiv:hep-th/0202070
-----, -----, -----,
"On the Schroedinger Representation for a Scalar Field on Curved Spacetime".
arXiv:gr-qc/0207088
I.V. Kanatchikov,
"On the precanonical structure of the Schrödinger wave functional".
arXiv:1312.4518
-----,
"Precanonical Quantization and the Schrödinger Wave Functional Revisited".
arXiv:1112.5801
Chul Koo Kim, Sang Koo You,
"The Functional Schrödinger Picture Approach to Many-Particle Systems".
arXiv:cond-mat/0212557
Paul Mansfield, Marcos Sampaio,
"Yang-Mills beta-function from a large-distance expansion of the Schroedinger functional".
arXiv:hep-th/9807163
Path Integral Approach
Kimichika Fukushima, Hikaru Sato,
"Example of an explicit function for confining classical Yang-Mills fields with quantum fluctuations in the path integral scheme".
arXiv:1402.0450
Timothy Nguyen,
"The Perturbative Approach to Path Integrals: A Succinct Mathematical Treatment".
arXiv:1505.04809, 26 pages.
Stefan Weinzierl,
"Introduction to Feynman Integrals".
arXiv:1005.1855, 43 pages
Semiclassical Techniques
Alberto S. Cattaneo, Pavel Mnev, Nicolai Reshetikhin,
"Semiclassical quantization of classical field theories".
arXiv:1311.2490, 36 pages.
Families of Fields
Really, QFT studies three families of fields: scalar (spin-0), Dirac (spin-1/2), and gauge bosons (spin-1, or "vector fields"). Higher spin fields (e.g., the Rarita-Schwinger (spin-3/2) field) are usually non-renormalizable or have some other problems.
(Spin-0) Scalar Field
Nik Weaver,
"Operator algebras associated with the Klein-Gordon position representation in relativistic quantum mechanics".
arXiv:math/0209079, 28 pages
(Spin-1/2) Dirac Field
C. J. Quimbay, Y. F. Pérez, R. A. Hernandez,
"Canonical quantization of the Dirac oscillator field in (1+1) and (3+1) dimensions".
arXiv:1201.3389
(Spin-1) Vector Bosons
QED
Miguel Campiglia, Alok Laddha,
"Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg's soft photon theorem".
arXiv:1505.05346, 16 pages
Yang-Mills Theory
Alexander D. Popov,
"Loop groups in Yang-Mills theory".
arXiv:1505.06634, 7 pages.
James Owen Weatherall,
"Fiber Bundles, Yang-Mills Theory, and General Relativity".
arXiv:1411.3281, 54 pages; discusses Yang-Mills theory "geometrically", in analogy to classical General Relativity.
(Spin-3/2) Rarita-Schwinger Field
Stephen L. Adler,
"Classical and Quantum Gauged Massless Rarita-Schwinger Fields".
arXiv:1502.02652
There's actually a "uniqueness theorem" stating, basically, spin-2 fields couple to everything in exactly the same way, up to some proportionality constant. This is the paper of Boulanger, Damour, Gualtieri, and Henneaux, "Inconsistency of interacting, multi-graviton theories" (2001).
Nicolas Boulanger, Thibault Damour, Leonardo Gualtieri, Marc Henneaux,
"Inconsistency of interacting, multi-graviton theories".
Nucl.Phys.B597 (2001) 127-171
doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00718-5arXiv:hep-th/0007220, 44+1 pages.
Nicolas Boulanger, Thibault Damour, Leonardo Gualtieri, Marc Henneaux,
"No consistent cross-interactions for a collection of massless spin-2 fields".
arXiv:hep-th/0009109, 12+1 pages.
Nonlinear Sigma Models
Noriaki Ikeda,
"Lectures on AKSZ Sigma Models for Physicists".
arXiv:1204.3714, 97 pages.
Timothy Nguyen,
"Quantization of the Nonlinear Sigma Model Revisited".
arXiv:1408.4466, 51 pages.
Feynman Diagrams
These are usually covered too briefly in most textbooks, probably because to understand them adequately you need to see someone draw such a diagram, then walk through "translating" a diagram into an integral.
Michael Polyak,
"Feynman diagrams for pedestrians and mathematicians".
arXiv:math/0406251, 28 pages.
Symmetries in QFT
Wigner's Theorem
Daniel S. Freed,
"On Wigner's theorem".
arXiv:1112.2133, 5 pages
Group Theory
Andrew Douglas, Joe Repka,
"The GraviGUT Algebra Is not a Subalgebra of E8, but E8 Does Contain an Extended GraviGUT Algebra".
arXiv:1305.6946
Renormalization, Renormalization "Group"
The basic scheme:
Step 0: Write down your Lagrangian
Step 1: Do dimensional regularization
Step 2: Replace "bare" constants like mass m_{bare} with "renormalized" constants m related by m = Z_{m}m_{bare}, then
Step 3: Make certain the propagators and vertex contributions "work out".
Remark. This is all from memory, I need to review the details a bit more. But that's the gist of the renormalization game, introduce counter-terms, etc. This will give us also the renormalization group flow, which is used to determine if the theory is "asymptotically free" or "asymptotically safe". (End of Remark)
Abdelmalek Abdesselam,
"QFT, RG, and all that, for mathematicians, in eleven pages".
arXiv:1311.4897, 11 pages.
Kevin Costello,
Renormalization and Effective Field Theory.
AMS publishers, 2011.
Puzzle. Is dimensional regularization "coordinate independent" (in the sense, can we use it in curved spacetime)? Is there some generic criteria we can use to determine if a regularization scheme is "coordinate independent"? Which ones are "coordinate independent"? (End of Puzzle)
An alternative way is to use some more sophisticated scheme of renormalization, which would not be universal one as the MS-based RG is, but which should be designed especially for the given application. Unfortunately, there is no covariant renormalization scheme except the MS one. Furthermore, the known renormalization schemes (e.g. the momentum subtraction scheme) of renormalization are not really appropriate for the use in the gravitational framework. Still the momentum subtraction scheme enables one to extract some relevant information, [...].
Apparently they are contained in the following resources:
I.L. Buchbinder, S.D. Odintsov and I.L. Shapiro,
Effective Action in Quantum Gravity.
IOP Publishing, Bristol, 1992.
Asymptotic Safety
Andrew D. Bond, Daniel F. Litim,
"Theorems for Asymptotic Safety of Gauge Theories".
arXiv:1608.00519
R. Percacci,
"Asymptotic Safety".
arXiv:0709.3851, 25 pages.
R. Percacci,
"A short introduction to asymptotic safety".
arXiv:1110.6389, 18 pages, a good general introduction.
Case Studies ("Examples")
M. Fabbrichesi, R. Percacci, A. Tonero, O. Zanusso,
"Asymptotic safety and the gauged SU(N) nonlinear sigma-model".
arXiv:1010.0912, 11 pages.
Daniel F. Litim, Francesco Sannino,
"Asymptotic safety guaranteed".
arXiv:1406.2337, 31 pages.
Andrew D. Bond, Daniel F. Litim,
"More asymptotic safety guaranteed".
arXiv:1707.04217, 62 pages.
Assorted Lecture Notes
Luis Alvarez-Gaume, Miguel A. Vazquez-Mozo,
"Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory".
arXiv:hep-th/0510040, 113 pages.
V. Parameswaran Nair, Quantum Field Theory: A Modern Perspective. Springer-Verlag.
Various introductory texts are discussed on Physics.SE
Quantization of Constrained Systems
Bianca Dittrich, Philipp A. Hoehn, Tim A. Koslowski, Mike I. Nelson,
"Chaos, Dirac observables and constraint quantization".
arXiv:1508.01947, 48 pages.
Quantizing Gauge Systems
N. Reshetikhin,
"Lectures on quantization of gauge systems".
arXiv:1008.1411, 63 pages.
Conformal and Topological Field Theory
Conformal Field Theory
Yasuyuki Kawahigashi,
"Conformal Field Theory, Tensor Categories and Operator Algebras".
arXiv:1503.05675
Yu Nakayama,
"Scale invariance vs conformal invariance".
arXiv:1302.0884
Edward Frenkel,
"Lectures on the Langlands Program and Conformal Field Theory".
arXiv:hep-th/0512172
Jian Qiu,
"Lecture Notes on Topological Field Theory".
arXiv:1201.5550, 64 pages - nice discussion of Chern-Simons as a TQFT.
George Thompson,
"1992 Trieste Lectures on Topological Gauge Theory and Yang-Mills Theory".
arXiv:hep-th/9305120, 70 pages. Discusses Yang-Mills on Riemann surfaces.
Chern-Simons Models
Tudor Dimofte,
"Perturbative and nonperturbative aspects of complex Chern-Simons Theory".
arXiv:1608.02961, 33 pages.
John C. Baez,
"4-Dimensional BF Theory as a Topological Quantum Field Theory".
arXiv:q-alg/9507006, 15 pages.
Aberto S. Cattaneo, Paolo Cotta-Ramusino, Juerg Froehlich, Maurizio Martellini,
"Topological BF Theories in 3 and 4 Dimensions".
arXiv:hep-th/9505027, 25 pages.
Pavel Mnev,
"Discrete BF theory".
arXiv:0809.1160, 204 pages.
A.G.Grozin,
"Introduction to the Heavy Quark Effective Theory".
arXiv:hep-ph/9908366, "old preprint".
Effective Field Theory
Clifford Cheung, Karol Kampf, Jiri Novotny, Chia-Hsien Shen, Jaroslav Trnka,
"A Periodic Table of Effective Field Theories".
arXiv:1611.03137
Henriette Elvang, Callum R. T. Jones, Stephen G. Naculich,
"Soft Photon and Graviton Theorems in Effective Field Theory".
arXiv:1611.07534, 6 pages.
Andrew J. Larkoski, Duff Neill, Iain W. Stewart,
"Soft Theorems from Effective Field Theory".
arXiv:1412.3108
J.M. Campbell, J.W. Huston, W.J. Stirling,
"Hard Interactions of Quarks and Gluons: a Primer for LHC Physics".
arXiv:hep-ph/0611148, 118 pages.
Composite Higgs Boson
Giuliano Panico, Andrea Wulzer,
"The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs".
arXiv:1506.01961, 325 pages --- a monograph in preparation for Springer-Verlag.
Standard Model
Scott Willenbrock,
"Symmetries of the Standard Model".
arXiv:hep-ph/0410370, 31 pages.
J. C. Montero, V. Pleitez,
"Custodial Symmetry and Extensions of the Standard Model".
arXiv:hep-ph/0607144, 12 pages.
Paul Langacker,
"Structure of the Standard Model".
arXiv:hep-ph/0304186, 22 pages.
Jean Iliopoulos,
"Introduction to the Standard Model of the Electro-Weak Interactions".
arXiv:1305.6779, 44 pages. Discusses (i) A brief summary of the phenomenology of the electromagnetic and the weak interactions; (ii) Gauge theories, Abelian and non-Abelian; (iii) Spontaneous symmetry breaking; (iv) The step-by-step construction of the Standard Model; (v) The Standard Model and experiment.
Brian Henning, Xiaochuan Lu, Hitoshi Murayama,
"How to use the Standard Model effective field theory"
arXiv:1412.1837, 94 pages.
Phenomenology
Tao Han,
"Collider Phenomenology: Basic Knowledge and Techniques".
arXiv:hep-ph/0508097, 51 pages.
Detlev Buchholz, Stephen J. Summers,
"Scattering in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory: Fundamental Concepts and Tools".
arXiv:math-ph/0509047, 14 pages
Clifford Cheung,
"TASI Lectures on Scattering Amplitudes".
arXiv:1708.03872, 63 pages.
Claude Duhr,
"Mathematical aspects of scattering amplitudes".
arXiv:1411.7538, 58 pages
Tomasz R. Taylor,
"A Course in Amplitudes".
arXiv:1703.05670, 57 pages
Bootstrap
David A. McGady, Laurentiu Rodina,
"Higher-spin massless S-matrices in four-dimensions".
arXiv:1311.2938, 33 pages.
Provides another route to many of the familiar results (like uniqueness of spin-2 field up to some constant factor in the coupling, or absence of interactions for spin j>=3 fields) from relatively straightforward conditions.
Spinor-Helicity Formalism
This is a new-fangled approach which algorithmically computes scattering amplitudes for on-shell processes. As far as I can tell, the computations boil down to recursion relations instead of tricky integrals...which is nice, because computers can do recursion relations way better than they can do integrals. (It is unclear to me whether the formalism extends to off-shell processes, though.)
The standard book on this is Scattering Amplitudes in Gauge Theory and Gravity by Elvang and Huang, though a large portion of it is freely available on arXiv:
Clifford Cheung,
"TASI Lectures on Scattering Amplitudes".
arXiv:1708.03872, 63 pages.
Lance J. Dixon,
"A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods".
arXiv:1310.5353, 48 pages, discusses more topics than just the Spinor-Helicity formalism.