- Endpoints are declared by adding an
:entrypointmetadata at the function declaration, which could further extended to adefentrypointmacro. - Due to the typed nature of Michelson, the code must be typed to properly be translated to code:
- Type declarations should use the
typefunction (or macro?) to declare types for namespace defined variables. - Extra type annotation could be done by using metadata.
- Need for a type checker, which I don't know how to implement (I don't know to how to build a backend also, but don't tell anyone).
- Michelson types need a correspondence for Clojure literals, while some are possible, conjunction and disjunction types are not available for Clojure.
- Type declarations should use the
- Some types have an extra challenge, like option and or, because Clojure doesn't have the proper idioms to deal with it, I should define a few patterns to describe how to interpret them, mainly option.
- To descrease the overhead for type inference, some literals are going to be used for naturals and mutez, like
1nand1mutez.
Just like domain specific stuff are exposed on the Tezos module for LIGO, I'm going to expose those on the tezos namespace.
- Macros
- Emulate some of the dynamic features of Clojure and other Lisps
(type storage nat)
(type return (pair (list operation) storage))
(type increment (-> unit storage return))
(defn ^:entrypoint increment
[_ storage]
(tezos/pair :unit (inc storage))
(type decrement (-> unit storage return))
(defn ^:entrypoint decrement
[_ storage]
(tezos/pair :unit (dec storage)))
(type decrement (-> unit storage return))
(defn ^:entrypoint reset
[_ _]
(tezos/pair :unit 0))
Symbols and repetitions
One of the problems I've encountered is that I can't have random access to memory, so accessing symbols becomes difficult because I need to duplicate and reorder things on the stack so the operations are valid. I still have no clear mental model of doing this and I've come to a simple way but without not proofs that it actually works.
DUGinstruction if that's larger than a 1)The on the right is wrong, it should be actually: